<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> In this research, the volume and composition of woody debris (WD) were inventoried by line intersect sampling (LIS) in recreational and conservative parts of Fandoughlou forests in Northwestern Iran. Based on the pre-study qualitative assessments of WD properties, 60 transects in conserved part including 60 ha tract and 60 transects in recreational part including 60 ha and 60 transects were set up for WD survey. In each area, a systematic series of sampling points was located in the inventory of WD. At each sampling point, we performed line-intersect sampling (LIS) with a line length of 100 m with random orientation of sample lines. Estimates of the total volume of WD across recreational and conservative parts of the forest ranged from 0.70 m3 ha-1 to 1.49 m3 ha-1. The results of independent t-test indicated that the amount of CWD and FWD in conserved part is significantly higher than CWD and FWD in recreational part (t4, 0.05 = 4.26, p = 0.013; t4, 0.05 = 2.69, p = 0.05). The number of tree species of CWD composition was higher in conserved area, more than 5 species including (hazel, beech, hornbeam, oak, maple, and other species). In the conserved part, CWD in highly-decayed classes accounted for 75% of total CWD volumes, but in the recreational division, CWD in the early decayed classes accounted for 79% of total WD volumes. Our results suggest preserving the current conserved forests and maintaining the structural and functional integrity of WD.</abstract>

Recreational activities impact on the amount and characteristics of woody debris in the Fandoghlou forests, Northwestern Iran

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> This paper was focused on determining whether gravimetric sampling and impedance method of measuring soil moisture content provided different results and if they did, what was the size of the differences between particular methods on rendzinas and cambisols. The means of moisture content should be equal when using both methods on similar spots. During the research, an Eijkelkamp Penetrologger penetrometer equipped with impedance probes and gravimetric sampling cylinders from Eijkelkamp were used. The samples were taken from the undisturbed stand, ruts, and the centre of the skid trail. The impedance probes were inserted six centimetres deep into the soil. Soil samples were taken from similar depth in order to calculate the moisture content through the gravimetric method. 138 measurements were carried out for each method. The minimal difference of moisture contents measured by individual methods was 0.01%, maximal difference was 22.06%, and on average it was 7.42%. Oneway ANOVA was used for first stage analysis of the statistical sample. It proved that the differences between measurements were statistically significant in two out of three considered stands. Tukey’s HSD test was used to identify which data groups contributed to refuting the aforementioned hypothesis. The test showed that in one stand all relevant pairs of data were significantly different, while in the other stand only data pairs from the ruts were significantly different. The calibration method provided by the producers did not refine the accuracy of the impedance probes sufficiently and different calibration procedures have to be used.</abstract>

Comparison of the gravimetric sampling and impedance methods for measuring soil moisture content

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> Forest research has long traditions in Estonia that can be traced back to the 19th century. Data from long-term forest experiments are available since 1921. The first studies mainly focused on silvicultural treatments and application of such data for understanding and modeling ecological processes was limited. The Department of Forest Management of the Estonian University of Life Sciences started to develop the Estonian Network of Forest Research Plots (ENFRP) in 1995. Since then, plots have been continuously re-measured with 5-year interval. Approximately 100-150 permanent sample plots were measured annually. In 2014, the long-term research network consisted of 729 permanent sample plots, of which 699 have been re-measured at least once, 667 plots - twice and 367 plots - three times. The total number of trees recorded in the network database amounts to 130,479. The plots are systematically distributed throughout the country. Detailed dendrometric measurements including tree spatial distribution are part of the survey protocol. Initially the network was set up to produce suitable data for development of individual tree growth models for Estonia. The significance of the network for the Estonian forest research is continuously increasing and nowadays ENFRP is recognized as an important national research infrastructure.</abstract>

Monitoring and modeling of forest ecosystems: the Estonian Network of Forest Research Plots / Metsaökosüsteemide seire ja modelleerimine metsa kasvukäigu püsiproovitükkide võrgustiku abil

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> We compared the C storage of two nitrogen-fixing trees in mixed and monospecific plantations to investigate the C sequestration potential after 10 years of their establishment. The study was carried out in three types of plantation, Dalbergia sissoo Roxb. ex DC. pure (P1DS), Leucaena leucocephala (Lam.) de Wit pure (P2LL) and mixed plantation of D. sissoo and L. leucocephala (P3DS.LL). The results of the study indicated that, P3DS.LL sequestered 34.30 ± 0.24 t yr-1 ha-1 CO2 compared to 27.35 ± 0.19 t yr-1 ha-1 in P1DS and 19.81 ± 0.44 t yr-1 ha-1 in P2LL. Total carbon storage was also maximum in P3DS.LL (93.47 ± 0.67 t ha-1) followed by P1DS (74.54 ± 0.53 t ha-1) and P2LL (53.98 ± 1.21 t ha-1). This indicates that L. leucocephala has synergetic effect with D. sissoo to enhance the carbon sequestration potential when interplanted together. The study revealed that mixed plantation of N-fixer trees have potential to sequester more carbon than same species in monoculture. The study concluded that in reforestation or afforestation program the synergic effect of N-fixer trees can be helpful projects to offset more C emissions.</abstract>

Carbon sequestration potential of nitrogen-fixing tree stands

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> Paulownia Siebold et Zucc., a widely distributed native genus, has been commonly used in the furniture. The color of wood is a very important aesthetical property, and it has a fundamental influence on the commercial value of timbers. Therefore, it is critical for forest managers to select elite Paulownia clones based on the color of wood. Eighteen 5-year-old Paulownia clones grown in a hilly area in Hubei Province, China were examined in terms of color values (L*, a*, b*), color difference (ΔE*), and Hunter lab space whiteness (W) using a Chroma meter CR-400. Differences in color parameters among the 18 clones were analyzed and clustered. The results showed that the ranges of L*, a*, b*, ΔE*, and W were 77.19-80.38, 3.60-4.84, 13.79-15.69, 17.92-21.37, and 68.92-72.42, respectively. The color parameters significantly differed among the examined clones. Differential and cluster analyses indicated that clones 204, 605, 702, and 603 had higher L*, W, and lower ΔE*, rendering these as elite clones with superior color properties.</abstract>

Key Laboratory of Tree Breeding and Cultivation of the State Forestry Administration, Research Institute of Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China;

China Paulownia Research Center, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Zhengzhou 450003, China

Key Laboratory of Tree Breeding and Cultivation of the State Forestry Administration, Research Institute of Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China

Wood color analysis and integrated selection of Paulownia clones grown in Hubei Province, China

AHEAD OF PRINT

Volume 79 (2023): Issue 1 (December 2023)

Volume 78 (2023): Issue 1 (November 2023)

Volume 77 (2022): Issue 1 (December 2022)

Volume 76 (2022): Issue 1 (December 2022)

Volume 75 (2021): Issue 1 (December 2021)

Volume 74 (2021): Issue 1 (December 2021)

Volume 73 (2020): Issue 1 (December 2020)

Volume 72 (2020): Issue 1 (September 2020)

Volume 71 (2019): Issue 1 (December 2019)

Volume 70 (2019): Issue 1 (June 2019)

Volume 69 (2018): Issue 1 (December 2018)

Volume 68 (2018): Issue 1 (June 2018)

Volume 67 (2017): Issue 1 (December 2017)

Volume 66 (2017): Issue 1 (June 2017)

Volume 65 (2016): Issue 1 (December 2016)

Volume 64 (2016): Issue 1 (June 2016)

Volume 63 (2015): Issue 1 (December 2015)

Volume 62 (2015): Issue 1 (June 2015)

Volume 61 (2014): Issue 1 (December 2014)

Volume 60 (2014): Issue 1 (June 2014)

Volume 59 (2013): Issue 1 (December 2013)

Volume 58 (2013): Issue 1 (June 2013)

Volume 57 (2012): Issue 1 (December 2012)

Volume 56 (2012): Issue 1 (June 2012)

Volume 55 (2011): Issue 1 (December 2011)

Volume 54 (2011): Issue 1 (June 2011)

Volume 53 (2010): Issue 2010 (January 2010)

Volume 52 (2010): Issue 2010 (June 2010)

Volume 51 (2009): Issue 2009 (December 2009)

Volume 50 (2009): Issue 2009 (June 2009)

Volume 49 (2008): Issue 2008 (December 2008)

Volume 48 (2008): Issue 2008 (June 2008)

Forestry Studies

 Forestry Studies | Metsanduslikud Uurimused is a peer-reviewed journal managed by the Institute of Forestry and Rural Engineering, Estonian University of Life Sciences. The journal publishes original research articles, reviews, technical reports and short communications. Papers are published in English or Estonian with English summary. Authors whose mother tongue is not English are strongly urged to have their manuscripts reviewed linguistically before submission. Submission of an article is understood to imply that the article is original and is not being considered for publication elsewhere. Manuscripts generally should not exceed 25 one-sided 1.5-spaced printed pages, including tables, illustrations, references and abstract. Reviews must not exceed 20 pages, technical reports 5 pages. The authors should aim to submit their work as concisely as possible and longer papers will be accepted under exceptional circumstances. Suitable manuscripts are considered by at least two independent referees before acceptance.   Why subscribe and read   the journal publishes research papers on all aspects of forestry (silviculture, dendrology, tree physiology and genetics, forest products, forest operation and techniques, forest economics and policy, etc.), and also close subjects (environmental protection, ecology, botany, zoology, entomology, pathology, soil science, etc.),  the journal is published twice a year in paper and electronic versions,  peer reviewed journal by experts from Europe and US,  publishing history since 1939.   Why submit   submissions accepted in a wide range of categories: original research articles, reviews, technical reports and short communications,  rapid review (by two independent referees) and fast editing process,  coverage by major abstracting and indexing services,  publishing without charge,  accessibility through MetaPress platform.   Archiving  Sciendo archives the contents of this journal in Portico - digital long-term preservation service of scholarly books, journals and collections.  Plagiarism Policy  The editorial board is participating in a growing community of Similarity Check System's users in order to ensure that the content published is original and trustworthy. Similarity Check is a medium that allows for comprehensive manuscripts screening, aimed to eliminate plagiarism and provide a high standard and quality peer-review process. 