Effects of natural antimicrobials on bacterial cell hydrophobicity, adhesion, and zeta potential / Vpliv naravnih protimikrobnih snovi na bakterijsko hidrofobnost, adhezijo in zeta potencial

1. Jefferson KK. What drives bacteria to produce a biofilm? FEMS Microbiol Lett 2004;236:163-73. doi: 10.1016/j. femsle.2004.06.005Search in Google Scholar

2. Chmielewski AN, Frank JF. Biofilm formation and control in food processing facilities. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Safety 2003;2:22-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-4337.2003. tb00012.xSearch in Google Scholar

3. Bae YM, Baek SY, Lee SY. Resistance of pathogenic bacteria on the surfaces of stainless steel depending on attachment form and efficacy of chemical sanitizers. Int J Food Microbiol 2012;153:465-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.12.01710.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.12.01722225983Search in Google Scholar

4. Giaouris E, Chorianopoulos N, Nychas GJE. Effect of temperature, pH, and water activity on biofilm formation Salmonella enteritidis PT4 on stainless steel surfaces as indicated by the bead vortexing method and conductance measurements. J Food Protection 2005;68:2149-54. PMID: 1624572210.4315/0362-028X-68.10.2149Search in Google Scholar

5. Monds RD, O’Toole GA. The developmental model of microbial biofilms: ten years of a paradigm up for review.Search in Google Scholar

Trends Microbiol 2009;17:73-87. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2008. 11.001Search in Google Scholar

6. Barnes LM, Lo MF, Adams MR, Chamberlain AHL. Effect of milk proteins on adhesion of bacteria to stainless steel surfaces. Appl Environ Microbiol 1999;65:4543-8. PMID: 1050808710.1128/AEM.65.10.4543-4548.19999160510508087Search in Google Scholar

7. Goulter RM, Gentle IR, Dykes GA. Issues in determining factors influencing bacterial attachment: a review using the attachment of Escherichia coli to abiotic surfaces as an example. Lett Appl Microbiol 2009;49:1-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2009.02591.x10.1111/j.1472-765X.2009.02591.x19291206Search in Google Scholar

8. Boks NP, Norde W, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ. Forces involved in bacterial adhesion to hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces. Microbiology 2008;154:3122-33. doi: 10.1099/ mic.0.2008/018622-010.1099/mic.0.2008/018622-018832318Search in Google Scholar

9. Simões M, Simões LC, Vieira MJ. A review of current emergent biofilm control strategies. LWT- Food Sci Technol 2010;43:573-83. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2009.12.00810.1016/j.lwt.2009.12.008Search in Google Scholar

10. Abreu AC, Borges A, Mergulhão F, Simões F. Use of phenyl isothiocyanate for biofilm prevention and control. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 2014;86:34-41. doi: 10.1016/j. ibiod.2013.03.024Search in Google Scholar

11. Lemos M, Borges A, Teodósio J, Araújo P, Mergulhão F, Melo L, Simões M. The effects of ferulic and salicylic acids on Bacillus cereus and Pseudomonas fluorescens single- and dual-species biofilms. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 2014;86:42-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2013.06.01110.1016/j.ibiod.2013.06.011Search in Google Scholar

12. Klančnik A, Smole Možina S, Zhang Q. Anti-Campylobacter activities and resistance mechanisms of natural phenolic compounds in Campylobacter. PLoS ONE 2012;7(12):e51800. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.005180010.1371/journal.pone.0051800352409123284770Search in Google Scholar

13. ISO 4833:1991. Microbiology - General guidance for the enumeration of micro-organisms - Colony count technique at 30 degrees C. Genva: International Organization for Standardization; 1991.Search in Google Scholar

14. Rosenberg M. Bacterial adherence to hydrocarbon: a useful technique for studying cell surface hydrophobicity. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1984;22:289-95. doi: 10.1111/ j.1574-6968.1984.tb00743.x10.1111/j.1574-6968.1984.tb00743.xSearch in Google Scholar

15. Tahmourespour A, Kermanshahi RK, Salehi R, Nabinejad A. The relationship between cell surface hydrophobicity and antibiotic resistance of streptococcal strains isolated from dental plaque and caries. Iran J Basic Med Sci 2008;10:251-5.Search in Google Scholar

16. Christensen GD, Simpson WA, Younger JJ, Baddour LM, Barrett FF, Melton DM, Beachey EH. Adherence of coagulase-negative staphylococci to plastic tissue culture plates: a quantitative model for the adherence of staphylococci to medical devices. J Clin Microbiol 1985;22:996-1006. PMID: 390585510.1128/jcm.22.6.996-1006.19852718663905855Search in Google Scholar

17. Harvey J, Keenan KP, Gilmour A. Assessing biofilm formation by Listeria monocytogenes strains. Food Microbiol 2007;24:380-92. PMID: 1718976410.1016/j.fm.2006.06.006Search in Google Scholar

18. Lage OM, Bondoso J, Catita JAM. Determinationof zeta potential in Planctomycetes and its application in heavy metal toxicity assessment. Arch Microbiol 2012;194:847-55. doi: 10.1007/s00203-012-0818-x10.1007/s00203-012-0818-xSearch in Google Scholar

19. Heimez PC, Rajagopalan R. Principles of Colloid and Surface Chemistry. 3rd edition. New York (NY): CRC Press; 1997.Search in Google Scholar

20. Bohinc K, Dražič G, Fink R, Oder M, Jevšnik M, Nipič D, Godič-Torkar K, Raspor P. Available surface dictates microbial adhesion capacity. Int J Adhes Adhes 2014;50:265-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.01.02710.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.01.027Search in Google Scholar

21. Jadhav S, Shah R, Bhave M, Palombo EA. Inhibitory activity of yarrow essential oil on Listeria planktonic cells and biofilms. Food Control 2013;29:125-30. doi: 10.1016/j. foodcont.2012.05.071Search in Google Scholar

22. Biazzar E, Heidani M, Asefnezhad A, Montazeri A. The relationship between cellular adhesion and surface roughness in polystyrene modified by microwave plasma radiation. Int J Nanomedicine 2011; 6:631-9. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S1721810.2147/IJN.S17218Search in Google Scholar

23. Martin MA, Pfaller MA, Massanari RM, Wenzel RP. Use of cellular hydrophobicity, slime production, and species identification markers for the clinical significance of coagulase-negative staphylococcal isolates. Am J Infect Control 1989;17:130-5. PMID: 274219810.1016/0196-6553(89)90199-5Search in Google Scholar

24. Schneider PF, RileyTV. Cell-surface hydrophobicity of Staphylococcus saprophyticus. Epidemiol Infect 1991;106:71-5. PMID: 199345410.1017/S095026880005645422718551993454Search in Google Scholar

25. Reisner K, Krogfelt KA, Klein BM, Zechner EL, Molin S. In vitro biofilm formation of commensal and pathogenic Escherichia coli strains: impact of environmental and genetic factors. J Bacteriol 2006;188:3572-81. doi: 10.1128/ JB.188.10.3572-3581.200610.1128/JB.188.10.3572-3581.2006148284916672611Search in Google Scholar

26. Rode TM, Langsrud S, Holck A. Møretrø T. Different patterns of biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus under foodrelated stress conditions. Int J Food Microbiol 2007;116:372-3. PMID: 1740879210.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.02.01717408792Search in Google Scholar

27. Kalaichelvam K, Chai LC, Thong KL. Variations in motility and biofilm formation of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi. Gut Pathogens 2014;6:2-5. doi: 10.1186/1757-4749-6-210.1186/1757-4749-6-2392211324499680Search in Google Scholar

28. Rivas L, Fegan N, Dykes GA. Physicochemical properties of Shiga toxigenic Escherichia coli. J Appl Microbiol 2005;99:716-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02688.x10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02688.x16162222Search in Google Scholar

29. Nwanyanwu CE, Abu GO. Influence of growth media on hydrphobicity of phenol-utilizing bacteria found in petroleum refinery effluent. Int Res J Biol Sci 2013;2:6-11.Search in Google Scholar

30. Soni KA, Balasubramanian AK, Beskok A, Pillai SD. Zeta potential of selected bacteria in drinking water when dead, starved, or exposed to minimal and rich culture media. Curr Microbiol 2008;56:93-7. doi: 10.1007/s00284-007-9046-z10.1007/s00284-007-9046-z17985185Search in Google Scholar

31. Bohinc K, Dražič G, Abram A, Jevšnik M, Jeršek B, Nipič D, Kurinčič M, Raspor P. Metal surface characteristics dictate bacterial adhesion capacity. Int J Adhes Adhes 2016;68:39-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.01.00810.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.01.008Search in Google Scholar

32. Preedy E, Perni S, Nipič D, Bohinc K, Prokopovich P. Surface roughness mediated adhesion forces between borosilicate glass and gram-positive bacteria. Langmuir 2014;30:9466-76. doi: 10.1021/la501711t10.1021/la501711t25019516Search in Google Scholar