1. bookVolume 10 (2017): Issue 2 (December 2017)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1313-9053
First Published
08 Sep 2014
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Open Access

Intrafetal Laser Coagulation for Trap Sequence in a Complicated Dichorionic Triamniotic Triplet Pregnancy Case Report and Review of the Literature

Published Online: 30 Jun 2018
Volume & Issue: Volume 10 (2017) - Issue 2 (December 2017)
Page range: 146 - 150
Received: 29 Nov 2017
Accepted: 27 Feb 2018
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1313-9053
First Published
08 Sep 2014
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English

1. Moore TR, Gale S, Benirschke K. Perinatal outcome of forty -nine pregnancies complicated by acardiac twinning. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990;163(3):907-12.10.1016/0002-9378(90)91094-SSearch in Google Scholar

2. Aston KI, Peterson CM, Carrell DT. Monozygotic twinning associated with assisted reproductive technologies: a review. Reproduction. 2008;136(4):377-86.10.1530/REP-08-0206Search in Google Scholar

3. Vitthala S, Gelbaya TA, Brison DR, Fitzgerald CT, Nardo LG. The risk of monozygotic twins after assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2009;15(1):45-55.10.1093/humupd/dmn045Search in Google Scholar

4. Sebire NJ, Snijders RJ, Hughes K, Sepulveda W, Nicolaides KH. The hidden mortality of monochorionic twin pregnancies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997;104(10):1203-0.10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb10948.xSearch in Google Scholar

5. Van Allen MI, Smith DW, Shepard TH. Twin reversed arterial perfusion (TRAP) sequence: a study of 14 twin pregnancies with acardius. Semin Perinatol. 1983;7(4):285-93.Search in Google Scholar

6. Robie GF, Payne GG, Morgan MA. Selective delivery of an acardiac, acephalic twin. N Engl J Med. 1989;320(8):512-3.10.1056/NEJM198902233200808Search in Google Scholar

7. Chaveeva P, Poon LC, Sotiriadis A, Kosinski P, Nicolaides KH. Optimal method and timing of intrauterine intervention in twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence: case study and meta- analysis. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2014;35(4):267-79.10.1159/000358593Search in Google Scholar

8. Snijders RJ, Noble P, Sebire N, Souka A, Nicolaides KH. UK multicentre project on assessment of risk of trisomy 21 by maternal age and fetal nuchal-translucency thickness at 10-14 weeks of gestation. Fetal Medicine Foundation First Trimester Screening Group. Lancet. 1998;352(9125):343-6.10.1016/S0140-6736(97)11280-6Search in Google Scholar

9. Lewi L, Valencia C, Gonzalez E, Deprest J, Nicolaides KH. The outcome of twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence diagnosed in the first trimester. Am.J. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(3):213.e1-e4.10.1016/j.ajog.2010.04.01820522408Search in Google Scholar

10. Maiz N, Nicolaides KH. Ductus venosus in the first trimester: contribution to screening of chromosomal, cardiac defects and monochorionic twin complications. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2010;28(2):65-71.10.1159/00031403620571255Search in Google Scholar

11. Ville Y, Hyatt JA, Vandenbussche FPHA, Nicolaides KH: Endoscopic laser coagulation of umbilical cord vessels in twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1994;4(5):396-8.10.1046/j.1469-0705.1994.04050396.x12797148Search in Google Scholar

12. Chaveeva P, Kosinski P, Birdir C, Orosz L, Nicolaides KH. Embryo reduction in dichorionic triplets to dichorionic twins by intrafetal laser. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2014;35(2):83-6.10.1159/00035695024356669Search in Google Scholar

13. Chaveeva P, Peeva G, Pugliese SG, Shterev A, Nicolaides KH. Intrafetal laser ablation for embryo reduction from dichorionic triplets to dichorionic twins. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;50(5):632-4.10.1002/uog.1883428792107Search in Google Scholar

14. Chaveeva P, Kosinski P, Puglia D, Poon LC, Nicolaides KH. Trichorionic and dichorionic triplet pregnancies at 10-14 weeks: outcome after embryo reduction compared to expectant management. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2013;34(4):199- 205.10.1159/00035617024192576Search in Google Scholar

15. Skiadas CC, Missmer SA, Benson CB, Acker D, Racowsky C. Impact of selective reduction of the monochorionic pair in in vitro fertilization triplet pregnancies on gestational length. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(7):2930-1.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.05.03220646687Search in Google Scholar

16. Morlando M, Ferrara L, D’Antonio F, Lawin- O’Brien A, Sankaran S, Pasupathy D, et al. Dichorionic triplet pregnancies: risk of miscarriage and severe preterm delivery with fetal reduction versus expectant management. Outcomes of a cohort study and systematic review. BJOG. 2015;122(8):1053-60.10.1111/1471-0528.1334825851612Search in Google Scholar

17. van de Mheen L, Everwijn SM, Haak MC, Manten GT, Zondervan HA, Knapen MF, et al. Outcome of multifetal pregnancy reduction in women with a dichorionic triamniotic triplet pregnancy to a singleton pregnancy: a retrospective nationwide cohort study. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2016;40(2):94-9.10.1159/00044165026678498Search in Google Scholar

18. Abel JS, Flöck A, Berg C, Gembruch U, Geipel A. Expectant management versus multifetal pregnancy reduction in higher order multiple pregnancies containing a monochorionic pair and a review of the literature. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016;294(6):1167-73.10.1007/s00404-016-4145-327380181Search in Google Scholar

19. Abi-Nader K, Whitten SM, Filippi E, Scott R, Jauniaux E. Dichorionic triamniotic triplet pregnancy complicated by acardius acormus. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2009;26(1):45-9.10.1159/00023636019816031Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo