[Adler, R.W. (2011). Performance management and organizational strategy: How to design systems that meet the needs of confrontation strategy firms, The British Accounting Review, 43(4), 251-263, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2011.08.00410.1016/j.bar.2011.08.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Al-Mashari, M. & Zairi, M. (1999). BPR implementation process: an analysis of key success and failure factors, Business Process Management Journal, 5(1), 87-112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/1463715991024910810.1108/14637159910249108]Search in Google Scholar
[Aslani, A., Naaranoja, M. & Zakeri, B. (2012a). The prime criteria for private sector participation in renewable energy investment in the Middle East (case study: Iran). Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(4), 1977-1987. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.12.01510.1016/j.rser.2011.12.015]Search in Google Scholar
[Aslani, A., Helo, P. & Naaranoja, M. (2012b). Development of creativity in concurrent engineering teams, American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 2(3), 77-84, http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2012.2301010.4236/ajibm.2012.23010]Search in Google Scholar
[Azar, A. (2008). Fuzzy Management Science [in Persian]. Tehran: IMPSC.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bafandeh, A. (2009). Developing a fuzzy expert system in order to design the organizational structure [in Persian], Beyond the Management, 9(2), 103-128.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bennett, R. & Savani, S. (2004). Managing conflict between marketing and other functions within charitable organizations, Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 25(2), 180 - 200, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/143773041052184010.1108/1437730410521840]Search in Google Scholar
[Cernancky, M., Makula, M. & Benuskova, L. (2007). Organization of the state space of a simple recurrent network before and after training on recursive linguistic structures, Neural Networks, 20(2), 236-244, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2006.01.02010.1016/j.neunet.2006.01.020]Search in Google Scholar
[Chang, D.Y. (1996). Theory and methodology: applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP, European Journal of Operational Research, 95(3), 649-655, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(95)00300-210.1016/0377-2217(95)00300-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Chou, T.C. & Cheng, S.C. (2006). Design and implementation of a semantic image classification and retrieval of organizational memory information systems using analytical hierarchy process, Omega, 34(2), 125-134, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2004.08.00410.1016/j.omega.2004.08.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Daft, R.L. (2009). Organization Theory and Design (Tenth Edition). US: South-Western Cengage Learning.]Search in Google Scholar
[Damjanovic, V. (2010). Semantic reengineering of business processes, Information Systems, 35(4), 496-504, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2009.06.00310.1016/j.is.2009.06.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Dessler, G. (2007). Human Resource Management (11th Edition). US: Prentice Hall.]Search in Google Scholar
[DuBrin, A.J. (2006). Fundamentals of Organizational Behavior (4th editions). US: South-Western College Pub.]Search in Google Scholar
[Grover, V., Jeong, S.R., Kettinger, W.J & Teng, T.C. (1995). The implementation of business process re-engineering, Journal of Management Information Systems, 12(1), 109 - 144.10.1080/07421222.1995.11518072]Search in Google Scholar
[Hall, J.M. & Johnson, M.E. (2009). When Should Process Be Art, Not Science, Harvard Business Review, Retrieved July 20, 2012, from <http://www.virginia.edu/sciartproject/docs/WhenShouldaProcessBeArt.pdf>]Search in Google Scholar
[Hatch, M.J. & Cunliffe, Al. (2006). Organization Theory: Modern, Symbolic, and Postmodern Perspectives(2nd edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hwang, C.L. & Yoon, K (1981). Multiple Attribute Decision-Making; Methods and Applications- a State of the Art Survey, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9_3]Search in Google Scholar
[Ishizaka, A. & Labib, A. (2011). Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process, Expert Systems with Applications, 38(11), 14336-14345, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.14310.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.143]Search in Google Scholar
[Ketchen, D.J. & Hult, T.M. (2007). Toward greater integration of insights from organization theory and supply chain management, Journal of Operations Management, 25(2), 455-458, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2006.05.00110.1016/j.jom.2006.05.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Mintzberg, H. (2007). Mintzberg on Management. New York: The Free Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Momeni, M. (2007). New Topics in the Operations Research [in Persian]. Tehran: University of Tehran.]Search in Google Scholar
[Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. London: SAGE.]Search in Google Scholar
[Robbins, S.P. (2006). Organization Theory: Structure, Design and Application. USA: Pearson Academic.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sarmad, Z. (2009). The Research Method in Behavioral Science [in Persian]. Tehran: Aghah.]Search in Google Scholar
[Saaty, T.L. & Peniwati K. (2007). Group Decision Making: Drawing out and Reconciling Differences. Pennsylvania: RWS Publications.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sethi, R. & Nicholson, C.Y. (2001). Structural and contextual correlates of charged behavior in product development teams, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18(3), 154-168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.183015410.1111/1540-5885.1830154]Search in Google Scholar