Otwarty dostęp

Relationship Between Environmental Changes and Waste Management Policies on the Formation of the Quality of Life in Poland. A Regional Approach

 oraz   
05 lip 2025

Zacytuj
Pobierz okładkę

Map 1.

Spatial distribution of synthetic measure of quality of life, ecology and the environment, waste management of counties in Poland in 2010, 2018, 2019, and 2020
Source: authors’ own study based on Statistics Poland data (GUS, n.d.).
Spatial distribution of synthetic measure of quality of life, ecology and the environment, waste management of counties in Poland in 2010, 2018, 2019, and 2020 Source: authors’ own study based on Statistics Poland data (GUS, n.d.).

Figure 1.

Relation of synthetic measure of quality of life, waste management of counties in Poland in 2010, 2018, 2019, and 2020
Source: authors’ own study based on Statistics Poland data (GUS, n.d.).
Relation of synthetic measure of quality of life, waste management of counties in Poland in 2010, 2018, 2019, and 2020 Source: authors’ own study based on Statistics Poland data (GUS, n.d.).

Figure 2.

Relation of synthetic measure of quality of life, ecology and environment of counties in Poland in 2010, 2018, 2019, and 2020
Source: authors’ own study based on Statistics Poland data (GUS, n.d.).
Relation of synthetic measure of quality of life, ecology and environment of counties in Poland in 2010, 2018, 2019, and 2020 Source: authors’ own study based on Statistics Poland data (GUS, n.d.).

Diagnostic variables describing the quality of life, waste management, and ecology and the environment in counties in Poland

Variable Jednostki D/S
Ecology and tde environment
X1 Share of forest area in total area % S
X2 Share of legally protected areas in total area % S
X3 Share of green areas in total area % S
X4 Wastewater treated per year dam3/km2 S
X5 Industrial and municipal wastewater treated % S
X6 Population using wastewater treatment plants % S
X7 Mixed waste collected during the year kg per capita D
X8 Share of recycled waste in waste volume % S
X9 Share of industry in water consumption % D
Waste management
Y1 Expenditures on utilities and environmental protection PLN per capita S
Y2 Waste generated during the year thousand tons per 1,000 population D
Y3 Waste recovered thousand tons per 1,000 population S
Y4 Waste disposed of thousand tons per 1,000 population S
Y5 Share of recovered waste in the amount of waste % S
Y6 Mixed waste collected during the year kg per capita D
Y7 Area of wild dumps pieces per 100 km2 D
Y8 Municipal waste collected during liquidation of wild dumps tons per 100 km2 D
Quality of life
Z1 Share of local tax income in total counties’ own income % S
Z2 Share of PIT and CIT tax income in total income % S
Z3 Share of property expenditures to total expenditures % S
Z4 Expenditures on housing management PLN per capita S
Z5 Expenditures on education and upbringing PLN per capita S
Z6 Expenditures on health care PLN per capita S
Z7 Expenditures on public safety and fire protection PLN per capita S
Z8 Expenditures on public administration PLN per capita S
Z9 Expenditures on transport and communications PLN per capita S
Z10 Expenditures on municipal management and environmental protection PLN per capita S
Z11 Housing pieces per 1,000 population S
Z12 Distribution network – water supply km per km2 S
Z13 Distribution network – sewerage km per km2 S
Z14 Distribution network – gas km per km2 S
Z15 Migration balance in total person per 1,000 population S
Z16 Old-age dependency ratio % D
Z17 Birth rate person per 1,000 population S
Z18 Outpatient entities (as of December 31) facility per 10,000 population S
Z19 Population per community pharmacy person per pharmacy S
Z20 Beneficiaries of community social assistance person per 10,000 population D
Z21 Foundations, associations, and social organizations facility per 1,000 population S
Z22 Entities registered facility per 1,000 population S
Z23 Natural persons engaged in business activity person per 1,000 population S
Z24 Registered unemployed person per 1,000 population D
Z25 Employed person per 1,000 population S
Z26 Forest land area ha per 100 ha S
Z27 Legally protected areas ha per 100 ha S
Z28 Wastewater treated per year % S
Z29 Waste generated during the year thousand tons per km2 D
Z30 Share of recycled waste in the amount of waste generated % S
Z31 Population using wastewater treatment plants % S
Z32 Emission of gaseous pollutants tons per km2 D
Z33 Public libraries facility per 10,000 population S
Z34 Hard-surfaced municipal and county roads km per km2 S
Z35 Municipal and county roads with a dirt surface km per km2 S
Z36 Share of parks, greens, and residential green areas in total area % S

Selected characteristics of synthetic measures of quality of life, ecology and environment, waste management of counties in Poland in 2010, 2018, 2019, and 2020

Year Mean Median Minimum Maximum Range Quartile (range) Standard deviation Coefficient of variation Skewness Gini coefficient Kurtosis
q Quality of life
2010 0.36 0.36 0.29 0.50 0.21 0.03 0.03 7.16 1.13 0.044 3.43
2018 0.37 0.37 0.31 0.51 0.20 0.03 0.03 7.64 1.16 0.047 2.59
2019 0.37 0.37 0.31 0.52 0.21 0.03 0.03 7.70 1.33 0.046 3.43
2020 0.37 0.37 0.32 0.51 0.19 0.03 0.03 7.43 1.32 0.045 3.32
q Ecology and environment
2010 0.49 0.49 0.36 0.60 0.24 0.04 0.04 8.04 -0.26 0.050 0.56
2018 0.45 0.44 0.34 0.63 0.29 0.06 0.04 9.47 0.51 0.058 1.18
2019 0.45 0.44 0.33 0.64 0.31 0.05 0.04 9.12 0.60 0.056 1.92
2020 0.45 0.45 0.32 0.64 0.32 0.06 0.04 9.57 0.45 0.059 1.39
q Waste management
2010 0.52 0.53 0.43 0.61 0.18 0.03 0.03 5.18 -0.87 0.034 0.85
2018 0.48 0.48 0.38 0.56 0.18 0.03 0.03 5.24 0.50 0.034 1.46
2019 0.48 0.48 0.38 0.55 0.17 0.03 0.02 4.64 0.28 0.031 2.33
2020 0.48 0.48 0.39 0.55 0.16 0.02 0.03 5.21 0.32 0.034 1.86