This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Bishop, P., and Williams, L. (2012). The Temporary City. Routledge.BishopP.WilliamsL. (2012). The Temporary City. Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Till, K. E., and McArdle, R. (2015). The Improvisional City: Valuing Urbanity beyond the Chimera of Permanence. Irish Geography, 48(1), 37–68.TillK. E.McArdleR. (2015). The Improvisional City: Valuing Urbanity beyond the Chimera of Permanence. Irish Geography, 48(1), 37–68.Search in Google Scholar
Burgers, J. (2000). Urban landscapes on public space in the post-industrial city. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 15, 145–164.BurgersJ. (2000). Urban landscapes on public space in the post-industrial city. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 15, 145–164.Search in Google Scholar
Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid Modernity. Polity Press.BaumanZ. (2000). Liquid Modernity. Polity Press.Search in Google Scholar
Bauman, Z., and Tester, K. (2001). Conversations with Zygmunt Bauman. Cambridge: Polity Press.BaumanZ.TesterK. (2001). Conversations with Zygmunt Bauman. Cambridge: Polity Press.Search in Google Scholar
Urbaniak, M. (2014). Gorzki posmak płynnej nowoczesności. Wybrane zagadnienia z filozofii społecznej Zygmunta Baumana (eng.: The bitter aftertaste of liquid modernity. Selected issues from Zygmunt Bauman's social philosophy). KNUV, 42, 5–27.UrbaniakM. (2014). Gorzki posmak płynnej nowoczesności. Wybrane zagadnienia z filozofii społecznej Zygmunta Baumana (eng.: The bitter aftertaste of liquid modernity. Selected issues from Zygmunt Bauman's social philosophy). KNUV, 42, 5–27.Search in Google Scholar
Hou, J. (2020). Guerrilla urbanism: urban design and the practices of resistance. Urban design international, 25, 117–125.HouJ. (2020). Guerrilla urbanism: urban design and the practices of resistance. Urban design international, 25, 117–125.Search in Google Scholar
Koolhaas, R., and Mau, B. (1995). S, M, L, XL. The Monacelli Press.KoolhaasR.MauB. (1995). S, M, L, XL. The Monacelli Press.Search in Google Scholar
Tschumi, B. (1994). Event-Cities. Cambridge: MIT Press Ltd.TschumiB. (1994). Event-Cities. Cambridge: MIT Press Ltd.Search in Google Scholar
Rewers, E. (2005). POST-POLIS. Wstęp do filozofii ponowoczesnego miasta (eng: An introduction to the philosophy of the postmodern city). Kraków: Universitas.RewersE. (2005). POST-POLIS. Wstęp do filozofii ponowoczesnego miasta (eng: An introduction to the philosophy of the postmodern city). Kraków: Universitas.Search in Google Scholar
Gołębiewski, J. I. (2016). Perspektywy rewitalizacji Międzyodrza w Szczecinie przy zastosowaniu tymczasowych interwencji przestrzennych (eng.: Prospects for revitalisation of Międzyodrza in Szczecin using temporary spatial interventions.). Szczecin: Zachodniopomorski Uniwersytet Technologiczny (eng.: Szczecin: West Pomeranian University of Technology).GołębiewskiJ. I. (2016). Perspektywy rewitalizacji Międzyodrza w Szczecinie przy zastosowaniu tymczasowych interwencji przestrzennych (eng.: Prospects for revitalisation of Międzyodrza in Szczecin using temporary spatial interventions.). Szczecin: Zachodniopomorski Uniwersytet Technologiczny (eng.: Szczecin: West Pomeranian University of Technology).Search in Google Scholar
Martin, M., Hincks, S., and Deas, I. (2020). Temporary use in England's core cities: Looking beyond the exceptional. Urban Studies, 57(16), 3381–3401.MartinM.HincksS.DeasI. (2020). Temporary use in England's core cities: Looking beyond the exceptional. Urban Studies, 57(16), 3381–3401.Search in Google Scholar
Bosák, V., Slach, O., Nováček, A., and Krtička, L. (2020). Temporary use and brown-field regeneration in post-socialist context: From bottom-up governance to artists exploitation. European Planning Studies, 28(3), 604–626.BosákV.SlachO.NováčekA.KrtičkaL. (2020). Temporary use and brown-field regeneration in post-socialist context: From bottom-up governance to artists exploitation. European Planning Studies, 28(3), 604–626.Search in Google Scholar
O’Callaghan, C., and Lawton, P. (2015). Temporary Solutions? Vacant Space Policy and Strategies for ReUse in Dublin. Irish Geography, 48(1), 69–87.O’CallaghanC.LawtonP. (2015). Temporary Solutions? Vacant Space Policy and Strategies for ReUse in Dublin. Irish Geography, 48(1), 69–87.Search in Google Scholar
Lauermann, J. (2016). Temporary projects, durable outcomes: Urban development through failed Olympic bids? Urban Studies, 53(9), 1885–1901.LauermannJ. (2016). Temporary projects, durable outcomes: Urban development through failed Olympic bids?Urban Studies, 53(9), 1885–1901.Search in Google Scholar
Corner, J. (2006). Terra Fluxus [in:] The Landscape Urbanism Reader, Waldheim, C. [ed.], New York: Princeton Architectural Press.CornerJ. (2006). Terra Fluxus [in:] The Landscape Urbanism Reader, WaldheimC. [ed.], New York: Princeton Architectural Press.Search in Google Scholar
Galdini, R. (2019). Temporary uses in contemporary spaces. A European project in Rome. Cities, 96, 103–868.GaldiniR. (2019). Temporary uses in contemporary spaces. A European project in Rome. Cities, 96, 103–868.Search in Google Scholar
Oswalt, P., Overmeyer, K., and Misselwitz, P. (2013). Urban Catalyst: The Power of Temporary Use. Berlin: DOM publishers.OswaltP.OvermeyerK.MisselwitzP. (2013). Urban Catalyst: The Power of Temporary Use. Berlin: DOM publishers.Search in Google Scholar
Lehtovuori, P., and Ruoppila, S. (2012). Temporary uses as means of experimental urban planning. SAJ-Serbian Architectural Journal, 4(1), 29–54.LehtovuoriP.RuoppilaS. (2012). Temporary uses as means of experimental urban planning. SAJ-Serbian Architectural Journal, 4(1), 29–54.Search in Google Scholar
Andres, L., and Kraftl, P. (2021). New directions in theorizing temporary urbanisms: Adaptability, activation, and trajectory. Progress in Human Geography, 45(5), 1237–1253.AndresL.KraftlP. (2021). New directions in theorizing temporary urbanisms: Adaptability, activation, and trajectory. Progress in Human Geography, 45(5), 1237–1253.Search in Google Scholar
Chang, R. A., and Gerrits, L. (2022). What spatially stabilizes temporary use? A qualitative comparative analysis of 40 temporary use cases along synchronized stabilization trajectories. Cities, 130, 103–868.ChangR. A.GerritsL. (2022). What spatially stabilizes temporary use? A qualitative comparative analysis of 40 temporary use cases along synchronized stabilization trajectories. Cities, 130, 103–868.Search in Google Scholar
Andres, L. (2013). Differential spaces, power hierarchy, and collaborative planning: a critique of the role of temporary uses in shaping and making places. Urban Studies, 50(4), 759–775.AndresL. (2013). Differential spaces, power hierarchy, and collaborative planning: a critique of the role of temporary uses in shaping and making places. Urban Studies, 50(4), 759–775.Search in Google Scholar
Moore-Cherry, N., and McCarthy, L. (2016). Debating temporary uses for vacant urban sites: Insights for practice from a stakeholder workshop. Planning Practice and Research, 31(3), 347–357.Moore-CherryN.McCarthyL. (2016). Debating temporary uses for vacant urban sites: Insights for practice from a stakeholder workshop. Planning Practice and Research, 31(3), 347–357.Search in Google Scholar
Gorard, S. (2002). The Role of Secondary Data in Combining Methodological Approaches. Educational Review, 54(3), 231–237.GorardS. (2002). The Role of Secondary Data in Combining Methodological Approaches. Educational Review, 54(3), 231–237.Search in Google Scholar
Bednarowska, Z. (2015). Desk research – wykorzystanie potencjału danych zastanych w prowadzeniu badań marketingowych i społecznych (eng.: Desk research – harnessing the potential of foundational data in marketing and social research). Marketing i rynek (eng.: Marketing and the market), 7(2015), 18–26.BednarowskaZ. (2015). Desk research – wykorzystanie potencjału danych zastanych w prowadzeniu badań marketingowych i społecznych (eng.: Desk research – harnessing the potential of foundational data in marketing and social research). Marketing i rynek (eng.: Marketing and the market), 7(2015), 18–26.Search in Google Scholar
Moore-Cherry, N. (2017). Beyond art in ‘meanwhile spaces’: Temporary parks, urban governance, and the co-production of an urban area. The impact of artists on contemporary European urban development, 207–224.Moore-CherryN. (2017). Beyond art in ‘meanwhile spaces’: Temporary parks, urban governance, and the co-production of an urban area. The impact of artists on contemporary European urban development, 207–224.Search in Google Scholar
Sasser, J. (2016). Mike Lydon and Anthony Garcia, Tactical Urbanism: Short Term Action for Long Term Change. Washington, DC: Island Press.SasserJ. (2016). Mike Lydon and Anthony Garcia, Tactical Urbanism: Short Term Action for Long Term Change. Washington, DC: Island Press.Search in Google Scholar
Madsen, K. (2010). Kragh and Berglund. A+t. Vitoria-Gasteiz, 80–91.MadsenK. (2010). Kragh and Berglund. A+t. Vitoria-Gasteiz, 80–91.Search in Google Scholar
Kamvasinou, K. (2017). Short Term Projects, Long Term Ambitions: Facets of Transience in Two London Development Sites. Transience and Permanence in Urban Development, 65–83.KamvasinouK. (2017). Short Term Projects, Long Term Ambitions: Facets of Transience in Two London Development Sites. Transience and Permanence in Urban Development, 65–83.Search in Google Scholar
Samson, K. (2015). Aesthetic Performativity in Urban Design and Art. Engaging Spaces: Sites of Performance, Interaction, and Reflection, 292.SamsonK. (2015). Aesthetic Performativity in Urban Design and Art. Engaging Spaces: Sites of Performance, Interaction, and Reflection, 292.Search in Google Scholar
Deboosere, B., De Raeve, W., and Miessen, M. (2016). On Tempelhofer Feld. Spector Books.DeboosereB.De RaeveW.MiessenM. (2016). On Tempelhofer Feld. Spector Books.Search in Google Scholar
Roskamm, N. (2013). 4,000,000 m2 of Public Space: The Berlin “Tempelhofer Feld” and a Short Walk with Lefebvre and Laclau. In Public Space and the Challenges of Urban Transformation in Europe (pp. 63–77). Routledge.RoskammN. (2013). 4,000,000 m2 of Public Space: The Berlin “Tempelhofer Feld” and a Short Walk with Lefebvre and Laclau. In Public Space and the Challenges of Urban Transformation in Europe (pp. 63–77). Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
St Hill, C. (2019). This is Temporary: how transient projects are redefining architecture. Routledge.HillC.St (2019). This is Temporary: how transient projects are redefining architecture. Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Ataman, C., and Tuncer, B. (2022). Urban interventions and participation tools in urban design processes: a systematic review and thematic analysis (1995–2021). Sustainable Cities and Society, 76, 103–462.AtamanC.TuncerB. (2022). Urban interventions and participation tools in urban design processes: a systematic review and thematic analysis (1995–2021). Sustainable Cities and Society, 76, 103–462.Search in Google Scholar
Mackrodt, U. (2015). Cui bono? Die Pioniernutzungen auf dem Tempelhofer Feld in Berlin zwischen Partizipation, Stadtmarketing und Protest. Städtische Planungskulturen im Spiegel von Konflikten, Protesten und Initiativen, 277–302.MackrodtU. (2015). Cui bono? Die Pioniernutzungen auf dem Tempelhofer Feld in Berlin zwischen Partizipation, Stadtmarketing und Protest. Städtische Planungskulturen im Spiegel von Konflikten, Protesten und Initiativen, 277–302.Search in Google Scholar
SenStadt (Senatsverwaltung für Stadtentwicklung Berlin) (2010). Zwischen und Pioniernutzungen im Tempelhofer Park. Berlin.SenStadt (Senatsverwaltung für Stadtentwicklung Berlin) (2010). Zwischen und Pioniernutzungen im Tempelhofer Park. Berlin.Search in Google Scholar
Team Ideenwerkstatt Berlin (2008). Dokumentation Expertenkonferenz am 29. und 30. November 2007 im Flughafen Berlin-Tempelhof. Berlin.Team Ideenwerkstatt Berlin (2008). Dokumentation Expertenkonferenz am 29. und 30. November 2007 im Flughafen Berlin-Tempelhof. hBerlin.Search in Google Scholar
Huber, E. E. (2021). Wir schenken der Welt das Tempelhofer Feld. Praxismanual Situationsansatz: Ein Bildungskonzept für Pädagogik, Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, 295–323.HuberE. E. (2021). Wir schenken der Welt das Tempelhofer Feld. Praxismanual Situationsansatz: Ein Bildungskonzept für Pädagogik, Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, 295–323.Search in Google Scholar
Leonhard, S. (2016). Das Tempelhofer Feld-Partizipationsprozess und Bewertung der Nachnutzungskonzepte (Doctoral dissertation, Hochschule für Technik und Wirtschaft Berlin).LeonhardS. (2016). Das Tempelhofer Feld-Partizipationsprozess und Bewertung der Nachnutzungskonzepte (Doctoral dissertation, Hochschule für Technik und Wirtschaft Berlin).Search in Google Scholar
Roskamm, N., and Karge, T. (2010). Grand opening Tempelhofer Feld. Berlin: Universitätsverlag der Technischen Universität Berlin.RoskammN.KargeT. (2010). Grand opening Tempelhofer Feld. Berlin: Universitätsverlag der Technischen Universität Berlin.Search in Google Scholar
Schönball, R. (2012). Tempelhofer Feld. Brennpunkt der Gentrifizierung. Der Tagesspiegel, 30.10.2012.SchönballR. (2012). Tempelhofer Feld. Brennpunkt der Gentrifizierung. Der Tagesspiegel, 30.10.2012.Search in Google Scholar
Dehne, M. (2015). Soziologie der Angst. Konzeptuelle Grundlagen, soziale Bedingungen und empirische Analysen, Wiesbaden, Springer Fachmedien.DehneM. (2015). Soziologie der Angst. Konzeptuelle Grundlagen, soziale Bedingungen und empirische Analysen, Wiesbaden, Springer Fachmedien.Search in Google Scholar
Colomb, C. (2012). Pushing the urban frontier: Temporary uses of space, city marketing, and the creative city discourse in 2000s Berlin. Journal of Urban Affairs, 34(2), 131–152.ColombC. (2012). Pushing the urban frontier: Temporary uses of space, city marketing, and the creative city discourse in 2000s Berlin. Journal of Urban Affairs, 34(2), 131–152.Search in Google Scholar
Chen, L., and Conroy, M. M. (2023). Vacant urban land temporary use and neighborhood sustainability: A comparative study of two Midwestern cities. Journal of Urban Affairs, 1–25.ChenL.ConroyM. M. (2023). Vacant urban land temporary use and neighborhood sustainability: A comparative study of two Midwestern cities. Journal of Urban Affairs, 1–25.Search in Google Scholar
Fabian, L., and Samson, K. (2016). Claiming participation–a comparative analysis of DIY urbanism in Denmark. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 9(2), 166–184.FabianL.SamsonK. (2016). Claiming participation–a comparative analysis of DIY urbanism in Denmark. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 9(2), 166–184.Search in Google Scholar
Römer, A., and Aït Sidhoum, N. (2013). Low Tech Transgression: The Interventional Work of EXYZT. Architectural Design, 83(6), 66–69.RömerA.Aït SidhoumN. (2013). Low Tech Transgression: The Interventional Work of EXYZT. Architectural Design, 83(6), 66–69.Search in Google Scholar
Suau, C., Davidson, R., and Lascelles, M. (2011). DIY: Do It Yourself. In The Union Street Urban Orchard: A Case Study of Creative Interim Use.SuauC.DavidsonR.LascellesM. (2011). DIY: Do It Yourself. In The Union Street Urban Orchard: A Case Study of Creative Interim Use.Search in Google Scholar
Stevens, Q. (2018). Temporary uses of urban spaces: How are they understood as “creative”? Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 12(3), 90.StevensQ. (2018). Temporary uses of urban spaces: How are they understood as “creative”? Archnet-IJAR:International Journal of Architectural Research, 12(3), 90.Search in Google Scholar
Priemus, H. (2004). The path to successful urban renewal: Current policy debates in the Netherlands. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 19, 199–209.PriemusH. (2004). The path to successful urban renewal: Current policy debates in the Netherlands. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 19, 199–209.Search in Google Scholar
Pratt, A. C., and Hutton, T. A. (2013). Reconceptualizing the Relationship between the Creative Economy and the City: Learning from the Financial Crisis. Cities, 33, 86–95.PrattA. C.HuttonT. A. (2013). Reconceptualizing the Relationship between the Creative Economy and the City: Learning from the Financial Crisis. Cities, 33, 86–95.Search in Google Scholar
Ferreri, M. (2015). The seductions of temporary urbanism. Ephemera, 15(1), 181–191.FerreriM. (2015). The seductions of temporary urbanism. Ephemera, 15(1), 181–191.Search in Google Scholar
Bragaglia, F., and Rossignolo, C. (2021). Temporary urbanism as a new policy strategy: a contemporary panacea or a trojan horse? International planning studies, 26(4), 370–386.BragagliaF.RossignoloC. (2021). Temporary urbanism as a new policy strategy: a contemporary panacea or a trojan horse?International planning studies, 26(4), 370–386.Search in Google Scholar
Sandler, D. (2020). Correction to: Grassroots urbanism in contemporary São Paulo. Urban Design International, 25, 137–151.SandlerD. (2020). Correction to: Grassroots urbanism in contemporary São Paulo. Urban Design International, 25, 137–151.Search in Google Scholar
Madanipour, A. (2018). Temporary use of space: Urban processes between flexibility, opportunity, and precarity. Urban Studies, 55(5), 1093–1110.MadanipourA. (2018). Temporary use of space: Urban processes between flexibility, opportunity, and precarity. Urban Studies, 55(5), 1093–1110.Search in Google Scholar
Kamvasinou, K. (2017). Temporary intervention and long term legacy: lessons from London case studies. Journal of Urban Design, 22(2), 187–207.KamvasinouK. (2017). Temporary intervention and long term legacy: lessons from London case studies. Journal of Urban Design, 22(2), 187–207.Search in Google Scholar
Schultz, M., and Hernes, T. (2020). The temporal interplay between strategy and identity: Punctuated, subsumed, and sustained modes. Strategic Organization, 18(1), 106–135.SchultzM.HernesT. (2020). The temporal interplay between strategy and identity: Punctuated, subsumed, and sustained modes. Strategic Organization, 18(1), 106–135.Search in Google Scholar