1. bookVolume 9 (2016): Issue 2 (December 2016)
    Openness, Transparency and Ethics in Public Administration: Do they Support Each Other?
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1338-4309
ISSN
1337-9038
First Published
03 Aug 2009
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

The Ambiguous Meaning of the Ethical Issue in a Context of NPM Reforms: Insights from the OECD, Canada and France

Published Online: 30 Dec 2016
Volume & Issue: Volume 9 (2016) - Issue 2 (December 2016) - Openness, Transparency and Ethics in Public Administration: Do they Support Each Other?
Page range: 93 - 119
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1338-4309
ISSN
1337-9038
First Published
03 Aug 2009
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

An important interest in public-administration ethics has been expressed in OECD member states since the 1990s in reaction to the development of New Public Management (NPM) reforms. However, the meanings attached to the ethical issue in a context of managerial modernization remain ambiguous depending on the country and / or time period studied. Therefore, this article aims at underlining the main characteristics of administrative ethics thanks to the creation of a theoretical concept which summarizes them. The latter can also serve as an analytical grid to engage in further research and especially comparisons between varying national cases.

For that purpose, the analysis is divided in two parts and draws insights from the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Canada and France, through a review of major official reports and a series of interviews with public officials and experts in charge of these questions. First of all, it concentrates on the OECD’s historical activities on public-sector ethics in order to devise a theoretical concept of administrative ethics. The utility and relevance of this concept is then tested while being implemented to compare the Canadian and French governments’ overall interest in ethics in their process of public-management reform.

The article distinguishes two key dimensions of public-administration ethics, namely the managerial and normative ones, which are strongly intertwined. On the one hand, the managerial dimension focuses on the management of civil servants’ daily behaviors and combines the compliance-based and integrity-based approaches to govern conducts in public administration. On the other hand, the normative dimension refers to the normative framework incorporating the core principles and values which define civil servants’ professional identities and guide their specific missions and goals within the democratic system.

The historical comparison of major trends in terms of administrative ethics in Canada and France shows, finally, that, despite national characteristics, the two countries have tended progressively to deal with the ethical issue in a more comprehensive way. They are trying to take into account, for example, problems due to conflicts of public values and combine compliance-based and integrity-based instruments of ethics management. These evolutions shed light more generally on the movement of hybridization, incorporating elements from traditional public administration and New Public Management, which seems to develop in both states.

Keywords

Bezes, Philippe. 2009. Réinventer l’Etat. Les réformes de l’administration française (1962 – 2008). Paris: Presses universitaires de France. Collection le lien social.Search in Google Scholar

Bezes, Philippe and Gilles Jeannot. 2011. “The Development and Current Features of the French Civil Service System.” In Frits Van Der Meer (ed.). Civil Service Systems in Western Europe. 2nd ed. Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar, 56 – 62.Search in Google Scholar

Boisvert, Yves (ed.). 2011a. Ethique et gouvernance publique: Principes, enjeux et défis. Montréal: Liber.Search in Google Scholar

Boisvert, Yves. 2011b. L’institutionnalisation de l’éthique gouvernementale: Quelle place pour l’éthique ? Québec: Presses de l’Université du Québec.10.2307/j.ctv18pgktsSearch in Google Scholar

Boisvert, Yves, Magalie Jutras, Georges A. Legault, Allison Marchildon and Louis Côté. 2003. Petit manuel d’éthique appliquée à la gestion publique. Montréal: Liber.Search in Google Scholar

Boltanski, Luc and Eve Chiapello. 2011. Le nouvel esprit du capitalisme. 2nd ed. Paris: Gallimard. Collection Tel.Search in Google Scholar

Canada. 1987. Governing Values: Report of the Committee on Governing Values. Ottawa: Ministry of Supply and Services Canada.Search in Google Scholar

Canada. 1990. Fonction publique 2000: Rapport du groupe d’étude sur la formation et le perfectionnement. Ottawa: Conseil du Trésor. 23 juillet.Search in Google Scholar

Canada. 2001. Building on a Strong Foundation – The Dialogue Continues volume II. Ottawa: Canadian Centre for Management Development.Search in Google Scholar

Canada. 2003. Values and Ethics Code for the Public Sector. Ottawa: Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat.Search in Google Scholar

Canada. 2011. Values and Ethics Code for the Public Sector. Ottawa: Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat.Search in Google Scholar

Chambon, François and Olivier Gaspon. 1996. La déontologie administrative. Paris: Librairie générale de droit et de jurisprudence.Search in Google Scholar

Christensen, Tom. 2012. “Post-NPM and Changing Public Governance.” Meiji Journal of Political Science and Economics 1, 1 – 11.Search in Google Scholar

Cooper, Terry. 2001. “The Emergence of Administrative Ethics as a Field of Study in the United States.” In Terry Cooper (ed.). Handbook of Administrative Ethics. 2nd ed. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc., 1 – 36.Search in Google Scholar

Cox III, Raymond (ed.). 2009. Ethics and Integrity in Public Administration: Concepts and Cases. New York: ME Sharpe.Search in Google Scholar

De Graaf, Gjalt and Zeger Van Der Wal. 2009. “Introduction: The Need for Methodological Rigor and Diversity in Administrative Ethics.” Public Integrity 11(1), 5 – 8.Search in Google Scholar

De Graaf, Gjalt and Zeger Van Der Wal. 2010. “Managing Conflicting Public Values: Governing with Integrity and Effectiveness.” The American Review of Public Administration 40(6), 623 – 630.Search in Google Scholar

De Graaf, Gjalt and Hester Paanakker. 2015. “Good Governance: Performance Values and Procedural Values in Conflict.” The American Review of Public Administration 45(6), 635 – 652.Search in Google Scholar

Dwivedi, O. P. and John Halligan. 2003. “The Canadian Public Service: Balancing Values and Management.” In John Halligan (ed.). Civil Service Systems in Anglo-American Countries. Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar, 148 – 173.Search in Google Scholar

France. Commissariat Général du Plan. 1989. Le pari de la responsabilité. Rapport de la commission Efficacité de l’Etat présidée par François de Closets. Paris: La Documentation Française.Search in Google Scholar

France. Commissariat Général du Plan. 1993. Pour un Etat stratège, garant de l’intérêt général. Rapport de la commission Etat, administration et services publics de l’an 2000 présidée par Christian Blanc. Paris: La Documentation Française.Search in Google Scholar

France. Conseil d’Etat. 1999. L’intérêt général. Rapport public 1999. Paris: La Documentation Française. Etudes et documents no. 50.Search in Google Scholar

France. Conseil d’Etat. 2013. Le droit souple. Etude annuelle 2013. Paris: La Documentation Française. Les rapports du Conseil d’Etat no. 64.Search in Google Scholar

France. Assemblée Nationale. 2015. Projet de loi relatif à la déontologie et aux droits et obligations des fonctionnaires. Adopté par l’Assemblée Nationale en première lecture. Session ordinaire de 2015 – 2016, 7 octobre. Available at http://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/14/ta/ta0594.asp (last accessed 25 January 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Hassenteufel, Patrick. 2005. “De la comparaison internationale à la comparaison transnationale: Les déplacements de la construction d’objets comparatifs en matière de politiques publiques.” Revue française de science politique 55(1), 113 – 132.Search in Google Scholar

Hood, Christopher. 1991. “A Public Management for all Seasons ?” Public Administration 69(1), 3 – 19.Search in Google Scholar

Huberts, Leo. 2014. The Integrity of Governance. What It Is, What We Know, What Is Done, and Where To Go. New York: Palgrave MacMillan. IIAS Series: Governance and Public Management.Search in Google Scholar

Kelly, Joanne. 2000. “Budgeting and Program Review in Canada 1994 – 2000.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 59(3), 72 – 78.Search in Google Scholar

Kernaghan, Kenneth. 1996. The Ethics Era in Canadian Public Administration. Ottawa: Canadian Centre for Management Development. Research paper 19. June.Search in Google Scholar

Kernaghan, Kenneth. 2007. Une vocation spéciale: valeurs, éthique et professionnalisme de la fonction publique. Ottawa: Agence de gestion des ressources humaines de la fonction publique du Canada.Search in Google Scholar

Kickert, Walter (ed.). 2008. The Study of Public Management in Europe and the US: A Comparative Analysis of National Distinctiveness. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Kolthoff, Emile. 2007. Ethics and New Public Management: Empirical Research into the Effects of Businesslike Government on Ethics and Integrity. The Hague: BJU Legal Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Kolthoff, Emile, Leo Huberts and Hans Van Den Heuvel. 2007. “The Ethics of New Public Management: Is Integrity at Stake ?” Public Administration Quarterly 30(4), 399 – 439.Search in Google Scholar

Lascoumes, Pierre. 1999. Corruptions. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.Search in Google Scholar

Lynch, Cynthia E. and Thomas D. Lynch. 2011. “Public Sector Value and Virtue and the OECD.” In Michiel S. De Vries and Pan Suk Kim (eds.). Value and Virtue in Public Administration: A Comparative Perspective. London: Palgrave Macmillan. IIAS Series: Governance and Public Management, 241 – 255.Search in Google Scholar

Maesschalck, Jeroen. 2004. “The Impact of NPM Reforms on Public Servants’ Ethics: Towards a Theory.” Public Administration 82(2), 465 – 489.Search in Google Scholar

Maesschalck, Jeroen. 2005. “Approaches to Ethics Management in the Public Sector: A Proposed Extension of the Compliance-Integrity Continuum.” Public Integrity 7(1), 21 – 41.Search in Google Scholar

Mény, Yves. 1992. La corruption de la République. Paris: Fayard.Search in Google Scholar

Menzel, Donald C. 2001. “Ethics Management in Public Organizations. What, Why and How ?” In Terry Cooper (ed.). Handbook of Administrative Ethics. 2nd ed. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc., 355 – 366.Search in Google Scholar

Merrien, François-Xavier. 1999. “La Nouvelle Gestion Publique: un concept mythique.” Lien social et Politiques 41, 95 – 103.Search in Google Scholar

Niquège, Sylvain. 2014. “Discipline et déontologie: de l’art et des manières de faire corps.” In Charles Fortier (ed.). Le statut général des fonctionnaires: trente ans, et après ? Paris: Dalloz, 279 – 290.Search in Google Scholar

OECD. 1995. Governance in Transition: Public Management Reforms in OECD Countries. Paris: OECD Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

OECD. 1996. Ethics in the Public Service: Current Issues and Practices. Paris: OECD Publishing. Public Management Occasional Papers 14.Search in Google Scholar

OECD. 2000. Trust in Government: Ethics Measures in OECD Countries. Paris: OECD Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

OECD. Public Management Service. 1994. Summary record of the 9th meeting of the public management committee held at the Château de la Muette, Paris on 7 – 8 April. Paris. Drafted on 25 May and distributed on 3 August. PUMA / M(94)1.Search in Google Scholar

OECD. Public Management Service. 1995. Meeting of senior officials from centres of government on the impacts of globalisation on policy making. Maintaining ethics in public service: the role of the centre. Meeting to be held at Eigtveds Pakhus, Copenhagen on 28 – 29 September. Paris. 22 August. PUMA / MPM(95)6.Search in Google Scholar

OECD. Public Managenement Service. 1996. Summary record of the 14th meeting of the public management committee on 30 – 31 October. Paris. Distributed on 5 December. PUMA / M(96)2.Search in Google Scholar

OECD. Public Management Service. 1997. Realignment and public sector ethics: the neglected management problem in the new public administration. Paper written by Stuart Gilman for the Symposium “Ethics in the Public Sector: Challenges and Opportunities for OECD Countries” to be held at the OECD, Château de la Muette, Paris on 3 – 4 November 1997. Paris. Distributed on 6 October. PUMA / ETH(97)11.Search in Google Scholar

OECD. Public Governance and Territorial Development Directorate. 2009. Towards a Sound Integrity Framework: Instruments, Processes, Structures and Conditions for Implementation. Paris. 23 April. GOV / PGC / GF(2009)1.Search in Google Scholar

Ongaro, Edoardo. 2009. Public Management Reform and Modernization Trajectories of Administrative Change in Italy, France, Greece, Portugal and Spain. Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar.Search in Google Scholar

Pal, Leslie. 2009. “The OECD and Global Public Management Reform.” Croatian Public Administration 9(4), 1057 – 1089.Search in Google Scholar

Pal, Leslie. 2012. Frontiers of Governance. The OECD and Global Public Management Reform. London: Palgrave MacMillan.Search in Google Scholar

Pêcheur, Bernard. 2013. Rapport à Monsieur le Premier ministre sur la fonction publique. Paris: La Documentation Française.Search in Google Scholar

Peters, Tom and Robert Waterman. 1982. In Search of Excellence: Lessons from America’s Best-Run Companies. New York: Harper & Row.Search in Google Scholar

Picq, Jean. 1994. L’Etat en France: Servir une nation ouverte sur le monde. Rapport de la mission sur les responsabilités et l’organisation de l’Etat. Paris: La Documentation Française.Search in Google Scholar

Pollitt, Christopher and Geert Bouckaert. 2011. Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis – New Public Management, Governance and The Neo-Weberian State. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Rohr, John. 1976. “The Study of Ethics in the PA Curriculum.” Public Administration Review 36(4), 398 – 406.Search in Google Scholar

Rohr, John. 1978. Ethics for Bureaucrats: An Essay on Law and Values. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc.Search in Google Scholar

Sauvé, Jean-Marc, Didier Migaud and Jean-Claude Magendie. 2011. Pour une nouvelle déontologie de la vie publique. Rapport de la Commission de réflexion pour la prévention des conflits d’intérêts dans la vie publique. Paris: La Documentation Française.Search in Google Scholar

Silicani, Jean-Ludovic. 2008. Livre blanc sur l’avenir de la fonction publique: faire des services publics et de la fonction publique des atouts pour la France. Paris: La Documentation française.Search in Google Scholar

Tait, John. 1996. A Strong Foundation: Report of the Task Force on Public Service Values and Ethics. Ottawa: Canadian Centre for Management Development.Search in Google Scholar

Truchet, Didier. 2010. “Le besoin de déontologie.” AJDA 38, 2129.Search in Google Scholar

Vigouroux, Christian. 2006. Déontologie des fonctions publiques. Paris: Dalloz.Search in Google Scholar

Weber, Max. 1965. “L’objectivité de la connaissance dans les sciences et la politique sociales.” Essais sur la théorie de la science. Premier essai. Paris: Plon. no. 19.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo