[1. Jefferson KK. What drives bacteria to produce a biofilm? FEMS Microbiol Lett 2004;236:163-73. doi: 10.1016/j. femsle.2004.06.005]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Chmielewski AN, Frank JF. Biofilm formation and control in food processing facilities. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Safety 2003;2:22-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-4337.2003. tb00012.x]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Bae YM, Baek SY, Lee SY. Resistance of pathogenic bacteria on the surfaces of stainless steel depending on attachment form and efficacy of chemical sanitizers. Int J Food Microbiol 2012;153:465-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.12.01710.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.12.01722225983]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Giaouris E, Chorianopoulos N, Nychas GJE. Effect of temperature, pH, and water activity on biofilm formation Salmonella enteritidis PT4 on stainless steel surfaces as indicated by the bead vortexing method and conductance measurements. J Food Protection 2005;68:2149-54. PMID: 1624572210.4315/0362-028X-68.10.2149]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Monds RD, O’Toole GA. The developmental model of microbial biofilms: ten years of a paradigm up for review.]Search in Google Scholar
[Trends Microbiol 2009;17:73-87. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2008. 11.001]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Barnes LM, Lo MF, Adams MR, Chamberlain AHL. Effect of milk proteins on adhesion of bacteria to stainless steel surfaces. Appl Environ Microbiol 1999;65:4543-8. PMID: 1050808710.1128/AEM.65.10.4543-4548.19999160510508087]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Goulter RM, Gentle IR, Dykes GA. Issues in determining factors influencing bacterial attachment: a review using the attachment of Escherichia coli to abiotic surfaces as an example. Lett Appl Microbiol 2009;49:1-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2009.02591.x10.1111/j.1472-765X.2009.02591.x19291206]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Boks NP, Norde W, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ. Forces involved in bacterial adhesion to hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces. Microbiology 2008;154:3122-33. doi: 10.1099/ mic.0.2008/018622-010.1099/mic.0.2008/018622-018832318]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Simões M, Simões LC, Vieira MJ. A review of current emergent biofilm control strategies. LWT- Food Sci Technol 2010;43:573-83. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2009.12.00810.1016/j.lwt.2009.12.008]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Abreu AC, Borges A, Mergulhão F, Simões F. Use of phenyl isothiocyanate for biofilm prevention and control. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 2014;86:34-41. doi: 10.1016/j. ibiod.2013.03.024]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Lemos M, Borges A, Teodósio J, Araújo P, Mergulhão F, Melo L, Simões M. The effects of ferulic and salicylic acids on Bacillus cereus and Pseudomonas fluorescens single- and dual-species biofilms. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 2014;86:42-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2013.06.01110.1016/j.ibiod.2013.06.011]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Klančnik A, Smole Možina S, Zhang Q. Anti-Campylobacter activities and resistance mechanisms of natural phenolic compounds in Campylobacter. PLoS ONE 2012;7(12):e51800. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.005180010.1371/journal.pone.0051800352409123284770]Search in Google Scholar
[13. ISO 4833:1991. Microbiology - General guidance for the enumeration of micro-organisms - Colony count technique at 30 degrees C. Genva: International Organization for Standardization; 1991.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Rosenberg M. Bacterial adherence to hydrocarbon: a useful technique for studying cell surface hydrophobicity. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1984;22:289-95. doi: 10.1111/ j.1574-6968.1984.tb00743.x10.1111/j.1574-6968.1984.tb00743.x]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Tahmourespour A, Kermanshahi RK, Salehi R, Nabinejad A. The relationship between cell surface hydrophobicity and antibiotic resistance of streptococcal strains isolated from dental plaque and caries. Iran J Basic Med Sci 2008;10:251-5.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Christensen GD, Simpson WA, Younger JJ, Baddour LM, Barrett FF, Melton DM, Beachey EH. Adherence of coagulase-negative staphylococci to plastic tissue culture plates: a quantitative model for the adherence of staphylococci to medical devices. J Clin Microbiol 1985;22:996-1006. PMID: 390585510.1128/jcm.22.6.996-1006.19852718663905855]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Harvey J, Keenan KP, Gilmour A. Assessing biofilm formation by Listeria monocytogenes strains. Food Microbiol 2007;24:380-92. PMID: 1718976410.1016/j.fm.2006.06.006]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Lage OM, Bondoso J, Catita JAM. Determinationof zeta potential in Planctomycetes and its application in heavy metal toxicity assessment. Arch Microbiol 2012;194:847-55. doi: 10.1007/s00203-012-0818-x10.1007/s00203-012-0818-x]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Heimez PC, Rajagopalan R. Principles of Colloid and Surface Chemistry. 3rd edition. New York (NY): CRC Press; 1997.]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Bohinc K, Dražič G, Fink R, Oder M, Jevšnik M, Nipič D, Godič-Torkar K, Raspor P. Available surface dictates microbial adhesion capacity. Int J Adhes Adhes 2014;50:265-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.01.02710.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.01.027]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Jadhav S, Shah R, Bhave M, Palombo EA. Inhibitory activity of yarrow essential oil on Listeria planktonic cells and biofilms. Food Control 2013;29:125-30. doi: 10.1016/j. foodcont.2012.05.071]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Biazzar E, Heidani M, Asefnezhad A, Montazeri A. The relationship between cellular adhesion and surface roughness in polystyrene modified by microwave plasma radiation. Int J Nanomedicine 2011; 6:631-9. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S1721810.2147/IJN.S17218]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Martin MA, Pfaller MA, Massanari RM, Wenzel RP. Use of cellular hydrophobicity, slime production, and species identification markers for the clinical significance of coagulase-negative staphylococcal isolates. Am J Infect Control 1989;17:130-5. PMID: 274219810.1016/0196-6553(89)90199-5]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Schneider PF, RileyTV. Cell-surface hydrophobicity of Staphylococcus saprophyticus. Epidemiol Infect 1991;106:71-5. PMID: 199345410.1017/S095026880005645422718551993454]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Reisner K, Krogfelt KA, Klein BM, Zechner EL, Molin S. In vitro biofilm formation of commensal and pathogenic Escherichia coli strains: impact of environmental and genetic factors. J Bacteriol 2006;188:3572-81. doi: 10.1128/ JB.188.10.3572-3581.200610.1128/JB.188.10.3572-3581.2006148284916672611]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Rode TM, Langsrud S, Holck A. Møretrø T. Different patterns of biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus under foodrelated stress conditions. Int J Food Microbiol 2007;116:372-3. PMID: 1740879210.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.02.01717408792]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Kalaichelvam K, Chai LC, Thong KL. Variations in motility and biofilm formation of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi. Gut Pathogens 2014;6:2-5. doi: 10.1186/1757-4749-6-210.1186/1757-4749-6-2392211324499680]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Rivas L, Fegan N, Dykes GA. Physicochemical properties of Shiga toxigenic Escherichia coli. J Appl Microbiol 2005;99:716-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02688.x10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02688.x16162222]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Nwanyanwu CE, Abu GO. Influence of growth media on hydrphobicity of phenol-utilizing bacteria found in petroleum refinery effluent. Int Res J Biol Sci 2013;2:6-11.]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Soni KA, Balasubramanian AK, Beskok A, Pillai SD. Zeta potential of selected bacteria in drinking water when dead, starved, or exposed to minimal and rich culture media. Curr Microbiol 2008;56:93-7. doi: 10.1007/s00284-007-9046-z10.1007/s00284-007-9046-z17985185]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Bohinc K, Dražič G, Abram A, Jevšnik M, Jeršek B, Nipič D, Kurinčič M, Raspor P. Metal surface characteristics dictate bacterial adhesion capacity. Int J Adhes Adhes 2016;68:39-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.01.00810.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.01.008]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Preedy E, Perni S, Nipič D, Bohinc K, Prokopovich P. Surface roughness mediated adhesion forces between borosilicate glass and gram-positive bacteria. Langmuir 2014;30:9466-76. doi: 10.1021/la501711t10.1021/la501711t25019516]Search in Google Scholar