TWO MEASURES OF THE DEPENDENCE OF PREFERENTIAL RANKINGS ON CATEGORICAL VARIABLES

Balinski, Michel, Laraki, Rida. (2010). Majority Judgment: Measuring, Ranking, and Electing. Cambridge: The MIT Press. Search in Google Scholar

Can, Burak. (2014). Weighted distances between preferences. Journal of Mathematical Economics 51, 109-115. 10.1016/j.jmateco.2014.01.002Search in Google Scholar

Charon, Irene, Hudry, Olivier. (2010). An updated survey on the linear ordering problem for weighted or unweighted tournaments. Annals of Operation Research 175, 107-158. 10.1007/s10479-009-0648-7Search in Google Scholar

Elkind, Edith, Faliszewski, Piotr, Slinko, Arkadii. (2012). Rationalizations of Condorcet-consistent rules via distances of hamming type. Social Choice and Welfare 39, 891-905. 10.1007/s00355-011-0555-0Search in Google Scholar

Erdamar, Bora. (2013). Informational Frameworks for Collective Decision Making: “A Suggested Compromise”. Economics and Finances. Ecole Polytechnique X. PhD Thesis. Search in Google Scholar

Guilbaud, Georges-Théodule. (1952). Les théories de l’intérêt général et le problème logique de l’agrégation. Economie Appliquée 5(4), 501-584. Complete English translation in Electronic Journ@l for History of Probability and Statistics 4.1, 2008. 10.3406/ecoap.1952.3831Search in Google Scholar

Hamming, Richard W. (1950). Error Detecting and Error Correcting Codes. The Bell System Technical Journal 29, 147-160. 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1950.tb00463.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Kemeny, John G. (1959). Mathematics without numbers. Daedalus 88, 577-591. Search in Google Scholar

Kemeny, John G., Snell, Laurie. (1962).Mathematical Models in the Social Sciences. New York: Ginn. Search in Google Scholar

Lissowski, Grzegorz. (1974a). Statystyczny opis zbioru uporządkowań preferencyjnych (Statistical description of a set of preferential rankings). Prakseologia Nr 3-4 (51-52), 379-413. Search in Google Scholar

Lissowski, Grzegorz. (1974b). Statistical laws and prediction. The Polish Sociological Bulletin No 2, 23-37. Search in Google Scholar

Lissowski, Grzegorz. (1976). Interpretation of statistical measures. The Polish Sociological Bulletin. Special issue. Studies in Methodology, 89-111. Search in Google Scholar

Lissowski, Grzegorz. (1977). Statistical association and prediction. In K. Szaniawski (ed.), Problems of Formalization in the Social Sciences. 217-245.Warszawa: Ossolineum. Search in Google Scholar

Lissowski, Grzegorz. (2000). Metody agregacji indywidualnych preferencji (The methods of aggregation of individual preferences). Studia Socjologiczne No 1-2 (156-157), 79-103. Search in Google Scholar

Lissowski, Grzegorz, Haman, Jacek, Jasiński, Mikołaj. (2011). Podstawy statystyki dla socjologow. Tom 1. Opis statystyczny, Tom 2. Zależności statystyczne, Tom 3. Wnioskowanie statystyczne. (Fundamentals of Statistics for Sociologists. Vol. 1. Statistical Description, Vol. 2. Statistical Association, Vol. 3.Search in Google Scholar

Statistical Inference). Seria Wykłady z Socjologii. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe “Scholar”. Second edition. Search in Google Scholar

Lissowski, Grzegorz, Swistak, Piotr. (1995). Choosing the best social order: new principles of justice and normative dimensions of choice. American Political Science Review 89, 74-96. 10.2307/2083076Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Meskanen, Tommi, Nurmi Hannu. (2006). Distance from consensus: a theme and variations. In B. Simeone and P. Pukelsheim (eds.), Mathematics and Democracy. Recent Advances in Voting Systems and Collective Choice. 117-132. Berlin: Springer. Search in Google Scholar

McLean, Iain. (1990). The Borda and Condorcet principles: Three Medieval applications. Social Choice and Welfare 7, 99-108. 10.1007/BF01560577Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Monjardet, Bernard. (2008). “Math´ematique Sociale” and mathematics. A case study: Condorcet’s effect and medians. Electronic Journ@l for History of Probability and Statistics 4.1. Search in Google Scholar

Nurmi, Hannu. (2014). Are we done with preference rankings? If we are, then what? http://www.utu.fi/yksikot/soc/yksikot/pcrc/Documents/Nurmioct2014.pdf Internet: 26-02-2015.Search in Google Scholar

Young, H. Peyton. (1988). Condorcet’s theory of voting. American Political Science Review 82, 1231-1244. 10.2307/1961757Search in Google Scholar

Young, H. Peyton, Levenglick, A. (1978). A consistent extension of Condorcet’s election principle. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics 35 (2), 285-300.10.1137/0135023Open DOISearch in Google Scholar