[1. Hui, L., C. Min. Research on the Distribution System Simulation of Large Company’s Logistics under Internet of Things Based on Traveling Salesman Problem Solution. – Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. 16, 2016, No 5, pp.78-97.10.1515/cait-2016-0054]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Weyrich, M., C. Ebert. Reference Architectures for the Internet of Things. – IEEE Software, January/February 2016, pp. 112-116. https://www.computer.org/csdl/mags/so/2016/01/mso2016010112.pdf10.1109/MS.2016.20]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Kim, J., J. Lee, J. Kim, J. Yun. M2M Service Platforms: Survey, Issues, and Enabling Technologies. – IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, Vol. 16, First Quarter 2014, No 1, pp. 61-76.10.1109/SURV.2013.100713.00203]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Apel, S., C. Kastner, B. Garvin. Exploring Feature Interactions in the Wild: The New Feature Interaction Challenge. – In: Proc. of 5th International Workshop on Feature-Oriented Software Development, FOSD, ACM, 2013, pp.1-8.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Datta, S., C. Bonnet. A Lightweight Framework for Efficient M2M Device Management in OneM2M Architecture. – In: International Conference on Recent Advances in Internet of Things (RIoT’15), 2015, pp.1-6.10.1109/RIOT.2015.7104900]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Open Mobile Alliance. Diagnostics and Monitoring Management Object. – OMA-TS-DiagMonTrapMO-V1_0-20090414-C, 2009.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Open Mobile Alliance. Diagnostics and Monitoring Trap Events Specifications. – OMA-TS-DiagMonTrapEvents-V1_2-20131008-A, 2013.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Pencheva, E., I. Atanasov. Detection of CAMEL Feature Interaction. – International Journal on Information Technology and Security, 2010, No 1, pp. 25-42.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Atanasov, I., E. Pencheva. CAMEL Service Interaction Detection. – International Journal on Information Technologies and Control, 2010, Issue 4, pp. 2-9.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Atanasov, I., E. Pencheva. A Formal Approach to Service Interaction Detection in Mobile Networks. – In: 10th WSEAS Int. Conf. on Software Engineering, Parallel and Distributed Systems (SEPADS’11), Cambridge, UK, 2011, pp. 118-123]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Atanasov, I., E. Pencheva. Reasoning on Service Interaction in Mobile networks. – International Journal of Computers and Communications, Vol. 15, 2011, No 2, pp. 59-66.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. 3GPP Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects. – Policy and Charging Control Architecture, Release 13, V13.7.0, 2016.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Androcec, D., N. Vrcek. Ontologies for Platform as Service APIs Interoperability. – Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. 16, 2026, No 4, pp. 29-44.10.1515/cait-2016-0065]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Chen, Y., Q. Xin, S. Guan. Keynote Speech 1: Creating IoT Applications through Visual Programming and Service Orchestration. – In: 2016 IEEE Information Technology, Networking, Electronic and Automation Control Conference, Chongqing, China, 2016, pp. 1-7.]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Im, C., C, Jeong. ISOMP: An Instant Service-Orchestration Mobile M2M Platform. – Hindawi Mobile Information System, Vol. (2016), 2016 Article ID 7263729, pp.1-16.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Gupta, H., S. B. Nath, S. Chakraborty, S. K. Ghosh. SDFog: A Software Defined Computing Architecture for QoS Aware Service Orchestration over Edge Devices. Cornell University Library, arXiv:1609.01190 [cs.NI].]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Lee, N., H. Lee, W. Ryu. Considerations for Web of Object Service Architecture on IoT Environment. – International Journal of Smart Home, Vol. 9, 2015, No 1, pp. 195-202.10.14257/ijsh.2015.9.1.21]Search in Google Scholar
[18. D’Angelo, G., S. Ferretti, V. Ghini. Simulation of the Internet of Things. Cornell University Library, arXiv:1605.04876 [cs.NI].]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Apel, S., J. Atlee, L. Baresi, P. Zave. Feature Interactions: The next Generation. Report form Dagstuhl Seminar 14281, 2014, pp. 1-5.]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Maternaghan, C., K. Turner. Policy Conflicts in Home Automation. – Computer Networks, Vol. 57, 2013, Issue 12, pp. 2429-2241.10.1016/j.comnet.2013.02.026]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Dominguez, A. L. Detection of Feature Interactions in Automotive Active Safety Features. PhD Thesis, School of Computer Science, University of Waterloo, 2012.]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Lin, Y. B., et al. EasyConnect: A Management System for IoT Devices and Its Applications for Interactive Design and Art. – IEEE Internet of Things, Vol. 2, 2015, Issue 6, pp. 551-561.10.1109/JIOT.2015.2423286]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Pedersen, T., T. Le Guilly, A. P. Ravn, A. Skou. A Method for Model Checking Feature Interactions. – In: 10th International Joint Conference on Software Technologies (ICSOFT’15), Colmar, Alsace, France, 2015, pp. 1-10.10.5220/0005516402190228]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Zave, P. Modularity in Distributed Feature Composition. – In: Software Requirements and Design: The Work of Michael Jackson. Good Friends Publishing, 2010, pp. 267-290.]Search in Google Scholar