Open Access

MRI reduces variation of contouring for boost clinical target volume in breast cancer patients without surgical clips in the tumour bed

, , , , , , , ,  and   
Mar 17, 2017

Cite
Download Cover

(A) Generalized conformity index (CIgen) and (B) accuracy index (AI) as a function of the cavity visualization score (CVS) for CT and MRI based contouring of lumpectomy cavity clinical target volume. None of the patients had surgical clips inserted in the tumor bed. Case numbers are indicated for each modality.
(A) Generalized conformity index (CIgen) and (B) accuracy index (AI) as a function of the cavity visualization score (CVS) for CT and MRI based contouring of lumpectomy cavity clinical target volume. None of the patients had surgical clips inserted in the tumor bed. Case numbers are indicated for each modality.
CT and MRI based contouring in two examples with high and low cavity visualization scores (CVS). Observers’ delineations are white and expert consensus (EC) contours black. (A) Case with a CVS of 4.8 on CT and 5 on MRI: mean generalized conformity index (CIgen), accuracy index (AI) and inter-delineation distance (IDD) were 0.79, 0.85 and 2.4 mm on CT and 0.80, 0.86 and 2.2 mm on MRI. (B) Case with a CVS of 2 on CT and 3 on MRI: mean CIgen, AI and IDD were 0.46, 0.61 and 6 mm for CT and 0.63, 0.73 and 4.5 mm for MRI.
CT and MRI based contouring in two examples with high and low cavity visualization scores (CVS). Observers’ delineations are white and expert consensus (EC) contours black. (A) Case with a CVS of 4.8 on CT and 5 on MRI: mean generalized conformity index (CIgen), accuracy index (AI) and inter-delineation distance (IDD) were 0.79, 0.85 and 2.4 mm on CT and 0.80, 0.86 and 2.2 mm on MRI. (B) Case with a CVS of 2 on CT and 3 on MRI: mean CIgen, AI and IDD were 0.46, 0.61 and 6 mm for CT and 0.63, 0.73 and 4.5 mm for MRI.

Accuracy index (AI) and inter-delineation distances (IDD), based on the expert consensus (EC) delineation as the reference_ The differences in AI and IDD between CT and MRI were statistically significant (p < 0_05)

CTMRI
Case
IDD [mm]AIIDD [mm]AI
MeanSDCoV [%]MeanSDCoV [%]Mean(SD)CoV [%]MeanSDCoV [%]
12.10.8380.880.0231.80.58320.880.012
23.61.9530.780.1123.21.9590.830.023
33.92.6670.670.07103.21.8560.780.022
42.31430.750.0682.30.9390.770.056
564670.610.15244.52.1470.730.1420
62.61.1420.820.0222.61380.830.022
764.1680.640.09143.61.8500.760.057
82.41.2500.850.0222.21450.860.044
932.9970.810.0452.91.8620.800.056
104.53.5780.770.0793.32610.840.022
113.32610.740.09122.51.3520.830.023
123.42.3680.770.0683.61.7470.800.022
MEAN3.62.3610.760.07931.5490.810.045

Results for inter-observer variation in contouring_ The difference in mean generalized conformity index (CIgen) between the CT and MRI based contouring was statistically significant (p = 0_007)

CaseCTMRI
Mean V [cm3] (SD)CoV [%]CIgenMean V [cm3] (SD)CoV [%]CIgen
1198 (10)50.85106 (4)40.87
2241 (37.5)160.69256 (28)110.77
3108 (20.7)190.56125 (10)80.75
475 (18.1)240.6492 (12)130.69
5175 (47.9)270.46217 (68)310.63
6140 (10.1)70.76125 (14)110.76
7103(39.7)390.4864 (2)40.66
8180 (22.5)120.79158 (14)90.8
9135 (19.8)150.77126 (20)160.71
10204 (44.3)220.68215 (19)90.76
1199 (14.4)150.66135 (11)80.79
12195 (27.3)140.69210 (29)140.74
MEAN (SD)154 (26)180.67 (0.12)152 (19)120.74 (0.07)
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
4 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Medicine, Clinical Medicine, Radiology, Internal Medicine, Haematology, Oncology