<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

This article addresses cross-border cooperation between Polish law enforcement authorities and those of other European Union Member States in obtaining electronic evidence in criminal matters. It discusses provisions such as Article 589g § 1, Article 589l § 1, Article 589w § 4, and Article 589ze § 10 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CCP), focusing on defining electronic evidence. Currently, there are no legal definitions for these terms. The article posits that the existing definitions of electronic evidence are imprecise and lead to interpretational doubts. Therefore, it is crucial to organise the conceptual framework in the CCP by creating new definitions or clarifying existing ones. The analysis incorporates the provisions of Regulation (EU) 2023/1543 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2023 on European Prod uction Orders and European Preservation Orders for electronic evidence in criminal proceedings and the execution of custodial sentences following criminal proceedings.
</abstract>

The concept of evidence obtained from electronic correspondence

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

The study is devoted to the issue of international cooperation in combating money laundering as a transnational crime. It is an original scientific article, the purpose of which is to highlight the difficulties that, in the current global situation, are posed by cooperation with third countries, i.e., those that are not members of the European Union. The analysis covers several thematic areas that are of key importance in this regard (using the formal dogmatic method). The specificity of the regulations in force in other countries was also indicated, particularly in the context of modern technologies and threats of cyber-laundering (incorporating elements of the legal and comparative method). As a result, conclusions were drawn regarding the challenges that the fight against laundering raises on the international arena, extending beyond the structures of the EU. The conclusion suggests directions for actions that would be desirable to undertake in order to ensure effective international cooperation with third countries in the field of combating money laundering.
</abstract>

Cooperation with third countries in combating money laundering in the face of modern challenges

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

This article explores the involvement of members from both Polish and foreign consular posts in the process of taking evidence in criminal proceedings. Specifically, it examines the participation of Polish consular officers in the interrogation of witnesses and defendants, as outlined in Article 177 § 1b(2) of the Polish Code of Criminal Procedure. Additionally, the article discusses interrogation of these parties by consuls acting on behalf of Polish courts. Governed by both Polish and international law, this process is situated within the realm of international criminal proceedings and consular law. The article also delves into the right to decline to give evidence, a privilege granted to members of consular posts based on their official functions. In this context, we introduce the concept of ‘consular secrecy’, which can be likened to professional secrecy or secrecy associated with the official roles of certain individuals.
</abstract>

The Involvement of Consuls and Consular Officers in Evidence Gathering under Articles 177 § 1b(2), 586 § 1, and Article 177 § 1 in Conjunction with Articles 582 § 1 and 581 § 1 of the Polish Code of Criminal Procedure

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

This scientific article researches the procedure for issuing a European protection order by a Polish court or public prosecutor, resulting in the enforcement of protective, penal, or probation measures by a competent judicial or equivalent authority in a Member State of the European Union. These measures require refraining from staying in certain environments or places and avoiding contact with or proximity to certain people. This article does not cover provisions concerning the execution of such an order by the competent authority of a Member State. The main research objective is to demonstrate the importance of this measure in continuing the protection of the aggrieved in another Member State. The research findings are original and primarily national in scope but also relevant to other countries due to their relation to an EU instrument. This article analyses the essence of the European protection order, its issuance requirements, including the ruling on the aggrieved’s protection measure, necessity of issuing the order, aggrieved’s motion, issuance proceedings, authorised issuing authorities, ruling form, forum for issuance, issuance mode, right to appeal, order transmission, and information obligations. The paper is significant for its in-depth dogmatic analysis and substantial theoretical content and is practical in guiding interpretation of the requirements for the application of this measure and the issuance procedure.
</abstract>

The Issuance of the European protection order

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

The article discusses matters related to the issuance of the European Investigation Order (EIO) during the stage of a preparatory proceeding, the objective of which is to obtain information protected by banking secrecy from a foreign bank. Attention is drawn to the essence of this instrument of international cooperation in criminal matters and its comprehensive nature. A key problem revealed in prosecutorial and judicial practice consists of determining the entity competent to issue the European Investigation Order in the <italic>in rem</italic> phase of the preparatory proceedings. This issue also necessitates determining whether, in such a procedural situation, it is necessary to obtain the consent of the district court to access information subject to bank secrecy and whether this affects the scope of competence of the court or the prosecutor. An examination of case law and the accompanying opinions of the doctrine presented in the article reveals a non-uniform, even mutually exclusive, approach to this issue. A critical look at the presented range of views enables a clear stance on the aforementioned issues and the formulation of a <italic>de lege ferenda</italic> proposal.
</abstract>

Issuance of the European investigation order at the stage of a preparatory proceeding for the purpose of obtaining information constituting bank secrecy

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

The Act of 7 July 2022, amending the Act – Criminal Code and certain other acts, introduced the possibility of imposing a sentence of life imprisonment without parole into the Criminal Code. The legislator provided for two grounds for the optional imposition of an irreducible life imprisonment sentence. The first (Article 77 § 3 of the Criminal Code) is based on formal grounds: a previous conviction for a specific type of crime (against life and health, freedom, sexual freedom, public security, or of a terrorist nature) to life imprisonment or imprisonment for a term of not less than 20 years. The second ground (Article 77 § 4 of the Criminal Code) operates on a substantive condition: the nature and circumstances of the act and the personal characteristics of the perpetrator indicate that the perpetrator’s remaining at liberty would pose a permanent danger to the life, health, freedom, or sexual freedom of others. This article posits that the provisions of Article 77 § 3 and 4 of the Criminal Code are incompatible with Article 3 of the ECHR, which prohibits torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. As a result of the introduction of this type of punishment in Polish law, we may unfortunately realistically expect other states to refuse to hand over individuals prosecuted for crimes punishable by such punishment or those already sentenced to such punishment.
</abstract>

Consequences of introducing the possibility of imposing an irreducible life sentence into the criminal code with regard to extradition and the execution of the european arrest warrant

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

This article endeavours to answer whether, in light of the current International Criminal Court’s (ICC) powers, it is possible to hold the Russian Federation accountable for international crimes. The answer hinges on the type of crimes committed, as some (such as the crime of aggression) are considered excluded from the ICC’s jurisdiction. The article also explores alternative methods of holding Russia accountable, such as establishing a special <italic>ad hoc</italic> tribunal, a topic widely discussed in the European Parliament and culminating in a resolution of 19 January 2023.
</abstract>

The Competences of the International Criminal Court and the conflict in Ukraine

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

The present gloss refers to the thesis and considerations expressed in the Supreme Court judgement of 28 February 2023, I KZP 13/22, concerning the exception to the rule of speciality stipulated in Article 14(1)(b) of the European Convention on Extradition. The author presents arguments concerning the broad international legal context of the analysed regulation, which develops and confirms the accuracy of the Supreme Court’s stance on a broader than lexical interpretation of the term ‘final discharge’. Moreover, the paper discusses the nature of the exception in question in the light of the standard of protection laid down in Article 52(4) of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland.
</abstract>

Gloss on the judgement of the Supreme Court of 28 February 2023, I KZP 13/22 (expressing approval)

AHEAD OF PRINT

Volume 18 (2024): Issue 1 (March 2024)

Volume 17 (2023): Issue 4 (December 2023)

Volume 17 (2023): Issue 3 (September 2023)

Volume 17 (2023): Issue 2 (June 2023)

Volume 17 (2023): Issue 1 (March 2023)

Volume 16 (2022): Issue 4 (December 2022)

Volume 16 (2022): Issue 3 (September 2022)

Volume 16 (2022): Issue 2 (June 2022)

Volume 16 (2022): Issue 1 (March 2022)

Ius Novum

Ius Novum is an all-Poland scientific journal that presents analytical articles on the science of law, with focus on Central and Eastern European countries. The journal covers a range of basic areas of law, including constitutional law, civil law and procedure, criminal law and procedure, administrative law and procedure, financial law, business law, and international law.　  The journal aims to create a modern forum for the exchange and debate of opinions among scholars of jurisprudence by popularising research results at both domestic and international levels. It takes into account the significance of the impact of legal studies on the social and economic environment of Central and Eastern Europe.  The journal publishes original scientific papers of considerable cognitive value for all representatives of legal science and practice. These papers can be of interest not only to domestic, but also, or even primarily, to international scientific circles. The journal presents innovative dogmatic analyses of current legal solutions, forecasts for the direction of development in various areas of law, legal evaluations of new social phenomena, assessments of the quality of law enactment and application, signals of the efficiency of adopted legal regulations, and discussions on problems concerning legal certainty. Additionally, the journal features empiric research findings of great social importance.   The journal is open not only to the scientific and teaching staff of Lazarski University, but also to representatives of jurisprudence from other academic centres within the international scientific community. We welcome independent scholars with recognised achievements, as well as young scientists who wish to contribute their interesting and innovative ideas to the discourse on law.   The quarterly publishes original articles using research apparatus, and exceptionally, glosses that concern and resolve especially significant scientific issues.　  Archiving  Sciendo archives the contents of this journal in Portico - digital long-term preservation service of scholarly books, journals and collections.  Plagiarism Policy  The editorial board is participating in a growing community of Similarity Check System's users in order to ensure that the content published is original and trustworthy. Similarity Check is a medium that allows for comprehensive manuscripts screening, aimed to eliminate plagiarism and provide a high standard and quality peer-review process. 