[Agestam, E. 1985. En produktionsmodell för blandbestånd av tall, gran och björk i Sverige. (A growth simulator for mixed stands of pine, spruce and birch in Sweden). Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Forest and Yield Research. Report 15, 1-150. (In Swedish with English summary).]Search in Google Scholar
[Andreassen, K. & Øyen, B.-H. 2002. Nye tilvekstmodeller for granskog behandlet med bledningshogst. (New growth models for Norway spruce forest treated with selection system). - Research notes from Norwegian Forest Research Institute, 6/02, 10-12. (In Norwegian).]Search in Google Scholar
[Andreassen, K., Eid, T., Tomter, S.M. 2008. Bestandstilvekstmodeller for «alminnelig» ensaldret skog i Norge. (Growth models for stands in «ordinary» even-aged forest in Norway). - Report from Norwegian Forest and Landscape Institute, 06/08, 19 pp. (In Norwegian with English summary).]Search in Google Scholar
[Andreassen, K., Tomter, S.M. 2003. Basal area growth models for individual trees of Norway spruce, Scots pine, birch and other broadleaves in Norway. - Forest Ecology and Management, 180, 11-24.]Search in Google Scholar
[Blingsmo, K. 1984. Diametertilvekstfunksjoner for bjørk-, furu-, og granbestand. (Diameter increment functions for stands of birch, Scots pine and Norway spruce). - Research notes from Norwegian Forest Research Institute, 7/84, 1-22. (In Norwegian with English summary).]Search in Google Scholar
[Blingsmo, K. 1988. Tilvekstfunksjoner. (Growth models). - Research paper from Norwegian Forest Research Institute, Ås, 8 pp. (In Norwegian).]Search in Google Scholar
[Blomqvist, A.G. 1872. Tabeller framställande utviklingen af jemnåriga och slutna skogbestånd af tall, gran och bjørk. (Tables for prognosis of even-aged and dense stands of Scots pine, Norway spruce and birch). Helsinki. (In Swedish).]Search in Google Scholar
[Bollandsås, O. M., Buongiorno, J., Gobakken, T. 2008. Predicting the growth of stands and trees of mixed species and size: A matrix model for Norway. - Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 23(2), 167-178.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bollandsås, O.M., Næsset, E. 2009. Weibull models for single tree increment of Norway spruce, Scots pine, birch, and other broadleaves in Norway. - Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 24, 55-67.]Search in Google Scholar
[Braastad, H. 1974. Diametertilvekstfunksjoner for gran. (Diameter increment functions for Picea abies). - Communications from Norwegian Forest Research Institute, 31(1), 1-74. (In Norwegian with English summary).]Search in Google Scholar
[Braastad, H. 1975. Produksjonstabeller og tilvekstmodeller for gran. (Yield tables and growth models for Picea abies). - Communications from Norwegian Forest Research Institute, 31(9), 356-537. (In Norwegian with English summary).]Search in Google Scholar
[Braastad, H. 1977. Tilvekstmodellprogram for bjørk. (Growth model computer program for birch). - Research notes from Norwegian Forest Research Institute, 1/77, 1-17. (In Norwegian with English summary).]Search in Google Scholar
[Braastad, H. 1980. Tilvekstmodellprogram for furu. (Growth model computer program for Pinus sylvestris). - Communications from Norwegian Forest Research Institute, 35(5), 265-359. (In Norwegian with English summary).]Search in Google Scholar
[Brantseg, A. 1951. Kubikk- og produksjonsundersøkelser i vest-norske granplantninger. (Investigation of volume and production in planted Norway spruce in Western Norway). - Communications from Western Norway Forest Research Institute, 9, 1-109. (In Norwegian with English summary).]Search in Google Scholar
[Burk, T.E. 1986. Growth and yield model validation: Have you ever met one that you liked? -Allen, A., Conney, T.C. (eds.) Data management issues in forestry. Forest Resources System Institute, Florence, Alabama, pp 35-39.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chatterjee, S., Price, B. 1977. Regression Analyses by Example. John Wiley & Sons. 228 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Christie, J.M., Lines, R. 1979. A comparison of forest productivity in Britain and Europe in relation to climatic factors. - Forest Ecology and Management, 2, 75-102.]Search in Google Scholar
[Clutter, J.L., Fortson, J.C., Pienaar, L.V., Brister, G.H., Bailey, R.L. 1983. Timber Management: A Quantitative Approach. Wiley, New York, 333 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Eid, T. 2003. Registreringer i Aas skog 1960-2000. Tester av arealbaserte tilvekstmodeller. (Measurements in Aas forest 1960-2000. Tests of area based growth models). - Research paper from Norwegian Forest and Landscape Institute, 5/2003, 16 pp. (In Norwegian).]Search in Google Scholar
[Eid, T., Eriksson, L.O. 1991. Noen norske og svenske tilvekst-, pris- og kostnadsfunksjoners effekt på lønnsomheten ved tynning. (Some Norwegian and Swedish increment, price and cost functions effect on the profitability of thinnings). - Research notes from Norwegian Forest and Landscape Institute, 7/91, 17 pp. (In Norwegian with English summary).]Search in Google Scholar
[Eid, T., Hobbelstad, K. 2005. Langsiktige investerings-, avvirknings- og inntektsanalyser for skog med Avvirk-2000. (Long term analyses of investment, harvesting and incomes in forest with Avvirk-2000 simulator). - Research paper from Norwegian Forest and Landscape Institute, 2/05, 29 pp. (In Norwegian).]Search in Google Scholar
[Eide, E., Langsæter, A. 1941. Produksjonsundersøkelser i granskog. (Forest production investigations in Norway spruce forest). - Communications from Norwegian Forest Research Institute, 7, 355-500. (In Norwegian with German summary).]Search in Google Scholar
[Ekö, P.M. 1985. En produktionsmodell för skog i Sverige baserad på bestånd från riksskogtaxeringens provytor. (A growth simulator for Swedish forest based on data from the national forest survey). Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Silviculture. Report, 16, 1-224 + Appendix. (In Swedish with English summary).]Search in Google Scholar
[Eriksson, H. 1985. - Lundkvist, L.E. (ed.). Forest as a financial resource in the agro-forestry firm. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Institute of Economy and Statistics, Report 252. (In Swedish).]Search in Google Scholar
[Gustavsen, H.G. 1998. Volymtillväxten och övre höjdens utveckling i talldominerade bestånd i Finland - en utvärdering av några modellers validitet i nuvarende skogar. (Volume growth and top height development in Norway spruce dominated stands in Finland - analyses of the validity of some models in present forest). - Communications from Finish Forest Research Institute, 707, 190 pp. + Appendix. (In Swedish).]Search in Google Scholar
[Härkönen, S., Mäkinen, A., Tokola, T., Rasinmäki, J., Kalliovirta, J. 2010. Evaluation of forest growth simulators with NFI permanent sample plot data from Finland. - Forest Ecology and Management, 259, 573-582.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hasenauer, H. (ed.). 2006. Sustainable forest management. Growth models for Europe. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. pp. 1-398.10.1007/3-540-31304-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Hobbelstad, K. 1980. En analyse av noen avkastningsprognoser i skogbruket, og en ny tilvekstfunksjon for gran. (Analyses of some harvesting prognosis in forest, and a new growth model for Norway spruce). - Research paper from Norwegian Forest and Landscape Institute, 3/80, 1-35. (In Norwegian with English summary).]Search in Google Scholar
[Jonson, T. 1914. Om bonitering av skogsmark. (About site index estimation of forest fields). - Journal of Swedish Forestry Society, 2(5), 369-392. (In Swedish).]Search in Google Scholar
[Jørgensen, S.E.1986. Fundamentals of ecological modelling. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 389 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kangas, A., Kangas, J. 1999. Optimization bias in forest management planning solutions due to errors in forest variables. - Silva Fennica, 33(4), 303-315.]Search in Google Scholar
[Larsson, J.Y., Hylen, G. 2007. Skogen i Norge. Statistikk over skogforhold og skogressurser i Norge registrert i perioden 2000-2004. (Statistics of forest conditions and forest resources in Norway). - Research paper from Norwegian Forest and Landscape Institute, 1/07, 91 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mayer, D.G., Stuart, M.A., Swain, A.J. 1994. Regression of real world data on model output: an appropiate overall test of validity. - Agricultural Systems, 45, 93-104.]Search in Google Scholar
[McRoberts, R.E., Hahn, J.Z., Hefty, G.J., van Cleve, J.R. 1995. Variation in forest inventory field measurements. - Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 24, 1766-1770.]Search in Google Scholar
[Møller, C.M. 1933. Boniteringstabeller af bonitetesvise tilvækstoversikter for bøg, eg og rødgran i Danmark. (Site index tables and growth for beech, oak and Norway spruce in Denmark). - Journal of Danish Forestry Society, 9, 457-626. (In Danish).]Search in Google Scholar
[Nilsen, P., Øyen, B.-H. 2002. Nye tilvekstmodeller i bestand med fjellskoghogst. (New growth models in stands with mountain selective cutting). - Research notes from Norwegian Forest Research Institute, 6/02, 7-9. (In Norwegian).]Search in Google Scholar
[Oderwald, R.G., Hans, R.P. 1993. Corroborating models with modell properties. - Forest Ecology and Management, 62, 271-283.]Search in Google Scholar
[Opdahl, H. 1992. Bonitet, vekst og produksjon hos osp i Sør-Norge. (Site index, growth and production in aspen (Populus tremula L.) in South-Norway). - Communications from Norwegian Forest Research Institute, 44(11), 1-44. (In Norwegian with English summary).]Search in Google Scholar
[Øyen, B., Nes, K. 1997. Growth patterns of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) in western Norway. - Communications from Norwegian Forest Research Institute, 47/18, 24 pp. (In Norwegian).]Search in Google Scholar
[Øyen, B.-H. 2001. Utvikling for plantninger med kjempeedelgran (Abies grandis Lindbl.) i Vest-Norge. (Development of planted grand fir (Abies grandis Lindbl.) in Western Norway). - Research notes from Norwegian Forest Research, 3/01, 27-29. (In Norwegian with English summary).]Search in Google Scholar
[Persson, O.A. 1992. En produktionsmodell för tallskog i Sverige. (A growth simulator for Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) in Sweden). Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Forest Yield Research, Report 31, 1-206. (In Swedish with English summary).]Search in Google Scholar
[Pettersen, J. 1997. Sammenligning av norske og svenske tilvekstfunksjoner for gran og furu. (Comparison of some Norwegian and Swedish growth models in Norway spruce and Scots pine). - Communications from Norwegian Forest Research Institute, 48(19), 311-328. (In Norwegian with English summary).]Search in Google Scholar
[Petterson, H. 1937. Utvecklingsprognoser for skogbestånd. (Development prognosis in forest stands). Nordic forestry congress excursion program. Stockholm, p. 22-31. (In Swedish).]Search in Google Scholar
[Porte, A., Bartelink, H.H. 2002. Modelling mixed forest growth: a review of models for forest management. - Ecological Modelling, 150, 1 & 2, 141-188.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rennolls, K. 1995. Mis-specification and over-parameterization in forest modelling. - Koehl, M., Gertner, G.Z. (eds.). Caring for the Forest: Research in a Changing World, Invited paper at IUFRO XX World Conference, Tampere, (S4.11-00, Statistics, Mathematics and Computers), pp. 61-70.]Search in Google Scholar
[Reynolds, M.R. 1984. Estimating the error in model predictions. - Forest Science, 30, 454-469.]Search in Google Scholar
[SAS 2004. SAS/STAT 9.1 User’s Guide, Volume 1-7, 5180 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[SAS 2011. SAS/GRAPH® 9.3: Reference, Second Edition. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.]Search in Google Scholar
[Solberg, S., Tveite, B. 2000. Crown density and growth relationships between stands of Picea abies in Norway. - Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 15(1), 87-96.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stage, A.R., Wykoff, W.R. 1993. Calibrating a Model of Stochastic Effects on Diameter Increment for Individual-Tree Simulations of Stand Dynamics. - Forest Science, 39(4), 692-705.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stalsberg, T. 1882. Tilvækstberegninger. (Forest growth calculations). Norwegian Forest Society, Oslo/ Kristiania, pp. 149-152. (In Norwegian).]Search in Google Scholar
[Strand, L. 1983. Increment functions based on data from mixed stands. - Communications from Norwegian Forest Research Institute, 38(5), 1-10.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tveite, B. 1980. Samband mellom svensk boniteringssystem (H100) og norsk boniteringssystem (H40). (Relationship between Swedish site index system (H100) and Norwegian site index system H40.) Internal note, Norwegian Forest Research Institute, 17/1-1980. 2 pp. (In Norwegian).]Search in Google Scholar
[Tveite, B., Braastad, H. 1981. Bonitering av gran, furu, og bjørk. (Site index estimation of Norway spruce, Scots pine and birch). - Journal of Norwegian Forestry, 1981(4), 17-22. (In Norwegian).]Search in Google Scholar
[Vanclay, J.K. 1994. Modelling forest growth and yield: Application to mixed tropical forests. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, 312 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vanclay, J.K., Skovsgaard, J.P. 1997. Evaluating forest growth models. - Ecological Modelling, 98, 1-12.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vuokila, Y., Valiaho, H. 1980. Growth and yield models for conifer cultures in Finland. - Communication Institute Forestry Fennica, 99(2), 1-271. ]Search in Google Scholar
