This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Abedi N, Ho AL, Knox A, Tashakkor Y, Omeis T, Van Laeken N, Lennox P, Macadam SA. Predictors of mastectomy flap necrosis in patients undergoing immediate breast reconstruction: a review of 718 patients. Ann Plast Surg. 2016;76(6):629–634. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000000262AbediNHoALKnoxATashakkorYOmeisTVan LaekenNLennoxPMacadamSAPredictors of mastectomy flap necrosis in patients undergoing immediate breast reconstruction: a review of 718 patients. 2016;76(6):629–634. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.000000000000026210.1097/SAP.000000000000026225003437Search in Google Scholar
Alderman AK, Wei Y, Birkmeyer JD. Use of breast reconstruction after mastectomy following the Women’s Health and Cancer Rights Act. JAMA. 2006;295(4):383–388. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.295.4.387AldermanAKWeiYBirkmeyerJDUse of breast reconstruction after mastectomy following the Women’s Health and Cancer Rights Act. . 2006;295(4):383–388. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.295.4.38710.1001/jama.295.4.38716434628Search in Google Scholar
Al-Halabi B, Viezel-Mathieu A, Shulman Z, Behr MA, Fouda Neel O. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;142(5):639e–652e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000004892Al-HalabiBViezel-MathieuAShulmanZBehrMAFouda NeelO2018;142(5):639e–652e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.000000000000489210.1097/PRS.000000000000489230096121Search in Google Scholar
Araco A, Gravante G, Araco F, Delogu D, Cervelli V, Walgenbach K. A retrospective analysis of 3,000 primary aesthetic breast augmentations: postoperative complications and associated factors. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2007;31(5):532–539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-007-0162-8AracoAGravanteGAracoFDeloguDCervelliVWalgenbachKA retrospective analysis of 3,000 primary aesthetic breast augmentations: postoperative complications and associated factors. 2007;31(5):532–539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-007-0162-810.1007/s00266-007-0162-817659411Search in Google Scholar
Blough JT, Vu MM, Qiu CS, Mlodinow AS, Khavanin N, Fine NA, Kim JYS. Beyond 30 days: a risk calculator for longer term outcomes of prosthetic breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018;6(12):e2065. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002065BloughJTVuMMQiuCSMlodinowASKhavaninNFineNAKimJYSBeyond 30 days: a risk calculator for longer term outcomes of prosthetic breast reconstruction. . 2018;6(12):e2065. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.000000000000206510.1097/GOX.0000000000002065632661630656128Search in Google Scholar
Bocian A, Kurczych K, Maliszewski D. Postępowanie rekonstrukcyjne u chorych na raka piersi – wskazania szczegółowe. In: Nowecki ZI, Jeziorski A, editors. Chirurgiczne leczenie zmian nowotworowych piersi (Reconstruction procedures in patients with breast cancer-detailed indications. In: Surgical treatment of breast cancer). Konsensus Polskiego Towarzystwa Chirurgii Onkologicznej (Consensus of the Polish Society of Oncological Surgery). Gdańsk (Poland): Via Medica; 2016. p. 78–80.BocianAKurczychKMaliszewskiD. In: NoweckiZIJeziorskiA, editors. . Gdańsk (Poland): Via Medica; 2016. p. 78–80.Search in Google Scholar
Brand KG. Infection of mammary prostheses: a survey and the question of prevention. Ann Plast Surg. 1993;30(4):289–295. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-199304000-00001BrandKGInfection of mammary prostheses: a survey and the question of prevention. 1993;30(4):289–295. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-199304000-0000110.1097/00000637-199304000-000018512282Search in Google Scholar
Chattha AS, Cohen JB, Bucknor A, Chen AD, Tobias AM, Lee BT, Lin SJ. Surgical site infection in immediate breast reconstruction: does chemotherapy timing make a difference? J Surg Oncol. 2018;117(7):1440–1446. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.25053ChatthaASCohenJBBucknorAChenADTobiasAMLeeBTLinSJSurgical site infection in immediate breast reconstruction: does chemotherapy timing make a difference?2018;117(7):1440–1446. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.2505310.1002/jso.2505329574751Search in Google Scholar
Chessa D, Ganau G, Spiga L, Bulla A, Mazzarello V, Campus GV, Rubino S. Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis virulence strains as causative agents of persistent infections in breast implants. PLoS One. 2016;11(1):e0146668. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146668ChessaDGanauGSpigaLBullaAMazzarelloVCampusGVRubinoSStaphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis virulence strains as causative agents of persistent infections in breast implants. . 2016;11(1):e0146668. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.014666810.1371/journal.pone.0146668472790226811915Search in Google Scholar
Chidester JR, Danci I, Lewis P, Biskup N, Kim H, Gupta S. Antibiogram for periprosthetic infections. A tool for better informed selection of empiric antibiotics for surgical site infections. Ann Plast Surg. 2016;76 Suppl 3:S158–S161. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000000803ChidesterJRDanciILewisPBiskupNKimHGuptaSAntibiogram for periprosthetic infections. A tool for better informed selection of empiric antibiotics for surgical site infections. 2016;76Suppl 3:S158–S161. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.000000000000080310.1097/SAP.000000000000080327015327Search in Google Scholar
Conte MP, Superti F, Moio M, Ammendolia MG, Longhi C, Aleandri M, Marazzato M, Goldoni P, Parisi P, Borab Z, et al. Bacterial biofilm associated with a case of capsular contracture. New Microbiol. 2018;41(3):238–241.ConteMPSupertiFMoioMAmmendoliaMGLonghiCAleandriMMarazzatoMGoldoniPParisiPBorabZBacterial biofilm associated with a case of capsular contracture. 2018;41(3):238–241.Search in Google Scholar
Costerton JW, Stewart PS, Greenberg EP. Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections. Science. 1999;284(5418):1318–1322. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.284.5418.1318CostertonJWStewartPSGreenbergEPBacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections. . 1999;284(5418):1318–1322. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.284.5418.131810.1126/science.284.5418.131810334980Search in Google Scholar
Donlan RM, Costerton JW. Biofilms: survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2002;15(2): 67–193. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.15.2.167-193.2002DonlanRMCostertonJWBiofilms: survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms. 2002;15(2): 67–193. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.15.2.167-193.200210.1128/CMR.15.2.167-193.200211806811932229Search in Google Scholar
Feldman EM, Kontoyiannis DP, Sharabi SE, Lee E, Kaufman Y, Heller L. Breast implant infections: is cefazolin enough? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126(3):779–785. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181e5f7ffFeldmanEMKontoyiannisDPSharabiSELeeEKaufmanYHellerLBreast implant infections: is cefazolin enough?2010;126(3):779–785. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181e5f7ff10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181e5f7ff20811212Search in Google Scholar
Fleischer M, Ozorowski T, Pawlik K, Skoczyńska A, Dubiel G, Mączyńska A, Żabicka D, Hryniewicz W. Zalecenia prowadzenia mikrobiologicznych badań przesiewowych u hospitalizowanych pacjentów. Narodowy Program Ochrony Antybiotyków na lata 2016–2020 [Internet]. Warszawa (Poland): Narodowy Instytut Leków; 2017 [cited 2018 Apr 10]. Available from http://antybiotyki.edu.pl/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/ZALECENIAPROWADZENI-ABADAN13.07.pdfFleischerMOzorowskiTPawlikKSkoczyńskaADubielGMączyńskaAŻabickaDHryniewiczW. . Warszawa (Poland): Narodowy Instytut Leków;2017 [cited 2018 Apr 10]. Available from http://antybiotyki.edu.pl/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/ZALECENIAPROWADZENI-ABADAN13.07.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Halvorson EG, Disa JJ, Mehrara BJ, Burkey BA, Pusic AL, Cordeiro PG. Outcome following removal of infected tissue expanders in breast reconstruction: a 10-year experience. Ann Plast Surg. 2007; 59(2): 131–136. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000252716.73356.68HalvorsonEGDisaJJMehraraBJBurkeyBAPusicALCordeiroPGOutcome following removal of infected tissue expanders in breast reconstruction: a 10-year experience. 2007; 59(2): 131–136. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000252716.73356.6810.1097/01.sap.0000252716.73356.6817667404Search in Google Scholar
Ilonzo N, Tsang A, Tsantes S, Estabrook A, Thu Ma AM. Breast reconstruction after mastectomy: a ten-year analysis of trends and immediate postoperative outcomes. Breast. 2017;32:7–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2016.11.023IlonzoNTsangATsantesSEstabrookAThu MaAMBreast reconstruction after mastectomy: a ten-year analysis of trends and immediate postoperative outcomes. . 2017;32:7–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2016.11.02310.1016/j.breast.2016.11.02327988412Search in Google Scholar
Isenberg HD. Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook. Washington D.C. (USA): ASM Press; 2004.IsenbergHD. Washington D.C. (USA): ASM Press; 2004.Search in Google Scholar
Jagsi R, Jiang J, Momoh AO, Alderman A, Giordano SH, Buchholz TA, Pierce LJ, Kronowitz SJ, Smith BD. Complications after mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction for breast cancer: a claims-based analysis. Ann Surg. 2016;263(2):219–227. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001177JagsiRJiangJMomohAOAldermanAGiordanoSHBuchholzTAPierceLJKronowitzSJSmithBDComplications after mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction for breast cancer: a claims-based analysis. 2016;263(2):219–227. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.000000000000117710.1097/SLA.0000000000001177482418225876011Search in Google Scholar
Lankiewicz JD, Yokoe DS, Olsen MA, Onufrak F, Fraser VJ, Stevenson K, Khan Y, Hooper D, Platt R, Huang SS. Beyond 30 days: does limiting the duration of surgical site infection follow-up limit detection? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2012;33(2):202–204. https://doi.org/10.1086/663715LankiewiczJDYokoeDSOlsenMAOnufrakFFraserVJStevensonKKhanYHooperDPlattRHuangSSBeyond 30 days: does limiting the duration of surgical site infection follow-up limit detection?. 2012;33(2):202–204. https://doi.org/10.1086/66371510.1086/663715360826422227993Search in Google Scholar
McCullough MC, Chu CK, Duggal CS, Losken A, Carlson GW. Antibiotic prophylaxis and resistance in surgical site infection after immediate tissue expander reconstruction of the breast. Ann Plast Surg. 2016;77(5):501–505. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000000275McCulloughMCChuCKDuggalCSLoskenACarlsonGWAntibiotic prophylaxis and resistance in surgical site infection after immediate tissue expander reconstruction of the breast. 2016;77(5):501–505. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.000000000000027510.1097/SAP.000000000000027525003455Search in Google Scholar
Momoh AO, Ahmed R, Kelley BP, Aliu O, Kidwell KM, Kozlow JH, Chung KC. A systematic review of complications of implant-based breast reconstruction with prereconstruction and postre-construction radiotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(1):118–124. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3284-zMomohAOAhmedRKelleyBPAliuOKidwellKMKozlowJHChungKCA systematic review of complications of implant-based breast reconstruction with prereconstruction and postre-construction radiotherapy. 2014;21(1):118–124. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3284-z10.1245/s10434-013-3284-z415334824081801Search in Google Scholar
NCIN. Breast cancer. The second all breast cancer report. Surgical treatment outcomes and The non-invasive breast cancer report [Internet]. London (UK): National Cancer Intelligence Network; 2011 [cited 2018 Apr 10]. Available from http://www.ncin.org.uk/cancer_type_and_topic_specific_work/cancer_type_specific_work/breast_cancer/NCIN. London (UK): National Cancer Intelligence Network; 2011 [cited 2018 Apr 10]. Available from http://www.ncin.org.uk/cancer_type_and_topic_specific_work/cancer_type_specific_work/breast_cancer/Search in Google Scholar
Olsen MA, Nickel KB, Fox IK, Margenthaler JA, Wallace AE, Fraser VJ. Comparison of wound complications after immediate, delayed, and secondary breast reconstruction procedures. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(9):e172338. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2017.2338OlsenMANickelKBFoxIKMargenthalerJAWallaceAEFraserVJComparison of wound complications after immediate, delayed, and secondary breast reconstruction procedures. 2017;152(9):e172338. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2017.233810.1001/jamasurg.2017.2338583144528724125Search in Google Scholar
Olsen MA, Nickel KB, Fox IK. Surveillance and prevention of surgical site infections in breast oncologic surgery with immediate reconstruction. Curr Treat Options Infect Dis. 2017;9(2):155–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40506-017-0117-9OlsenMANickelKBFoxIKSurveillance and prevention of surgical site infections in breast oncologic surgery with immediate reconstruction. 2017;9(2):155–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40506-017-0117-910.1007/s40506-017-0117-9561233028959143Search in Google Scholar
Pajkos A, Deva AK, Vickery K, Cope C, Chang L, Cossart YE. Detection of subclinical infection in significant breast implant capsules. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111(5):1605–1611. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000054768.14922.44PajkosADevaAKVickeryKCopeCChangLCossartYEDetection of subclinical infection in significant breast implant capsules. 2003;111(5):1605–1611. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000054768.14922.4410.1097/01.PRS.0000054768.14922.44Search in Google Scholar
Phillips BT, Bishawi M, Dagum AB, Khan SU, Bui DT. A systematic review of antibiotic use and infection in breast reconstruction: what is the evidence? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182729c39PhillipsBTBishawiMDagumABKhanSUBuiDTA systematic review of antibiotic use and infection in breast reconstruction: what is the evidence?2013;131(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182729c3910.1097/PRS.0b013e3182729c39Search in Google Scholar
Phillips BT, Halvorson EG. Antibiotic prohylaxis following implant-based breast reconstruction: what is the evidence? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;138(4):751–757. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000002530PhillipsBTHalvorsonEGAntibiotic prohylaxis following implant-based breast reconstruction: what is the evidence?2016;138(4):751–757. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.000000000000253010.1097/PRS.0000000000002530Search in Google Scholar
Pittet B, Montandon D, Pittet D. Infection in breast implants. Lancet Infect Dis. 2005;5(2):94–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(05)70084-0PittetBMontandonDPittetDInfection in breast implants. 2005;5(2):94–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(05)70084-010.1016/S1473-3099(05)70084-0Search in Google Scholar
Prażmo E, Godlewska R, Kwaśny M, Mielczarek A. Virulence factors of Enterococcus faecalis in relation to pulp diseases and periapical infections. Postepy Mikrobiol. 2016;55:247–254.PrażmoEGodlewskaRKwaśnyMMielczarekAVirulence factors of Enterococcus faecalis in relation to pulp diseases and periapical infections. . 2016;55:247–254.Search in Google Scholar
Romero FA, Powell EA, Babady NE, Kaltsas A, Figueroa CJ, Pulitzer M, Mehrara BJ, Glickman MS, Morjaria S. Nontuberculous mycobacterial infections after silicone breast implant reconstruction emphasize a diversity of infecting mycobacteria. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2017;4(4):ofx189. https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx189RomeroFAPowellEABabadyNEKaltsasAFigueroaCJPulitzerMMehraraBJGlickmanMSMorjariaSNontuberculous mycobacterial infections after silicone breast implant reconstruction emphasize a diversity of infecting mycobacteria. 2017;4(4):ofx189. https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx18910.1093/ofid/ofx189Search in Google Scholar
Seng P, Bayle S, Alliez A, Romain F, Casanova D, Stein A. The microbial epidemiology of breast implant infections in a regional referral centre for plastic and reconstructive surgery in the south of France. Int J Infect Dis. 2015;35:62–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2015.04.010SengPBayleSAlliezARomainFCasanovaDSteinAThe microbial epidemiology of breast implant infections in a regional referral centre for plastic and reconstructive surgery in the south of France. 2015;35:62–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2015.04.01010.1016/j.ijid.2015.04.010Search in Google Scholar
Sinha I, Pusic AL, Wilkins EG, Hamill JB, Chen X, Kim HM, Guldbrandsen G, Chun YS. Late surgical-site infection in immediate implant-based breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139(1):20–28. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000002839SinhaIPusicALWilkinsEGHamillJBChenXKimHMGuldbrandsenGChunYSLate surgical-site infection in immediate implant-based breast reconstruction. 2017;139(1):20–28. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.000000000000283910.1097/PRS.0000000000002839Search in Google Scholar
Song JH, Kim YS, Jung BK, Lee DW, Song SY, Roh TS, Lew DH. Salvage of infected breast implants. Arch Plast Surg. 2017;44(6):516–522. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2017.01025SongJHKimYSJungBKLeeDWSongSYRohTSLewDHSalvage of infected breast implants. 2017;44(6):516–522. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2017.0102510.5999/aps.2017.01025Search in Google Scholar
Tarkowski R, Szmigiel K, Rubin A, Borowiec G, Szelachowska J, Jagodziński W, Bębenek M. Patient’s education before mastectomy influences the rate of reconstructive surgery. J Cancer Educ. 2017;32(3):537–542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-016-0982-9TarkowskiRSzmigielKRubinABorowiecGSzelachowskaJJagodzińskiWBębenekMPatient’s education before mastectomy influences the rate of reconstructive surgery. 2017;32(3):537–542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-016-0982-910.1007/s13187-016-0982-9Search in Google Scholar
Vacheethasanee K, Temenoff JS, Higashi JM, Gary A, Anderson JM, Bayston R, Marchant RE. Bacterial surface properties of clinically isolated Staphylococcus epidermidis strains determine adhesion on polyethylene. J Biomed Mater Res. 1998;42(3):425–432. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19981205)42:3<425::AIDJBM12>3.0.CO;2-FVacheethasaneeKTemenoffJSHigashiJMGaryAAndersonJMBaystonRMarchantREBacterial surface properties of clinically isolated Staphylococcus epidermidis strains determine adhesion on polyethylene. 1998;42(3):425–432. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19981205)42:3<425::AIDJBM12>3.0.CO;2-F10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19981205)42:3<425::AID-JBM12>3.0.CO;2-FSearch in Google Scholar
Viola GM, Baumann DP, Mohan K, Selber J, Garvey P, Reece G, Raad II, Rolston KV, Crosby MA. Improving antimicrobial regimens for the treatment of breast tissue expander-related infections. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016;4(5):e704. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000690ViolaGMBaumannDPMohanKSelberJGarveyPReeceGRaadIIRolstonKVCrosbyMAImproving antimicrobial regimens for the treatment of breast tissue expander-related infections. . 2016;4(5):e704. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.000000000000069010.1097/GOX.0000000000000690499569527579229Search in Google Scholar
Warren Peled A, Itakura K, Foster RD, Hamolsky D, Tanaka J, Ewing C, Alvarado M, Esserman LJ, Hwang ES. Impact of chemotherapy on postoperative complications after mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction. Arch Surg. 2010;145(9):880–885. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2010.163Warren PeledAItakuraKFosterRDHamolskyDTanakaJEwingCAlvaradoMEssermanLJHwangESImpact of chemotherapy on postoperative complications after mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction. 2010;145(9):880–885. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2010.16310.1001/archsurg.2010.16320855759Search in Google Scholar
Weichman KE, Levine SM, Wilson SC, Choi M, Karp NS. Antibiotic selection for the treatment of infectious complications of implant-based breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2013;71(2):140–143. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e3182590924WeichmanKELevineSMWilsonSCChoiMKarpNSAntibiotic selection for the treatment of infectious complications of implant-based breast reconstruction. 2013;71(2):140–143. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e318259092410.1097/SAP.0b013e318259092423486147Search in Google Scholar