1. bookVolume 60 (2016): Issue 2 (June 2016)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2453-7837
First Published
30 Mar 2016
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Rat Spinal Cord Injury Experimental Model

Published Online: 06 Jul 2016
Volume & Issue: Volume 60 (2016) - Issue 2 (June 2016)
Page range: 41 - 46
Received: 25 Apr 2016
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2453-7837
First Published
30 Mar 2016
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

Spinal cord injuries (SCI) with their tragic consequences belong to the most serious pathological conditions. That is why they have stimulated basic research workers, as well as health care practitioners, to search for an effective treatment for decades. Animal experimental models have been essential in these efforts. We have jointly decided to test and standardize one of the spinal cord injury compression models in rats. Twentythree adult female Wistar rats weighing 250-320 g were utilized. Employing general anaesthesia along with a mixture of sevoflurane with O2, 2 rats (sham controls) had their vertebral arch of either Th8 or Th9 vertebra removed (laminectomy). The other 21 experimental rats with similar laminectomies were divided into 3 subgroups (n = 7) which received compression impact forces of 30, 40 or 50 g (subgroups-1, -2, and -3, respectively) applied on their exposed spinal medulla for 15 minutes. All rats were observed for 28 days after the experimental procedure and their motor functions were assessed by the Basso, Beattie, Bresnahan (BBB) test 6 hours, 7, 21 and 28 days after the simulated SCI. All 23 rats survived the surgical procedures. The control rats were without any neurological deficits. There were, in every experimental subgroup, 1 or 2 rats with extreme BBB scores. So the rats with the maximum and minimum BBB values were excluded. Then, the results acquired in the residual 5 rats in each group were averaged and statistically analysed by the Tukey multiple comparisons test. Statistically significant intersubgroup differences were found at all survival times equal to or longer than 7 post SCI days. The goal of the SCI experiment was to generate a reproducible and reliable, submaximal spinal cord trauma model. The statistical analyses demonstrated that this objective was best achieved in the subgroup-2 with the 40 g compression.

Keywords

1. Animal Protection Act of the Slovak Republic No. 15/1995, part 39 (In Slovak), 1250-1255.Search in Google Scholar

2. Basso, M. D., Beattie, M. S., Bresnahan, J. C., 1995: A sensitive and reliable locomotor rating scale for open field testing rats. J. Neurotrauma, 12, 1-21.10.1089/neu.1995.12.17783230Search in Google Scholar

3. Beneš, V., 1987: Spinal Cord Injuries (In Czech), 3rd edn., Avicenum, Prague, 189 pp.Search in Google Scholar

4. Dolan, I., Šrámková, T., 2013: Spinal cord injuries, incidence in Slovakia and prevention. Via Pract., 10, 203-205.Search in Google Scholar

5. Dryden, D. M., Saunders, L. D., Jacobs, P., Schnopflocker, D. P., Rowe, B. H., May, L. A., et al., 2005: Direct health care costs after traumatic spinal cord injury. J. Trauma, 59, 443-449.10.1097/01.ta.0000174732.90517.df16294090Search in Google Scholar

6. Lee, D. H., Lee, J. K., 2013: Animal models of axon regeneration after spinal cord injury. Neurosci. Bull., 29, 436-444.10.1007/s12264-013-1365-4392073323893429Search in Google Scholar

7. Lee, B. B., Cripps, R. A., Fitzharris, M., Wing, P. C., 2014: The global map of traumatic spinal cord injury epidemiology: Update 2011, global incidence rate. Spinal Cord, 52, 110-116.10.1038/sc.2012.15823439068Search in Google Scholar

8. Maženský, D., Petrovová, E., Luptáková, L., 2011: Variations of the origin of arteries supplying the brain in the rabbit and rat ischemia experiments. Folia Veterinaria, 55, 133-136.Search in Google Scholar

9. Navarro, R., Juhas, J., Keshavarzi, S., Juhasova, J., Motlik, J., Johe, K., et al., 2012: Chronic spinal compression model in minipigs: A systematic behavioural, qualitative, and quantitative neuropathological study. J. Neurotrauma, 29, 499-513.10.1089/neu.2011.2076327882322029501Search in Google Scholar

10. Popesko, P., Rajtová, V., Horák, J., 1990: The Atlas of Anatomy of Small Laboratory Animals (In Slovak). 2nd edn., Príroda, Bratislava, 253 pp.Search in Google Scholar

11. Oyinbo, C. A., 2011: Secondary injury mechanisms in traumatic spinal cord injury: A nugget of this multiply cascade. Acta Neurobiol. Exp., 71, 281-299.Search in Google Scholar

12. Rossignol, S., Schwab, M., Schwartz, M., Fehlings, M. G., 2007: Spinal cord injury: Time to move ? J. Neurosci., 27, 11782-11792.10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3444-07.2007667335417978014Search in Google Scholar

13. Rowland, J. W., Hawryluk, G. W. J., Kwon, B., Fehlings, M. G., 2008: Current status of acute spinal cord injury pathophysiology and emerging therapies: Promise on the horizon. Neurosurg. Focus, 25, 1-17.10.3171/FOC.2008.25.11.E218980476Search in Google Scholar

14. Silva, N. A., Susa, N., Reis, R. L., Salgado, A. J., 2014: From basics to clinical: A comprehensive review on spinal cord injury. Progr. Neurobiol., 114, 25-57.10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.11.00224269804Search in Google Scholar

15. Stokes, B. T., Jakeman, L. B., 2002: Experimental modelling of human spinal cord injury: A model that crosses the species barrier and mimics the spectrum of human cytopathology. Spinal Cord, 40, 101-109.10.1038/sj.sc.310125411859436Search in Google Scholar

16. Šulla, I., jr., Maršala, J., Šulla, I., 2003: Study of schemic and compressive paraplegia in dogs. In 12th European Congress of Neurosurgery, Lisbon, Portugal, September 7-12, Monduzzi Editore, International Proceedings Division, Bologna, 891-894.Search in Google Scholar

17. Šulla, I., Bačiak, L., Juránek, I., Cicholesová, T., Boldižár, M., Balik, V., Lukáčová, N., 2014: Assessment of motor recovery and MRI correlates in a porcine spinal cord injury model. Acta Vet. Brno, 83, 393-397.10.2754/avb201483040393Search in Google Scholar

18. Tchvaloon, E., Front, L., Gelernter, I., Ronen, J., Bluvshtein, V., Caty, A., 2008: Survival, neurological recovery and morbidity after spinal cord injuries following road accidents in Israel. Spinal Cord, 46, 145-149.10.1038/sj.sc.310208617579616Search in Google Scholar

19. Vanický, I., Urdzíková, L., Saganová, K., Čížková, D., Gálik, J., 2001: A simple and reproducible model of spinal cord injury induced by epidural balloon inflation in the rat. J. Neurotrauma, 18, 1399-1407.10.1089/0897715015272568711780869Search in Google Scholar

20. Vijayaprakash, K. M., Srindharan, N., 2013: An experimental spinal cord injury rat model using customized impact device: A cost-effective approach. J. Pharmacol. Pharmacother., 4, 211-213.10.4103/0976-500X.114607374630723960429Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo