[Chén, Zhīpíng 陈支平. 2019. “Míngdài ‘hǎishàng sīchóu zhi Lù’ fāzhǎn móshì de lìshǐ fǎnsī 明代‘海上丝绸之路’发展模式的历史反思 [Reflections on the Development Model of Míng Era ‘Maritime Silk Routes’].” Zhōngguó Shǐyánjiū 中国史研究 [Journal of Chinese Historical Studies], 2019 (1), pp. 191–198.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chéng, Nínà 程尼娜. 2015. “Míngdài nǚzhēn cháogòng zhìdù yánjiū 明代女真朝贡制度研究 [Research on the Míng-Jurchen Tributary System].” Wén Shǐ Zhé 文史哲 [Journal of Humanities], 347, pp. 90–109.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chéng, Nínà 程尼娜. 2016. “Míngdài Wūliánghā Měnggǔ Sānwèi cháogòng zhìdù 明代兀良哈蒙古三卫朝贡制度 [The Tributary System of the Mongolian Uriyangqa Three Commanderies During the Míng Dynasty].” Shǐxué Jíkān 史学集刊 [Collected Papers of Historical Studies] 2016 (2), pp. 4–17.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chiang, Kai-shek. 1947. China’s Destiny and Chinese Economic Theory. New York: Roy Publishers.]Search in Google Scholar
[CNKI – China National Knowledge Infrastructure (Zhōngguó Zhīwǎng 中国知网). Online: www.cnki.net (accessed: June 30, 2020).]Search in Google Scholar
[Deng, Gang. 1997. “The Foreign Staple Trade of China in the Pre-Modern Era.” The International History Review, 19 (2), pp. 253–85.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fairbank, John King and Ssu Yü Têng. 1941. “On The Ch’ing Tributary System.” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies, 6 (2), pp. 135–246.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fairbank, John King. 1968. The Chinese World Order: Traditional China’s Foreign Relations. Second edition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674333482]Search in Google Scholar
[Frank, Andre Gunder. 1998. ReORIENT: Global Economy in the Asian Age. Berkeley: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520921313]Search in Google Scholar
[Fù, Bǎichén 付百臣. 2007. “Lüèlùn Rìběn zài Dōng Yà cháogòng tǐxì zhōng de juésè yǔ zuòyòng 略论日本在东亚朝贡体系中的角色与作用 [Brief Discussion of Japan’s Role and Function in the East Asian Tributary System].” Shèhuì Kēxué Zhànxiàn 社会科学战线 [Social Science Front], 2007 (6), pp. 150–155.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hamashita, Takeshi 浜下武志. 1990. Kindai Chūgoku no kokusai-teki keiki – Chōkō bōeki shisutemu to kindai Ajia 近代中国の国際的契機―朝貢貿易システムと近代アジア [The International Moment of Early Modern China – The Tribute-Trade System and Early Modern Asia]. Tōkyō 東京: Tōkyō Daigaku Shuppankai 東京大学出版会.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hamashita, Takeshi. 2008. China, East Asia and the Global Economy. Milton Park, Abingdon and New York: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hé, Àiguó 何爱国. 2001. “Lüèlùn shíliù-shíqī shìjì Zhōnngguó yǔ Ōuzhōu lièqiáng guānyú Dōngnán Yà shìwù de chōngtū 略论十六-十七世纪中国与欧洲列强关于东南亚事务的冲突 [Brief Discussion of the Conflicts Between China and European Powers on Southeast Asian Affairs During the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries].” Kūnmíng Lǐgōng Dàxué Xuébào (Shè Kē Bǎn) 昆明理工大学学报 (社科版) [Journal of the Kūnmíng University of Science and Technology (Social Sciences and Humanities)], 1 (4), pp. 35–42.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hé, Xīnhuá 何新华. 2016. Qīngdài cháogòng wénshū yánjiū 清代朝贡文书研究 [Research on Qīng-Era Tributary Documents]. First edition. Guāngzhōu 广州: Guāngzhōu Zhōngshān Dàxué Chūbǎnshè 广州中山大学出版社.]Search in Google Scholar
[Huáng, Chúnyàn 黄纯艳. 2018. “Cháogòng tǐxì yǔ Sòngdài guójiā ānquán 朝贡体系与宋朝国家 安全 [Tributary System and National Security During the Sòng Dynasty].” Jǐnán Xuébào (Zhéxué Shèhuì Kēxué Bǎn) 暨南学报(哲学社会科学版) [Jǐnán Journal (Philosophy and Social Sciences)], 229, pp. 120–132.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jäger, Margarete and Siegfried Jäger. 2007. Deutungskämpfe: Theorie und Praxis Kritischer Diskursanalyse. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jäger, Siegfried. 2015. Kritische Diskursanalyse: Eine Einführung. Sixth edition. Münster: Unrast Verlag.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jiān, Jūnbō 简军波. 2009. “Zhōnghuá cháogòng tǐxì: Guānniàn jiégòu yǔ gōngnéng 中华朝贡体系:观念结构与功能 [China’s Tributary System: Its Conceptual Structure and Function].” Guójì Zhèngzhì Yánjiū 国际政治研究 [Journal of International Studies], 2009 (1), pp. 132–43.]Search in Google Scholar
[Quán, Hǎizōng 全海宗 [=Chŏn Hae-jong] 1997. “Qīngdài Hán-Zhōng cháogòng guānxi kǎo 清代韩中朝贡关系考 [Analysis of Qīng-era Korean-Chinese Tributary Relations].” In Quán Hǎizōng 全海宗, ed., Zhōng-Hán guānxi shǐ lùnjí 中韩关系史论集 [Collection of Papers on the History of Sino-Korean Relations]. Běijīng 北京: Zhōngguó Shèhuì Kēxué Chūbǎnshè 中 国社会科学出版社.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kang, David C. 2012. East Asia Before the West – Five Centuries of Trade and Tribute. New York: Columbia University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kang, David C. [=Kāng Cànxióng 康灿雄]. 2016. Xīfāng zhīqián de Dōng Yà: Cháogòng màoyì wǔbǎi nián 西方之前的东亚: 朝贡贸易五百年 [East Asia Before the West: Five Hundred Years of Tribute and Trade]. Běijīng 北京: Shèhuì Kēxué Wénxiàn Chūbǎnshè 社会科学文献 出版社.]Search in Google Scholar
[Khata’i, ʿAli Akbar [=Ālǐ Ākèbā’ěr 阿里·阿克巴尔]. 1988. Zhōnngguó Jìxíng 中国纪行 [Travel Notes on China]. Běijīng 北京: Sānlián Shūdiàn 三联书店.]Search in Google Scholar
[Keller, Reiner. 2011. Diskursforschung: Eine Einführung für SozialwissenschaftlerInnen. Fourth edition. Münster: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.]Search in Google Scholar
[Larsen, Kirk W. 2011. “The Qing Empire (China), Imperialism, and the Modern World.” History Compass, 9 (6), pp. 498–508.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lebow, Richard Ned. 2009. A Cultural Theory of International Relations. First edition. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lǐ, Bǎojùn 李宝俊, and Bō Liú 刘波. 2011. “‘Cháogòng - cèfēng’ zhìxù lùnxī ‘朝贡——册封’秩序论析 [Analysis of the ‘Tributary-Feudal’ Order].” Wàijiāo Pínglùn 外交评论 [Foreign Affairs Review], 2011 (2), pp. 109–121.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lǐ, Jīnmíng 李金明. 2006. “Lùn Míngchū de hǎijìn yǔ cháogòng màoyì 论明初的海禁与朝贡贸 易 [On the Early Míng Maritime Ban and Tribute-Trade].” Fújiàn Lùntán (Rénwén Shèhuì Kēxué Bǎn 福建论坛(人文社会科学版) [Fújiàn Forum (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition)], 2006 (7), pp. 73–77.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lǐ, Yúnquán 李云泉. 2011. “Zàilùn Qīngdài cháogòng tǐzhì 再论清代朝贡体制 [Rethinking the Qīng-Era Tributary System].” Shāndōng Shīfàn Dàxué Xuébào (Rénwén Shèhuì Kēxué Bǎn) 山 东师范大学学报(人文社会科学版) [Journal of Shāndōng Normal University (Humanities and Social Sciences)], 56 (5), pp. 93–100.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lǐ, Yúnquán 李云泉. 2014. “Huàyǔ, shìjiǎo yǔ fāngfǎ: Jìn nián lái Míng-Qīng cháogòng tǐzhì yánjiū de jǐge wèntí 话语,视角与方法: 近年来明清朝贡体制研究的几个问题. [Discourse, Perspectives, and Methodology: Issues in Recent Research on the Míng-Qīng Tributary System].” Zhōngguó Biānjiāng Shǐdì Yánjiū 中国边疆史地研究 [China’s Borderland History and Geography Studies], 24 (2), pp. 1–11.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lieberman, Victor. 2003. Strange Parallels: Southeast Asia in Global Context, c. 800–1830. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511512087]Search in Google Scholar
[Liú, Xìnjūn 刘信君. 2011. “Zhōng-Cháo yǔ Zhōngguó hé Dōngnán Yà fānshǔguó cháogòng zhìdù zhi bǐjiào 中朝与中国和东南亚藩属国朝贡制度之比较 [Comparison of the Sino-Korean Tributary System and the Tributary System Between China and Its Southeast Asian Vassal States].” Guāngdōng Shèhuì Kēxué 广东社会科学 [Guāngdōng Social Sciences Journal], 2011 (1), pp. 122–130.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lǚ, Zhèngāng 吕振纲. 2017. “Cóng cháogòng wénshū kàn Qīngdài de cháogòng tǐxì - Jiān píng Hé Xīnhuá ‘Qīngdài cháogòng wénshū yánjiū’ 从朝贡文书看清代的朝贡体系——兼评何新 华《清代朝贡文书研究》 [Seeing the Qīng Tributary System Through Tributary Documents – Review of Hé Xīnhuá’s ‘Research on Qīng-Era Tributary Documents’].” Shǐxué Lǐlùn Yánjiū 史学理论研究 [Historiography Quarterly], 2017 (1), pp. 143–147.]Search in Google Scholar
[Luó, Róngqú 罗荣渠. 2004. “Shíwǔ shìjì Zhōng-Xī hánghǎi fāzhǎn qǔxiàng de duìbǐ yǔ sīsuǒ 15 世纪中西航海发展取向的对比与思索 [Comparing and Contemplating the Development Tendencies of Fifteenth-Century Chinese and Western Navigation].” In Wáng Tiānyǒu 王天有 and Wàn Míng 万明, eds., Zhèng Hé yánjiū bǎinián lùnwénxuǎn 郑和研究百年论文选 [Selection of Articles from One Hundred Years of Research on Zhèng Hé]. Běijīng 北京: Běijīng Dàxué Chūbǎnshè 北京大学出版社.]Search in Google Scholar
[Míngshǐ 明史 [History of the Míng]. Online: https://ctext.org/wiki.pl?if=gb&chapter=751744&remap=gb (accessed: March 1, 2020).]Search in Google Scholar
[Naqqāsh, Ghiyāth Al-Dīn [=Huǒzhě Gàiyēsùdīng 火者·盖耶速丁]. 2002. Shāhālǔ qiǎnshǐ Zhōngguó jì 沙哈鲁遣使中国记 [Records on the Envoy of Shahrukh Mirza to China]. Běijīng 北京: Zhōnghuá Shūjú 中华书局.]Search in Google Scholar
[Niǔ, Jūnkǎi 牛军凯. 2003. “Cháogòng yǔ bāngjiāo: Míngmò-Qīngchū Zhōng-Yuè guānxi yánjiū (1593–1702) 朝贡与邦交: 明末清初中越关系研究(1593–1702) [Tribute and Diplomacy: Research on Sino-Vietamese Relations During the Late Míng and Early Qīng (1593–1702)].” Ph.D. thesis, Sun Yat-sen University, Guāngzhōu 广州, China.]Search in Google Scholar
[Perdue, Peter C. 2015. “The Tenacious Tributary System.” Journal of Contemporary China, 24 (96), pp. 1002–1014.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pomeranz, Kenneth. 2001. The Great Divergence: China, Europe, and the Making of the Modern World Economy. Revised edition. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400823499]Search in Google Scholar
[Qín, Yàqīng 秦亚青. 2006. “Guójì guānxi lǐlùn zhōng de Zhōngguó xuépài shēngchéng kěnéng hé bìrán 国际关系理论中国学派生成的可能和必然 [The Possibility and Necessity of the Formation of a Chinese School of International Relations Theory].” Shìjiè Jīngjì yǔ Zhèngzhì 世界 经济与政治 [World Economics and Politics], 2006 (3), pp. 7–13+4.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rén, Niànwén 任念文. 2014. “Míngchū Nánhǎi cháogòng zhìdù yǔ fēngjiàn guójiā hǎiyáng zhànlüè shùlùn 明初南海朝贡制度与封建国家海洋战略述论 [On the Early Míng South China Sea Tributary System and Maritime Strategy of Feudal States].” Tàipíngyáng Xuébào 太平洋学报 [Pacific Journal], 22 (8), pp. 94–105.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sachsenmaier, Dominic. 2011. Global Perspectives on Global History: Theories And Approaches In A Connected World. Reissue edition. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511736544]Search in Google Scholar
[Schottenhammer, Angela. 2012. “The ‘China Seas’ in World History: A General Outline of the Role of Chinese and East Asian Maritime Space from Its Origins to c. 1800.” Journal of Marine and Island Cultures, 1 (2), pp. 63–86.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sòng, Xiǎoqín 宋晓芹. 2017. “Shìlùn Zhōngguó zài Dōng Yà cháogòng tǐxì zhōng de dìwèi hé zùoyòng 试论中国在东亚朝贡体系中的地位和作用 [Analysing China’s Position and Function in the East Asian Tributary System].” Dàlián Dàxué Xuébào 大连大学学报 [Journal of Dàlián University], 38 (4), pp. 9–13.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sūn, Hóngméi 孙红梅. 2009. “Yuáncháo de ‘Tiānxià yī jiā’ sīxiǎng jíqí zhèngzhì wénghuà yītǒng 元朝的"天下一家"思想及其政治文化一统 [The ‘All under Heaven Is One Family’ Ideology of the Yuán Dynasty and Political-Cultural Unification].” Hēilóngjiāng Mínzú Cóngbào 黑龙 江民族丛刊 [Hēilóngjiāng Nationalities Series], 2009 (3), pp. 91–95.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wang, Gungwu. 2013. Renewal: The Chinese State and the New Global History. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.10.2307/j.ctt1pc5f9k]Search in Google Scholar
[Wang, Hui. 2014. China from Empire to Nation-State. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674736306]Search in Google Scholar
[Wáng Qīng 王青. 2007. “Zhōngguó chuántǒng duìwài guānxi de liǎng zhǒng móshì - Lìyì rènzhī yǔ tǐxì jiégòu fēnxi 中国传统对外关系的两种模式 - 利益认知与体系结构分析 [The Two Patterns of China’s Traditional Foreign Relations – Interest Perception and System Structure Analysis].” Ph.D. thesis, Tsinghua University, Běijīng 北京, China.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wang, Yiwei. 2016. The Belt and Road: What Will China Offer the World in Its Rise. First edition. Beijing: New World Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wang, Yuan-kang. 2013. “Explaining the Tribute System: Power, Confucianism, and War in Medieval East Asia.” Journal of East Asian Studies, 13 (2), pp. 207–232.]Search in Google Scholar
[Weigelin-Schwiedrzik, Susanne. 2004. “Zentrum und Peripherie in China und Ostasien.” In Sepp Linhart and Susanne Weigelin-Schwiedrzik, eds., Ostasien 1600–1900. Wien: Promedia, pp. 81–98.]Search in Google Scholar
[Weigelin-Schwiedrzik, Susanne. 2007. “Ist Ostasien eine europäische Erfindung? Anmerkungen zu einem Artikel von Wang Hui.” In Sepp Linhart and Susanne Weigelin-Schwiedrzik, eds., Ostasien im 20. Jahrhundert. Geschichte und Gesellschaft. Wien: Promedia, pp. 9–21.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wohlforth, William C. 1999. “The Stability of a Unipolar World.” International Security, 24 (1), pp. 5–41.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wǔ, Xīnbō 武心波. 2003. “Rìběn yǔ Dōng Yà ‘cháogòng tǐxì’ 日本与东亚‘朝贡体系’ [Japan and the East Asian Tributary System].” Guójì Guānchá 国际观察 [International Review], 2003 (6), pp. 60–66.]Search in Google Scholar
[Xú, Bō 徐波. 2017. “Duì gǔdài Dōng Yà cháogòng tǐzhì de zàisīkǎo 对古代东亚朝贡体制的再思考 [Rethinking the Pre-Modern East Asian Tributary System].” Guójì Zhèngzhì Yánjiū 国际政 治研究 [Journal of International Studies], 2017 (3), pp. 85–102.]Search in Google Scholar
[Xǔ, Jìlín 许纪霖. 2015. “Shénme shì Xīn-Tiānxiàzhǔyì? 什么是新天下主义？ [What Is Neo-Tianxiaism?]” Online: https://cul.qq.com/a/20150427/020813.htm (accessed: July 1, 2020).]Search in Google Scholar
[Xǔ, Jìlín 许纪霖. 2017. Jiā, guó, Tiānxià - Xiàndài Zhōngguó de gèrén, guójiā yǔ shìjiè rèntóng 家国天下——现代中国的个人，国家与世界认同 [Home, Country, Tianxia – The Personal, National and Global Identity of Modern China]. Shànghǎi 上海: Shànghǎi Rénmín Chūbǎnshè 上海人民出版社.]Search in Google Scholar
[Yáng, Línkūn 杨林坤. 2014. “Lùn Míngcháo Xīyù cháogòng màoyì zhèngcè de déshī 论明朝西域 朝贡贸易政策的得失 [On the Gains and Losses of Míng-Era Tributary Trade in the Western Regions].” Zhōngnán Mínzú Dàxué Xuébào (Rénwén Shèhuì Kēxué Bǎn) 中南民族大学学报 (人文社会科学版) [Journal of South-Central University for Nationalities (Humanities and Social Sciences)], 34 (2), pp. 72–76.]Search in Google Scholar
[Yǐn, Qiǎoruǐ 尹巧蕊. 2017. “Qīngdài Měnggǔ cháogòng fǎlǜ zhōng de duōyuán fǎwénhuà 清代蒙 古朝贡法律制度中的多元法文化 [On Diversity in the Legal Culture of the Qīng-Era Mongol Tributary Law System].” Lántāi Shìjiè 兰台世界 [Lantai World], 2013 (7/2), pp. 101–102.]Search in Google Scholar
[Yù, Chángsēn 喻常森. 2000. “Shìlùn cháogòng zhìdù de yǎnbiàn 试论朝贡制度的演变 [On the Evolution of the Tributary System].” Nányáng Wèntí Yánjiū 南洋问题研究 [Southeast Asian Affairs], 2000 (1), pp. 55–65.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhang, Feng. 2009. “Rethinking the ‘Tribute System’: Broadening the Conceptual Horizon of Historical East Asian Politics.” Chinese Journal of International Politics, 2009 (2), pp. 545–574.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhāng, Xiàngyào 张向耀. 2011. “Cóng cháogòng kàn Míngcháo Hàn-Zàng jiāoliú 从朝贡看明朝汉藏交流 [Míng-Era Han-Tibetan Interaction from the Perspective of Tributary Exchange].” Nèijiāng Shīfàn Xuéyuàn Xuébào 内江师范学院学报 [Journal of Nèijiāng Normal University], 26 (3), pp. 54–57.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhèng Rónghé 郑容和 [=Chŏng Yong-hwa 鄭容和]. 2006. “Cóng zhōubiān shìjiǎo lái kàn cháogòng guānxi – Cháoxiǎn wángcháo duì cháogòng tǐxì de rènshi hé lìyòng 从周边视角来 看朝贡关系——朝鲜王朝对朝贡体系的认识和利用 [Seeing Tributary Relations From the Perspective of Neighbours – The Chosŏn Dynasty’s Understanding and Instrumentalisation of the Tributary System].” Guójì Zhèngzhì Yánjiū 国际政治研究 [Journal of International Studies], 2006 (1), pp. 72–87.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhuāng, Guótǔ 庄国土. 2005a. “Lüèlùn cháogòng zhìdù de xūhuàn: Yǐ gǔdài Zhōngguó yǔ Dōngnán Yà de cháogòng guānxi wèi lì 略论朝贡制度的虚幻: 以古代中国与东南亚的朝贡 关系为例 [On the Illusiveness of the Tributary System: The Case of Tributary Relations Between Pre-Modern China and Southeast Asia].” Nányáng Wèntí Yánjiū 南洋问题研究 [Southeast Asian Affairs], 2005 (3), pp. 1–9.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhuāng, Guótǔ 庄国土. 2005b. “Lùn Zhèng Hé xià Xīyáng duì Zhóngguó hǎiwài kāituò shìyè de pòhuài - Jiān lùn cháogòng zhìdù de xūhuànxìng 论郑和下西洋对中国海外开拓事业的破坏 — 兼论朝贡制度的虚假性 [On the Damage Caused by the Zhèng Hé Missions to Chinese Overseas Expansion – Also Discussing the Fictitiousness of the Tributary System].” Xiàmén Dàxué Xuébào (Zhéxué Shèhuìxué Bǎn) 厦门大学学报 (哲学社会科学版) [Xiàmén University Journal (Arts & Social Sciences)], 2005 (3), pp. 70–77.]Search in Google Scholar
| 13 wrz 2020