An Approach to Self-Configuration of M2M Services

1. Hui, L., C. Min. Research on the Distribution System Simulation of Large Company’s Logistics under Internet of Things Based on Traveling Salesman Problem Solution. – Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. 16, 2016, No 5, pp.78-97.10.1515/cait-2016-0054Search in Google Scholar

2. Weyrich, M., C. Ebert. Reference Architectures for the Internet of Things. – IEEE Software, January/February 2016, pp. 112-116. https://www.computer.org/csdl/mags/so/2016/01/mso2016010112.pdf10.1109/MS.2016.20Search in Google Scholar

3. Kim, J., J. Lee, J. Kim, J. Yun. M2M Service Platforms: Survey, Issues, and Enabling Technologies. – IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, Vol. 16, First Quarter 2014, No 1, pp. 61-76.10.1109/SURV.2013.100713.00203Search in Google Scholar

4. Apel, S., C. Kastner, B. Garvin. Exploring Feature Interactions in the Wild: The New Feature Interaction Challenge. – In: Proc. of 5th International Workshop on Feature-Oriented Software Development, FOSD, ACM, 2013, pp.1-8.Search in Google Scholar

5. Datta, S., C. Bonnet. A Lightweight Framework for Efficient M2M Device Management in OneM2M Architecture. – In: International Conference on Recent Advances in Internet of Things (RIoT’15), 2015, pp.1-6.10.1109/RIOT.2015.7104900Search in Google Scholar

6. Open Mobile Alliance. Diagnostics and Monitoring Management Object. – OMA-TS-DiagMonTrapMO-V1_0-20090414-C, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

7. Open Mobile Alliance. Diagnostics and Monitoring Trap Events Specifications. – OMA-TS-DiagMonTrapEvents-V1_2-20131008-A, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

8. Pencheva, E., I. Atanasov. Detection of CAMEL Feature Interaction. – International Journal on Information Technology and Security, 2010, No 1, pp. 25-42.Search in Google Scholar

9. Atanasov, I., E. Pencheva. CAMEL Service Interaction Detection. – International Journal on Information Technologies and Control, 2010, Issue 4, pp. 2-9.Search in Google Scholar

10. Atanasov, I., E. Pencheva. A Formal Approach to Service Interaction Detection in Mobile Networks. – In: 10th WSEAS Int. Conf. on Software Engineering, Parallel and Distributed Systems (SEPADS’11), Cambridge, UK, 2011, pp. 118-123Search in Google Scholar

11. Atanasov, I., E. Pencheva. Reasoning on Service Interaction in Mobile networks. – International Journal of Computers and Communications, Vol. 15, 2011, No 2, pp. 59-66.Search in Google Scholar

12. 3GPP Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects. – Policy and Charging Control Architecture, Release 13, V13.7.0, 2016.Search in Google Scholar

13. Androcec, D., N. Vrcek. Ontologies for Platform as Service APIs Interoperability. – Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. 16, 2026, No 4, pp. 29-44.10.1515/cait-2016-0065Search in Google Scholar

14. Chen, Y., Q. Xin, S. Guan. Keynote Speech 1: Creating IoT Applications through Visual Programming and Service Orchestration. – In: 2016 IEEE Information Technology, Networking, Electronic and Automation Control Conference, Chongqing, China, 2016, pp. 1-7.Search in Google Scholar

15. Im, C., C, Jeong. ISOMP: An Instant Service-Orchestration Mobile M2M Platform. – Hindawi Mobile Information System, Vol. (2016), 2016 Article ID 7263729, pp.1-16.Search in Google Scholar

16. Gupta, H., S. B. Nath, S. Chakraborty, S. K. Ghosh. SDFog: A Software Defined Computing Architecture for QoS Aware Service Orchestration over Edge Devices. Cornell University Library, arXiv:1609.01190 [cs.NI].Search in Google Scholar

17. Lee, N., H. Lee, W. Ryu. Considerations for Web of Object Service Architecture on IoT Environment. – International Journal of Smart Home, Vol. 9, 2015, No 1, pp. 195-202.10.14257/ijsh.2015.9.1.21Search in Google Scholar

18. D’Angelo, G., S. Ferretti, V. Ghini. Simulation of the Internet of Things. Cornell University Library, arXiv:1605.04876 [cs.NI].Search in Google Scholar

19. Apel, S., J. Atlee, L. Baresi, P. Zave. Feature Interactions: The next Generation. Report form Dagstuhl Seminar 14281, 2014, pp. 1-5.Search in Google Scholar

20. Maternaghan, C., K. Turner. Policy Conflicts in Home Automation. – Computer Networks, Vol. 57, 2013, Issue 12, pp. 2429-2241.10.1016/j.comnet.2013.02.026Search in Google Scholar

21. Dominguez, A. L. Detection of Feature Interactions in Automotive Active Safety Features. PhD Thesis, School of Computer Science, University of Waterloo, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

22. Lin, Y. B., et al. EasyConnect: A Management System for IoT Devices and Its Applications for Interactive Design and Art. – IEEE Internet of Things, Vol. 2, 2015, Issue 6, pp. 551-561.10.1109/JIOT.2015.2423286Search in Google Scholar

23. Pedersen, T., T. Le Guilly, A. P. Ravn, A. Skou. A Method for Model Checking Feature Interactions. – In: 10th International Joint Conference on Software Technologies (ICSOFT’15), Colmar, Alsace, France, 2015, pp. 1-10.10.5220/0005516402190228Search in Google Scholar

24. Zave, P. Modularity in Distributed Feature Composition. – In: Software Requirements and Design: The Work of Michael Jackson. Good Friends Publishing, 2010, pp. 267-290.Search in Google Scholar