[
1. World Green Building Council, 2017. Global Status Report │UN environment and international energy agency [www Document]. URL. https://www.worldgbc.org/news-media/global-status-report-2017
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Haung H., Gao X., Wang H., Ye H., 2017. Influence of rice husk on strength and permeability of ultra-high performance concrete, Construction and Building Materials. Vol. 149: 621 – 628, doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.15510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.155
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Andrew R.M., 2019. Global CO2 emission from cement production, 1928 – 2018, Earth System Science Data, Vol. 11, Iss. 4: 1675 – 1710, doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-1675-201910.5194/essd-11-1675-2019
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Sun J., Xu K., Shi C., Ma J., Li W., Shen X., 2017. Influence of core/shell TiO2@SiO2 nanoparticles on cement hydration, Construction and Building Materials. Vol. 156; 114 – 122, doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.08.12410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.08.124
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Teixeira K.P., Rocha I.P., Carneiro L.D., Flores J., Dauer E.A., Ghahremaninezhad A., 2016. The effect of curing temperature on the properties of cement pastes modified with TiO2 nanoparticles, Materials, Vol. 9, Iss. 11: 952 – 967, doi.org/10.3390/ma911095210.3390/ma9110952545723428774073
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Khaloo A., Mobini M.H., Hosseini P., 2016. Influence of different types of nano-SiO2 particles on properties of high-performance concrete, Construction and Building Materials. Vol. 113; 188 – 201, doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.04110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.041
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Liu J., Li Q., Xu S., 2015. Influence of nanoparticles on fluidity and mechanical properties of cement mortar. Construction and Building Materials. Vol. 101; 892 – 901, doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.14910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.149
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Pisello A.L., D’alessandro A., Sambuco S., Rallini M., Ubertini F., Asdrubali F., Materazzi A.L., Cotana F., 2017. Multipurpose experimental characterization of smart nanocomposite cement-based materials for thermal-energy efficiency and strain-sensing capability. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, Vol. 161: 77 – 88, doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2016.11.03010.1016/j.solmat.2016.11.030
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Yoo D., You I., Lee S., 2017. Electrical properties of cement-based composites with carbon Nanotubes, Graphene, and Graphite Nanofibres. Sensors, Vol. 17, No. 5: 1064 – 1076, doi.org/10.3390/s1705106410.3390/s17051064546966928481296
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Cadavid-Giraldo N., Velez-Gallego M.C., Restrepo-Boland A., 2020. Carbon emissions reduction and financial effects of a cap and tax system on an operating supply chain in the cement sector. Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 275: 122583, doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.12258310.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122583
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Snellings R., 2016. Assessing, Understanding and Unlocking Supplementary Cementitious Materials, RILEM Technical Letters, Vol. 1: 50 – 55, doi.org/10.21809/rilemtechlett.2016.1210.21809/rilemtechlett.2016.12
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Serivener K., Martirena F., Bishnoi S., Maity S., 2018. Calcined Clay limestone cements (LC3), Cement and Concrete Research. Vol. 114: 49 – 56, doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2017.08.01710.1016/j.cemconres.2017.08.017
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Charitha V., Athira V.S., Jittin V., Bahurudeen A., Nanthagopalan P., 2021. Use of different agro-waste ashes in concrete for effective upcycling of locally available resources. Construction and Building Materials. Vol. 285; 122851, doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12285110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122851
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Robert U.W., Etuk S.E., Umoren G.P., Agbasi O.E., 2019. Assessment of Thermal and Mechanical Properties of Composite Board produced from Coconut (Cocos nucifera) Husks, Waste Newspapers, and Cassava Starch, International Journal of Thermophysics Vol. 40, No. 9: 83, doi.org/10.1007/s10765-019-2547-810.1007/s10765-019-2547-8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Bőger T., Bianchi S., Salzer C., Pichelin F., 2018.Binderless boards made of milled coconut husk: an analysis of the technical feasibility and process restraints. International Wood Products Journal, Vol. 9, No.1: 3–8, doi.org/10.1080/20426445.2017.140075610.1080/20426445.2017.1400756
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Panyakaew S., Fotios S., 2011. New Thermal Insulation boards made from coconut husk and bagasse, Energy and Buildings, Vol. 43, No. 7: 1732 – 1739, doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.03.01510.1016/j.enbuild.2011.03.015
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Glowacki B., Barbu M.C., Van Wijck J., Chaowana P., 2019. The use of coconut husk in high pressure laminate production, Journal of Tropical Forest Science, Vol. 24, No. 1: 27 – 36
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Zafar S.,2021. Energy Potential of Coconut Biomass, Bioenergy Consult, Last accessed: March 19, 2021, www.bioenergyconsult.com
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. Tajuddin M., Ahmed Z., Ismail H., 2016. A review of natural fibers and processing operations for the production of binderless boards. BioResources, Vol. 11, No. 2: 5600 – 561710.15376/biores.11.2.Tajuddin
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. Gui Q., Qin M., Li K., 2016. Gas permeability and electrical conductivity of structural concretes: Impact of pore structure and pore saturation, Cement and Concrete Research. Vol. 89: 109 – 11910.1016/j.cemconres.2016.08.009
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. Xiao L., Ren Z., Shi W., Wei X., 2016. Experimental Study on Chloride permeability in concrete by non-contact electrical resistivity measurement and RCM. Construction and Building Materials. Vol. 123: 27 – 34, doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.06.11010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.06.110
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. Wang Y., Gong F., Ueda T., Zhang D., 2014. Theoretical Model for estimation of ice content of concrete by using electrical measurements. Procedia Engineering, Vol. 95: 366 – 375, doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.19510.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.195
]Search in Google Scholar
[
23. Gopalakrishnan R., Vignesh B., Jeyalakshmi R., 2020. Mechanical, electrical, and microstructural studies on mamo-TiO2admixtured cement mortar cured with industrial waste water. Engineering Research Express. Vol. 2: 025010, doi.org/10.1088/2631-8695/ab899c10.1088/2631-8695/ab899c
]Search in Google Scholar
[
24. ASTM C136/136M, 2019. Standard Test Method for Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregates, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA
]Search in Google Scholar
[
25. Robert U.W., Etuk S.E., Agbasi O.E., Okorie U.S., Abdulrazzaq Z.T., Anonaba A.U., Ojo O.T., 2021. On the hygrothermal properties of sandcrete blocks produced with sawdust as partial replacement of sand. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Materials. Vol. 30, No. 1: 144 – 155, doi.org/10.1515/jmbm-2021-001510.1515/jmbm-2021-0015
]Search in Google Scholar
[
26. Yahaya M.D., 2009. Physico-chemical classification of Nigerian cement. Australian Journal of Technology. Vol. 12, No. 3: 164 – 174
]Search in Google Scholar
[
27. Okwadha G.D.O., 2016. Partial Replacement of Cement b Plant solid waste ash in concrete production. IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering. Vol. 13, No. 5: 35 – 40, doi.org/10.9790/1684-130503354010.9790/1684-1305033540
]Search in Google Scholar
[
28. Robert U.W., Etuk S.E., Agbasi O.E., Iboh U.A., Ekpo S.S., 2020.Temperature – dependent Electrical Characteristics of Disc-shaped Compacts fabricated using Calcined Eggshell Nanopowder and Dry Cassava Starch. Powder Metallurgy Progress. Vol. 20, Iss. 1: 12 – 20, doi.org/10.2478/pmp-2020-000210.2478/pmp-2020-0002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
29. Guiling X., Xiaoping C., Cai L., Pan X., Changsui Z., 2016. Experimental investigation on the flowability properties of cohesive carbonaceous powders, Journal of Particulate Science and Technology, 35(3); 322 – 329. doi.org/10.1080/02726351.2016.115491010.1080/02726351.2016.1154910
]Search in Google Scholar
[
30. Lu H., Guo X., Liu Y., Gong X., 2015. Effects of particle size on flow mode and flow characteristics of pulverised coal, Kona Powder Part I., 32; 143 – 53. doi.org/10.14356/kona.201500210.14356/kona.2015002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
31. USP, Powder Flow. In: The United States Pharmacopeia 30-National Formulary 25 Convention, Rockville, 2007.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
32. ASTM C618, 2019. Standard Specification for Coal Fly Ash and Raw or Calcined Natural Pozzolan for use in concrete, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA
]Search in Google Scholar
[
33. Ternero F., Rosa L.G., Urban P., Montes J.M., Cuevas F.G., 2021. Influence of Total porosity on the properties of sintered materials – A Review, Metals, Vol. 11, No. 5: 730, doi.org/10.3390/met1105073010.3390/met11050730
]Search in Google Scholar
[
34. Tumidajski P.J., 1996. Electrical conductivity of Portland Cement Mortars. Cement and Concrete Research. Vol. 26, No. 4: 529 - 53410.1016/0008-8846(96)00027-0
]Search in Google Scholar