[
Afshar Jahanshahi, A. – Brem, A. – Bhattacharjee, A. 2017. Who Takes More Sustainability-Oriented Entrepreneurial Actions? The Role of Entrepreneurs’ Values, Beliefs and Orientations. In Sustainability, vol. 9, 2017, no. 10, pp. 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101636
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Arshi, T.A. – Wallis, J. 2024. Entrepreneurial values and circular economy adoption: A cross-lagged SEM-based machine learning study. In Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, vol. 12, 2024, no. 2, pp. 157–176. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2024.120210
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bengtsson, M. et al. 2018. Transforming systems of consumption and production for achieving the sustainable development goals: moving beyond efficiency. In Sustainability Science, vol. 13, 2018, no. 6, pp. 1533–1547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0582-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Biga, B. et al. (eds). 2017. Open eyes book. In Międzynarodowy Kongres Ekonomii Wartości Open Eyes Economy Summit, Kraków : Fundacja Gospodarki i Administracji Publicznej, 2017.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bijon, N. et al. 2022. Towards a Sustainable Bioeconomy through Industrial Symbiosis: Current Situation and Perspectives. In Sustainability, vol. 14, 2022, no. 3, pp. 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031605
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Booth, D. 2021. Post-materialism as a basis for achieving environmental sustainability. In The Journal of Population and Sustainability, vol. 5, 2021, no. 2. https://doi.org/10.3197/jps.2021.5.2.97
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cromie, S. – Johns, S. 1983. Irish Entrepreneurs: Some Personal Characteristics. In Journal of Occupational Behaviour, vol. 4, 1983, no. 4, pp. 317–324.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
D’Amico, G. et al. 2022. Smart and Sustainable Bioeconomy Platform: A New Approach towards Sustainability. In Sustainability, vol. 14, 2022, no. 1, p. 466. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010466
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dembinski, P.H. 2011. The Incompleteness of the Economy and Business: A Forceful Reminder. In Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 100, 2011, no. S1, pp. 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1185-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Diaz Tautiva, J.A. et al. 2023. Understanding the role of institutions and economic context on entrepreneurial value creation choice. In Oeconomia Copernicana, vol. 14, 2023, no. 2, pp. 405–447. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2023.011
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dietz, T. et al. 2018. Governance of the Bioeconomy: A Global Comparative Study of National Bioeconomy Strategies. In Sustainability, vol. 10, 2018, no. 9, pp. 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093190
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Commission. Directorate General for Research and Innovation. 2018. A sustainable bioeconomy for Europe: strengthening the connection between economy, society and the environment : updated bioeconomy strategy. LU : Publications Office. Available at: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/792130 (Accessed: 11 March 2025).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Galutskykh, N.А. – Didorchuk, I.L. 2024. The Current Trends in the World Market of Organic Products. In Business Inform, vol. 2, 2024, no. 553, pp. 20–26. https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2024-2-20-26
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gardner, H.J. – Martin, M.A. 2007. Analyzing Ordinal Scales in Studies of Virtual Environments: Likert or Lump It! In Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, vol. 16, 2007, no. 4, pp. 439–446. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.16.4.439
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gawel, E. – Pannicke, N. – Hagemann, N. 2019. A Path Transition Towards a Bioeconomy – The Crucial Role of Sustainability. In Sustainability, vol. 11, 2019, no. 11, pp. 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11113005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goldstein, J.S. 1985. Kondratieff Waves as War Cycles. In International Studies Quarterly, vol. 29, 1985, no. 4, p. 411. https://doi.org/10.2307/2600380
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gómez-Haro, S. – Aragón-Correa, J.A. – Cordón-Pozo, E. 2011. Differentiating the effects of the institutional environment on corporate entrepreneurship. In Management Decision, vol. 49, 2011, no. 10, pp. 1677–1693. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741111183825
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Grossauer, F. – Stoeglehner, G. 2023. Bioeconomy – A Systematic Literature Review on Spatial Aspects and a Call for a New Research Agenda. In Land, vol. 12, 2023, no. 1, p. 234. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12010234
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hampden-Turner, C. – Trompenaars, F. 1995. The seven cultures of capitalism: value systems for creating wealth in the United States, Britain, Japan, Germany, France, Sweden and the Netherlands. 1st ed., London : Piatkus, 1995.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hassegawa, M. et al. 2022. Innovative forest products in the circular bioeconomy. In Open Research Europe, vol. 2, p. 19. https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.14413.2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hausner, J. – Paprocki, W. – Gronicki, M. 2018. Polski archipelag rozwoju w warunkach globalnej niepewności (The Polish Development Archipelago in the Face of Global Uncertainty). Sopot : Centrum Myśli Strategicznych, 2018 (in Polish).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hechavarría, D.M. et al. 2017. Taking care of business: the impact of culture and gender on entrepreneurs’ blended value creation goals. In Small Business Economics, vol. 48, 2017, no. 1, pp. 225–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9747-4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hofstede, G.H. – Hofstede, G.J. – Minkov, M. 2010. Cultures and organizations: software of the mind: intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival. 3rd ed., New York : McGraw-Hill, 2010.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Holm, H.J. – Opper, S. – Nee, V. 2013. Entrepreneurs Under Uncertainty: An Economic Experiment in China. In Management Science, vol. 59, 2013, no. 7, pp. 1671–1687. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1120.1670
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hornaday, J.A. – Bunker, C.S. 1970. The Nature of the Entrepreneur. In Personnel Psychology, vol. 23, 1970, no. 1, pp. 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1970.tb01634.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Inglehart, R. 1981. Post-Materialism in an Environment of Insecurity. In American Political Science Review, vol. 75, 1981, no. 4, pp. 880–900. https://doi.org/10.2307/1962290
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jacob-John, J. et al. 2021. Synergistic Interactions of SDGs in Food Supply Chains: A Review of Responsible Consumption and Production. In Sustainability, vol. 13, 2021, no. 16, pp. 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168809
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jamieson, S. 2004. Likert scales: how to (ab)use them. In Medical Education, vol. 38, 2004, no. 12, pp. 1217–1218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02012.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jones, P. – Comfort, D. – Hillier, D. 2018. The sustainable development goals and retailing. In World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, vol. 14, 2018, no. 5, p. 608. https://doi.org/10.1504/WREMSD.2018.094335
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Joseph, T.M. et al. 2023. Emerging Bio-Based Polymers from Lab to Market: Current Strategies, Market Dynamics and Research Trends. In C Journal of Carbon Research, vol. 9, 2023, no. 1, p. 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/c9010030
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kaesehage, K. et al. 2019. Seriously Personal: The Reasons that Motivate Entrepreneurs to Address Climate Change. In Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 157, 2019, no. 4, pp. 1091–1109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3624-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kobayashi, Y. et al. 2019. Time evolution of companies towards a stable scaling curve obtained from flow diagrams in three-dimensional phase space. In New Journal of Physics, vol. 21, 2019, no. 4. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/ab0e55
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kotane, I. 2015. Use of Financial and non-financial Indicators in Evaluation of Company’s Performance. In CBU International Conference Proceedings, 2015, pp. 224–233. https://doi.org/10.12955/cbup.v3.605
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kraus, S. et al. 2020. The sharing economy: a bibliometric analysis of the state-of-the-art. In International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, vol. 26, 2020, no. 8, pp. 1769–1786. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-06-2020-0438
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Leonor, M.M.R. – Easud, G.S.M. – Fernando, P.P.L. 2022. Indeterminate Likert Scale in Social Sciences Research. In International Journal of Neutrosophic Science, vol. 19, 2022, no. 1, pp. 289–297. https://doi.org/10.54216/IJNS.190125
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Liobikiene, G. et al. 2019. Evaluation of bioeconomy in the context of strong sustainability. In Sustainable Development, vol. 27, 2019, no. 5, pp. 955–964. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1984
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Loorbach, D.A. – Lijnis Huffenreuter, R. 2013. Exploring the economic crisis from a transition management perspective. In Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, vol. 6, 2013, pp. 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2013.01.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lozano, R. – Barreiro-Gen, M. 2023. Organisations’ contributions to sustainability. An analysis of impacts on the Sustainable Development Goals. In Business Strategy and the Environment, vol. 32, 2023, no. 6, pp. 3371–3382. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3305
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Luchian, I. – Doncev, T. 2023. Actual global trends the of sharing economy. In in Economic growth in the conditions of globalization, vol. II. International Scientific-Practical Conference ‘Economic growth in the conditions of globalization. In National Institute for Economic Research, 2023, pp. 114–120. https://doi.org/10.36004/nier.cecg.III.2023.17.14
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Macha-Huamán, R. et al. 2023. Business Model Canvas in the entrepreneurs’ business model: a system approach. In ICST Transactions on Scalable Information Systems [Preprint]. https://doi.org/10.4108/eetsis.3594
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Majeed, M.U. et al. 2022. Green Marketing Approaches and Their Impact on Green Purchase Intentions: Mediating Role of Green Brand Image and Consumer Beliefs towards the Environment. In Sustainability, vol. 14, 2022, no. 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811703
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marx, C. 2015. Capital A Critique of Political Economy. on-line. www.marxists.org. Available at: www.chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/pdf/Capital-Volume-I.pdf (Accessed: 1 April 2025)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McClelland, D.C. 1976. The achieving society. New York : Irvington, 1976.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Menger, C. 2011. Principles of economics. Pocketbook edition. Translated by J. Dingwall and B.F. Hoselitz. Auburn, Alabama : Ludwig von Mises Institute, 2011.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Palley, T. – Rochon, L.-P. – Vernengo, M. 2012. Statement of the Co-Editors: Economics and the economic crisis: the case for change. In Review of Keynesian Economics, 2012, no. 1, pp. 1–4. https://doi.org/10.4337/roke.2012.01.00
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Palmer, E. – Burton, R. – Haskins, C. 2020. A Systems Engineering Framework for Bioeconomic Transitions in a Sustainable Development Goal Context. In Sustainability, vol. 12, 2020, no. 16, p. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166650
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pandey, J. – Tewary, N.B. 1979. Locus of control and achievement values of entrepreneurs. In Journal of Occupational Psychology, vol. 52, 1979, no. 2, pp. 107–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1979.tb00446.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pradhan, P. et al. 2017. A Systematic Study of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Interactions. In Earth’s Future, vol. 5, 2017, no. 11, pp. 1169–1179. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017EF000632
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ray, P.H. – Anderson, S.R. 2000. The cultural creatives: how 50 million people are changing the world. 1st ed., New York: Harmony Books, 2000.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ronzon, T. – Sanjuán, A.I. 2020. Friends or foes? A compatibility assessment of bioeconomy-related Sustainable Development Goals for European policy coherence. In Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 254, 2020, pp. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119832
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Santos, S.C. et al. 2021. Understanding how and when personal values foster entrepreneurial behavior: A humane perspective. In Journal of Small Business Management, vol. 59, 2021, no. 3, pp. 373–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2021.1888384
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schröder, P. et al. 2019. SDG 12: Responsible Consumption and Production – Potential Benefits and Impacts on Forests and Livelihoods. In Katila, P. et al. (eds). Sustainable Development Goals: Their Impacts on Forests and People. 1st ed., Cambridge University Press, 2019, pp. 386–418. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108765015.014
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schütte, G. 2018. What kind of innovation policy does the bioeconomy need? In New Biotechnology, vol. 40, 2018, pp. 82–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2017.04.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schwartz, D. – Loewenstein, G. – Agüero-Gaete, L. 2020. Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour through green identity labelling. In Nature Sustainability, vol. 3, 2020, no. 9, pp. 746–752. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-0543-4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Singh, S. 1989. Personality Characteristics, Work Values, and Life Styles of Fast- and Slow-Progressing Small-Scale Industrial Entrepreneurs. In The Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 129, 1989, no. 6, pp. 801–805. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1989.9712088
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Smith, A. 2005. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. USA : Pennsylvania State University (an electronic classics series publication). Available at: www.chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.rrojasdatabank.info/Wealth-Nations.pdf (Accessed: 1 April 2025)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Székács, A. 2017. Environmental and Ecological Aspects in the Overall Assessment of Bioeconomy. In Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, vol. 30, 2017, no. 1, pp. 153–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-017-9651-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tehseen, S. – Haider, S.A. 2021. Impact of Universities’ Partnerships on Students’ Sustainable Entrepreneurship Intentions: A Comparative Study. In Sustainability, vol. 13, 2021, no. 9, pp. 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095025
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Van Gogh, R. et al. 2025. Could you show me the path(s) to slow fashion consumption? An application of the prototype willingness model. In Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, vol. 29, 2025, no. 2, pp. 286–303. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-03-2023-0057
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yasir, N. et al. 2023. The Environmental Values Play a Role in the Development of Green Entrepreneurship to Achieve Sustainable Entrepreneurial Intention. In Sustainability, vol. 15, 2023, no. 8, pp. 1–27. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086451
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zhang, X. et al. 2022. Networks open the door to the success of technological entrepreneurship: a perspective on political skills. In Kybernetes, vol. 51, 2022, no. 12, pp. 3487–3507. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-01-2021-0050
]Search in Google Scholar