1. bookVolume 9 (2016): Issue 2 (December 2016)
    Openness, Transparency and Ethics in Public Administration: Do they Support Each Other?
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1338-4309
ISSN
1337-9038
First Published
03 Aug 2009
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Exploring the Determinants of Transparency of Slovak Municipalities

Published Online: 30 Dec 2016
Volume & Issue: Volume 9 (2016) - Issue 2 (December 2016) - Openness, Transparency and Ethics in Public Administration: Do they Support Each Other?
Page range: 121 - 145
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1338-4309
ISSN
1337-9038
First Published
03 Aug 2009
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

This paper focuses on the transparency of Slovak municipalities. It identifies the main trends in the transparency of the 100 largest Slovak municipalities between 2010 and 2014. It shows that there are different degrees of transparency in Slovak municipalities, and it applies regressions to explore correlates and identify the main factors behind this state. This research is descriptive and explanatory and adds to literature by examining political, structural factors related to the political supply of the transparency of the municipalities and the convergence effect. The regression analysis identifies the convergence effect, according to which the transparency of municipalities improves inversely to their initial score. It also finds a negative incumbency effect that indicates lower improvement for incumbent mayors than for new ones. The size of a municipality is also one of the factors that determine the transparency level of that municipality. This relationship is positive – greater size of a municipality increases the level of its transparency.

Keywords

Adsera, A., C. Boix and M. Payne. 2003. “Are you being Served ? Political Accountability and Quality of Government.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 19(2), 445 – 490.Search in Google Scholar

Banisar, D. 2004. “Global Survey: Freedom of Information and Access to Government Record Laws around the World.” The Freedominfo.org. Publisher not identified.Search in Google Scholar

Bannister, F. and R. Connolly. 2011. “The Trouble with Transparency: A Critical Review of Openness in e-Government.” Policy & Internet 3(1), 1 – 30.Search in Google Scholar

Beynon-Davies, P. 2007. “Models for e-Government.” Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy 1(1), 7 – 28.Search in Google Scholar

Birkinshaw, Patrick. 2006. “Freedom of information and openness: Fundamental human rights ?”Administrative Law Review 58, no. 1, 177 – 218.Search in Google Scholar

Chadwick, A. and C. May. 2003. “Interaction between States and Citizens in the Age of the Internet: ‘e-Government’ in the United States, Britain, and the European Union.” Governance-Oxford 16(2), 271 – 300.Search in Google Scholar

Christensen, L. T. and J. Cornelissen. 2015. “Organizational Transparency as Myth and Metaphor.” European Journal of Social Theory 18(2), 132 – 149.Search in Google Scholar

Cox, W. G. and N. J. Katz. 1996. “Why Did the Incumbency Advantage in U.S. House Elections Grow ?” Journal of Political Science 40(2), 478 – 497.Search in Google Scholar

Curtin, D. and A. Meijer. 2006. “Does Transparency Strengthen Legitimacy ?” Information Polity 11(2), 109 – 122.Search in Google Scholar

Curtin, G. G., M. H. Sommer and V. Vis-Sommer (eds). 2003. “The World of E-Government.” Journal of Political Marketing 2(3 / 4), pages: 1 – 16.Search in Google Scholar

Eurostat. 2015. “Households: Level of Internet Access.” Available at http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Information_society_statistics_-_households_and_individuals (last accessed 02 / 05 / 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Eurostat. 2014. “Internet Use and Frequency of Use.” Available at http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Internet_and_cloud_services_-_statistics_on_the_use_by_individuals (last accessed 09 / 06 / 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Florini, Ann. 2009. “The right to know: transparency for an open world”. Columbia University Press,Search in Google Scholar

Gordon, C. S. and D. Landa. 2009. “Do the Advantages of Incumbency Advantage Incumbents ?” The Journal of Politics 71(4), 1481 – 1498.Search in Google Scholar

Grimmelikhuijsen, S. G. and E. W. Welch. 2012. “Developing and Testing a Theoretical Framework for Computer-Mediated Transparency of Local Governments.” Public Administration Review 78(1), 562 – 571.Search in Google Scholar

Grosse, C. U. 2002. “Managing Communication within Virtual Intercultural Teams.” Business Communication Quarterly 65(4), 22 – 38.Search in Google Scholar

Hansen, H. K., L. T. Christensen and M. Flyverbom. 2015. “Logics of Transparency in Late Modernity: Metaphors, Power and Paradoxes.” European Journal of Social Theory 18(2), 117 – 131.Search in Google Scholar

Hood, Ch. 2006. Transparency in Historical Perspective. In: Hood, Ch. and Heald, D. (eds.). Transparency: the Key to Better Governance ?. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 3 – 23.10.5871/bacad/9780197263839.003.0001Search in Google Scholar

Inglehart, R. 1985. “Aggregate Stability and Individual-Level Flux in Mass Belief Systems: The Level of Analysis Paradox.” American Political Science Review 79, 97 – 116.Search in Google Scholar

International Budget Partnership. 2015. The Open Budget Survey 2015. Available at: http://www.internationalbudget.org/wp-content/uploads/OBS2015-Report-English.pdf (last accessed 10 / 06 / 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Islam, R. 2003. “Do more Transparent Governments Govern Better ?” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3077.10.1596/1813-9450-3077Search in Google Scholar

Khagram, S. et al. (eds). 2013. Open Budgets: The Political Economy of Transparency, Participation and Accountability. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.Search in Google Scholar

Láštic, E. 2008. “Zákon o slobodnom prístupe k informáciám ako protikorupčný nástroj.” In E. Sičáková-Beblavá and M. Beblavý. 2008: 11 statočných. Bratislava: Transparency International Slovensko, 192 – 215.Search in Google Scholar

Lowatcharin, G. and Ch. E. Menifield. 2015. “Determinants of Internet-Enabled Transparency at the Local Level: A Study of Midwestern County Web Sites.” State and Local Government Review 47, 102 – 115.Search in Google Scholar

McNeal, R., C. Tolbert, K. Mossberger and L. Dotterweich. 2003. “Innovating in Digital Government in the American States.” Social Science Quarterly 84(1), 52 – 70.Search in Google Scholar

Margetts, H. 2011. “The Internet and Transparency.” The Political Quarterly 82(4), 518 – 521.Search in Google Scholar

Meijer, A. 2009. “Understanding Modern Transparency.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 75(2), 255 – 269.Search in Google Scholar

Ministry of Finance in Slovakia. 2016. Public Administration Budget 2016 – 2018. Bratislava: Ministry of Finance.Search in Google Scholar

Moon, M. J. 2002. “The Evolution of e-Government among Municipalities: Rhetoric or Reality ?” Public Administration Review 62(4), 424 – 433.Search in Google Scholar

Mussa, A., P. Bebič and P. Durman. 2015. “Transparency and Openness in Local Governance: A Case of Croatian Cities.” HKJU – CCPA 15(2), 415 – 450.Search in Google Scholar

Nižňanský, V. (ed.). 2005. Decentralizácia na Slovensku: Bilancia nekonečného príbehu 1995 – 2005. Bratislava: Považská tlačiareň.Search in Google Scholar

Norman, S. M., B. J. Avolio and F. Luthans. 2010. “The Impact of Positivity and Transparency on Trust in Leaders and their Perceived Effectiveness.” The Leadership Quarterly 21, 350 – 364.Search in Google Scholar

Norris, D. F. and M. J. Moon. 2005. “Advancing e-Government at the Grassroots: Tortoise or Hare ?” Public Administration Review VOL. 65 64 – 75.10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00431.xSearch in Google Scholar

OECD. 1999. European Principles for Public Administration. SIGMA Papers 27, Paris: OECD.Search in Google Scholar

Oliver, R. 2004. What is Transparency. New York: McGraw-Hill.Search in Google Scholar

Pina, V., L. Torres and S. Royo. 2010. “Is Egovernment Leading to more Accountable and Transparent Local Governments ? An Overall View.” Financial Accountability & Management 26(1), 3 – 20.Search in Google Scholar

Pina, V., L. Torres and S. Royo. 2007. “Are ICTs Improving Transparency and Accountability in the EU Regional and Local Governments ? An Empirical Study.” Public Administration 85(2), 449 – 472.Search in Google Scholar

Piotrowski, S. J. and G. G. Van Ryzin. 2007. “Citizen Attitudes toward Transparency in Local Government.” The American Review of Public Administration 37(3), 306 – 323.Search in Google Scholar

Piotrowski, S. J. (2010). Transparency and secrecy: A reader linking literature and contemporary debate. Lexington Books, 2010.Search in Google Scholar

Prat, A. (2006). The more closely we are watched, the better we behave ?. In: Hood, C. – Heald,, D. (eds.): Transparency: The key to Better Governance ? Oxford: Oxford University Press,10.5871/bacad/9780197263839.003.0006Search in Google Scholar

Radin, B. 2002. The Accountable Juggler: The Art of Leadership in a Federal Agency. Washington DC: CQ Press.10.4135/9781483345215Search in Google Scholar

Rawlings, B. 2009. “Give the Emperor a Mirror: Toward Developing a Stakeholder Measurement of Organizational Transparency.” Journal of Public Relations Research 21(1), 71 – 99.Search in Google Scholar

Rothstein, B. 2005. Social Traps and the Problem of Trust. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511490323Search in Google Scholar

Scott, J. K. 2006. “‘E’ the People: Do US Municipal Government Web Sites Support Public Involvement ?” Public Administration Review 66(3), 341 – 353.Search in Google Scholar

Schnackenberg, Andrew K., and Edward C. Tomlinson (2014). “Organizational transparency a new perspective on managing trust in organization-stake-holder relationships.” Journal of Management: 0149206314525202.Search in Google Scholar

Sloboda, M. 2015. Slovak Mayors as Managers: The Case Study in Slovak Cities. 23rd NISPAcee Annual Conference. Bratislava: NISPAcee Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sloboda, M. 2014. “Women’s Participation and Incumbency Advantage in Slovak Cities: The Case Study of Mayoral Elections in Slovakia.” Socialiniai tyrimai / Social Research 3(36), 101 – 111.Search in Google Scholar

Statistics Office. 2014. “Election to the Bodies of Communal Self-Government.” Available at http://slovak.statistics.sk/ (last accessed 10 / 06 / 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Strathern, M. 2000. “The Tyranny of Transparency.” _British Educational Research Journal 26(3), 309 – 321.Search in Google Scholar

Swianiewicz, P. (Ed.). 2003. Consolidation or Fragmentation ? The Size of Local Governments in Central and Eastern Europe (Local Government Initiative). Budapest: Central European University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Transparency International. 2012. Money, Politics, Power: Corruption Risks in Europe. Available at: https://issuu.com/transparencyinternational/docs/corruption_risks_in_europe?backgroundColor= (last accessed 10 / 06 / 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Transparency International Slovakia. 2014. Transparency and Openness of Cities. Available at: http://mesta2014.transparency.sk/sk/sets/mesta-2014 (last accessed 10 / 06 / 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Vishwanath, T. and D. Kaufmann. 1999. Towards Transparency in Finance and Governance. Available at SSRN 258978.Search in Google Scholar

Welch, E. W. and Ch. C. Hinnant. 2002. Internet Use, Transparency, and Interactivity Effects on Trust in Government. Proceedings of the 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE Computer Society.10.1109/HICSS.2003.1174323Search in Google Scholar

Williams, C. C. (2008) “Toward a taxonomy of corporate reporting strategies.” Journal of Business Communication 45.3: 232 – 264.10.1177/0021943608317520Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo