[
Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Addison-Wesley.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Amichai-Hamburger, Y. (2012). Reducing intergroup conflict in the digital age. In H. Giles (Ed.), The handbook of intergroup communication (pp. 181–193). Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Amichai-Hamburger, Y., Hasler, B. S., & Shani-Sherman, T. (2015). Structured and unstructured intergroup contact in the digital age. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 515–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.022
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Amichai-Hamburger, Y., & McKenna, K. Y. A. (2006). The contact hypothesis reconsidered: Interacting via the Internet. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(3), 825–843. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00037.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ben-Ze’ev, A. (2003). Privacy, emotional closeness, and openness in cyberspace. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(4), 451–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00078-X
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bode, L. (2016). Pruning the news feed: Unfriending and unfollowing political content on social media. Research & Politics, 3(3), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168016661873
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Boyd, D. (2010). Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), A networked self (pp. 39-58). Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brown, R., Eller, A., Leeds, S., & Stace, K. (2007). Intergroup contact and intergroup attitudes: A longitudinal study. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37(4), 692–703. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.384
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brown, R., & Hewstone, M. (2005). An integrative theory of intergroup contact. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 255–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(05)37005-5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brown, R., Vivian, J., & Hewstone, M. (1999). Changing attitudes through intergroup contact: The effects of group membership salience. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29(5–6), 741–764. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199908/09)29:5/6<741::AID-EJSP972>3.0.CO;2-8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Carr, C. T., Varney, E. J., & Blesse, J. R. (2016). Social media and intergroup communication: Collapsing and expanding group contexts. In H. Giles & A. Maass (Eds.), Advances in intergroup communication (pp. 155–173). Peter Lang.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Christofides, E., Muise, A., & Desmarais, S. (2009). Information disclosure and control on Facebook: Are they two sides of the same coin or two different processes? CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12(3), 341–344. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2008.0226
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., Validzic, A., Matoka, K., Johnson, B., & Frazier, S. (1997). Extending the benefits of recategorization: Evaluations, self-disclosure, and helping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33(4), 401–420. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1997.1327
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dovidio, J. F., ten Vergert, M., Stewart, T. L., Gaertner, S. L., Johnson, J. D., Esses, V. M., Riek, B. M., & Pearson, A. R. (2004). Perspective and prejudice: Antecedents and mediating mechanisms. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(12), 1537–1549. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271177
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gallagher, J. D., Heerdink, M. W., & Hewstone, M. (2021). Online engagement between opposing political protest groups via social media is linked to physical violence of offline encounters. Social Media + Society, 7(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120984445
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gudykunst, W. B. (1993). Toward a theory of effective interpersonal and intergroup communication: An anxiety/uncertainty management (AUM) perspective. In R. L. Wiseman & J. Koester (Eds.), Intercultural communication competence (pp. 33–71). Sage.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Guess, A., Lyons, B., Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2018). Avoiding the echo chamber about echo chambers: Why selective exposure to like-minded political news is less prevalent than you think. Knight Foundation.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Harwood, J. (2010). The contact space: A novel framework for intergroup contact research. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29(2), 154–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X09359520
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Harwood, J. (2021). Modes of intergroup contact: If and how to interact with the outgroup. Journal of Social Issues 77(2), 147–177. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12421
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Harwood, J., Hewstone, M., Paolini, S., & Voci, A. (2005). Grandparent– grandchild contact and attitudes toward older adults: Moderator and mediator effects. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(3), 393–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271577
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hewstone, M. (1996). Contact and categorization: Social psychological interventions to change intergroup relations. In C. N. Macrae, C. Stangor, & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Stereotypes and stereotyping (pp. 323–368).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Guilford. Hewstone, M., & Brown, R. (1986). Contact is not enough: An intergroup perspective on the ‘Contact Hypothesis’. In M. Hewstone & R. Brown (Eds.), Contact and conflict in intergroup encounters (pp.1-44). Blackwell.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hogg, M. A. (2000). Social processes and human behavior: Social psychology. In K. Pawlik & M. R. Rosenzweig (Eds.), International handbook of psychology (pp. 305–327). Sage.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hogg, M. A., & Vaughan, G. M. (2008). Social psychology (5th ed.). Pearson.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McKenna, K. Y. A., Green, A. S., & Gleason, M. E. J. (2002). Relationship formation on the internet: What’s the big attraction? Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 9–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00246
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Menard, S. (2008). Handbook of longitudinal research: Design, measurement, and analysis. Elsevier.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Miller, N. (2002). Personalization and the promise of contact theory. Journal of Social Issues, 58(2), 387-410. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00267
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nguyen, Μ., Bin, Y.S., & Campbell, A. (2012). Comparing online and offline self-disclosure: A systematic review. CyberPsychology, Behavior & Social Networking, 15(2), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2011.0277
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ortiz, Μ., & Harwood, J. (2007). A social cognitive theory approach to the effects of mediated intergroup contact on intergroup attitudes. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 51(4), 615–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838150701626487
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Parks, M. R. (2010). Social network sites as virtual communities. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), A networked self (pp. 105-123). Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pettigrew, T. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65–85.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pettigrew, T. F. (2021). Advancing intergroup contact theory: Comments on the issue’s articles. Journal of Social Issues 77(2), 258–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12423
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751–783. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Postmes, T., Spears, R. & Lea, M. (2002). Intergroup differentiation in computer-mediated communication: Effects of depersonalization. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.6.1.3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Postmes, T., Spears, R., Sakhel, K., & De Groot, D. (2001). Social influence in computer-mediated communication: The effects of anonymity on group behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(10), 1243–1254. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672012710001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Reicher, S. D., Spears, R., & Postmes, T. (1995). A social identity model of deindividuation phenomena. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (pp. 161–198). Wiley.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rheingold, H. (2000). The virtual community (Rev. Ed.). MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Reinecke, L., & Trepte, S. (2008). Privatsphäre 2.0: Konzepte von Privatheit, Intimsphäre und Werten im Umgang mit ‘user-generated-content’ [Privacy 2.0: Concepts of privacy, intimacy and values regarding the use of ‘usergenerated-content’]. In A. Zerfaß, M. Welker, & J. Schmidt (Eds.), Kommunikation, Partizipation und Wirkungen im Social Web. Band 1: Grundlagen und Methoden: Von der Gesellschaft zum Individuum [Communication, participation and effects of the social web. Volume 1: Basic principles and methods: From society to the individuum] (pp. 205–228). Herbert von Halem Verlag.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ruspini, E. (2002). Introduction to longitudinal research. Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Spears, R., & Postmes, T. (2015). Group identity, social influence and collective action online: Extensions and aßpplications of the SIDE model. In S. S. Sundar (Ed.) The handbook of psychology of communication technology (pp. 23–46). Blackwell.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (1984), The role of ignorance in intergroup relations. In N. Miller & M.B. Brewer (Eds.), Groups in contact: The psychology of desegregation (pp. 229–256). Academic Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (2001). Improving intergroup relations. Sage. Sternberg, C., Gartzou-Katsouyanni, K., Nicolaïdis, K. (2018). The setting: The Greco-German affair on the Euro stage. In C. Sternberg, K. Gartzou-Katsouyanni, & K. Nicolaidis (Eds.) The Greco-German affair in the Euro crisis. Palgrave studies in European Union politics (pp. 121–139). Palgrave Pivot.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tajfel, Η., & Turner, J.C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W.G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks/Cole.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tidwell, L. S., & Walther, J. B. (2002). Computer-mediated communication effects on disclosure, impressions, and interpersonal evaluations. Getting to know one another a bit at a time. Human Communication Research, 28(3), 317–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00811.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Trepte, S., & Reinecke, L. (2013). The reciprocal effects of social network site use and the disposition for self-disclosure: A longitudinal study. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 1102–1112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.10.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Turner, R. N., Hewstone, M., & Voci, A. (2007). Reducing explicit and implicit prejudice via direct and extended contact: The mediating role of self-disclosure and intergroup anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(3), 369–388. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.3.369
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Turner, R. N., Hewstone, M., Voci, A., & Vonofakou, C. (2008). A test of the extended intergroup contact hypothesis: The mediating role of intergroup anxiety, perceived ingroup and outgroup norms, and inclusion of the outgroup in the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(4), 843–860. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0011434
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tzogopoulos, G., (2015). Greek-German relations in times of crisis. Institut Français des Relations Internationales.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vasileiadis, G., Tsioumis, K., Vamvakidou, I., & Sailakis, I. (2020). Representations of the Greek German relationship in the decade of crisis (2008-2018): A case study on the Greek public history magazine “The Illustrated History”. In B. Krzywosz-Rynkiewicz & V. Zorbas (Eds.), Citizenship at a crossroads: Rights, identity, and education (368–381). Charles University and Children’s Identity and Citizenship European Association.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vezzali, L., Hewstone, M., Capozza, D., Giovannini, D., & Wölfer, R. (2014). Improving intergroup relations with extended and vicarious forms of indirect contact. European Review of Social Psychology, 25(1), 314–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2014.982948
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Voci, A., & Hewstone, M. (2003). Intergroup contact and prejudice toward immigrants in Italy: The mediational mole of anxiety and the moderational role of group salience. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 6(1), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430203006001011
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Walther, J. B. (2007). Selective self-presentation in computer-mediated communication: Hyperpersonal dimensions of technology, language, and cognition. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(5), 2538–2557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2006.05.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Walther, J.B., Hoter, E., Ganayem, A., & Shonfeld, S. (2014). Computer-mediated communication and the reduction of prejudice: A controlled longitudinal field experiment among Jews and Arabs in Israel. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 550–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.08.004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wilson, R.E., Gosling, S.D., & Graham, L.T. (2012). A review of Facebook research in the social sciences. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(3), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612442904
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wölfer, R., Faber, N. S., & Hewstone, M. (2015). Social network analysis in the science of groups: Cross-sectional and longitudinal applications for studying intra- and intergroup behavior. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 19(1), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000021
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wright, S. C., Aron, A., McLaughlin-Volpe, T., & Ropp, S. A. (1997). The extended contact effect: Knowledge of cross-group friendships and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(1), 73–90.
]Search in Google Scholar