This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Yelin E, Callahan LF. The economic cost and social and psychological impact of musculoskeletal conditions. National Arthritis Data Work Groups. Arthritis Rheum. 1995; 38:1351-62.YelinECallahanLF.The economic cost and social and psychological impact of musculoskeletal conditionsNational Arthritis Data Work Groups. Arthritis Rheum.19953813516210.1002/art.1780381002Search in Google Scholar
Wluka AE, Cicuttini FM, Spector TD. Menopause, oestrogens and arthritis. Maturitas. 2000; 35:183-99.1093673610.1016/S0378-5122(00)00118-3WlukaAECicuttiniFMSpectorTD.Menopause, oestrogens and arthritisMaturitas.20003518399Search in Google Scholar
Lawrence JS, Bremner JM, Bier F. Osteo-arthrosis. Prevalence in the population and relationship between symptoms and x-ray changes. Ann Rheum Dis. 1966; 25:1-24.590533410.1136/ard.25.1.1LawrenceJSBremnerJMBierF.Osteo-arthrosis. Prevalence in the population and relationship between symptoms and x-ray changesAnn Rheum Dis.196625124Search in Google Scholar
Brandt KD, Fife RS. Ageing in relation to the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis. Clin Rheum Dis. 1986; 12:117-30.3522081BrandtKDFifeRS.Ageing in relation to the pathogenesis of osteoarthritisClin Rheum Dis.1986121173010.1016/S0307-742X(21)00623-8Search in Google Scholar
Guermazi A, Zaim S, Taouli B, Miaux Y, Peterfy CG, Genant HG. MR findings in knee osteoarthritis. Eur Radiol. 2003; 13:1370-86.12764655GuermaziAZaimSTaouliBMiauxYPeterfyCGGenantHG.MR findings in knee osteoarthritisEur Radiol.20031313708610.1007/s00330-002-1554-4Search in Google Scholar
Graichen H, von Eisenhart-Rothe R, Vogl T, Englmeier KH, Eckstein F. Quantitative assessment of cartilage status in osteoarthritis by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging: technical validation for use in analysis of cartilage volume and further morphologic parameters. Arthr Rheum. 2004; 50:811-6.10.1002/art.20191GraichenHvon Eisenhart-RotheRVoglTEnglmeierKHEcksteinF.Quantitative assessment of cartilage status in osteoarthritis by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging: technical validation for use in analysis of cartilage volume and further morphologic parametersArthr Rheum.2004508116Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Buckland-Wright JC, Macfarlane DG, Lynch JA, Jasani MK, Bradshaw CR. Joint space width measures cartilage thickness in osteoarthritis of the knee: high resolution plain film and double contrast macroradiographic investigation. Ann Rheum Dis. 1995; 54:263-8.10.1136/ard.54.4.2637763102Buckland-WrightJCMacfarlaneDGLynchJAJasaniMKBradshawCR.Joint space width measures cartilage thickness in osteoarthritis of the knee: high resolution plain film and double contrast macroradiographic investigationAnn Rheum Dis.1995542638Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Brandt KD, Mazzuca SA, Conrozier T, Dacre JE, Peterfy CG, Provvedini D, et al. Which is the best radiographic protocol for a clinical trial of a structure modifying drug in patients with knee osteoarthritis? J Rheumatol. 2002; 29:1308-20.12064851BrandtKDMazzucaSAConrozierTDacreJEPeterfyCGProvvediniDWhich is the best radiographic protocol for a clinical trial of a structure modifying drug in patients with knee osteoarthritis?J Rheumatol.200229130820Search in Google Scholar
Adams JG, McAlindon T, Dimasi M, Carey J, Eustace S. Contribution of meniscal extrusion and cartilage loss to joint space narrowing in osteoarthritis. Clin Radiol. 1999; 54:502-6.10.1016/S0009-9260(99)90846-210484216AdamsJGMcAlindonTDimasiMCareyJEustaceS.Contribution of meniscal extrusion and cartilage loss to joint space narrowing in osteoarthritisClin Radiol.1999545026Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Gale DR, Chaisson CE, Totterman SM, Schwartz RK, Gale ME, Felson D. Meniscal subluxation: association with osteoarthritis and joint space narrowing. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1999; 7:526-32.1055885010.1053/joca.1999.0256GaleDRChaissonCETottermanSMSchwartzRKGaleMEFelsonD.Meniscal subluxation: association with osteoarthritis and joint space narrowingOsteoarthritis Cartilage.199975263210558850Search in Google Scholar
Cicuttini F, Forbes A, Morris K, Darling S, Bailey M, Stuckey S. Gender differences in knee cartilage volume as measured by magnetic resonance imaging. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1999; 7:265-71.10.1053/joca.1998.020010329301CicuttiniFForbesAMorrisKDarlingSBaileyMStuckeyS.Gender differences in knee cartilage volume as measured by magnetic resonance imagingOsteoarthritis Cartilage.199972657110329301Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Peterfy CG, van Dijke CF, Janzen DL. Quantification of articular cartilage in the knee with pulsed saturation transfer subtraction and fat-suppressed MR imaging: optimization and validation. Radiology. 1994; 192: 485-91.10.1148/radiology.192.2.80294208029420PeterfyCGvan DijkeCFJanzenDL.Quantification of articular cartilage in the knee with pulsed saturation transfer subtraction and fat-suppressed MR imaging: optimization and validationRadiology.199419248591Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Sonin AH, Pensy RA, Mulligan ME, Hatem S. Grading articular cartilage of the knee using fast spin-echo proton density weighted MR imaging without fat suppression. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002; 179: 1159-66.10.2214/ajr.179.5.179115912388492SoninAHPensyRAMulliganMEHatemS.Grading articular cartilage of the knee using fast spin-echo proton density weighted MR imaging without fat suppressionAJR Am J Roentgenol.2002179115966Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Potter HG, Linklater JM, Allen AA, Hannafin JA, Haas SB. Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage in the knee. An evaluation with use of fastspin echo imaging. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998; 80: 1276-84.10.2106/00004623-199809000-00005PotterHGLinklaterJMAllenAAHannafinJAHaasSB.Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage in the knee. An evaluation with use of fastspin echo imagingJ Bone Joint Surg Am.199880127684Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Burgkart R, Glaser C, Hyhlik-Durr A, Englmeier KH, Reiser M, Eckstein F. Magnetic resonance imaging based assessment of cartilage loss in severe osteoarthritis: accuracy, precision, and diagnostic value. Arthr Rheum. 2001; 44:2072-7.10.1002/1529-0131(200109)44:9<2072::AID-ART357>3.0.CO;2-3BurgkartRGlaserCHyhlik-DurrAEnglmeierKHReiserMEcksteinF.Magnetic resonance imaging based assessment of cartilage loss in severe osteoarthritis: accuracy, precision, and diagnostic valueArthr Rheum.20014420727Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Piplani MA, Disler DG, McCauley TR, Holmes TJ, Cousins JP. Articular cartilage volume in the knee: semiautomated determination from three-dimensional reformations of MR images. Radiology. 1996; 198: 855-9.10.1148/radiology.198.3.86288838628883PiplaniMADislerDGMcCauleyTRHolmesTJCousinsJP.Articular cartilage volume in the knee: semiautomated determination from three-dimensional reformations of MR imagesRadiology.19961988559Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Glaser C, Burgkart R, Kutschera A, Englmeier KH, Reiser M, Eckstein F. Femorotibial cartilage metrics from coronal MR image data: technique, test–retest reproducibility, and findings in osteoarthritis. Magn Reson Med. 2003; 50:1229-36.10.1002/mrm.10648GlaserCBurgkartRKutscheraAEnglmeierKHReiserMEcksteinF.Femorotibial cartilage metrics from coronal MR image data: technique, test–retest reproducibility, and findings in osteoarthritisMagn Reson Med.200350122936Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Maataoui A, Graichen H, Abolmaali ND, Khan MF, Gurung J, Straub R, et al. Quantitative cartilage volume measurement using MRI: comparison of different evaluation techniques. Eur Radiol. 2005; 15:1550-4.10.1007/s00330-005-2744-715856246MaataouiAGraichenHAbolmaaliNDKhanMFGurungJStraubRQuantitative cartilage volume measurement using MRI: comparison of different evaluation techniquesEur Radiol.20051515504Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Eckstein F, Schnier M, Huebner M, Priebsch J, Glaser C, Englmeier KH, et al. Accuracy of cartilage volume and thickness measurements with magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Orthop. 1998; 352:137-48.EcksteinFSchnierMHuebnerMPriebschJGlaserCEnglmeierKHAccuracy of cartilage volume and thickness measurements with magnetic resonance imagingClin Orthop.19983521374810.1097/00003086-199807000-00017Search in Google Scholar
Eckstein F, Stammberger T, Priebsch J, Englmeier KH, Reiser M. Effect of gradient and section orientation on quantitative analysis of knee joint cartilage. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000; 11:161-7.10.1002/(SICI)1522-2586(200002)11:2<161::AID-JMRI13>3.0.CO;2-J10713949EcksteinFStammbergerTPriebschJEnglmeierKHReiserM.Effect of gradient and section orientation on quantitative analysis of knee joint cartilageJ Magn Reson Imaging.2000111617Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hohe J, Ateshian G, Reiser M, Englmeier KH, Eckstein F. Surface size, curvature analysis, and assessment of knee joint incongruity with MRI in vivo. Magn Reson Med. 2002; 47:554-61.10.1002/mrm.1009711870843HoheJAteshianGReiserMEnglmeierKHEcksteinF.Surface size, curvature analysis, and assessment of knee joint incongruity with MRI in vivoMagn Reson Med.20024755461Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Eckstein F, Charles HC, Buck RJ, Kraus VB, Remmers AE, Hudelmaier M, et al. Accuracy and precision of quantitative assessment of cartilage morphology by magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 T. Arthritis Rheum. 2005; 52:3132-6.10.1002/art.21348EcksteinFCharlesHCBuckRJKrausVBRemmersAEHudelmaierMAccuracy and precision of quantitative assessment of cartilage morphology by magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 TArthritis Rheum.2005523132616200592Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
