Effect of urine adulterants on commercial drug abuse screening test strip results

1United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, United Nations. World Drug Report 2017. Vienna: Division for Policy Analysis and Public Affairs; 2017. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, United Nations. World Drug Report 2017 Vienna Division for Policy Analysis and Public Affairs; 2017Search in Google Scholar

2Kilibarda B, Simić D, Baroš S, Brandić I. National Report on Drug Situation in Serbia, 2014 [displayed 18 March 2020]. Available at http://www.emcdda.europa.eu/system/files/publications/ 805/National_Report_Serbia_2014_EN_483880.pdf Kilibarda B Simić D Baroš S Brandić I National Report on Drug Situation in Serbia 2014 [displayed 18 March 2020]. Available at http://www.emcdda.europa.eu/system/files/publications/805/National_Report_Serbia_2014_EN_483880.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

3European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction. Serbia National Drug Report, 2017 [displayed 3 January 2018]. Available at http://www.emcdda.europa.eu/system/files/publications/4701/National%20drug%20report_Serbia.pdf_en European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction. Serbia National Drug Report 2017 [displayed 3 January 2018]. Available at http://www.emcdda.europa.eu/system/files/publications/4701/National%20drug%20report_Serbia.pdf_enSearch in Google Scholar

4Ministry of Health of the Republic of Serbia, Institute of Public Health of Serbia “Dr Milan Jovanović-Batut”, European School Project on Alcohol and other Drugs. European Survey on the use of Alcohol and Other Drugs among young people in Serbia, 2008 [displayed 18 March 2020]. Available at http://www.batut.org.rs/download/publikacije/ESPAD%20eng%202008.pdf Ministry of Health of the Republic of Serbia, Institute of Public Health of Serbia “Dr Milan Jovanović-Batut”, European School Project on Alcohol and other Drugs. European Survey on the use of Alcohol and Other Drugs among young people in Serbia 2008 [displayed 18 March 2020]. Available at http://www.batut.org.rs/download/publikacije/ESPAD%20eng%202008.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

5Standridge JB, Adams SM, Zotos AP. Urine drug screening: a valuable office procedure. Am Fam Physician 2010;81:635–40. PMID: 20187600 Standridge JB Adams SM Zotos AP Urine drug screening: a valuable office procedure Am Fam Physician 201081635 40 PMID: 20187600Search in Google Scholar

6Manchikanti L, Atluri S, Trescot AM, Giordano J. Monitoring opioid adherence in chronic pain patients: tools, techniques, and utility. Pain Physician 2008;11(Suppl 2):S155–80. PMID: 18443638 Manchikanti L Atluri S Trescot AM Giordano J Monitoring opioid adherence in chronic pain patients: tools, techniques, and utility Pain Physician 200811Suppl 2S155 80 PMID: 1844363810.36076/ppj.2008/11/S155Search in Google Scholar

7Schulberg M, Gerostamoulos D. Urinary drug screening. Aust Prescr 2013;36:62–4. doi: 10.18773/austprescr.2013.051 Schulberg M Gerostamoulos D Urinary drug screening Aust Prescr 20133662 4 10.18773/austprescr.2013.051Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

8Tominaga M, Michiue T, Maeda H. Evaluation of the on-site immunoassay drug-screening device Triage-TOX in routine forensic autopsy. Leg Med (Tokyo) 2015;17:499–502. doi: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2015.10.007 Tominaga M Michiue T Maeda H Evaluation of the on-site immunoassay drug-screening device Triage-TOX in routine forensic autopsy Leg Med (Tokyo) 201517499 502 10.1016/j.legalmed.2015.10.007Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

9Moriya F. Urine levels of drugs for which Triage DOA screening was positive. Leg Med (Tokyo) 2009;11(Suppl 1):S434–6. doi: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2009.01.090 Moriya F Urine levels of drugs for which Triage DOA screening was positive Leg Med (Tokyo) 200911Suppl 1S434 6 10.1016/j.legalmed.2009.01.090Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

10Gomolka E. Immunoassay in toxicology diagnosis. In: Abuelzein E, editor. Trends in immunolabelled and related techniques. Rijeka: InTech; 2012. p. 67–82. Gomolka E Immunoassay in toxicology diagnosis. In: Abuelzein E, editor. Trends in immunolabelled and related techniques Rijeka InTech 2012 p 67–8210.5772/36388Search in Google Scholar

11Jaffee WB, Trucco E, Levy S, Weiss RD. Is this urine really negative? A systematic review of tampering methods in urine drug screening and testing. J Subst Abuse Treat 2007;33:33–42. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2006.11.008 Jaffee WB Trucco E Levy S Weiss RD Is this urine really negative? A systematic review of tampering methods in urine drug screening and testing J Subst Abuse Treat 20073333 42 10.1016/j.jsat.2006.11.008Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

12Zimbardi G. Workplace substance use, the risk of occupational injury, and testing [dissertation]. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh; 2005. Zimbardi G Workplace substance use, the risk of occupational injury, and testing [dissertation] Pittsburgh University of Pittsburgh; 2005Search in Google Scholar

13Riahi-Zanjani B. False positive and false negative results in urine drug screening tests: tampering methods and specimen integrity tests. PhOL 2014;1:102–8. Riahi-Zanjani B. False positive and false negative results in urine drug screening tests: tampering methods and specimen integrity tests PhOL 20141102 8Search in Google Scholar

14Moeller KE, Lee KC, Kissack JC. Urine drug screening: practical guide for clinicians. Mayo Clin Proc 2008;83:66–76. doi: 10.4065/83.1.66 Moeller KE Lee KC Kissack JC Urine drug screening: practical guide for clinicians Mayo Clin Proc 20088366 76 10.4065/83.1.66Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

15Schütz H, Erdmann F, Verhoff MA, Weiler G. Pitfalls of toxicological analysis. Leg Med (Tokyo) 2003;5(Suppl 1):S6– 19. doi: 10.1016/s1344-6223(02)00084-6 Schütz H Erdmann F Verhoff MA Weiler G Pitfalls of toxicological analysis Leg Med (Tokyo) 20035Suppl 1S6– 19 10.1016/s1344-6223(02)00084-6Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

16Cone EJ, Lange R, Darwin WD. In vivo adulteration: excess fluid ingestion causes false-negative marijuana and cocaine urine test tesults. J Anal Toxicol 1998;22:460–73. doi: 10.1093/ jat/22.6.460 Cone EJ Lange R Darwin WD In vivo adulteration: excess fluid ingestion causes false-negative marijuana and cocaine urine test tesults J Anal Toxicol 199822460 73 10.1093/jat/22.6.4609788521Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

17Conel EJ, Caplan YH, Moser F, Robert T, Shelby MK, Black DL. Normalization of urinary drug concentrations with specific gravity and creatinine. J Anal Toxicol 2009;33:1–7. doi: 10.1093/jat/33.1.1 Conel EJ Caplan YH Moser F Robert T Shelby MK Black DL Normalization of urinary drug concentrations with specific gravity and creatinine J Anal Toxicol 2009331 7 10.1093/jat/33.1.119161663Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

18Dasgupta A. The effects of adulterants and selected ingested compounds on drugs-of-abuse testing in urine. Am J Clin Pathol 2007;128:491–503. doi: 10.1309/FQY06F8XKTQPM149 Dasgupta A The effects of adulterants and selected ingested compounds on drugs-of-abuse testing in urine Am J Clin Pathol 2007128491 503 10.1309/FQY06F8XKTQPM14917709324Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

19USA Federal Register. Mandatory guidelines for federal workplace drug testing programs using urine specimens, Subpart H - Urine Specimen Collection Procedure. Federal Register Vol. 80, No. 94, 2015. USA Federal Register Mandatory guidelines for federal workplace drug testing programs using urine specimens, Subpart H - Urine Specimen Collection Procedure Federal Register Vol. 80 No 94 2015Search in Google Scholar

20Medicines and Medical Devices Agency of Serbia [displayed 18 March 2020]. Available at https://www.alims.gov.rs/eng/medical-devices/ Medicines and Medical Devices Agency of Serbia [displayed 18 March 2020 Available at https://www.alims.gov.rs/eng/medical-devices/Search in Google Scholar

21Rahdert E, Czechowicz D. Adolescent Drug abuse: Clinical Assessment and Therapeutic Interventions. NIDA Research Monograph 156. Rockville: National Institute on Drug Abuse Research; 1995. Rahdert E Czechowicz D Adolescent Drug abuse: Clinical Assessment and Therapeutic Interventions. NIDA Research Monograph 156 Rockville National Institute on Drug Abuse Research; 199510.1037/e495732006-001Search in Google Scholar

22Washio Y, Fairfax-Columbo J, Ball E, Cassey H, Arria A, Bresani E. A review of guidelines on home drug testing websites for parents. J Addict Med 2014;8:258–63. doi: 10.1097/ ADM.0000000000000042 Washio Y Fairfax-Columbo J Ball E Cassey H Arria A Bresani E A review of guidelines on home drug testing websites for parents J Addict Med 20148258 63 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000042412263225026103Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

23Roškar R, Sollner Dolenc M. Determination of benzodiazepines in urine via benzophenone derivatives using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Arh Hig Rada Toksikol 2010;61:381–8. doi: 10.2478/10004-1254-61-2010-2058 Roškar R Sollner Dolenc M Determination of benzodiazepines in urine via benzophenone derivatives using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry Arh Hig Rada Toksikol 201061381 8 10.2478/10004-1254-61-2010-205821183429Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

24Schwarzhoff R, Cody J. The effects of adulterating agents on FPIA analysis of urine for drugs of abuse. J Anal Toxicol 1993;17:14–7. doi: 10.1093/jat/17.1.14 Schwarzhoff R Cody J The effects of adulterating agents on FPIA analysis of urine for drugs of abuse J Anal Toxicol 19931714 7 10.1093/jat/17.1.148429620Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

25Cody J, Schwarzhoff R. Impact on adulterants on RIA analysis of urine for drugs of abuse. J Anal Toxicol 1989;13:277–84. doi: 10.1093/jat/13.5.277 Cody J Schwarzhoff R Impact on adulterants on RIA analysis of urine for drugs of abuse J Anal Toxicol 198913277 84 10.1093/jat/13.5.2772615338Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

26Mikkelsen S, Ash O. Adulterants causing false negatives in illicit drug testing. Clin Chem 1988;34:2333–6. PMID: 3052928 Mikkelsen S Ash O Adulterants causing false negatives in illicit drug testing Clin Chem 1988342333 6 PMID: 305292810.1093/clinchem/34.11.2333Search in Google Scholar

27Warner A. Interference of common household chemicals in immunoassay methods for drugs of abuse. Clin Chem 1989;35:648–51. PMID: 2539273 Warner A Interference of common household chemicals in immunoassay methods for drugs of abuse Clin Chem 198935648 51 PMID: 253927310.1093/clinchem/35.4.648Search in Google Scholar