[Andrejevic, M. (2004). Reality TV. The work of being watched. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.]Search in Google Scholar
[Arnstein, S.R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216-224.10.1080/01944366908977225]Search in Google Scholar
[Bailey, O., Cammaerts, B., & Carpentier, N. (2007). Understanding alternative media. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Barker, J., & Tucker, R.N. (1990). The interactive learning revolution: Multimedia in education and training. London: Kogan Page.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bauwens, M. (2009). Co-creation and the new industrial paradigm of peer production. Fibreculture, 14. Retrieved from http://journal.fibreculture.org/issue14/issue14_bauwens.html.]Search in Google Scholar
[Baym, N.K. (2002). Interpersonal life online. In L. Lievrouw & S. Livingstone (Eds.), The handbook of the new media. The social shaping and consequences of ICTs (pp. 62-76). London: Sage.]Search in Google Scholar
[Berrigan, F.J. (1979). Community communications. The role of community media in development. Paris: UNESCO.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bey, H. (1985). The temporary autonomous zone, ontological anarchy, poetic terrorism. Brooklyn: Autono-media.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bunge, M.A. (1977). Treatise on basic philosophy: Volume 3: Ontology I: The furniture of the world. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-94-010-9924-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Carpentier, N. (2003). Access and participation in the discourse of the digital divide. The European perspective at/on the WSIS. In J. Servaes (Ed.), The European information society. A reality check (pp. 99-120). Bristol: Intellect.]Search in Google Scholar
[Carpentier, N. (2006). Participation and power in the television program Temptation Island. In N. Carpentier, et al. (Eds.), Researching media, democracy and participation. The intellectual work of the 2006 European media and communication doctoral summer school (pp. 135-147). Tartu: University of Tartu Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Carpentier, N., & Patyn, N. (2007). MUDs and power. Reducing the democratic imaginary? Studies in Communication / Estudos em Comunicação, 2, 1-45.]Search in Google Scholar
[Carpentier, N. (2011). Media and participation. A site of ideological-democratic struggle. Bristol: Intellect.]Search in Google Scholar
[Carpentier, N., & Doudaki, V. (2013). Community media for reconciliation. A Cypriot case study. Communication, Culture and Critique, 7(4), 415-434.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cassarino, I., & Richter, W. (2008). Swarm creativity. The legal and organizational challenges of open content film production. DIME Working Papers on Intellectual Property Rights no. 45. Retrieved from http://www.bbk.ac.uk/innovation/publications/dime/docs/WP45-IPR.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[Children’s Partnership (2000). Online content for low-income and underserved Americans: An issue brief. Retrieved from http://www.contentbank.org/ataglance_issuebrief.asp, 2000.]Search in Google Scholar
[De Jaegher, H., & Di Paolo, E. (2007). Participatory sense-making. An enactive approach to social cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6(4), 485-507.10.1007/s11097-007-9076-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Debruyne, P., & Gielen, P. (Eds.). (2011). Community art. The politics of trespassing. Amsterdam: Valiz Antennae.]Search in Google Scholar
[DeFleur, M.L., & Dennis, E.E. (1994). Understanding mass communication. A liberal arts perspective (5th edition). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.]Search in Google Scholar
[Eco, U. (1968). La struttura assente. La ricerca semiotica e il metodo strutturale/The absent structure. Semiotic research and the structuralist method. Milano: Bompiani.]Search in Google Scholar
[Festinger, L., & Thibaut, J. (1951). Interpersonal communication in small groups. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46(1), 92-99.10.1037/h0054899]Search in Google Scholar
[Fierlbeck, K. (1998). Globalizing democracy. Power, legitimacy and the interpretation of democratic ideas. Manchester: Manchester University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fiske, J. (1987). Television culture. London: Taylor & Francis.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fiske, J. (1989). Understanding popular culture. London: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Foucault, M. (1978). History of sexuality, Part 1. An introduction. New York: Pantheon.]Search in Google Scholar
[Garton, A. (1995). Social interaction and the development of language and cognition. Hove: Psychology Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Giddens, A. (2006). Sociology (5th edition). Cambridge: Polity Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gist, N.P. (1950). Social interaction and social process. In S. Eldridge (Ed.), Fundamentals of sociology; A situational analysis (pp. 361–380). New York: Thomas Y. Crowell Company.]Search in Google Scholar
[Guattari, F. (1993). Machinic heterogenesis. In V. Andermatt Conley (Ed.), Rethinking technologies (pp. 13-27). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gurstein, M. (2000). Community informatics: Enabling communities with information and communications technologies. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Inc (IGI).10.4018/978-1-878289-69-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms. Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/1564.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Haeckel, S.H. (1998). About the nature and future of interactive marketing. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 12(1), 63-71.10.1002/(SICI)1520-6653(199824)12:1<63::AID-DIR8>3.0.CO;2-C]Search in Google Scholar
[Hall, S. (1980). Encoding/decoding. In S. Hall (Ed.), Culture, media, language. Working papers in Cultural Studies, 1972–79 (pp. 128-138). London: Hutchinson.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hartmann, M. (2008). Fandom without the trimmings? EURO 2008, public viewing and new kinds of audiences. In N. Carpentier et al. (Eds.), Democracy, journalism and technology. New developments in an enlarged Europe (pp. 255-266). Tartu: Tartu University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hasebrink, U., Herzog, A., & Eilders, C. (2007). Media users’ participation in Europe from a civil society perspective. In P. Baldi & U. Hasebrink (Eds.), Broadcasters and citizens in Europe. Trends in media accountability and viewer participation (pp. 75-91). Bristol: Intellect.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hoffman, D., & Novak, T. (1996). Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: Conceptual foundations. Journal of Marketing, 60, 58-60.10.1177/002224299606000304]Search in Google Scholar
[Hoffmann, B. (2003). Medienpädagogik: eine Einführung in Theorie und Praxis/Media pedagogics. An introduction in theory and praxis. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh (UTB).]Search in Google Scholar
[Horton, D., & Wohl, R.R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry, 19, 215-229.10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049]Search in Google Scholar
[Jaeger, P.T., & Bowman, C.A. (2005). Understanding disability: Inclusion, access, diversity, and civil rights. Portsmouth: Greenwood Publishing Group.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture. Where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jensen, J.F. (1998). ‘Interactivity’: Tracing a new concept in media and communication studies”, Nordicom review, 19(1), 185-204.]Search in Google Scholar
[Katz, E., Blumler, J., & Gurevitch, M. (1974). Utilisation of mass communication by the individual. In J. Blumler & E. Katz (Eds.), The uses of mass communications. Current perspectives on gratifications research (pp. 19-32). Beverly Hills/London: Sage.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kolodzy, J. (2006). Convergence journalism: Writing and reporting across the news media. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lee, J.-S. (2000). Interactivity: A new approach. Paper presented at the 2000 Convention of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Phoenix, Arizona.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lindlof, T.R. (1988). Media audiences as interpretative communities. Communication Yearbook, 11, 81-107.]Search in Google Scholar
[Livingstone, S., & Lunt, P. (1996). Talk on television. Audience participation and public debate. London: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[MacBride Commission [The International Commission for the Study of Communication Problems] (1980). Many voices, one world. Towards a new more just and more efficient world information and communication order. Report by the International Commission for the Study of Communication Problems. Paris and London: UNESCO & Kogan Page.]Search in Google Scholar
[Manovich, L. (2001). The language of new media. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[McMillan, S. (2002). Exploring models of interactivity from multiple research traditions: Users, documents and systems. In L. Lievrouw & S. Livingstone (Eds.), The Handbook of the new media. The social shaping and consequences of ICTs (pp. 163-182). London: Sage.]Search in Google Scholar
[Melucci, A. (1989). Nomads of the present. Social movements and individual needs in contemporary society. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Merrill, F.E., & Eldredge, H. W. (1957). Society and culture: An introduction to sociology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.]Search in Google Scholar
[Morley, D., & Silverstone, R. (1990). Domestic communication – Technologies and meanings. Media, Culture and Society, 12(1), 31-55.10.1177/016344390012001003]Search in Google Scholar
[Morton, L., Bitto, E., Oakland, M., & Sand, M. (2008). Accessing food resources: Rural and urban patterns of giving and getting food. Agriculture & Human Values, 25(1), 107-119.10.1007/s10460-007-9095-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Neeson, J.M. (1996). Commoners: Common Right, enclosure and social change in England, 1700–1820. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Newhagen, J.E., & Bucy, E.P. (2004). Routes to media access. In E.P. Bucy & J.E. Newhagen (Eds.), Media access: Social and psychological dimensions of new technology use (pp. 3-26). London: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Page, R.E. (2011). Stories and social media: Identities and interaction. London: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Palmgreen, P., & Rayburn, J.D. II (1985). An expectancy-value approach to media gratifications. In K.E. Rosengren, P. Palmgreen & L. Wenner (Eds.), Media gratification research (pp. 61-73). Beverly Hills & London: Sage.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pateman, C. (1970). Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511720444]Search in Google Scholar
[Penchansky, R., & Thomas, J.W. (1981). The concept of access: Definition and relationship to consumer satisfaction. Medical Care, 19(2), 127-140.10.1097/00005650-198102000-00001]Search in Google Scholar
[Penny, S. (1995). Consumer culture and the technological imperative. In Simon Penny (Ed.), Critical issues in electronic media (pp. 47-73). New York: State University of New York Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Persson, P., Höök, K., & Simsarian, K. (2000). Human–computer interaction versus reception studies: Objectives, methods and ontologies. NorFA Research Seminar Reception: Film, TV, Digital Culture, Department of Cinema Studies. Retrieved from http://www.sics.se/~perp/AComparisonofHuman.]Search in Google Scholar
[Potts, J.D., Hartley, J., Banks, J.A., Burgess, J.E., Cobcroft, R.S., Cunningham, S.D., & Montgomery, L. (2008). Consumer co-creation and situated creativity. Industry and Innovation, 15(5), 459-474.10.1080/13662710802373783]Search in Google Scholar
[Radway, J. (1988). Reading the romance. Women, patriarchy and popular literature. Chapel Hill & London: University of North Carolina Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rafaeli, S. (1988). Interactivity: From new media to communication. In R.P. Hawkins, J. M. Wiemann & S. Pingree (Eds.), Advancing communication science. Merging mass & interpersonal processes (pp. 110–134). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.]Search in Google Scholar
[Renckstorf, K., McQuail, D., & Jankowski, N. (1996). Media use as social action. A European approach to audience studies. London: Libbey.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rice, R.E. (2002). Primary issues in Internet use: Access, civic and community involvement, and social interaction and expression. In L. Lievrouw & S. Livingstone (Eds.), The handbook of the new media. The social shaping and consequences of ICTs (pp. 105-129). London: Sage.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rodríguez, C. (2011). Citizens’ media against armed conflict. Disrupting violence in Colombia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.10.5749/minnesota/9780816665839.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Roig, A. (2009). Cine en conexión: Producción industrial y social en la era cross-media. Barcelona: Editorial UOC.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rokeby, D. (1995). Transforming mirrors: Subjectivity and control in interactive media. In S. Penny (Ed.), Critical issues in electronic media (pp. 133-158). New York: State University of New York Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Romero, D., & Molina, A. (2011). Collaborative networked organisations and customer communities: Value co-creation and co-innovation in the networking era. Production Planning & Control, 22(5-6), 447-472.10.1080/09537287.2010.536619]Search in Google Scholar
[Servaes, J. (1999). Communication for development. One world, multiple cultures. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sharma, R.K. (1996). Fundamentals of sociology. New Delhi: Atlantic Publishers & Dist.]Search in Google Scholar
[Skog, D. (2005). Social interaction in virtual communities: The significance of technology. International Journal of Web Based Communities, 1(4), 464-474.10.1504/IJWBC.2005.008111]Search in Google Scholar
[Stein, L. (2001). Access television and grassroots political communication in the United States. In J. Downing, with T.V. Ford, G. Gil & L. Stein (Eds.), Radical media. Rebellious communication and social movements (pp. 299-324). London: Sage.]Search in Google Scholar
[Steyaert, J. (2002). Inequality and the digital divide: Myths and realities. In S. Hick & J. McNutt (Eds.), Advocacy, Activism, and the Internet. Community organization and social policy (pp. 199-211). New York: Lyceum Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Szuprowicz, B.O. (1995). Multimedia networking. New York: McGraw-Hill.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tabing, L. (2002). How to do community radio. A primer for community radio operators. New Delhi: UNESCO.]Search in Google Scholar
[Thompson, J.B. (1995). The media and modernity. A social theory of the media. Cambridge: Polity Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Titchkosky, T. (2011). The question of access: Disability, space, meaning. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Turner, J.H. (1988). A theory of social interaction. Stanford: Stanford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wegerich, K., & Warner, J. (2004). The politics of water: A survey. London: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[White, S. (Ed.). (1994). Participatory communication. Working for change and development. Beverly Hills: Sage.]Search in Google Scholar
