Genotypic correlation between Salmonella Enteritidis isolates from broiler breeders and hatchery flocks

1. Rabsch W, Tschape H, Baumler AJ: Non-typhoidal salmonellosis: emerging problems. Microbes Infect 2001, 3:237-247.10.1016/S1286-4579(01)01375-2 Search in Google Scholar

2. Whyte P, Mc Gill K, Collins JD, Gormley E: The prevalence and PCR detection of Salmonella contamination in raw poultry. Vet Microbiol 2002, 89:53-60.10.1016/S0378-1135(02)00160-8 Search in Google Scholar

3. Kabir SML: Avian Colibacillosis and Salmonellosis: A Closer Look at Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, Control and Public Health Concerns. Int J Env Res Pub He 2010, 7:89-114 doi:10.3390/ijerph7010089.10.3390/ijerph7010089281977820195435 Search in Google Scholar

4. Patrick ME, Adcock PM, Gomez TM, Altekruse SF, Holland BH, Tauxe RV, Swerdlow DL: Salmonella enteritidis infections, United States, 1985-1999. Emerg Infect Dis 2004,10:1-7.10.3201/eid1001.020572332275815078589 Search in Google Scholar

5. Hoop RK: The Swiss control programme for Salmonella enteritidis in laying hens: experiences and problems. Rev Sci Tech 1997,16:885-890.10.20506/rst.16.3.10639567314 Search in Google Scholar

6. Wegener HC, Hald T, Wong DLF, Madsen M, Korsgaard H, Bager F, Smitdt PG, Molbak K: Salmonella control programs in Denmark. Emerg Infect Dis 2003, 9:774-78010.3201/eid0907.030024302343512890316 Search in Google Scholar

7. Wagenaar JA, Hendriksen BS, Carrique-Mas J: Practical considerations of surveillance of Salmonella serovars other than Enteritidis and Typhimurium. Rev Sci Tech Oie 2013, 32:509-519.10.20506/rst.32.2.224424547654 Search in Google Scholar

8. Lee DH, Hyeon JY, Kim J, Kim JS, Kim SJ, Jeon SE, Choi SW, Hong WT, Song CS, Lee SW: Close genetic relationship between Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis isolated from patients with diarrhoea and poultry in the Republic of Korea. Clin Microbiol Infec 2015, 21:68-70 doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2015.05.03610.1016/j.cmi.2015.05.03626055417 Search in Google Scholar

9. Kang MS, Oh JY, Kwon YK, Lee DY, Jeong OM, Choi BK, Youn SY, Jeon BW, Lee HJ, Lee HS: Public health significance of major genotypes of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis present in both human and chicken isolates in Korea. Res Vet Sci 2017, 112:125-131.10.1016/j.rvsc.2017.02.01028242576 Search in Google Scholar

10. Authority EFS, EFSA CDPC: The European Union summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in 2017. Efsa J 2018,16 doi:ARTN 550010.2903/j.efsa.2018.550010.2903/j.efsa.2018.5500700954032625785 Search in Google Scholar

11. Sahan O, Aral EM, Aden MMA, Aksoy A, Yilmaz O, Jahed R, Akan M: Distribution and antibiotic resistance of Salmonella isolates from broiler enterprices in Turkey. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg 2016, 63(1): 1-6 Search in Google Scholar

12. Boxrud D, Pederson-Gulrud K, Wotton J, Medus C, Lyszkowicz E, Besser J, Bartkus JM: Comparison of multiple-locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, and phage typing for subtype analysis of Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis. J Clin Microbiol 2007, 45:536-543 doi:10.1128/JCM.01595-0610.1128/JCM.01595-06182908117151203 Search in Google Scholar

13. Foley SL, Lynne AM, Nayak R: Molecular typing methodologies for microbial source tracking and epidemiological investigations of Gram-negative bacterial foodborne pathogens. Infect Genet Evol 2009, 9:430-440 doi:10.1016/j.meegid.2009.03.00410.1016/j.meegid.2009.03.00419460308 Search in Google Scholar

14. Akiyama T, Khan AA, Cheng CM, Stefanova R: Molecular characterization of Salmonella enterica serovar Saintpaul isolated from imported seafood, pepper, environmental and clinical samples. Food Microbiol 2011, 28:1124-1128 doi:10.1016/j.fm.2011.03.00310.1016/j.fm.2011.03.00321645810 Search in Google Scholar

15. Sandt CH, Fedorka-Cray PJ, Tewari D, Ostroff S, Joyce K, M’ikanatha NM: A Comparison of Non-Typhoidal Salmonella from Humans and Food Animals Using Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns. Plos One 2013, 8.10.1371/journal.pone.0077836381371424204990 Search in Google Scholar

16. Tang S, Orsi RH, Luo H, Ge C, Zhang G, Baker RC, Stevenson A, Wiedmann M: Assessment and Comparison of Molecular Subtyping and Characterization Methods for Salmonella. Front Microbiol 2019,10:1591.10.3389/fmicb.2019.01591663943231354679 Search in Google Scholar

17. Maiden MCJ, Bygraves JA, Feil E, Morelli G, Russel JE, Urwin R, Zhang Q, Zhou J, Zurth K, Caugant DA, Feavers IM, Achtman M, Spratt BG: Multilocus sequence typing: a portable approach to the identification of clones within populations of pathogenic microorganisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1998, 95:3140-3145.10.1073/pnas.95.6.3140197089501229 Search in Google Scholar

18. Cai Y, Tao J, Jiao Y, Fei X, Zhou L, Wang Y, Zheng H, Pan Z, Jiao X: Phenotypic characteristics and genotypic correlation between Salmonella isolates from a slaughterhouse and retail markets in Yangzhou, China. Int J Food Microbiol 2016, 222:56-64.10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.01.02026851738 Search in Google Scholar

19. Pearce ME, Alikhan NF, Dallman TJ, Zhou Z, Grant K, Maiden MCJ: Comparative analysis of core genome MLST and SNP typing within a European Salmonella serovar Enteritidis outbreak. Int J Food Microbiol 2018, 274:1-11.10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2018.02.023589976029574242 Search in Google Scholar

20. Zakaria Z, Hassan L, Sharif Z, Ahmad N, Ali RM, Husin SA, Hazis NHBA, Sohaimi NFM, Bakar SA, Garba B: Analysis of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis isolates from chickens and chicken meat products in Malaysia using PFGE, and MLST. BMC Vet Res 2020, 16:393.10.1186/s12917-020-02605-y756838033069231 Search in Google Scholar

21. Kotetishvili M, Stine OC, Kreger A, Morris JG, Sulakvelidze A: Multilocus sequence typing for characterization of clinical and environmental salmonella strains. J Clin Microbiol 2002, 40:1626-1635.10.1128/JCM.40.5.1626-1635.200213092911980932 Search in Google Scholar

22. Harbottle H, White DG, McDermott PF, Walker RD, Zhao S: Comparison of multilocus sequence typing, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, and antimicrobial susceptibility typing for characterization of Salmonella enterica serotype Newport isolates. J Clin Microbiol 2006, 44:2449-2457 doi:10.1128/JCM.00019-0610.1128/JCM.00019-06148951016825363 Search in Google Scholar

23. Parker CT, Huynh S, Quinones B, Harris LJ, Mandrell RE: Comparison of genotypes of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis phage type 30 and 9c strains isolated during three outbreaks associated with raw almonds. Appl Environ Microbiol 2010, 76:3723–3731.10.1128/AEM.03053-09287643320363782 Search in Google Scholar

24. Ziebella K, Chuib L, Kingd R, Johnson S, Boerlin P, Johnson PR: Subtyping of Canadian isolates of Salmonella Enteritidis using Multiple Locus Variable Number Tandem Repeat Analysis (MLVA) alone and in combination with Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis (PFGE) and phage typing. J Microbiol Methods 2017, 139:29-36.10.1016/j.mimet.2017.04.01228456552 Search in Google Scholar

25. Liu F, Kariyawasam S, Jayarao BM, Barrangou R, Gerner-Smidt P, Ribot EM, Knabel SJ, Dudley EG: Subtyping Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis isolates from different sources by using sequence typing based on virulence genes and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPRs). Appl Environ Microbiol 2011,77:4520–4526.10.1128/AEM.00468-11312769521571881 Search in Google Scholar

26. Xie X, Hu Y, Xu Y, Yin K, Li Y, Chen Y, Xia J, Xu L, Liu Z, Geng S, Li Q, Jiao X, Chen X, Pan Z: Genetic analysis of Salmonella enterica serovar Gallinarum biovar Pullorum based on characterization and evolution of CRISPR sequence. Vet Microbiol 2017, 203:81–87.10.1016/j.vetmic.2017.02.01028619172 Search in Google Scholar

27. Li Q, Wang X, Yin, K, Hu Y, Xu H, Xie X, Xu L, Fei X, Chen X, Jiao X: Genetic analysis and CRISPR typing of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis from different sources revealed potential transmission from poultry and pig to human. Int J Food Microbiol 2018, 266:119–125.10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2017.11.02529212058 Search in Google Scholar

28. Allard MW, Luo Y, Strain E, Pettengill J, Timme R, Wang C, Li C, Keys CE, Zheng J, Stones R, Wilson MR, Musser SM, Brown EW: On the Evolutionary History, Population Genetics and Diversity among Isolates of Salmonella Enteritidis PFGE Pattern JEGX01.0004. Plos One 2013, 8:e55254.10.1371/journal.pone.0055254 Search in Google Scholar

29. Gunel E, Polat Kilic G, Bulut E, Durul B, Acar S, Alpas H, Soyer Y: Salmonella surveillance on fresh produce in retail in Turkey. Int J Food Microbiol 2015, 199:72-77.10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2015.01.01025643853 Search in Google Scholar

30. Acar S, Bulut E, Durul B, Uner I, Kur M, Avsaroglu MD, Kirmaci HA, Tel YO, Zeyrek FY, Soyer Y: Phenotyping and genetic characterization of Salmonella enterica isolates from Turkey revealing arise of different features specific to geography. Int J Food Microbiol 2017, 241:98-107.10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.09.03127768932 Search in Google Scholar

31. Sarıçam S, Müştak HK: Phylogenetic Analysis of Salmonella Infantis Strains from Poultry by Multilocus Sequence Typing. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg 2018, 65:407-411.10.1501/Vetfak_0000002874 Search in Google Scholar

32. Grimont PAD, Weill FX: Antigenic Formulae of the Salmonella Serovars. In: World Health Organization Collaborating Center for Reference and Research on Salmonella, 9th edn. 2007, Institut Pasteur, Paris. Search in Google Scholar

33. Millemann Y, Gaubert S, Remy D, Colmin C: Evaluation of IS200-PCR and comparison with other molecular markers To trace Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serotype typhimurium bovine isolates from farm to meat. J Clin Microbiol 2000, 38:2204-2209.10.1128/JCM.38.6.2204-2209.20008676510834977 Search in Google Scholar

34. Ranjbar R, Elhaghi P, Shokoohizadeh L: Multilocus Sequence Typing of the Clinical Isolates of Salmonella Enterica Serovar Typhimurium in Tehran Hospitals Iran J Med Sci 2017, 42:443-448. Search in Google Scholar

35. Tenover FC, Arbeit, RD, Goering RV, Mickelsen PA, Murray BE, Persing DH, Swaminathan B: Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing. J Clin Microbiol 1995, 33:2233-2239.10.1128/jcm.33.9.2233-2239.19952283857494007 Search in Google Scholar

36. Fei X, Yin K, Tin C, Hu Y, Li J, Zhou Z, Tian Y, Geng S, Chen X, Pan Z, Li Q, Jiao X: Analyses of prevalence and molecular typing reveal the spread of antimicrobial-resistant Salmonella infection across two breeder chicken farms. Poult Sci 2018, 97:4374-4383 doi:10.3382/ps/pey30510.3382/ps/pey30530016482 Search in Google Scholar

37. Williams JE, Dillard LH: Salmonella Penetration of Fertile and Infertile Chicken Eggs at Progressive Stages of Incubation. Avian Dis 1968, 12:629 doi:10.2307/158844610.2307/1588446 Search in Google Scholar

38. Mead GC, Hudson WR, Hinton MH: Use of a Marker Organism in Poultry-Processing to Identify Sites of Cross-Contamination and Evaluate Possible Control Measures. Brit Poultry Sci 1994, 35:345-354.10.1080/000716694084176997953779 Search in Google Scholar

39. Corry JE, Allen VM, Hudson WR, Breslin MF, Davies RH: Sources of Salmonella on broiler carcasses during transportation and processing: modes of contamination and methods of control. J Appl Microbiol 2002, 92:424-432.10.1046/j.1365-2672.2002.01543.x11872117 Search in Google Scholar

40. Cooke FJ, Brown DJ, Fookes M, Pickard D, Ivens A, Wain J, Roberts M, Kingsley RA, Thomson NR, Dougan R: Characterization of the genomes of a diverse collection of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium definitive phage type 104. J Bacteriol 2008, 190:8155-8162 doi:10.1128/JB.00636-0810.1128/JB.00636-08259320918849424 Search in Google Scholar

41. Fakhr MK, Nolan LK, Logue CM: Multilocus sequence typing lacks the discriminatory ability of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis for typing Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. J Clin Microbiol 2005, 43:2215-2219 doi:10.1128/JCM.43.5.2215-2219.200510.1128/JCM.43.5.2215-2219.2005115374515872244 Search in Google Scholar

42. Noda T, Murakami N, Asai T, Etoh Y, Ishihara T, Kuroki T, Horikawa K, Fıjimoto S: Multi-locus sequence typing of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Enteritidis strains in Japan between 1973 and 2004. Acta Vet Scand 2011, 53 doi:Artn 3810.1186/1751-0147-53-3810.1186/1751-0147-53-38312671821672260 Search in Google Scholar

43. Campioni F, Pitondo-Silva A, Bergamini AM, Falcao JP: Comparison of four molecular methods to type Salmonella Enteritidis strains. APMIS 2015, 123:422-426 doi:10.1111/apm.1236710.1111/apm.1236725703542 Search in Google Scholar

44. Papadopoulos T, Petridou E, Zdragas A, Mandilara G, Nair S, Peters T, Chattaway M, de Pinna E, Passiotou M, Vatopoulos A: Comparative study of all Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis strains isolated from food and food animals in Greece from 2008 to 2010 with clinical isolates. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2016, 35:741-746.10.1007/s10096-016-2591-226864044 Search in Google Scholar

45. Cao Y, Shen Y, Cheng L, Zhang X, Wang C, Wang Y, Zhou X, Chao G, Wu Y: Combination of multilocus sequence typing and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis reveals an association of molecular clonality with the emergence of extensive-drug resistance (XDR) in Salmonella. Microbiol Res 2018, 207:170-176.10.1016/j.micres.2017.12.00129458851 Search in Google Scholar

46. Wang J, Li J, Liu F, Cheng Y, Su J: Characterization of Salmonella enterica Isolates from Diseased Poultry in Northern China between 2014 and 2018. Pathogens 2020, 9:95.10.3390/pathogens9020095716867132033063 Search in Google Scholar

47. Saitou N, Nei M: The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987, 4:406-425. Search in Google Scholar

48. Felsenstein J : Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985, 39:783-791.10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00420.x28561359 Search in Google Scholar

49. Tamura K: Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions when there are strong transition-transversion and G + C-content biases. Mol Biol Evol 1992, 9:678-687. Search in Google Scholar

50. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K: MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 2018, 35:1547-1549.10.1093/molbev/msy096596755329722887 Search in Google Scholar