[
Agamben, G. (2003). State of exception. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ash, J. (2015). Sensations, networks and the GIF: Towards an allotropic account of affect. In K. Hillis, P. Susanna & P. Michael (Eds.), Networked Affect (pp. 119–134). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barassi, V. (2015). Social Media, Immediacy and the Time for Democracy: Critical Reflections on Social Media as ‘Temporalizing Practices’. In L. Dencik & O. Leistert (Eds.), Critical perspectives on social media and protest (pp. 73–90). London: Rowman & Littlefield
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg. A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.67066110.1080/1369118X.2012.670661
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2013). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139198752
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bishop, C. (2012). Artificial hells: Participatory art and the politics of spectatorship. London: Verso.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Boyd, D. (2011). Social network sites and networked publics: Affordances, dynamics and implications. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), A networked self: Identity, community and culture on social network sites (pp. 39–58). New York, NY: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Braidotti, R. (2009). On putting the active back into activism. New Formations, 68, 42–57.10.3898/newf.68.03.2009
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brunner, C. (2013). Relaying and re-beginning. transmutations, 1. Retrieved from http://transmutations.org/site/relaying-and-re-beginning/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brunner, C., & Fritsch, J. (2011). Interactive environments as fields of transduction. The Fibreculture Journal, 18, 118–145.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Butler, J. (2011). Bodies in alliance and the politics of the street. transversal online. Retrieved from http://eipcp.net/transversal/1011/butler/en/print
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bärtsch, T., Drognitz, D., Eschenmoser, S., Grieder, M., Hanselmann, A., Kamber, A., Rauch, A.P., Raunig, G., Schreibmüller, P., Schrick, N., Umurungi, M., & Vanecek, J. (Eds.). (2017). Ökologien der Sorge. Wien: transversal texts.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Castells, M. (2015). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the internet age. (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK; Malden, MA: Polity Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Couldry, N. (2010). Why voice matters: Culture and politics after neoliberalism. Los Angeles/London: SAGE.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Crary, J. (1992). Techniques of the Observer: On Vision and Modernity in the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Crary, J. (2001). Suspensions of perception: Attention, spectacle and modern culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
De Cauter, L., De Roo, R., & Vanhaesebrouck, K. (Eds.). (2011). Art and activism in the age of globalization. Rotterdam: NAi Publishers.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Deleuze, G. (1990). The logic of sense. London: The Athlone Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fritsch, J. (2009). Understanding affective engagement as a resource in interaction design. Proceedings of „Engaging Artifacts“, Nordic Design Research Conference 2009.10.21606/nordes.2009.020
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Garcia D., & Lovink, G. (1997). The ABC of tactical media. nettime, https://www.nettime.org/Lists-Archives/nettime-l-9705/msg00096.html
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gerbaudo, P. (2012). Tweets and the streets: Social media and contemporary activism. London, UK: Pluto Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gilbert, J. (2014). Common ground: Democracy and collectivity in an age of individualism. London, UK: Pluto Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Grusin, R. (2010). Premediation: Affect and mediality after 9/11. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hands, J. (2011). @ Is for Activism: Dissent, resistance and rebellion in a digital culture. London/New York, NY: Pluto.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hillis, K., Paasonen, S., & Petit, M. (Eds.). (2015). Networked affect. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9715.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Holmes, B. (2008). Swarmachine: Activist media tomorrow. Third Text, 22(5), 525–534. https://doi.org/10.1080/0952882080244000310.1080/09528820802440003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Holmes, B. (2009). Escape the overcode: Activist art in the control society. Eindhoven/Zagreb/Istanbul: WHW, Van Abbe Museum.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kester, G. (2011). The one and the many: Contemporary collaborative art in global context. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kurban, C., Peña-Lopez, I., & Haberer, M. (2015). What is technopolitics? A conceptual scheme for understanding politics in the digital age.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lievrouw, L. A. (2011). Alternative and activist new media. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Massumi, B. (1887). Notes on the Translation and Acknowledgments. In G. Deleuze, Guattari F. A Thousand Plateaus. Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press, xvi–xix.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Massumi, B. (2002). Parables for the virtual: Movement, sensation, affect. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Massumi, B. (2005). Fear (The Spectrum Said). positions,13(1), 31–48.10.1215/10679847-13-1-31
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Massumi, B. (2011). Semblance and event: Activist philosophy and the cccurrent arts, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/7681.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Massumi, B. (2015a). Ontopower: War powers, and the state of perception. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.10.1515/9780822375197
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Massumi, B. (2015b). The power at the end of the economy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.10.1515/9780822375814
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Massumi, B. (2015c). What animals teach us about politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.10.1515/9780822376057
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Massumi, B. (2019). Architecture of the unforeseen: Essays in the occurrent arts. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.10.5749/j.ctvpwhdm8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Massumi, B., & McKim, J. (2009). “Of microperception and micropolitics” – an interview with Brian Massumi. Inflexions 3. http://inflexions.org/n3_massumihtml.html
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McCosker, A. (2015). Social media activism at the margins: Managing visibility, voice and vitality affects. Social Media + Society, 1(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/205630511560586010.1177/2056305115605860
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Milan, S. (2015). Mobilizing in times of social media. From a politics of identity to a politics of visibility. In L. Dencik & O. Leistert (Eds.), Critical perspectives on social media and protest (pp. 53–71). London: Rowman & Littlefield.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Papacharissi, Z. (2014). Affective publics: Sentiment, technology, and politics. Oxford/New York, NY: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199999736.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective publics and structures of storytelling: Sentiment, events and mediality. Information, Communication & Society, 19(3), 307–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.110969710.1080/1369118X.2015.1109697
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pignarre, P., & Stengers, I. (2011). Capitalist sorcery: Breaking the spell. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Raley, R. (2009). Tactical media. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rancière, J. (2005). The politics of aesthetics. London: Continuum.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rancière, J. (2010). Dissensus: On politics and aesthetics. London/New York, NY: Continuum.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Raunig, G. (2007). Art and revolution: Transversal activism in the long twentieth century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Raunig, G. (2016). Dividuum: Machinic capitalism and molecular revolution. South Pasadena, CA: Semiotext(e).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Reed, T.V. (2019). The art of protest. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.10.5749/j.ctvb1hrcf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Reestorff, C. M. (2014). Mediatised affective activism: The activist imaginary and the topless body in the Femen movement. Convergence, 20(4), 478–495.10.1177/1354856514541358
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Reestorff, C. M. (2017). Culture war: Affective cultural politics, tepid nationalism, art activism. Bristol: Intellect.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Simondon, G. (2005). L’individuation à la lumière des notions de forme et d’information. Grenoble: Millon.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Thompson, N. (2012). Living as form: Socially engaged art from 1991-2011. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Toret, J. (2013). Tecnopolítica: la potencia de las multitudes conectadas. El sistema red 15M, un nuevo paradigma de la política distribuida. IN3 Working Paper Series. https://tecnopolitica.net/sites/default/files/1878-5799-3-PB%20(2).pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Treré, E., & Barrnquero Carretero, A. (2018). Tracing the roots of technopolitics: Towards a North-South dialogue. In F. Sierra Caballero & T. Gravante (Eds.), Networks, movements and technopolitics in Latin America (pp. 43–63). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zarzycka, M., & Olivieri, D. (2017). Affective encounters: Tools of interruption for activist media practices. Feminist Media Studies, 17(4), 527–534. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2017.1326546.10.1080/14680777.2017.1326546
]Search in Google Scholar