<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

<p>Throughout the two years of this pandemic, Taiwanese public authorities have obtained cooperation from religious organisations in limiting and mitigating the contagion, and the population was largely spared the influence of conspiracy theories about the virus’ origins. I have found no trace of any significant doomsday theologies among the major religions practiced in Taiwan emerging in the public health emergency caused by COVID-19. What explains this largely cooperative relationship? From the perspective of public policy, why has the government obtained the compliance of most religious actors to its directive and faced little or no opposition coming from them? I use a historical institutionalist approach to argue that decades of toleration from political leaders of all trends towards religions have generated a path dependency of mutual trust and that legacy predates the period of democratisation. The article explores the extent to which this outcome results from three factors: Taiwan’s religious diversity, or the absence of a religious hegemony opposed to the state; pragmatic and flexible theologies; and/or convergence between successive Taiwanese governments’ social policies and the social teachings of religions.</p>
</abstract>

Throughout the two years of this pandemic, Taiwanese public authorities have obtained cooperation from religious organisations in limiting and mitigating the contagion, and the population was largely spared the influence of conspiracy theories about the virus’ origins. I have found no trace of any significant doomsday theologies among the major religions practiced in Taiwan emerging in the public health emergency caused by COVID-19. What explains this largely cooperative relationship? From the perspective of public policy, why has the government obtained the compliance of most religious actors to its directive and faced little or no opposition coming from them? I use a historical institutionalist approach to argue that decades of toleration from political leaders of all trends towards religions have generated a path dependency of mutual trust and that legacy predates the period of democratisation. The article explores the extent to which this outcome results from three factors: Taiwan’s religious diversity, or the absence of a religious hegemony opposed to the state; pragmatic and flexible theologies; and/or convergence between successive Taiwanese governments’ social policies and the social teachings of religions.

The Legacy of an Accommodative Secularism: Religions and Taiwan’s Responses to COVID-19

Vienna Journal of East Asian Studies

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Throughout the two years of this pandemic, Taiwanese public authorities have obtained cooperation from religious organisations in limiting and mitigating the...

The Legacy of an Accommodative Secularism: Religions and Taiwan’s Responses to COVID-19

Data publikacji: 20 lis 2022

Zakres stron: 75 - 108

Otrzymano: 02 kwi 2022

Przyjęty: 12 wrz 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/vjeas-2022-0004

Słowa kluczowe
COVID-19, Taiwanese popular and communal religions, Matsu pilgrimage, Buddhism, Presbyterian Church, Welfare regimes

© 2022 André Laliberté, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The Legacy of an Accommodative Secularism: Religions and Taiwan’s Responses to COVID-19

Data publikacji: 20 lis 2022

Zakres stron: 75 - 108

Otrzymano: 02 kwi 2022

Przyjęty: 12 wrz 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/vjeas-2022-0004

Słowa kluczoweCOVID-19, Taiwanese popular and communal religions, Matsu pilgrimage, Buddhism, Presbyterian Church, Welfare regimes

© 2022 André Laliberté, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Słowa kluczowe
COVID-19, Taiwanese popular and communal religions, Matsu pilgrimage, Buddhism, Presbyterian Church, Welfare regimes