City versus Village: Central European and American Perspectives

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">The critique of the city is an almost obligatory cliché of the 20thcentury cultural criticism. This paper offers a parallel critical analysis of the conceptions of American ecologist Lewis Mumford and Hungarian historian István Hajnal. They were contemporaries, and their approaches had been inspired by interwar cultural criticism. Mumford did not hate the city: it was, for him, the engine of history, a reservoir of cultural creativeness. The theory of Hajnal, from many aspects, runs parallel with Mumford’s – moreover, the Hungarian historian gives a detailed theory on the types of European city. What connects them is an ecological approach.</abstract>

City in Modern Cultural Criticism: Lewis Mumford and István Hajnal

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">For long decades in Hungary, not just the inhabitants and their lifestyles but the buildings of the villages were seen as outdated; only small details found their ways as decorative elements of representative architectural styles. A change in the evaluation happened in the second part of 20th century, which led to vivid academic and professional research, extensive popularity and support by the leading socialist power and the public. The paper focuses on the transformation of the built elements from the countryside to the centres, both physically and in their evaluation between World War II and 1989.</abstract>

Heritagizing the Countryside in Hungary

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">An operational urban development relying on the structured cooperation of the public and private sectors is indispensable to purposefully address the challenges posed by sustainable development. Its evolution in Hungary may serve as inspiration for other countries as well. In the period preceding the regime change, it underwent a much more significant disruption as compared to regulation-based urban development. Afterwards, its methods, procedures, and instruments suitable for use in a democratic rule-of-law state and under market economy conditions had to be rebuilt from scratch. For this to happen, two external factors provided assistance: the French–Hungarian urban development cooperation and the EU. As a result, we could witness the successful development of the methods as well as of the conceptual, strategic, and operational planning tools forming a coherent system of operational urban development planning carried through with the public sector’s physical intervention into the urban tissue.</abstract>

An Insight into Operational Urban Development in Hungary in the Light of Regulation-Based Urban Development

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">The Serbo-Croatian language was but one of the casualties of the wars of the Yugoslav secession, as it was discursively forcefully split into first two, then three, and recently four allegedly separate languages. The first line of division was promoted by Serbian and Croatian nationalist linguists during the early nineties, soon to be followed by the invention of a standalone Bosnian language, even though contemporary linguistics agrees that Serbo-Croatian, with its regional varieties (as a standardized polycentric language), is a single language. Coming late into the fray, nationally-minded linguists from Montenegro achieved the state-driven proclamation of Montenegrin as a separate language to be in official use within the state only in 2007. Backed by the state, a coterie of nationalist literary theorists and linguists started discursively promoting Montenegrin in academic and public spaces, mostly via the dubious quasi-academic journal titled <italic>Lingua Montenegrina.</italic> This article explores the manners in which Montenegrin nationalist linguists discursively created what they dub to be a language entirely separate from all variants of Serbo-Croatian, which are mostly contained in encomiastic texts about key nationalists, attempts to classify several allophones and phonemes as well as to assert the purported primordial character of the language.</abstract>

The Discursive Creation of the ‘Montenegrin Language’ and Montenegrin Linguistic Nationalism in the 21st Century

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">This paper deals with the state of language rights in Luxembourg in the light of immigration and the multilingualism associated with it. Although Luxembourg might appear to be an ideal case of multilingualism with three official languages (Luxembourgish, French, and German), the reality is very different because its language policies are marked by a hierarchy: while Luxembourgish has the symbolic dominance as the ‘national language’, French is the preferred language in the workplace and administration. The situation has become complex due to the steady influx of immigrants since the 1970s. Currently, more than 40 per cent of Luxembourg’s population consists of foreigners, and this has changed the linguistic situation in the sense that Portuguese has become one of the most widely spoken languages in Luxembourg, although it does not enjoy any legal safeguards. Taking account of this multilingual scenario, this paper examines the rights of different linguistic communities in Luxembourg. On the one hand, there is the need to protect Luxembourgish, which is the majority language in Luxembourg but a minority language when compared to other national languages of Europe, while, on the other hand, the needs of its Portuguesespeaking community also have to be taken into account since the use of German as the medium of instruction at primary level disadvantages them. Finally, the paper will also consider the role and the future of the other two main languages (French and German).</abstract>

Migration, Language Policies, and Language Rights in Luxembourg

Post-Socialist Neoliberalism and the Ethnography of Uncertainty

AHEAD OF PRINT

Volume 22 (2022): Issue 1 (December 2022)

Volume 21 (2022): Issue 1 (November 2022)

Volume 20 (2021): Issue 1 (December 2021)

Volume 19 (2021): Issue 1 (November 2021)

Volume 18 (2020): Issue 1 (December 2020)

Volume 17 (2020): Issue 1 (October 2020)

Volume 16 (2019): Issue 1 (December 2019)

Volume 15 (2019): Issue 1 (November 2019)

Volume 14 (2018): Issue 1 (December 2018)

Volume 13 (2018): Issue 1 (December 2018)

Volume 12 (2017): Issue 1 (December 2017)

Volume 11 (2017): Issue 1 (September 2017)

Volume 10 (2016): Issue 1 (December 2016)

Volume 9 (2016): Issue 1 (October 2016)

Volume 8 (2015): Issue 1 (December 2015)

Volume 7 (2015): Issue 1 (August 2015)

Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, European and Regional Studies

Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, European and Regional Studies publishes original papers and surveys concerning the historical development, the economic, societal, political and philosophical dimensions of the European integration project. The European and Regional Studies series provides an independent forum for informed debate and discussion of European affairs.The printed and online versions of the papers are identical.  Why subscribe and read  Our journal publishes original and timely articles in the field of European and regional studies.  Why submit  Due to the multidisciplinary character of the European and regional studies, we accept articles from several fields. Besides this, publishing time is relatively short, providing so the topicality of the articles.  Rejection Rate   38%   Archiving  Sciendo archives the contents of this journal in Portico - digital long-term preservation service of scholarly books, journals and collections.  Plagiarism Policy  The editorial board is participating in a growing community of Similarity Check System's users in order to ensure that the content published is original and trustworthy. Similarity Check is a medium that allows for comprehensive manuscripts screening, aimed to eliminate plagiarism and provide a high standard and quality peer-review process.  Article Processing Charge (APC)  The journal does not have article processing charges (APCs) nor article submission charges. 