Otwarty dostęp

Review of PROMETHEE method in transportation


Zacytuj

Alkharabsheh, A., Moslem, S., Duleba, S., 2019, Evaluating passenger demand for development of the urban transport system by an AHP model with the real-world application of Amman, Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 9(22). DOI: 10.3390/app922475910.3390/app9224759Search in Google Scholar

Anagnostopoulos, K., Giannopoulou, M., Roukounis, Y., 2003. Multicriteria evaluation of transportation infrastructure projects: An application of PRO-METHEE and GAIA methods, Advances in Transport, 14, 599-608, DOI: 10.2495/UT030591Search in Google Scholar

Arcidiacono, S.G., Greco, P.S., 2018. Robustness Analysis for Interacting Criteria in Advanced Decision Support Systems, niversity of Catania and University of Messina. Available at: https://iris.unime.it/retrieve/handle/11570/3131327/214741/PhD Thesis Arcidiacono Sally Giuseppe.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Babaee, S. et al., 2015. Use of DEA and PROMETHEE II to assess the performance of older drivers, Transportation Research Procedia, 10(July), 798-808. DOI: 10.1016/j.trpro.2015.09.03310.1016/j.trpro.2015.09.033Search in Google Scholar

Bagherikahvarin, M., De Smet, Y., 2017. Determining new possible weight values in PROMETHEE: A procedure based on data envelopment analysis, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 68(5), 484-495. DOI: 10.1057/s41274-016-0107-110.1057/s41274-016-0107-1Search in Google Scholar

Balali, V. et al., 2014. Selection of appropriate material, construction technique, and structural system of bridges by use of multicriteria decision-making method, Transportation Research Record, 2431(1), 79-87, DOI: 10.3141/2431-1110.3141/2431-11Search in Google Scholar

Bilişik, Ö.N. et al., 2013. A hybrid fuzzy methodology to evaluate customer satisfaction in a public transportation system for Istanbul, Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 24(9-10), 1141-1159. DOI: 10.1080/14783363.2013.80994210.1080/14783363.2013.809942Search in Google Scholar

Brans, J.P., De Smet, Y., 2016. PROMETHEE Methods, Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis, DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-3094-410.1007/978-1-4939-3094-4Search in Google Scholar

Brans, J.P. Mareschal, B.. 1994. The PROMCALC & GAIA decision support system for multicriteria decision aid, Decision Support Systems, 12(4–5), 297-310, DOI: 10.1016/0167-9236(94)90048-510.1016/0167-9236(94)90048-5Search in Google Scholar

Brans, J.P., Vincke, P. and Mareschal, B., 1986. How to select and how to rank projects: The Promethee method, European Journal of Operational Research, 24(2), 228238. DOI: 10.1016/0377-2217(86)90044-510.1016/0377-2217(86)90044-5Search in Google Scholar

Dağdeviren, M., 2008. Decision making in equipment selection: An integrated approach with AHP and PROMETHEE, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 19(4), 397-406, DOI: 10.1007/s10845-008-0091-7,10.1007/s10845-008-0091-7Search in Google Scholar

Elevli, B., Demirci, A., 2004. Multicriteria choice of ore transport system for an underground mine: Application of PROMETHEE methods, Journal of The South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 104(5), 251-256.Search in Google Scholar

Fernández-Castro, A.S., Jiménez, M., 2005. PROMETHEE: An extension through fuzzy mathematical programming, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 56(1), 119-122, DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.260182810.1057/palgrave.jors.2601828Search in Google Scholar

Gunawardena, J. et al., 2015. Sources and transport pathways of common heavy metals to urban road surfaces, Ecological Engineering, 77, 98-102. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.01.02310.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.01.023Search in Google Scholar

Hensher, D.A., Ho, C.Q., Reck, D.J., 2021. Mobility as a service and private car use: Evidence from the Sydney MaaS trial, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 145, 17-33, DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2020.12.01510.1016/j.tra.2020.12.015Search in Google Scholar

Ishizaka, A. et al., 2020. Examining knowledge transfer activities in UK universities: advocating a PROMETHEE-based approach’, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 26(6), 1389-1409. DOI: 10.1108/IJEBR-01-2020-002810.1108/IJEBR-01-2020-0028Search in Google Scholar

Ishizaka, A., Resce, G., 2020. Best-Worst PROMETHEE method for evaluating school performance in the OECD’s PISA project, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, (May), DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2020.10079910.1016/j.seps.2020.100799Search in Google Scholar

Kabir, G., Sumi, R.S., 2014. Integrating fuzzy analytic hierarchy process with PROMETHEE method for total quality management consultant selection, Production and Manufacturing Research, 2(1), 380-399. DOI: 10.1080/21693277.2014.89568910.1080/21693277.2014.895689Search in Google Scholar

Kabir, G., Sumi, R.S., 2015. Hazardous waste transportation firm selection using fuzzy analytic hierarchy and PROMETHEE methods, International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 7(2), 115-136, DOI: 10.1504/IJSTL.2015.06784710.1504/IJSTL.2015.067847Search in Google Scholar

van Lierop, D., El-Geneidy, A., 2016. Enjoying loyalty: The relationship between service quality, customer satisfaction, and behavioral intentions in public transit, Research in Transportation Economics, 59, 50-59, DOI: 10.1016/j.retrec.2016.04.00110.1016/j.retrec.2016.04.001Search in Google Scholar

Lolli, F. et al., 2016, Waste treatment: an environmental, economic and social analysis with a new group fuzzy PROMETHEE approach, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 18(5), 1317-1332 DOI: 10.1007/s10098-015-1087-6.10.1007/s10098-015-1087-6Search in Google Scholar

Macharis, C. et al., 1998, The GDSS PROMETHEE procedure - A PROMETHEE-GAIA based procedure for group decision support, Journal of Decision Systems, 7(May 2014), 283-307, Available at: httpideas.repec.orgpulbulbeco2013-9373.htmlSearch in Google Scholar

Macharis, C. et al., 2004. PROMETHEE and AHP: The design of operational synergies in multicriteria analysis - Strengthening PROMETHEE with ideas of AHP, European Journal of Operational Research, 153(2), 307-317, DOI: 10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00153-X10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00153-XSearch in Google Scholar

Moslem, S. et al., 2019. Analysing Stakeholder Consensus for a Sustainable Transport Development Decision by the Fuzzy AHP and Interval AHP, Sustainability, 11(12), 3271, DOI: 10.3390/su1112327110.3390/su11123271Search in Google Scholar

Shen, W., Xiao, W., Wang, X., 2016. Passenger satisfaction evaluation model for Urban rail transit: A structural equation modeling based on partial least squares, Transport Policy, 46, 20–31, DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.10.00610.1016/j.tranpol.2015.10.006Search in Google Scholar

Tsamboulas, D.A., 2007. A tool for prioritizing multinational transport infrastructure investments, Transport Policy, 14(1), 11-26, DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2006.06.00110.1016/j.tranpol.2006.06.001Search in Google Scholar

Turcksin, L., Bernardini, A., Macharis, C., 2011. A combined AHPPROMETHEE approach for selecting the most appropriate policy scenario to stimulate a clean vehicle fleet, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 20, 954-965, DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.08.10410.1016/j.sbspro.2011.08.104Search in Google Scholar

Wang, J.J., Yang, D.L., 2006. Using a hybrid multi-criteria decision aid method for information systems outsourcing, Computers and Operations Research, 34(12), 3691-3700 DOI: 10.1016/j.cor.2006.01.01710.1016/j.cor.2006.01.017Search in Google Scholar

Zuo, C. et al., 2018. Reducing carbon emissions related to the transportation of aggregates: Is road or rail the solution?, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 117(July), 26-38, DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2018.08.00610.1016/j.tra.2018.08.006Search in Google Scholar