Comparison of treatment plans: a retrospective study by the method of radiobiological evaluation

[1] Yu CX. Intensity modulated arc therapy: A new method for delivering conformal radiation therapy. The theory & practice of intensity modulated radiation therapy. Madison, WI: Advanced Medical Publishing; 1997:107-20.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Mavroidis P, Lind BK, Brahme A. Biologically effective uniform dose (D) for specification, report and comparison of dose response relations and treatment plans. Phys Med Biol. 2001;46(10):2607-2630.10.1088/0031-9155/46/10/307Search in Google Scholar

[3] Mohan R, Wang X, Jackson A, et al. The potential and limitations of the inverse radiotherapy technique. Radiother Oncol. 1994;32(3):232-348.10.1016/0167-8140(94)90023-XSearch in Google Scholar

[4] Vineberg KA, Eisbruch A, Coselmon MM, et al. Is uniform target dose possible in IMRT plans in the head and neck? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002;52(5):1159-1172.10.1016/S0360-3016(01)02800-0Search in Google Scholar

[5] Miften MM, Das SK, Su M, et al. A dose-volume based tool for evaluating and ranking IMRT treatment plans. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2004;5(4):1-14.10.1120/jacmp.v5i4.1981Search in Google Scholar

[6] Mayo C, Yorke E, Merchant TE. Radiation associated brainstem injury. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76(3Suppl):S36-S41.10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.078Search in Google Scholar

[7] Mayo C, Martel MK, Marks LB, et al. Radiation dose–volume effects of optic nerves and chiasm. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76(3Suppl):S28-S35.10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.07.1753Search in Google Scholar

[8] Kirkpatrick JP, van der Kogel AJ, Schultheiss TE. Radiation dose-volume effects in the spinal cord. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76(3Suppl):S42-S49.10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.04.095Search in Google Scholar

[9] Bhandare N, Jackson A, Eisbruch A, et al. Radiation therapy and hearing loss. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76(3Suppl):S50-S57.10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.04.096Search in Google Scholar

[10] Emami B, Lyman J, Brown A, et al. Tolerance of normal tissue to therapeutic irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1991;21(1):109-122.10.1016/0360-3016(91)90171-YSearch in Google Scholar

[11] Rubin P. Law and order of radiation sensitivity: absolute versus relative. In: Vaeth JM, Meyer JL, eds. Frontiers of radiation therapy and oncology. Basel: Karger;1989:7-40.10.1159/000416568Search in Google Scholar

[12] Deasy JO, Moiseenko V, Marks L, et al. Radiotherapy dose–volume effects on salivary gland function. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76(3Suppl):S58-S63.10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.06.090Search in Google Scholar

[13] Lawton CA, Michalski J, El-Naqa I, et al. RTOG GU Radiation oncology specialists reach consensus on pelvic lymph node volumes for high-risk prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;74(2):383-387.10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.08.002Search in Google Scholar

[14] Viswanathan AN, Yorke ED, Marks LB, et al. Radiation dose–volume effects of the urinary bladder. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76(3Suppl):S116-S122.10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.02.090Search in Google Scholar

[15] Michalski JM, Gay H, Jackson A, et al. Radiation dose–volume effects in radiation-induced rectal injury. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76(3Suppl):S123-S129.10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.03.078Search in Google Scholar

[16] Niemierko A. Reporting and analyzing dose distributions: a concept of equivalent uniform dose. Med Phys. 1997;24(1):103-110.10.1118/1.598063Search in Google Scholar

[17] Thames HD, Zhang M, Tucker SL, et al. Cluster models of dose–volume effects. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys.. 2004;59(5):1491-1504.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Lyman JT. Complication probability as assessed from dose-volume histograms. Radiat Res Suppl. 1985;8:S13-S19.10.2307/3583506Search in Google Scholar

[19] Niemierko A, Goitein M. Modeling of normal tissue response to radiation: the critical volume model. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1993;25(1):135-145.10.1016/0360-3016(93)90156-PSearch in Google Scholar

[20] Anbumani S, Raj NA, Prabhakar GS, et al. Quantification of uncertainties in conventional plan evaluation methods in Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy. J BUON. 2014;19(1):297-303.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Gay HA, Niemierko A. A free program for calculating EUD-based NTCP and TCP in external beam radiotherapy. Physica Medica. 2007;23(3):115-125.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Niemierko A. A generalized concept of equivalent uniform dose (EUD). Med Phys. 1999;26(6):1100.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Oinam AS, Singh L, Shukla A, et al. Dose volume histogram analysis and comparison of different radiobiological models using in-house developed software. J Med Phys. 2011;36(4):220-229.10.4103/0971-6203.89971324973322228931Search in Google Scholar

[24] Rana S, Cheng C. Radiobiological impact of planning techniques for prostate cancer in terms of tumor control probability and normal tissue complication probability. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2015;4(2):167-172.10.4103/2141-9248.129023399193424761232Search in Google Scholar

[25] Jaganathan A, Tiwari M, Phansekar R, et al. Intensity-modulated radiation to spare neural stem cells in brain tumors: a computational platform for evaluation of physical and biological dose metrics. J Cancer Res Ther. 2011;7(1):58-63.10.4103/0973-1482.8046321546744Search in Google Scholar

[26] Kehwar TS. Analytical approach to estimate normal tissue complication probability using best fit of normal tissue tolerance doses into the NTCP equation of the linear quadratic model. J Cancer Res Ther. 2005;1(3):168-179.10.4103/0973-1482.1959717998649Search in Google Scholar

[27] Rana S, Rogers K. Radiobiological evaluation of dose calculation algorithms in Rapid Arc planning of esophageal cancer treatment plans. J Solid Tumors. 2013;3(3):44-52.10.5430/jst.v3n3p44Search in Google Scholar

[28] Akpati HC, Kim C, Kim B, et al. Unified dosimetry index (UDI): a figure of merit for ranking treatment plans. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2008;9(3):99-108.10.1120/jacmp.v9i3.2803572229818716596Search in Google Scholar