[Adsera, A., C. Boix and M. Payne. 2003. “Are you being Served ? Political Accountability and Quality of Government.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 19(2), 445 – 490.]Search in Google Scholar
[Banisar, D. 2004. “Global Survey: Freedom of Information and Access to Government Record Laws around the World.” The Freedominfo.org. Publisher not identified.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bannister, F. and R. Connolly. 2011. “The Trouble with Transparency: A Critical Review of Openness in e-Government.” Policy & Internet 3(1), 1 – 30.]Search in Google Scholar
[Beynon-Davies, P. 2007. “Models for e-Government.” Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy 1(1), 7 – 28.]Search in Google Scholar
[Birkinshaw, Patrick. 2006. “Freedom of information and openness: Fundamental human rights ?”Administrative Law Review 58, no. 1, 177 – 218.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chadwick, A. and C. May. 2003. “Interaction between States and Citizens in the Age of the Internet: ‘e-Government’ in the United States, Britain, and the European Union.” Governance-Oxford 16(2), 271 – 300.]Search in Google Scholar
[Christensen, L. T. and J. Cornelissen. 2015. “Organizational Transparency as Myth and Metaphor.” European Journal of Social Theory 18(2), 132 – 149.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cox, W. G. and N. J. Katz. 1996. “Why Did the Incumbency Advantage in U.S. House Elections Grow ?” Journal of Political Science 40(2), 478 – 497.]Search in Google Scholar
[Curtin, D. and A. Meijer. 2006. “Does Transparency Strengthen Legitimacy ?” Information Polity 11(2), 109 – 122.]Search in Google Scholar
[Curtin, G. G., M. H. Sommer and V. Vis-Sommer (eds). 2003. “The World of E-Government.” Journal of Political Marketing 2(3 / 4), pages: 1 – 16.]Search in Google Scholar
[Eurostat. 2015. “Households: Level of Internet Access.” Available at http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Information_society_statistics_-_households_and_individuals (last accessed 02 / 05 / 2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[Eurostat. 2014. “Internet Use and Frequency of Use.” Available at http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Internet_and_cloud_services_-_statistics_on_the_use_by_individuals (last accessed 09 / 06 / 2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[Florini, Ann. 2009. “The right to know: transparency for an open world”. Columbia University Press,]Search in Google Scholar
[Gordon, C. S. and D. Landa. 2009. “Do the Advantages of Incumbency Advantage Incumbents ?” The Journal of Politics 71(4), 1481 – 1498.]Search in Google Scholar
[Grimmelikhuijsen, S. G. and E. W. Welch. 2012. “Developing and Testing a Theoretical Framework for Computer-Mediated Transparency of Local Governments.” Public Administration Review 78(1), 562 – 571.]Search in Google Scholar
[Grosse, C. U. 2002. “Managing Communication within Virtual Intercultural Teams.” Business Communication Quarterly 65(4), 22 – 38.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hansen, H. K., L. T. Christensen and M. Flyverbom. 2015. “Logics of Transparency in Late Modernity: Metaphors, Power and Paradoxes.” European Journal of Social Theory 18(2), 117 – 131.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hood, Ch. 2006. Transparency in Historical Perspective. In: Hood, Ch. and Heald, D. (eds.). Transparency: the Key to Better Governance ?. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 3 – 23.10.5871/bacad/9780197263839.003.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Inglehart, R. 1985. “Aggregate Stability and Individual-Level Flux in Mass Belief Systems: The Level of Analysis Paradox.” American Political Science Review 79, 97 – 116.]Search in Google Scholar
[International Budget Partnership. 2015. The Open Budget Survey 2015. Available at: http://www.internationalbudget.org/wp-content/uploads/OBS2015-Report-English.pdf (last accessed 10 / 06 / 2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[Islam, R. 2003. “Do more Transparent Governments Govern Better ?” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3077.10.1596/1813-9450-3077]Search in Google Scholar
[Khagram, S. et al. (eds). 2013. Open Budgets: The Political Economy of Transparency, Participation and Accountability. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Láštic, E. 2008. “Zákon o slobodnom prístupe k informáciám ako protikorupčný nástroj.” In E. Sičáková-Beblavá and M. Beblavý. 2008: 11 statočných. Bratislava: Transparency International Slovensko, 192 – 215.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lowatcharin, G. and Ch. E. Menifield. 2015. “Determinants of Internet-Enabled Transparency at the Local Level: A Study of Midwestern County Web Sites.” State and Local Government Review 47, 102 – 115.]Search in Google Scholar
[McNeal, R., C. Tolbert, K. Mossberger and L. Dotterweich. 2003. “Innovating in Digital Government in the American States.” Social Science Quarterly 84(1), 52 – 70.]Search in Google Scholar
[Margetts, H. 2011. “The Internet and Transparency.” The Political Quarterly 82(4), 518 – 521.]Search in Google Scholar
[Meijer, A. 2009. “Understanding Modern Transparency.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 75(2), 255 – 269.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ministry of Finance in Slovakia. 2016. Public Administration Budget 2016 – 2018. Bratislava: Ministry of Finance.]Search in Google Scholar
[Moon, M. J. 2002. “The Evolution of e-Government among Municipalities: Rhetoric or Reality ?” Public Administration Review 62(4), 424 – 433.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mussa, A., P. Bebič and P. Durman. 2015. “Transparency and Openness in Local Governance: A Case of Croatian Cities.” HKJU – CCPA 15(2), 415 – 450.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nižňanský, V. (ed.). 2005. Decentralizácia na Slovensku: Bilancia nekonečného príbehu 1995 – 2005. Bratislava: Považská tlačiareň.]Search in Google Scholar
[Norman, S. M., B. J. Avolio and F. Luthans. 2010. “The Impact of Positivity and Transparency on Trust in Leaders and their Perceived Effectiveness.” The Leadership Quarterly 21, 350 – 364.]Search in Google Scholar
[Norris, D. F. and M. J. Moon. 2005. “Advancing e-Government at the Grassroots: Tortoise or Hare ?” Public Administration Review VOL. 65 64 – 75.10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00431.x]Search in Google Scholar
[OECD. 1999. European Principles for Public Administration. SIGMA Papers 27, Paris: OECD.]Search in Google Scholar
[Oliver, R. 2004. What is Transparency. New York: McGraw-Hill.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pina, V., L. Torres and S. Royo. 2010. “Is Egovernment Leading to more Accountable and Transparent Local Governments ? An Overall View.” Financial Accountability & Management 26(1), 3 – 20.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pina, V., L. Torres and S. Royo. 2007. “Are ICTs Improving Transparency and Accountability in the EU Regional and Local Governments ? An Empirical Study.” Public Administration 85(2), 449 – 472.]Search in Google Scholar
[Piotrowski, S. J. and G. G. Van Ryzin. 2007. “Citizen Attitudes toward Transparency in Local Government.” The American Review of Public Administration 37(3), 306 – 323.]Search in Google Scholar
[Piotrowski, S. J. (2010). Transparency and secrecy: A reader linking literature and contemporary debate. Lexington Books, 2010.]Search in Google Scholar
[Prat, A. (2006). The more closely we are watched, the better we behave ?. In: Hood, C. – Heald,, D. (eds.): Transparency: The key to Better Governance ? Oxford: Oxford University Press,10.5871/bacad/9780197263839.003.0006]Search in Google Scholar
[Radin, B. 2002. The Accountable Juggler: The Art of Leadership in a Federal Agency. Washington DC: CQ Press.10.4135/9781483345215]Search in Google Scholar
[Rawlings, B. 2009. “Give the Emperor a Mirror: Toward Developing a Stakeholder Measurement of Organizational Transparency.” Journal of Public Relations Research 21(1), 71 – 99.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rothstein, B. 2005. Social Traps and the Problem of Trust. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511490323]Search in Google Scholar
[Scott, J. K. 2006. “‘E’ the People: Do US Municipal Government Web Sites Support Public Involvement ?” Public Administration Review 66(3), 341 – 353.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schnackenberg, Andrew K., and Edward C. Tomlinson (2014). “Organizational transparency a new perspective on managing trust in organization-stake-holder relationships.” Journal of Management: 0149206314525202.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sloboda, M. 2015. Slovak Mayors as Managers: The Case Study in Slovak Cities. 23rd NISPAcee Annual Conference. Bratislava: NISPAcee Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sloboda, M. 2014. “Women’s Participation and Incumbency Advantage in Slovak Cities: The Case Study of Mayoral Elections in Slovakia.” Socialiniai tyrimai / Social Research 3(36), 101 – 111.]Search in Google Scholar
[Statistics Office. 2014. “Election to the Bodies of Communal Self-Government.” Available at http://slovak.statistics.sk/ (last accessed 10 / 06 / 2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[Strathern, M. 2000. “The Tyranny of Transparency.” _British Educational Research Journal 26(3), 309 – 321.]Search in Google Scholar
[Swianiewicz, P. (Ed.). 2003. Consolidation or Fragmentation ? The Size of Local Governments in Central and Eastern Europe (Local Government Initiative). Budapest: Central European University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Transparency International. 2012. Money, Politics, Power: Corruption Risks in Europe. Available at: https://issuu.com/transparencyinternational/docs/corruption_risks_in_europe?backgroundColor= (last accessed 10 / 06 / 2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[Transparency International Slovakia. 2014. Transparency and Openness of Cities. Available at: http://mesta2014.transparency.sk/sk/sets/mesta-2014 (last accessed 10 / 06 / 2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[Vishwanath, T. and D. Kaufmann. 1999. Towards Transparency in Finance and Governance. Available at SSRN 258978.]Search in Google Scholar
[Welch, E. W. and Ch. C. Hinnant. 2002. Internet Use, Transparency, and Interactivity Effects on Trust in Government. Proceedings of the 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE Computer Society.10.1109/HICSS.2003.1174323]Search in Google Scholar
[Williams, C. C. (2008) “Toward a taxonomy of corporate reporting strategies.” Journal of Business Communication 45.3: 232 – 264.10.1177/0021943608317520]Search in Google Scholar