[Anthony, Laurence. 2011. AntConc Version 3.2.4 (online). Tokyo: Waseda University. Available at: http://www.antlab.sci.waseda.ac.jp (accessed July 2015).]Search in Google Scholar
[Atkinson, Dwight. 1997. A critical approach to thinking in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly 31: 71-94.10.2307/3587975]Search in Google Scholar
[Berry, Roger. 1991. Re-articulating the article. ELT Journal 45: 252-259.10.1093/elt/45.3.252]Search in Google Scholar
[Butler, Yuko. 2002. Second language learners’ theories on the use of English articles: An analysis of the metalinguistic knowledge used by Japanese students in acquiring the English article system. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24: 451-480.10.1017/S0272263102003042]Search in Google Scholar
[Conor-Linton, Jeff and Charlene Polio. 2014. Comparing perspectives on L2 writing: Multiple analyses of a common corpus. Journal of Second Language Writing 26: 1-9.10.1016/j.jslw.2014.09.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Crossley, Scott and Danielle McNamara. 2009. Computational assessment of lexical differences in L1 and L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 18: 119-135.10.1016/j.jslw.2009.02.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Flood, James, Shirley Heath and Diane Lapp. 2014. Handbook of research on teaching literacy through the communicative and visual arts. New York: Rutledge.10.4324/9781315759616]Search in Google Scholar
[Fox, Helen. 1994. Listening to the world: Cultural issues in academic writing. Urbana: National Council of Teachers of English.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ho, Laina. 2000. Children’s literature in adult education. Children’s Literature in Education 31 (4): 259-271.10.1023/A:1026431003032]Search in Google Scholar
[Hoey, Michael. 2005. Lexical priming: A new theory of words and language. London and New York: Rutledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hunt, Peter. 2001. The fundamentals of children’s literature criticism. In J. Mickenberg and L. Vallone (eds.). The Oxford handbook of children’s literature, 35-51. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Johns, Ann. 1997. Text, role and context: Developing academic literacies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139524650]Search in Google Scholar
[Kuo, Chih-Hua. 1999. Can numbers talk? Basic data management of a corpus. RELC Journal 30 : 1-17.10.1177/003368829903000101]Search in Google Scholar
[Kwon, Sun-Hee. 2009. Lexical richness in L2 writing: How much vocabulary do L2 learners need to use? English Teaching 65: 155-174.10.15858/engtea.64.3.200909.155]Search in Google Scholar
[Laufer, Batia. 1991. How much lexis is necessary for reading comprehension? In P. Arnaud and H. Bejoint (eds.). Vocabulary and applied linguistics, 126-132. Basingstoke: Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-349-12396-4_12]Search in Google Scholar
[Laufer, Batia and Paul Nation. 1995. Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2 written production. Applied Linguistics 16: 307-322.10.1093/applin/16.3.307]Search in Google Scholar
[Lee, David and Sylvia Chen. 2009. Making a bigger deal of the small words: Function words and other key items in research writing by Chinese learners. Journal of Second Language Writing 18: 281-296.10.1016/j.jslw.2009.07.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Leki, Ilona, Alister Cumming and Tony Silva. 2008. A synthesis of research on second language writing in English. New York: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Massi, Maria and Adriana Benvenuto. 2001. Using fairy tales to develop reading and writing skills. CATESOL Journal 13: 157-164.]Search in Google Scholar
[Matsuoka, Warren and David Hirsh. 2010. Vocabulary learning through reading: Does an ELT course book provide good opportunities? Reading in a Foreign Language 22: 56-70.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nation, Paul and Ming-Tsu. 1999. Graded readers and vocabulary. Reading in a Foreign Language 12: 355-381.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nickalls, Richard. 2011. How definite are we about articles in English? A study of L2 learners’ English article interlanguage during a university professional English course. Proceedings from the Corpus Linguistics Conference 92, 1-19. Available from University of Birmingham Centre for Corpus Research.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pace-Sigge, Michael. 2013. The concept of lexical priming in the context of language use. ICAME Journal 37: 149-174.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ramathan, Vai. and Kaplan, Robert. 1996. Audience and voice in current composition texts: Some implications for ESL student writers. Journal of Second Language Writing 5: 21-34.10.1016/S1060-3743(96)90013-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Sasaki, Miyuki. 2008. The 150-year history of English language assessment in Japanese education. Language Testing 25: 63-83.10.1177/0265532207083745]Search in Google Scholar
[Schmidt, Richard. 1994. Deconstructing consciousness in search of useful definitions for applied linguistics. AILA Review 11: 11-26.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stapleton, Paul. 2002. Critical thinking in Japanese L2 writing: Rethinking tired constructs. ELT Journal 56: 250-257.10.1093/elt/56.3.250]Search in Google Scholar
[Stubbs, Michael. 1995. Collocations and cultural connotations of common words. Linguistics and Education 7: 379-390.10.1016/0898-5898(95)90011-X]Search in Google Scholar
[Thomas, Ed. 2015. Word frequency and collocation: Using children’s literature in adult learning. ICAME 39: 85-110.10.1515/icame-2015-0004]Search in Google Scholar
[Webb, Stuart and John Macalister. 2012. Is text written for children useful for L2 extensive reading? TESOL Quarterly 47: 300-322.10.1002/tesq.70]Search in Google Scholar
[Yoo, Isaiah. 2009. The English definite article: What ESL/EFL grammars say and what corpus findings show. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 8: 267-278.10.1016/j.jeap.2009.07.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Yoon, Hyunsook. 2008. More than a linguistic reference: The influence of corpus technology on L2 academic writing. Language Learning and Technology 12 (2): 31-48.]Search in Google Scholar