[1. Chaiwerawattana A. Breast. In: Khuhaprema T, Srivatanakul P, Sriplung H, Wiangnon S, Sumitsawan Y, Attasara P, editors. Cancer in Thailand Vol.4. Bangkok: National Cancer Institute; 2007; p. 48-50.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Leconte I, Feger C, Galant C, Berlière M, Berg BV, D’Hoore W, et al. Mammography and subsequent whole-breast sonography of nonpalpable breast cancers: the importance of radiologic breast density. Am J Roentgenol. 2003; 180:1675-9.10.2214/ajr.180.6.1801675]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Uchida K, Yamashita A, Kawase K, Kamiya K. Screening ultrasonography revealed 15% of mammographically occult breast cancers. Breast Cancer. 2008; 15:165-8.10.1007/s12282-007-0024-x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[4. Buchberger W, Niehoff A, Obrist P, DeKoekkoek-DollP, Dünser M. Clinically and mammographically occult breast lesions: detection and classification with highresolution sonography. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2000; 21:325-36.10.1016/S0887-2171(00)90027-1]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[5. Boonjunwetwat D, Thakhulee A, Prueksadee J. Mammographic parenchymal patterns of 1,666 Thai women: A mammographic screening evaluation. Chula Med J. 2010; 54: 303-12.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL, Dennis MA, Parker SH, Sisney GA. Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology. 1995; 196:123-34.10.1148/radiology.196.1.77845557784555]Search in Google Scholar
[7. American College of Radiology. ACR BI-RADSUltrasound Lexicon [online]. 2003 [cited 2008 Feb 25]. Available from: http://www.acr.org/SecondaryMainMenuCategories/quality_safety/BIRADSAtlas/BIRADSAtlasexcerptedtext/BIRADSUltrasoundFirstEdition/ACRBIRADSUSLexiconClassificationFormDoc1.aspx.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Jackson VP. Management of solid breast nodules: what is the role of sonography? Radiology. 1995; 196:14-5.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Hall FM. Sonography of the breast: controversies and opinions. Am J Roentgenol. 1997; 169:1635-6.10.2214/ajr.169.6.93931819393181]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Rahbar G, Sie AC, Hansen GC, Prince JS, Melany ML, Reynolds HE, et al. Benign versus malignant solid breast masses: US differentiation. Radiology. 1999; 213:889-94.10.1148/radiology.213.3.r99dc2088910580971]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Harper PA, Kelly-Fry E, Noe JS, Bies JR, Jackson VP. Ultrasound in the evaluation of solid breast masses. Radiology. 1983; 146:731-6.10.1148/radiology.146.3.62988586298858]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Hong AS, Rosen EL, Soo MS, Baker JA. BI-RADS for sonography: positive and negative predictive values of sonographic features. Am J Roentgenol. 2005; 184: 1260-5.10.2214/ajr.184.4.0184126015788607]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Lee W-J, Chu J-S, Huang C-S, Chang M-F, Chang K-J, Chen K-M. Breast cancer vascularity: color Doppler sonography and histopathology study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1996; 37:291-8.10.1007/BF018065108825140]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[14. Jackson VP, Kelly-Fry E, Rothschild PA, Hoiden RW, Clark SA. Automated breast sonography using a 7.5 MHz PVDF transducer: preliminary clinical evaluation. Radiology. 1986; 159:679-84.10.1148/radiology.159.3.35179523517952]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Lambie RW, Hodgden K, Herman EM, Kipperman M. Sonomammographic manifestations of mammographically detectable breast microcalcifications. J Ultrasound Med. 1983; 2:509-14.10.7863/jum.1983.2.11.509]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[16. Kasumi F. Can microcalcifications located within breast carcinomas be detected by ultrasound imaging?. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1988; 14(Suppl 1):175-82.10.1016/0301-5629(88)90060-9]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[17. Guyer PB, Dewbury KC, Warwick D, Smallwood J, Taylor I. Direct contact B-scan ultrasound in the diagnosis of solid breast masses. Clin Radiol. 1986; 37: 451-8.10.1016/S0009-9260(86)80053-8]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[18. Fornage BD, Lorigan JG, Andry E. Fibroadenoma of the breast: sonographic appearance. Radiology. 1989; 172:671-5.10.1148/radiology.172.3.2549564]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Teubner J. The echogenic border: an important diagnostic criterion in sonographic tumor diagnosis of the breast. In: Gill RW, Dadd MJ, editors. World Fed Ultrasound Med Biol. Oxford:Pergamon; 1985. p. 342.]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Bamber JC, De Gonzalez L, Cosgrove DO, Simmons P, Davey J, Mckinna JA. Quantitative evaluation of realtime ultrasound features of the breast. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1988; 14:81-7.10.1016/0301-5629(88)90050-6]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[21. Kasumi F, Fukami A, Kuno K, Kajitani T. Characteristic echographic features of circumscribed cancer. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1982; 8:369-77.10.1016/S0301-5629(82)80004-5]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[22. Cole-Beuglet C, Soriano RZ, Kurtz AB, Goldberg BB. Ultrasound analysis of 104 primary breast carcinomas classified according to histopathologic type. Radiology. 1983; 147:191-6.10.1148/radiology.147.1.68287276828727]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Venta LA, Dudiak CM, Salomon CG, Flisak ME. Sonographic evaluation of the breast. Radio Graphics. 1994; 14:29-50.10.1148/radiographics.14.1.81280648128064]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Ueno E, Tohno E, Itoh K. Classification and diagnostic criteria in breast echography. Jpn J Med Ultrasonics. 1986; 13:19-31.]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Baum G. Ultrasound mammography. Radiology. 1977; 122:199-205.10.1148/122.1.199186842]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Meyer JE, Amin E, Lindfors KK, Lipman JC, Stomper PC, Genest D. Medullary carcinoma of the breast: mammographic and US appearance. Radiology. 1989; 170:79-82.10.1148/radiology.170.1.26423502642350]Search in Google Scholar