The Modelling and Analysis of Shock Absorbers with Stroke-Dependent Damping

[1] Alonso M., Comas Á., Modelling a twin tube cavitating shock absorber, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering. 220.8, 2006, 1031–1040.10.1243/09544070D23104Search in Google Scholar

[2] Benaziz M., Nacivet S., Thouverez F., Nonlinear dynamic analysis of a shock absorber hydraulic spring valve, Proceedings of ISMA International Conference on Noise and Vibration Engineering, 2012, 3857–3870.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Deferme S., Stroke dependent bypass. U.S. Patent No. 6,918,473. 19 Jul. 2005.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Farjoud, Ahmadian M., Craft M., Burke W., Nonlinear modelling and experimental characterization of hydraulic dampers: effects of shim stack and orifice parameters on damper performance, Nonlinear Dynamics. 67.2, 2012, 1437–1456.10.1007/s11071-011-0079-2Search in Google Scholar

[5] Ferdek U., Łuczko J., Modelling and analysis of a twin-tube hydraulic shock absorber, Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics. 50.2, 2012, 627–638.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Ferdek U., Łuczko J., Performance comparison of active and semi-active SMC and LQR regulators in a quarter-car model, Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics. 53.4, 2015, 811–822.10.15632/jtam-pl.53.4.811Search in Google Scholar

[7] Ferdek U., Łuczko J., Vibration analysis of a half-car model with semi-active damping, Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 54.2, 2016, 321–332.10.15632/jtam-pl.54.2.321Search in Google Scholar

[8] Funke T., Bestle D., Physics-based model of a stroke-dependent shock absorber, Multibody System Dynamics. 30.2, 2013, 221–232.10.1007/s11044-013-9348-9Search in Google Scholar

[9] Götz O. et al., Dashpot with amplitude-dependent shock absorption, U.S. Patent No. 7,441,639. 28 Oct. 2008.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Lee C.T., Moon B.Y., Simulation and experimental validation of vehicle dynamic characteristics for displacement-sensitive shock absorber using fluid-flow modelling, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing. 20.2, 2006, 373–388.10.1016/j.ymssp.2004.09.006Search in Google Scholar

[11] Nowaczyk M., Vochten J.: Shock absorber with frequency dependent passive valve, U.S. Patent No. 9,441,700. 13 Sep. 2016.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Prabakar R.S., Sujatha C., Narayanan S., Optimal semi-active preview control response of a half car vehicle model with magnetorheological damper, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 326.3, 2009, 400–420.10.1016/j.jsv.2009.05.032Search in Google Scholar

[13] Talbott M.S., Starkey J., An experimentally validated physical model of a high-performance mono-tube damper, SAE Technical Paper, 2002.10.4271/2002-01-3337Search in Google Scholar

[14] Titurus B., Du Bois J., Lieven N., Hansford R., A method for the identification of hydraulic damper characteristics from steady velocity inputs, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing. 24.8, 2010, 2868–2887.10.1016/j.ymssp.2010.05.021Search in Google Scholar

[15] Ventura P., Ferreira C., Neves C., Morais R., Valente A., Reis M.J., An embedded system to assess the automotive shock absorber condition under vehicle operation, Sensors, 2008 IEEE. IEEE, 2008, 1210–1213.10.1109/ICSENS.2008.4716660Search in Google Scholar

[16] Witters M., Swevers J., Black-box model identification for a continuously variable, electro-hydraulic semi-active damper, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 24.1, 2010, 4–18.10.1016/j.ymssp.2009.03.013Search in Google Scholar