[
Bekker, S., & Mailand, M. (2019). The European flexicurity concept and the Dutch and Danish flexicurity models: How have they managed the Great Recession? Social Policy & Administration, 53 (1), 142–55.10.1111/spol.12441
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Boland, T., & Griffin, R. (2015). The sociology of unemployment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.7228/manchester/9780719097904.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bonoli, G. (2010). The political economy of active labor-market policy. Politics & Society, 38 (4), 435–57.10.1177/0032329210381235
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brodkin, E. Z. (2013). Work and the welfare state. In E. Z. Brodkin & G. Marston (Eds), Work and the welfare state: Street-level organizations and workfare politics (pp. 3–16). Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brodkin, E. Z. (2015). Street-level organizations and the ‘real world’ of workfare: Lessons from the US. Social Work & Society, 13 (1), 1–16.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Card, D., Kluve, J., & Weber, A. (2010). Active labour market policy evaluations: A meta analysis. The Economic Journal, 120 (548), F452–F477.10.1111/j.1468-0297.2010.02387.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative research. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Clasen, J., & Clegg, D. (2011). Regulating the risk of unemployment: National adaptations to post-industrial labour markets in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cousins, M. (2019). Welfare conditionality in the Republic of Ireland after the Great Recession. Journal of Social Security Law, 26 (1), 30–41.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Coutts, A. P., Stuckler, D., & Cann, D. J. (2014). The health and wellbeing effects of active labor market programs. In F. A. Huppert & C. L. Cooper (Eds), Interventions and policies to enhance wellbeing (vol. VI; pp. 465–82). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Deeming, C. (2016). Rethinking social policy and society. Social Policy & Society, 15 (2), 159–75.10.1017/S1474746415000147
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Department of Social Protection. (2012). Pathways to work. Government policy statement on labour market activation. Dublin: Government of Ireland.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dunn, A. (2014). Rethinking unemployment and the work ethic: Beyond the quasi-titmus paradigm. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dwyer, P. (2004). Creeping conditionality in the UK: From welfare rights to conditional entitlements. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 29 (2), 265–87.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fletcher, D. R., & Wright, S. (2018). A hand up or a slap down? Criminalising benefit claimants in Britain via strategies of surveillance, sanctions and deterrence. Critical Social Policy, 38 (2), 323–44.10.1177/0261018317726622
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goldsmith, A. H., Veum, J. R., & Darity, W. (1997). The impact of psychological and human capital on wages. Economic inquiry, 35 (4), 815–29.10.1111/j.1465-7295.1997.tb01966.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Grant, A. (2013). Welfare reform, increased conditionality and discretion: Jobcentre Plus advisers’ experiences of targets and sanctions. Journal of Poverty and Social Justice, 21 (2), 165–76.10.1332/175982713X668935
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Grubb, D., Singh, S., & Tergeist, P. (2009). Activation policies in Ireland [OECD Social, Employment, And Migration Working Papers 75]. Paris: OECD Publishing.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Irish National Organisation of the Unemployed. (2016). Mapping the journey for unemployed people. Report on phase two of the employment services research report. Dublin: Irish National Organisation of the Unemployed.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Irish National Organisation of the Unemployed. (2019) Building a quality Public Employment Service. Retrieved from https://www.inou.ie/assets/files/pdf/building_a_qpes.pdf [1 March 2021].
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Köppe, S., & MacCarthaigh, M. (2019). Public service integration in hard times: Merging unemployment benefit and labour market activation measures. Administration, 67 (2), 137–60.10.2478/admin-2019-0017
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Köppe, S., & O’Connell, P. J. (2016). Change management, redeployment and designing an integrated service: Implementation of Intreo. Dublin: Geary Institute.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lødemel, I., & Moreira, A. (2014). Activation or workfare? Governance and the neo-liberal convergence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199773589.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Manroop, L., & Richardson, J. (2016). Job search: A multidisciplinary review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18 (2), 206–27.10.1111/ijmr.12066
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Martin, J. P. (2014). Activation and active labour market policies in OECD countries: Stylized facts and evidence on their effectiveness. IZA policy paper no. 84. Bonn: Institute of Labor Economics.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mead, L. (1992). The new politics of poverty. New York: Basic Books.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Murphy, M. P. (2017). Irish flex insecurity: The post crisis reality for vulnerable workers in Ireland. Social Policy & Administration, 51 (2), 308–27.10.1111/spol.12289
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Murray, C. (1990). The emerging British underclass. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
National Economic and Social Council. (2005). The developmental welfare state. Dublin: National Economic and Social Development Office.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
National Economic and Social Council. (2011). Supports and services for unemployed jobseekers: Challenges and opportunities in a time of recession. No. 123. Dublin: National Economic and Social Development Office.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
O’Connell, P. J. (2017). Unemployment and labour market policy. In W. K. Roche, P. J. O’Connell, & A. Prothero, Austerity and recovery in Ireland: Europe’s poster child and the Great Recession. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
OECD. (2015). Economic surveys Ireland. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/economy/surveys/Ireland-2015-overview.pdf [1 March 2021].10.1787/eco_surveys-irl-2015-en
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Paul, K., & Moser, K. (2009). Unemployment impairs mental health: Meta-analyses. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74 (3), 264–82.10.1016/j.jvb.2009.01.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Staines, Z. (2021). Australia’s remote workfare policy: Rhetoric versus reality of ‘community’empowerment. Critical Social Policy, 41 (1), 4–24.10.1177/0261018319897056
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stewart, A., & Wright, S. (2018). Final findings – Jobseekers. Retrieved from http://www.welfareconditionality.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/40426-Jobseekers-web.pdf [1 March 2021].
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Taulbut, M., & Robinson, M. (2015). The chance to work in Britain: Matching unemployed people to vacancies in good times and bad. Regional Studies, 49 (12), 2070–86.10.1080/00343404.2014.893058
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Thomsen, S. L. (2009). Explaining the employability gap of short-term and long-term unemployed persons. Kyklos, 62 (3), 448–78.10.1111/j.1467-6435.2009.00445.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Van Parys, L., & Struyven, L. (2017). Bringing the street-level bureaucrats back in. The role of the caseworker’s interaction style for the motivation and participation of jobseekers. Annual ESPAnet Conference 2017, Lisbon.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wacquant, L. (2009). Punishing the poor: The neoliberal government of social insecurity. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Whitworth, A., & Carter, E. (2020). Programme form and service user well being: Linking theory and evidence. Social Policy & Administration, 54 (5), 844–58.10.1111/spol.12582
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wiggan, J. (2015). What variety of employment service quasi-market? Ireland’s JobPath as a private power market. Social policy review, 27, 151–70.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wright, S. (2016). Conceptualising the active welfare subject: Welfare reform in discourse, policy and lived experience. Policy and Politics, 44 (2), 235–52.10.1332/030557314X13904856745154
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wright, S., & Patrick, R. (2019). Welfare conditionality in lived experience: Aggregating qualitative longitudinal research. Social Policy and Society, 18 (4), 597–613.10.1017/S1474746419000204
]Search in Google Scholar
