[
1. Rabsch W, Tschape H, Baumler AJ: Non-typhoidal salmonellosis: emerging problems. Microbes Infect 2001, 3:237-247.10.1016/S1286-4579(01)01375-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Whyte P, Mc Gill K, Collins JD, Gormley E: The prevalence and PCR detection of Salmonella contamination in raw poultry. Vet Microbiol 2002, 89:53-60.10.1016/S0378-1135(02)00160-8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Kabir SML: Avian Colibacillosis and Salmonellosis: A Closer Look at Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, Control and Public Health Concerns. Int J Env Res Pub He 2010, 7:89-114 doi:10.3390/ijerph7010089.10.3390/ijerph7010089281977820195435
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Patrick ME, Adcock PM, Gomez TM, Altekruse SF, Holland BH, Tauxe RV, Swerdlow DL: Salmonella enteritidis infections, United States, 1985-1999. Emerg Infect Dis 2004,10:1-7.10.3201/eid1001.020572332275815078589
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Hoop RK: The Swiss control programme for Salmonella enteritidis in laying hens: experiences and problems. Rev Sci Tech 1997,16:885-890.10.20506/rst.16.3.10639567314
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Wegener HC, Hald T, Wong DLF, Madsen M, Korsgaard H, Bager F, Smitdt PG, Molbak K: Salmonella control programs in Denmark. Emerg Infect Dis 2003, 9:774-78010.3201/eid0907.030024302343512890316
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Wagenaar JA, Hendriksen BS, Carrique-Mas J: Practical considerations of surveillance of Salmonella serovars other than Enteritidis and Typhimurium. Rev Sci Tech Oie 2013, 32:509-519.10.20506/rst.32.2.224424547654
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Lee DH, Hyeon JY, Kim J, Kim JS, Kim SJ, Jeon SE, Choi SW, Hong WT, Song CS, Lee SW: Close genetic relationship between Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis isolated from patients with diarrhoea and poultry in the Republic of Korea. Clin Microbiol Infec 2015, 21:68-70 doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2015.05.03610.1016/j.cmi.2015.05.03626055417
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Kang MS, Oh JY, Kwon YK, Lee DY, Jeong OM, Choi BK, Youn SY, Jeon BW, Lee HJ, Lee HS: Public health significance of major genotypes of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis present in both human and chicken isolates in Korea. Res Vet Sci 2017, 112:125-131.10.1016/j.rvsc.2017.02.01028242576
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Authority EFS, EFSA CDPC: The European Union summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in 2017. Efsa J 2018,16 doi:ARTN 550010.2903/j.efsa.2018.550010.2903/j.efsa.2018.5500700954032625785
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Sahan O, Aral EM, Aden MMA, Aksoy A, Yilmaz O, Jahed R, Akan M: Distribution and antibiotic resistance of Salmonella isolates from broiler enterprices in Turkey. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg 2016, 63(1): 1-6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Boxrud D, Pederson-Gulrud K, Wotton J, Medus C, Lyszkowicz E, Besser J, Bartkus JM: Comparison of multiple-locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, and phage typing for subtype analysis of Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis. J Clin Microbiol 2007, 45:536-543 doi:10.1128/JCM.01595-0610.1128/JCM.01595-06182908117151203
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Foley SL, Lynne AM, Nayak R: Molecular typing methodologies for microbial source tracking and epidemiological investigations of Gram-negative bacterial foodborne pathogens. Infect Genet Evol 2009, 9:430-440 doi:10.1016/j.meegid.2009.03.00410.1016/j.meegid.2009.03.00419460308
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Akiyama T, Khan AA, Cheng CM, Stefanova R: Molecular characterization of Salmonella enterica serovar Saintpaul isolated from imported seafood, pepper, environmental and clinical samples. Food Microbiol 2011, 28:1124-1128 doi:10.1016/j.fm.2011.03.00310.1016/j.fm.2011.03.00321645810
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Sandt CH, Fedorka-Cray PJ, Tewari D, Ostroff S, Joyce K, M’ikanatha NM: A Comparison of Non-Typhoidal Salmonella from Humans and Food Animals Using Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns. Plos One 2013, 8.10.1371/journal.pone.0077836381371424204990
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Tang S, Orsi RH, Luo H, Ge C, Zhang G, Baker RC, Stevenson A, Wiedmann M: Assessment and Comparison of Molecular Subtyping and Characterization Methods for Salmonella. Front Microbiol 2019,10:1591.10.3389/fmicb.2019.01591663943231354679
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Maiden MCJ, Bygraves JA, Feil E, Morelli G, Russel JE, Urwin R, Zhang Q, Zhou J, Zurth K, Caugant DA, Feavers IM, Achtman M, Spratt BG: Multilocus sequence typing: a portable approach to the identification of clones within populations of pathogenic microorganisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1998, 95:3140-3145.10.1073/pnas.95.6.3140197089501229
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Cai Y, Tao J, Jiao Y, Fei X, Zhou L, Wang Y, Zheng H, Pan Z, Jiao X: Phenotypic characteristics and genotypic correlation between Salmonella isolates from a slaughterhouse and retail markets in Yangzhou, China. Int J Food Microbiol 2016, 222:56-64.10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.01.02026851738
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. Pearce ME, Alikhan NF, Dallman TJ, Zhou Z, Grant K, Maiden MCJ: Comparative analysis of core genome MLST and SNP typing within a European Salmonella serovar Enteritidis outbreak. Int J Food Microbiol 2018, 274:1-11.10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2018.02.023589976029574242
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. Zakaria Z, Hassan L, Sharif Z, Ahmad N, Ali RM, Husin SA, Hazis NHBA, Sohaimi NFM, Bakar SA, Garba B: Analysis of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis isolates from chickens and chicken meat products in Malaysia using PFGE, and MLST. BMC Vet Res 2020, 16:393.10.1186/s12917-020-02605-y756838033069231
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. Kotetishvili M, Stine OC, Kreger A, Morris JG, Sulakvelidze A: Multilocus sequence typing for characterization of clinical and environmental salmonella strains. J Clin Microbiol 2002, 40:1626-1635.10.1128/JCM.40.5.1626-1635.200213092911980932
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. Harbottle H, White DG, McDermott PF, Walker RD, Zhao S: Comparison of multilocus sequence typing, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, and antimicrobial susceptibility typing for characterization of Salmonella enterica serotype Newport isolates. J Clin Microbiol 2006, 44:2449-2457 doi:10.1128/JCM.00019-0610.1128/JCM.00019-06148951016825363
]Search in Google Scholar
[
23. Parker CT, Huynh S, Quinones B, Harris LJ, Mandrell RE: Comparison of genotypes of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis phage type 30 and 9c strains isolated during three outbreaks associated with raw almonds. Appl Environ Microbiol 2010, 76:3723–3731.10.1128/AEM.03053-09287643320363782
]Search in Google Scholar
[
24. Ziebella K, Chuib L, Kingd R, Johnson S, Boerlin P, Johnson PR: Subtyping of Canadian isolates of Salmonella Enteritidis using Multiple Locus Variable Number Tandem Repeat Analysis (MLVA) alone and in combination with Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis (PFGE) and phage typing. J Microbiol Methods 2017, 139:29-36.10.1016/j.mimet.2017.04.01228456552
]Search in Google Scholar
[
25. Liu F, Kariyawasam S, Jayarao BM, Barrangou R, Gerner-Smidt P, Ribot EM, Knabel SJ, Dudley EG: Subtyping Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis isolates from different sources by using sequence typing based on virulence genes and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPRs). Appl Environ Microbiol 2011,77:4520–4526.10.1128/AEM.00468-11312769521571881
]Search in Google Scholar
[
26. Xie X, Hu Y, Xu Y, Yin K, Li Y, Chen Y, Xia J, Xu L, Liu Z, Geng S, Li Q, Jiao X, Chen X, Pan Z: Genetic analysis of Salmonella enterica serovar Gallinarum biovar Pullorum based on characterization and evolution of CRISPR sequence. Vet Microbiol 2017, 203:81–87.10.1016/j.vetmic.2017.02.01028619172
]Search in Google Scholar
[
27. Li Q, Wang X, Yin, K, Hu Y, Xu H, Xie X, Xu L, Fei X, Chen X, Jiao X: Genetic analysis and CRISPR typing of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis from different sources revealed potential transmission from poultry and pig to human. Int J Food Microbiol 2018, 266:119–125.10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2017.11.02529212058
]Search in Google Scholar
[
28. Allard MW, Luo Y, Strain E, Pettengill J, Timme R, Wang C, Li C, Keys CE, Zheng J, Stones R, Wilson MR, Musser SM, Brown EW: On the Evolutionary History, Population Genetics and Diversity among Isolates of Salmonella Enteritidis PFGE Pattern JEGX01.0004. Plos One 2013, 8:e55254.10.1371/journal.pone.0055254
]Search in Google Scholar
[
29. Gunel E, Polat Kilic G, Bulut E, Durul B, Acar S, Alpas H, Soyer Y: Salmonella surveillance on fresh produce in retail in Turkey. Int J Food Microbiol 2015, 199:72-77.10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2015.01.01025643853
]Search in Google Scholar
[
30. Acar S, Bulut E, Durul B, Uner I, Kur M, Avsaroglu MD, Kirmaci HA, Tel YO, Zeyrek FY, Soyer Y: Phenotyping and genetic characterization of Salmonella enterica isolates from Turkey revealing arise of different features specific to geography. Int J Food Microbiol 2017, 241:98-107.10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.09.03127768932
]Search in Google Scholar
[
31. Sarıçam S, Müştak HK: Phylogenetic Analysis of Salmonella Infantis Strains from Poultry by Multilocus Sequence Typing. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg 2018, 65:407-411.10.1501/Vetfak_0000002874
]Search in Google Scholar
[
32. Grimont PAD, Weill FX: Antigenic Formulae of the Salmonella Serovars. In: World Health Organization Collaborating Center for Reference and Research on Salmonella, 9th edn. 2007, Institut Pasteur, Paris.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
33. Millemann Y, Gaubert S, Remy D, Colmin C: Evaluation of IS200-PCR and comparison with other molecular markers To trace Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serotype typhimurium bovine isolates from farm to meat. J Clin Microbiol 2000, 38:2204-2209.10.1128/JCM.38.6.2204-2209.20008676510834977
]Search in Google Scholar
[
34. Ranjbar R, Elhaghi P, Shokoohizadeh L: Multilocus Sequence Typing of the Clinical Isolates of Salmonella Enterica Serovar Typhimurium in Tehran Hospitals Iran J Med Sci 2017, 42:443-448.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
35. Tenover FC, Arbeit, RD, Goering RV, Mickelsen PA, Murray BE, Persing DH, Swaminathan B: Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing. J Clin Microbiol 1995, 33:2233-2239.10.1128/jcm.33.9.2233-2239.19952283857494007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
36. Fei X, Yin K, Tin C, Hu Y, Li J, Zhou Z, Tian Y, Geng S, Chen X, Pan Z, Li Q, Jiao X: Analyses of prevalence and molecular typing reveal the spread of antimicrobial-resistant Salmonella infection across two breeder chicken farms. Poult Sci 2018, 97:4374-4383 doi:10.3382/ps/pey30510.3382/ps/pey30530016482
]Search in Google Scholar
[
37. Williams JE, Dillard LH: Salmonella Penetration of Fertile and Infertile Chicken Eggs at Progressive Stages of Incubation. Avian Dis 1968, 12:629 doi:10.2307/158844610.2307/1588446
]Search in Google Scholar
[
38. Mead GC, Hudson WR, Hinton MH: Use of a Marker Organism in Poultry-Processing to Identify Sites of Cross-Contamination and Evaluate Possible Control Measures. Brit Poultry Sci 1994, 35:345-354.10.1080/000716694084176997953779
]Search in Google Scholar
[
39. Corry JE, Allen VM, Hudson WR, Breslin MF, Davies RH: Sources of Salmonella on broiler carcasses during transportation and processing: modes of contamination and methods of control. J Appl Microbiol 2002, 92:424-432.10.1046/j.1365-2672.2002.01543.x11872117
]Search in Google Scholar
[
40. Cooke FJ, Brown DJ, Fookes M, Pickard D, Ivens A, Wain J, Roberts M, Kingsley RA, Thomson NR, Dougan R: Characterization of the genomes of a diverse collection of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium definitive phage type 104. J Bacteriol 2008, 190:8155-8162 doi:10.1128/JB.00636-0810.1128/JB.00636-08259320918849424
]Search in Google Scholar
[
41. Fakhr MK, Nolan LK, Logue CM: Multilocus sequence typing lacks the discriminatory ability of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis for typing Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. J Clin Microbiol 2005, 43:2215-2219 doi:10.1128/JCM.43.5.2215-2219.200510.1128/JCM.43.5.2215-2219.2005115374515872244
]Search in Google Scholar
[
42. Noda T, Murakami N, Asai T, Etoh Y, Ishihara T, Kuroki T, Horikawa K, Fıjimoto S: Multi-locus sequence typing of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Enteritidis strains in Japan between 1973 and 2004. Acta Vet Scand 2011, 53 doi:Artn 3810.1186/1751-0147-53-3810.1186/1751-0147-53-38312671821672260
]Search in Google Scholar
[
43. Campioni F, Pitondo-Silva A, Bergamini AM, Falcao JP: Comparison of four molecular methods to type Salmonella Enteritidis strains. APMIS 2015, 123:422-426 doi:10.1111/apm.1236710.1111/apm.1236725703542
]Search in Google Scholar
[
44. Papadopoulos T, Petridou E, Zdragas A, Mandilara G, Nair S, Peters T, Chattaway M, de Pinna E, Passiotou M, Vatopoulos A: Comparative study of all Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis strains isolated from food and food animals in Greece from 2008 to 2010 with clinical isolates. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2016, 35:741-746.10.1007/s10096-016-2591-226864044
]Search in Google Scholar
[
45. Cao Y, Shen Y, Cheng L, Zhang X, Wang C, Wang Y, Zhou X, Chao G, Wu Y: Combination of multilocus sequence typing and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis reveals an association of molecular clonality with the emergence of extensive-drug resistance (XDR) in Salmonella. Microbiol Res 2018, 207:170-176.10.1016/j.micres.2017.12.00129458851
]Search in Google Scholar
[
46. Wang J, Li J, Liu F, Cheng Y, Su J: Characterization of Salmonella enterica Isolates from Diseased Poultry in Northern China between 2014 and 2018. Pathogens 2020, 9:95.10.3390/pathogens9020095716867132033063
]Search in Google Scholar
[
47. Saitou N, Nei M: The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987, 4:406-425.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
48. Felsenstein J : Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985, 39:783-791.10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00420.x28561359
]Search in Google Scholar
[
49. Tamura K: Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions when there are strong transition-transversion and G + C-content biases. Mol Biol Evol 1992, 9:678-687.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
50. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K: MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 2018, 35:1547-1549.10.1093/molbev/msy096596755329722887
]Search in Google Scholar