The Influence of Molar Extraction in Mandible on the Bone Remodeling Process under Different Chewing Conditions
Mar 31, 2025
About this article
Published Online: Mar 31, 2025
Page range: 148 - 152
Received: Dec 03, 2024
Accepted: Jan 12, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ama-2025-0017
Keywords
© 2025 Anna Tomaszewska, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Fig. 1.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 5.
![Distribution of HMH stress [MPa] in cancellous bone before tooth extraction](https://sciendo-parsed.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/67f3415f8d1bec042eac83d9/j_ama-2025-0017_fig_005.jpg?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Credential=AKIA6AP2G7AKOUXAVR44%2F20250910%2Feu-central-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20250910T102620Z&X-Amz-Expires=3600&X-Amz-Signature=22fc0d1cc40146d04c0ebedbd934e5be3ec9e8129f793b0892286c3f90f005d8&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&x-amz-checksum-mode=ENABLED&x-id=GetObject)
Fig. 6.
![Distribution of HMH stress [MPa] in cancellous bone after tooth extraction](https://sciendo-parsed.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/67f3415f8d1bec042eac83d9/j_ama-2025-0017_fig_006.jpg?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Credential=AKIA6AP2G7AKOUXAVR44%2F20250910%2Feu-central-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20250910T102620Z&X-Amz-Expires=3600&X-Amz-Signature=5398d2a23b21c3f0ce4e1b9edcbc7e09cd85e3064cfb3e8110619ee9027f4af3&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&x-amz-checksum-mode=ENABLED&x-id=GetObject)
Fig. 7.
![Distribution of HMH stress [MPa] in cortical bone before tooth extraction](https://sciendo-parsed.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/67f3415f8d1bec042eac83d9/j_ama-2025-0017_fig_007.jpg?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Credential=AKIA6AP2G7AKOUXAVR44%2F20250910%2Feu-central-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20250910T102620Z&X-Amz-Expires=3600&X-Amz-Signature=9de2962ceca44c239b98570c36c70cdfb8ef815ba105b430e2bf58e7676f8bc4&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&x-amz-checksum-mode=ENABLED&x-id=GetObject)
Fig. 8.
![Distribution of HMH stress [MPa] in cortical bone after tooth extraction](https://sciendo-parsed.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/67f3415f8d1bec042eac83d9/j_ama-2025-0017_fig_008.jpg?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Credential=AKIA6AP2G7AKOUXAVR44%2F20250910%2Feu-central-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20250910T102620Z&X-Amz-Expires=3600&X-Amz-Signature=3ec892fbf289c6eaa3ce9ec29318f3c31108d6a9ee3b08b4085c5277c78d61f1&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&x-amz-checksum-mode=ENABLED&x-id=GetObject)
Fig. 9.

Change in cortical bone density [g/cm3] in the analyzed areas for the model after tooth extraction compared to the model before tooth extraction
CR1 [%] | 0 | 102 | −9 | −12 |
CR2 [%] | −12 | 27 | −9 | −2 |
CR3 [%] | 285 | 28 | 52 | 2 |
CR4 [%] | −7 | 49 | −5 | 3 |
CR5 [%] | 323 | −4 | 127 | 0 |
CR6 [%] | −72 | 181 | 0 | 0 |
CR7 [%] | −10 | −4 | 9 | 0 |
CR8 [%] | 0 | 48 | 0 | −17 |
CR9 [%] | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
CR10 [%] | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
Change in cancellous bone density in the analyzed areas [g/cm3] for the model after tooth extraction compared to the model before tooth extraction
CN1 [%] | 938 | −72 | 505 | 27 |
CN2 [%] | 82 | −56 | 103 | 725 |
CN3 [%] | 80 | 0 | 59 | 483 |
CN4 [%] | −24 | −18 | 28 | 1415 |
CN5 [%] | 37 | 0 | 189 | 49 |
CN6 [%] | 68 | 0 | 2059 | 0 |
Values exerted by the muscles(17)
Middle temporalis [N] | 5.7 | 64.0 | 63.0 |
Deep masseter [N] | 21.2 | 48.9 | 17.1 |
Superficial masseter [N] | 76.1 | 114.2 | 137.0 |
Anterior temporalis [N] | 1.6 | 91.6 | 115.4 |
Medial pterygoid [N] | 136.4 | 104.9 | 146.9 |