Login
Register
Reset Password
Publish & Distribute
Publishing Solutions
Distribution Solutions
Subjects
Architecture and Design
Arts
Business and Economics
Chemistry
Classical and Ancient Near Eastern Studies
Computer Sciences
Cultural Studies
Engineering
General Interest
Geosciences
History
Industrial Chemistry
Jewish Studies
Law
Library and Information Science, Book Studies
Life Sciences
Linguistics and Semiotics
Literary Studies
Materials Sciences
Mathematics
Medicine
Music
Pharmacy
Philosophy
Physics
Social Sciences
Sports and Recreation
Theology and Religion
Publications
Journals
Books
Proceedings
Publishers
Blog
Contact
Search
EUR
USD
GBP
English
English
Deutsch
Polski
Español
Français
Italiano
Cart
Home
Journals
International Journal of Advanced Network, Monitoring and Controls
Volume 6 (2021): Issue 3 (January 2021)
Open Access
Design and Analysis of a Robotic Arm for a Commercial Flight Simulator
El-Sadi Haifa
El-Sadi Haifa
and
John Connolly
John Connolly
| Feb 22, 2022
International Journal of Advanced Network, Monitoring and Controls
Volume 6 (2021): Issue 3 (January 2021)
About this article
Previous Article
Next Article
Abstract
Article
Figures & Tables
References
Authors
Articles in this Issue
Preview
PDF
Cite
Share
Published Online:
Feb 22, 2022
Page range:
72 - 77
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21307/ijanmc-2021-030
Keywords
Simulator
,
CAD
,
Stress
,
Robot
© 2021 El-Sadi Haifa et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.
Basic robot configuration
Figure 2.
(a) Shoulder and arm function (simulated translational motion), (b) Gyroscopic wrist function (rotational motion)
Figure 3.
Robot Components (A-F) Robot Joints (0-4)
Figure 4.
Simulator Isometric view (a) Labeled components (b)
Figure 5.
Pitch wrist cross section and structure
Figure 6.
Robot Cross Section
Figure 7.
Different versions of cockpit
Figure 8.
Mesh details for the pitch wrist component (version A)
Figure 9.
Stress analysis of version A
Figure 10.
Stress analysis of version B
Figure 11.
Stress analysis of version C
Figure 12.
Gravity Loading Minimum Factor of Safety
Max simulator acceleration results
Simulator
Configuration
Maximum System
Acceleration
Version A
5.11g
Version B
3.21g
Version C
2.00g