[
Aga, D. A. (2024). Servant leadership and megaproject citizenship behavior: the mediating role of psychological ownership. International Journal of Project Organization and Management, 16(3), 369-395. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPOM.2024.140411
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16, 74-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bauer, T. N., & Erdogan, B. (2010). Organizational socialization: The effective onboarding of new employees. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 3: Maintaining, expanding, and contracting the organization, pp. 51-64). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/12171-002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238-246. https://escholarship.org/content/qt6cn677bx/qt6cn677bx_noSplash_b9df979f3ecdc02abc5cd3e918f387bb.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bradt, G. B., & Vonnegut, M. (2009). Onboarding: How to get your new employees up to speed in half the time. John Wiley & Sons.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230-258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124192021002005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Caldwell, B. G., & Caldwell, C. (2016). Ten classic onboarding errors: Violations of the HRM – employee relationship. Business and Management Research, 5(4), 47-55. https://doi.org/10.5430/bmr.v5n4p47
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Caldwell, C., & Peters, R. (2016). New employee onboarding – psychological contracts and ethical perspectives. Journal of Management Development, 37(1), 27-39. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-10-2016-0202
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cedeno, M. R., Baxter, W., Porat, T., & Peck, J. (2023). A method for prescribing psychological ownership: A project handover case study. In G. Castini (Ed.), Proceedings of the design society (Vol. 3, pp. 251-262). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2023.26
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cesário, F., & Chambel, M. J. (2019). On-boarding new employees: A three-component perspective of welcoming. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 27(5), 1465-1479. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-08-2018-1517
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling techniques. John Wiley & Sons. https://archive.org/details/cochran-1977-sampling-techniques
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Colvin, S. B. (2023). Improving the new hire experience through the development of human-centered onboarding practices (Dissertation in practice in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Education, University of Dayton). http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=dayton167958405594539
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cropanzano, R., Anthony, E. L., Daniels, S. R., & Hall, A. V. (2017). Social exchange theory: A critical review with theoretical remedies. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 479-516. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2015.0099
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Van Dyne, L., & Pierce, J. L. (2004). Psychological ownership and feelings of possession: Three field studies predicting employee attitudes and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(4), 439-459. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.249
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning. https://eli.johogo.com/Class/CCU/SEM/_Multivariate%20Data%20Analysis_Hair.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hu, L.-t., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kegans, L., McCamey, R. B., & Hammond, H. (2012). Organizational citizenship behavior and work experience. Hospital Topics, 90(3), 74-81. https://doi.org/10.1080/00185868.2012.721699
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Klein, H. J., & Polin, B. (2012). Are organizations on board with best practices onboarding. In C. R. Wanberg (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of organizational socialization (pp. 267-287). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199763672.013.0014
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Publications. https://dl.icdst.org/pdfs/files4/befc0f8521c770249dd18726a917cf90.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kumar, J., & Chandra, P. (2023). Exploring psychological mechanisms behind tourists’ sustainable behaviors at homestays. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 32(12), 2500-2517. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2023.2289005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Liu, S., Watts, D., Feng, J., Wu, Y., & Yin, J. (2024). Unpacking the effects of socialization programs on newcomer retention: A meta-analytic review of field experiments. Psychological Bulletin, 150(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000422
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McKinsey & Company. (2023). The State of Organizations 2023. https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/business%20functions/people%20and%20organizational%20performance/our%20insights/the%20state%20of%20organizations%202023/the-state-of-organizations-2023.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mia, M. M., Majri, Y., & Rahman, I. K. A. (2019). Covariance based-structural equation modeling (CB-SEM) using AMOS in management research. Journal of Business and Management, 21(1), 56-61. https://iosrjournals.org/iosr-jbm/papers/Vol21-issue1/Series-2/J2101025661.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Millward, L. J., & Hopkins, L. J. (1998). Psychological contracts, organizational and job commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 28(16), 1530-1556. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01689.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nabeel, D. M., Ullah, A., Nazir, M. W., Khan, S. A., & Khan, S. Z. (2023). Impact of green HRM practices on green volunteer behavior: Mediation of psychological ownership. Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), 12(2), 366-371. https://doi.org/10.61506/01.00009
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2010). The relationships of age with job attitudes: A meta‐analysis. Personnel Psychology, 63(3), 677-718. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01184.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pappas, P. (2023). A qualitative approach: Digital onboarding success factors based on employee-related outcomes (Master Thesis, Tilburg University). https://arno.uvt.nl/show.cgi?fid=162863
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Park, C. H., Song, J. H., Yoon, S. W., & Kim, J. (2013). A missing link: Psychological ownership as a mediator between transformational leadership and organizational citizenship behavior. Human Resource Development International, 16(5), 558-574. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2013.839510
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. T. (2001). Toward a theory of psychological ownership in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 298-310. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4378028
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers’ trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 1(2), 107-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(90)90009-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26(3), 513-563. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600307
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Powers, D. H. (2023). Human resources onboarding strategies influence on psychological contract fulfillment, trust, and commitment for contingent workers (Doctoral dissertation, Grand Canyon University).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rahmayanti, N., & Kurniawan, J. E. (2020). Relationship between person job fit and psychological ownership in the successor of family business. KnE Social Sciences, 4(3), 64-71. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v4i3.6377
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rodeghero, P., Zimmermann, T., Houck, B., & Ford, D. (2021, May). Please turn your cameras on: Remote onboarding of software developers during a pandemic. In 2021 IEEE/ACM 43rd International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice (ICSE-SEIP) (pp. 41-50). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE-SEIP52600.2021.00013
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rollag, K., Parise, S., & Cross, R. (2005). Getting new hires up to speed quickly. MIT Sloan Management Review, 46(2), 35-41. https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/getting-new-hires-up-to-speed-quickly/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Saks, A. M., & Gruman, J. A. (2011). Organizational socialization and positive organizational behavior: Implications for theory, research, and practice. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 28(1), 14-26. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.169
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Scheepers, D., & Ellemers, N. (2019). Social identity theory. In K. Sassenberg & M. L. W. Vliek (Eds.), Social psychology in action: Evidence‐based interventions from theory to practice (pp. 129-143). Universiteit Leiden. https://scholarlypublications.universiteitleiden.nl/access/item%3A2981336/view
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Santhanam, G., & Balaji, K. D. (2023). Remote onboarding effectiveness in Indian IT industry during the pandemic. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 8(5), e01457. https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i5.1457
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Santos, G. G., Pinho, J. C., Ferreira, A. P., & Vieira, M. (2024). Psychological contract breach and organizational citizenship behaviors: The moderating role of contract type. Management Research Review, 47(1), 18-44. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-06-2022-0440
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Suwanti, S., Udin, U., & Widodo, W. (2018). Person-organization fit, person-job fit, and innovative work behavior: The role of organizational citizenship behavior. International Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 6(3), 146-159. https://www.scribd.com/document/436939185/Person-Organization-Fit-Person-Job-Fit-And-Innovative-Work-Behavior-the-Role-of-Organizational-Citizenship-Behavior
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ucar, A. C., Alpkan, L., & Elci, M. (2021). The effects of person–organization fit and turnover intention on employees’ creative behavior: The mediating role of psychological ownership. Sage Open, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211066924
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Williamson Yarbrough, J., & Ramos Salazar, L. (2023). Virtual onboarding and socialization, an exploration of employee discussions and experiences. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 28(5), 707-723. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-12-2022-0158
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zhang, Y., Liu, G., Zhang, L., Xu, S., & Cheung, M. W. L. (2021). Psychological ownership: A meta-analysis and comparison of multiple forms of attachment in the workplace. Journal of Management, 47(3), 745-770. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320917195
]Search in Google Scholar