Login
Register
Reset Password
Publish & Distribute
Publishing Solutions
Distribution Solutions
Subjects
Architecture and Design
Arts
Business and Economics
Chemistry
Classical and Ancient Near Eastern Studies
Computer Sciences
Cultural Studies
Engineering
General Interest
Geosciences
History
Industrial Chemistry
Jewish Studies
Law
Library and Information Science, Book Studies
Life Sciences
Linguistics and Semiotics
Literary Studies
Materials Sciences
Mathematics
Medicine
Music
Pharmacy
Philosophy
Physics
Social Sciences
Sports and Recreation
Theology and Religion
Publications
Journals
Books
Proceedings
Publishers
Blog
Contact
Search
EUR
USD
GBP
English
English
Deutsch
Polski
Español
Français
Italiano
Cart
Home
Journals
Vision Rehabilitation International
Volume 4 (2011): Issue 1 (January 2011)
Open Access
The Centrality of O&M in Rehabilitation Programs Designed to Enhance Quality of Life: A Structural Equation Modelling Analysis
Polly Yeung
Polly Yeung
,
Steven La Grow
Steven La Grow
,
Andrew Towers
Andrew Towers
,
Fiona Alpass
Fiona Alpass
and
Christine Stephens
Christine Stephens
| Jan 01, 2011
Vision Rehabilitation International
Volume 4 (2011): Issue 1 (January 2011)
About this article
Previous Article
Next Article
Abstract
Article
Figures & Tables
References
Authors
Articles in this Issue
Preview
PDF
Cite
Share
Published Online:
Jan 01, 2011
Page range:
10 - 20
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21307/ijom-2011-002
© 2011 Polly Yeung et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Table 1.
Rotated factor loadings for the three-factor solution for life satisfaction scale (n = 356).
Table 2.
Fit indices for the confirmatory factor analysis for the life satisfaction scale.
Figure 1.
The initial model of structural relations between total health conditions, the three life satisfaction scores, ability to get around, and quality of life.
Figure 2.
The alternative and final model of structural relations between total number of diagnosed health conditions, three-construct of life satisfaction scale, ability to get around, and quality of life.
Table 3.
Fit index of the initial model and the alternative model.
Table 4.
Factor loadings, construct reliability, total pathway effects, variance explained and goodness of fit indexes for the final model.
Table 5.
Direct, indirect and total effects (Beta coefficients) illustrating the effect size for each predictor variable on quality of life.