<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> Persuasion is defined as human communication designed to influence the judgements and actions of others (Simons &amp; Jones 2011). The purpose of this research is to analyse the discourse of persuasion in Shakespeare from the perspective of historical pragmatics (Jucker &amp; Taavitsainen 2010), with particular attention to modals employed as part of the strategies. The modals under investigation are proximal and distal central modals, SHALL/SHOULD, WILL/WOULD, CAN/COULD, MAY/MIGHT, MUST, and the contracted form ’LL. The data for the present study is drawn from The Riverside Shakespeare (Evans 1997) and the concordance by Spevack (1968-1980). The corpus includes both cases where the persuasion attempt is successful and unsuccessful. After defining persuasion in comparison to speech acts, quantitative analysis reveals how frequently the persuader and the persuadee employ a modal regarding each type of modality and speech act. Further analysis shows in what manner the persuader and the persuadee interact with each other in discourse resorting to the following strategies: modality, proximal and distal meanings of the modal, speech act of each utterance including a modal, and use of the same modal or switching modals in interaction. This research thus clarifies how effectively speakers attempted to persuade others in interactions, shedding light on communication mechanisms in the past.</abstract>

Wilt Thou Be Lord of all the World? Modals and Persuasion in Shakespeare

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> This paper seeks to present the main meanings and the use of the modal verb can in the plays of two Early Modern English playwrights, William Shakespeare and Christopher Marlowe. In particular, the study aims at presenting a comparative analysis and provides descriptive as well as quantitative data. The research is based on the analysis of the corpus consisting of the plays written by Shakespeare and Marlowe between 1593-1599. The choice of the works is not random but includes the plays which bear the strongest resemblance in terms of theme, structure, and most importantly, the language of both authors.</abstract>

Can in Shakespeare and Marlowe

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> Few studies have focused on the anxiety experienced by learners of English as a foreign language in the context of Spanish universities. This study reports on the findings of an investigation into the sources of 216 Spanish university students’ anxiety and incorporates two underexplored aspects in this area, namely, the responsibility students attribute to different agents and the perception students have of their own ability to cope during an anxiety episode. A qualitative/quantitative design was used. Results indicated that the primary source of anxiety related to the speaking skill. Quantitative analyses revealed that learners place the main responsibility for their anxiety on themselves and that women hold themselves responsible for their anxiety to a greater degree than men. The perceived coping ability of men and women was ranked below ‘fair’. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.</abstract>

Anxiety in Spanish EFL University Lessons: Causes, Responsibility Attribution and Coping

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Unlike subject-orientation in English ‘-ly’ adverbs, subject-relatedness does not conflate two syntactic functions in one and the same form: subject-related ‘-ly’ adverbs are predicative elements in the clause and do not function as adverbials. Therefore, the morphological make-up of subject-related ‘-ly’ adverbs does not match the syntactic function and the categorial meaning usually associated with the adverbial suffix ‘-ly’. In subject-relatedness, the association of the predicative function with the ‘-ly’ suffix differs from that of the well-known set of ‘-ly’ adjectives where the suffix is the present-day form of Old English ‘-līc’. Subject-relatedness raises the question of how these ‘-ly’ adverbs should be classified and the implications of this classification on their place in the system of word-classes. Specifically, it raises the question of the place of this morphological, syntactic and semantic behaviour with respect to word-class membership. In this respect, the paper explores the interpretation of subject-related ‘-ly’ words in frameworks where adjectives and adverbs are considered one and the same word-class and also where they are considered separate ones. The interpretation of subject-related ‘-ly’ words as belonging to the categorial space between adjective and adverb is relevant especially in respect of the morphosyntactic processes described in the literature for similar cases: although the profile of subject-related ‘-ly’ words appears to meet the conditions of conversion, they do not become lexicalized, as in lexical conversion, and cannot be traced back to a syntactic process, as in syntactic conversion</abstract>

English ‘-Ly’ Adverbs: from Subject Orientation to Conversion

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> This article uses Charles S. Peirce’s concept of icon and Judith Butler’s idea of genealogy of gender to study levels of fictionality in the Old English poem Beowulf. It shows that Wealhtheow, the principal female character in the epic, operates as a diegetic reader in the poem. Her speeches, in which she addresses her husband King Hrothgar and Beowulf contain implicit references to the Lay of Finn, which has been sung by Hrothgar’s minstrel at the feast celebrating Beowulf’s victory. It is argued here that Wealhtheow represents herself as an icon of peace-weaving, as she casts herself as a figuration of Hildeburh, the female protagonist of the Lay of Finn. Hildeburh is the sister of Hnæf, the leader of the Danes, and is given by her brother to Finn the Frisian in a marriage alliance. In her role as a peace-weaver, the queen is to weave peace between tribes by giving birth to heirs of the crown. After the courtly minster’s performance of the Lay, Wealhtheow warns her husband against establishing political alliances with the foreigner Beowulf at the expense of his intratribal obligation to his cousin Hrothulf, who is to become king after Hrothgar’s death.</abstract>

Wealhtheow’s Peace-Weaving: Diegesis and Genealogy of Gender in Beowulf

AHEAD OF PRINT

Volume 58 (2023): Issue 1 (January 2023)

Volume 57 (2022): Issue 1 (January 2022)

Volume 56 (2021): Issue s1 (December 2021)

Volume 56 (2021): Issue 1 (December 2021)

Volume 55 (2020): Issue s2 (December 2020) Special issue: Dialogues, reinterpretations, critical repositionings in literary and cultural discourses of 21st century Canada

Volume 55 (2020): Issue s1 (December 2020) Special Issue: Multimodal Patterns in Cognition and Communication

Volume 55 (2020): Issue 1 (March 2020)

Volume 54 (2019): Issue s1 (December 2019) Special issue on Change from above in the history of English. Edited by Nikolaos Lavidas

Volume 54 (2019): Issue 1 (March 2019)

Volume 53 (2018): Issue 1 (March 2018)

Volume 53 (2018): Issue s1 (December 2018) Special issue on Native American indigenous studies

Volume 52 (2017): Issue 4 (December 2017)

Volume 52 (2017): Issue 3 (December 2017)

Volume 52 (2017): Issue 2 (December 2017)

Volume 52 (2017): Issue 1 (March 2017)

Volume 51 (2016): Issue 4 (December 2016)

Volume 51 (2016): Issue 3 (December 2016)

Volume 51 (2016): Issue 2 (December 2016)

Volume 51 (2016): Issue 1 (March 2016)

Volume 50 (2015): Issue 4 (December 2015)

Volume 50 (2015): Issue 2-3 (December 2015)

Volume 50 (2015): Issue 1 (March 2015)

Volume 49 (2014): Issue 4 (December 2014)

Volume 49 (2014): Issue 3 (December 2014)

Volume 49 (2014): Issue 2 (June 2014)

Volume 49 (2014): Issue 1 (March 2014)

Volume 48 (2013): Issue 4 (December 2013)

Volume 48 (2013): Issue 2-3 (December 2013)

Volume 48 (2013): Issue 1 (June 2013)

Volume 47 (2012): Issue 4 (December 2012)

Volume 47 (2012): Issue 2-3 (June 2012)

Volume 47 (2012): Issue 1 (April 2012)

Volume 46 (2011): Issue 4 (December 2011)

Volume 46 (2011): Issue 3 (June 2011)

Volume 46 (2010): Issue 2 (December 2010)

Volume 46 (2010): Issue 1 (June 2010)

Volume 45 (2009): Issue 2 (December 2009)

Volume 45 (2009): Issue 1 (June 2009)

Studia Anglica Posnaniensia

 Studia Anglica Posnaniensia: An international Review of English Studies, was established in 1968 by the eminent Polish anglicist Jacek Fisiak and has been published continuously ever since by Adam Mickiewicz University Poznañ (Faculty of English). It is devoted to publishing high-quality research in English linguistics, literatures in English, and broadly understood culture of anglophone countries. It carries original studies in all the above areas, both devoted solely to English and those of a comparative natures, as well as book reviews and thematic issues. New contributions appear continuously throughout the year on the online-first basis, while the yearbook is closed and printed in late December. The primary mode of publication is on-line, with printed copies reserved in principle for the authors alone. The journal welcomes contributions on all aspects on English studies as defined above, theoretical as well as applied. The language of the journal is English. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia is a Gold Open Access journal and as such it does not have any article processing charges (APCs) nor article submission charges. Rejection Rate   65%   Archiving  Sciendo archives the contents of this journal in Portico - digital long-term preservation service of scholarly books, journals and collections.  Plagiarism Policy  The editorial board is participating in a growing community of Similarity Check System's users in order to ensure that the content published is original and trustworthy. Similarity Check is a medium that allows for comprehensive manuscripts screening, aimed to eliminate plagiarism and provide a high standard and quality peer-review process. 