Predicting HR Management Strategies and Employee Satisfaction in Enterprises Based on Deep Generative Models

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Analysis of emotional baseline differences

	Sum of squares	df	Mean square	F	sig
Intergroup	0.503	5	0.163	0.031	0.958
Within group	813.312	561	1.563	-	-
Total amount	814.253	568	-	-	-

Experimental results of dynamic image based on cohy kanade look house

Expression	Test sample number	Correct number					Average recognition rate(%)
		Group 1	Group 2	Group 3	Group 4	Group 5
Anger	25	25	25	25	25	25	100%
Revulsion	26	25	26	24	25	25	94.32%
Fear	35	34	33	35	35	34	95.63%
Pleasure	26	26	26	26	26	26	100%
Sadness	25	24	22	22	21	22	92.57%
Surprise	50	50	50	50	50	50	100%
Summarize	187	184	182	182	182	182	98.72%

The variance of the emotional baseline is tested

F	df1	df2	sig
2.531	4	567	0.095

Specific emotional start frequency statistics

Group	Prediction scenario	Negative emotion(NA)			Positive emotion(PA)
		Anger	Unpleasure	Discontent	Pleasure	Excitation	Cheerfulness
Group 1(n=158)	Scenario 1	0	0	0	152 (85.23%)	15 (8.1%)	19 (6.67%)
	Scenario 2	55 (26.11%)	91 (45.33%)	73 (28.56%)	0	0	0
	Scenario 3	0	0	0	111 (72.88%)	27 (16.59%)	21 (10.53%)
	Scenario 4	41 (24.35%)	85 (51.99%)	46 (26.66%)	0	0	0
Group 2(n=144)	Scenario 1	0	0	0	131 (73.54%)	28 (16.9%)	22 (12.55%)
	Scenario 3	0	0	0	119 (65.5%)	32 (18.32%)	24 (16.18%)
	Scenario 2	51 (27.45%)	83 (44.52%)	57 (28.03%)	0	0	0
	Scenario 4	47 (24.11%)	83 43.21%)	67 (32.68%)	0	0	0

The difference between the test emotion intensity

Group		Emotional intensity prediction		Emotional baseline		t	d
		M	SD	M	SD
Group 1(n=158)	PA1	4.817	1.244	4.241	1.237	3.864**	0.518
	NA2	4.75	1.674			3.452**	0.355
Group 2(n=144)	PA1	4.745	1.405	4.278	1.165	2.631**	0.351
	NA2	4.77	1.651			2.225**	0.274
Group 3 (n=152)	PA1	4.829	1.265	4.373	1.152	2.912**	0.314
	PA2	4.81	1.347			2.121**	0.276
Group 4 (n=164)	NA1	4.873	1.696	4.352	1.413	2.543**	0.368
	NA2	4.83	1.547			2.751**	0.388

Static image experiment results based on cohy kanade look library

Expression	Test sample number	Correct number					Average recognition rate(%)
		Group 1	Group 2	Group 3	Group 4	Group 5
Anger	11	11	11	11	11	11	79.11%
Revulsion	24	24	24	24	24	24	91.34%
Fear	15	15	15	15	15	15	84.55%
Pleasure	25	25	25	25	25	25	98.21%
Sadness	50	50	50	50	50	50	100%
Surprise	11	11	11	11	11	11	91.81%
Summarize	143	136	136	136	137	137	93.52%

Test of sequence effect of emotional prediction

Group	Situation	Emotional type	Situational sort	N	Intensity prediction				Duration prediction
					M	SD	t	sig	M	SD	t	sig
Group 1(n=158)	Scenario 1	PA1	A	79	4.955	1.235	1.757	0.448	4.41	1.83	1.744	0.159
			B	79	4.678	1.228			3.96	1.988
	Scenario 2	NA2	A	79	4.74	1.752	0.048	1.276	4.9	1.925	1.681	0.174
			B	79	4.76	1.602			4.46	1.988
Group 2(n=144)	Scenario 3	PA1	A	72	4.672	1.374	-0.512	0.864	4.21	1.877	0.336	0.885
			B	72	4.817	1.44			4.15	1.833
	Scenario 4	NA2	A	72	4.8	1.632	0.369	1.154	5.18	1.911	1.34	0.329
			B	72	4.8	1.632			4.83	1.826
Group 3 (n=152)	Scenario 1	PA1	A	76	4.912	1.293	1.073	0.69	3.73	1.728	-0.752	0.434
			B	76	4.745	1.236			3.97	1.687
	Scenario 2	PA2	A	76	4.86	1.246	0.586	0.992	3.46	1.985	-1.139	0.26
			B	76	4.79	1.188			3.83	1.97
Group 4 (n=164)	Scenario 3	NA1	A	82	4.919	1.684	0.479	1.071	4.65	2.057	-1.23	0.23
			B	82	4.827	1.719			5.07	1.867
	Scenario 4	NA2	A	82	4.88	1.56	0.494	1.059	4.81	1.683	-0.306	0.719
			B	82	4.79	1.542			4.92	1.639