<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> Mandarin manner adverbs like dasheng ‘loudly’ (lit. ‘big voice’) occur both sentence-medially and sentence-finally, whereas adverbs formed with the adverbializer de (地) like kuaikuaide ‘quickly’ occur only sentence-medially. The behavior of AP-地 adverbs is puzzling under a classical adjunction analysis and under Cinque’s (1999) hierarchy of functional projections. Here, I argue that Mandarin manner adverbs have a uniform low attachment in V complement position and that preverbal/medial position reflects obligatory movement imposed by the status of 地 as a “concordializing element”.</abstract>

AP-de (地) Adverbs in Mandarin

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> In this paper, I argue for an analysis that treats the ba construction in Chinese as a case of shape preservation-induced movement structure. Specifically, the robust preverbal adverbial and PP expressions and the mandatory ba-DP movement in ditransitive structures are both derived from a violable head directionality macroparameter under the Symmetrical Syntax Hypothesis, which allows directionality parameters to examine word order throughout the derivation. In addition to being able to capture the parallel syntactic properties of Scandinavian object shift, this account receives further empirical support from word order facts of Archaic Chinese and Bambara.</abstract>

Parameter Preservation at the Syntax-PF Interface: The Ba Construction Revisited

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> In modern Chinese, a new degree adverb shén 神 is emerging. Expressions such as shénhăochī 神好吃 and shényǒuqù 神有趣 are found in colloquial Chinese, and they even appear as headlines to get readers’ attention. Shén originally refers to the dominator and creator of the universe. In modern Chinese, along with the original meaning, people frequently use shén to modify things (e.g., shén jīyīn 神基因) or actions (e.g., shén huí 神回). How many senses does shén have? How did shén derive the use of degree adverb? The paper targets on shén in modern Chinese, aiming to study its senses, to work out the relations among the various usages, and to find out how it generated the use of degree adverb. The conclusion shows that the senses of shén were derived from its original meaning either directly or indirectly through reanalysis, inference, metaphorization, and metonymization. The use of degree adverb was generated through metaphorization and reanalysis.</abstract>

Shén (神) in Modern Chinese

AHEAD OF PRINT

Volume 44 (2023): Issue 1 (June 2023)

Volume 43 (2022): Issue 2 (December 2022)

Volume 43 (2022): Issue 1 (June 2022)

Volume 42 (2021): Issue 2 (December 2021)

Volume 42 (2021): Issue 1 (June 2021)

Volume 41 (2020): Issue 2 (December 2020)

Volume 41 (2020): Issue 1 (June 2020)

Volume 40 (2019): Issue 2 (December 2019)

Volume 40 (2019): Issue 1 (June 2019)

Volume 39 (2018): Issue 2 (December 2018)

Volume 39 (2018): Issue 1 (June 2018)

Volume 38 (2017): Issue 2 (December 2017)

Volume 38 (2017): Issue 1 (June 2017)

Volume 37 (2016): Issue 2 (December 2016)

Volume 37 (2016): Issue 1 (June 2016)

Volume 36 (2015): Issue 2 (December 2015)

Volume 36 (2015): Issue 1 (May 2015)

Studies in Chinese Linguistics

 STUDIES IN CHINESE LINGUISTICS (ISSN 1017-1274) is an international academic journal devoted to comparative study of Chinese language and linguistics and a platform for research of comparative linguistics and dialectal grammar under a comparative approach. It was first published in 1980 by T.T. Ng Chinese Language Research Centre (CLRC) of the Institute of Chinese Studies at The Chinese University of Hong Kong. The journal is edited by CLRC, published and distributed by Sciendo (formerly De Gruyter Open) since 2015, with a single volume yearly containing two issues, three articles in each issue on average. We especially welcome synchronic or diachronic comparative works on any aspects of the syntax, semantics, and morphology among Chinese dialects or between a Chinese language/dialect and any languages that contribute to theoretical linguistics or have significant theoretical implications.  The journal does not have article processing charges (APCs) nor article submission charges.  Rejection Rate   64%   Archiving  Sciendo archives the contents of this journal in Portico - digital long-term preservation service of scholarly books, journals and collections.  Plagiarism Policy  The editorial board is participating in a growing community of Similarity Check System's users in order to ensure that the content published is original and trustworthy. Similarity Check is a medium that allows for comprehensive manuscripts screening, aimed to eliminate plagiarism and provide a high standard and quality peer-review process. 

Studies in Chinese Linguistics

Volume 39 (2018): Issue 1 (June 2018)

AP-de (地) Adverbs in Mandarin

Parameter Preservation at the Syntax-PF Interface: The Ba Construction Revisited

Shén (神) in Modern Chinese

Wyszukiwanie

Wszystkie tomy i zeszyty w tym czasopiśmie