[Aitken, B.J. and A.E. Harrison, 1999. Do Domestic Firms Benefit from Direct Foreign Investments? Evidence from Venezuela. American Economic Review 89: 605-618.10.1257/aer.89.3.605]Search in Google Scholar
[Andrijević-Matovac, V. 2003. Croatian National Innovation System: How to create and transfer knowledge and technology? In Transition Countries in the Knowledge Society, edited by J. Švarc, J. Lažnjak, Ž. Šporer, and D. Polšek, 199-217. The Institute of Social Sciences Ivo Pilar, Zagreb.]Search in Google Scholar
[Aralica, Z. and Bačić, K. 2005. Evaluation of Croatian innovation capability. In Croatian Accession to the European Union, Facing the Challenges of Negotiations, edited by K. Ott, 129-159. The Institute of Public Finance, Zagreb.]Search in Google Scholar
[Arrow, K. J. 1962. The economic implications of learning by doing. Review of Economic Studies 29: 155-173.10.2307/2295952]Search in Google Scholar
[Arvanitis, S. 1997. The Impact of Firm Size on Innovative Activity - An Empirical]Search in Google Scholar
[Analysis Based on Swiss Firm Data. Small Business Economics 9: 473-490.]Search in Google Scholar
[Baldwin, J. Hanel, P. and Sabourin, D. 2000. Determinants of Innovative Activity in Canadian Manufacturing Firms: The Role of Intellectual Property Rights. Ottawa, Micro-Economic Analysis Division Statistics Canada. http://www.statcan.ca/english/research/11F0019MIE/11F0019MIE2000122.pdf10.2139/ssrn.229792]Search in Google Scholar
[Baumol, J.W. 2004. Entrepreneurial Enterprises, Large Established Firms and Other Components of the Free-Market Growth Machine. Small Business Economics, 23 (1): 9-21.10.1023/B:SBEJ.0000026057.47641.a6]Search in Google Scholar
[Boia, M. J. Conceição, P. and Santos, R. 2003. Determinants of Innovation in Portugal: Designing, Implementing and Analyzing Evidence from the Third Community Innovation Survey. Instituto Superior Técnico, Lisbon.]Search in Google Scholar
[Božić, Lj. Radas, S. 2005. The Effects of Innovation Activities in SME's in the Republic of Croatia. Privredna kretanja i ekonomska politika 15 (103): 30-50.]Search in Google Scholar
[Caird, S. 1994. How important is the innovator for the commercial success of innovative products in SMEs. Technovation 14 (2): 71-83.10.1016/0166-4972(94)90097-3]Search in Google Scholar
[CEU 2000. Presidency conclusions: Lisbon European Council 2000. Bruxelles, Council of European Union. http://ue.eu.int/ueDocs/cms_Data/docs/pressData/en/ec/00100-r1.en0.htm]Search in Google Scholar
[Cohen, W. 2005. Empirical Studies of Innovative Activity. In Economics of Innovation and Technological Change Handbook, edited by P. Stoneman, 182-264. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R. and Walsh, J. P. 2000. Protecting their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and Why U.S. Manufacturing Firms Patent (or Not). NBER Working Paper 7552, MS: Cambridge.10.3386/w7552]Search in Google Scholar
[Cohen W. M. Klepper S 1992. The anatomy ofindustry R&D intensity distributions. American Economic Review 82: 777-799.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cohen, W. and Levinthal, D. 1989. Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D. Economic Journal 99: 569-596.10.2307/2233763]Search in Google Scholar
[Crépon, B., Duguet, E. and Mairesse, J. 1998. Research and Development, Innovation and Productivity: An Econometric Analysis at the Firm Level. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 7: 115-158.]Search in Google Scholar
[Crespi, M. 2004. Notes on the Determinants of Innovation: A Multi-perspective Analysis. Rome, FEEM Working Paper No. 42/04. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=52450310.2139/ssrn.524503]Search in Google Scholar
[Damijan, et al. 2003. Technology Transfer through FDI in Top-10 Transition Countries: How Important are Direct Effects, Horizontal and Vertical Spillovers? MI: Ann Arbor, William Davidson Institute working paper, no.549. http://eres.bus.umich.edu/docs/workpap-dav/wp549.pdf10.2139/ssrn.404241]Search in Google Scholar
[Dosi. G. 1988. Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation. Journal of Economic Literature 26: 1120-1171.]Search in Google Scholar
[Geroski, P. A. and Walters, C. F. 1995. Innovative Activities over the Business Cycle. Economic Journal 105: 916-928.10.2307/2235158]Search in Google Scholar
[Girma, S., Greenaway, D. and Wakelin, K. 2001. Who Benefits from Foreign Direct Investment in the UK? Scottish Journal of Political Economy 48: 119-133.10.1111/1467-9485.00189]Search in Google Scholar
[Griffith, R., Huergo, E., Mairesse, J., Peters, B. 2006. Innovation and Productivity Across four European Countries. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 22, 4: 483-498.]Search in Google Scholar
[Griliches, Z. 1990. Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey. Journal of Economic Literature 28: 1661-1707.10.3386/w3301]Search in Google Scholar
[Hausman, A., 2005. Innovativeness among small businesses: Theory and propositions for future research. Industrial Marketing Management 34 (8): 773-782.10.1016/j.indmarman.2004.12.009]Search in Google Scholar
[Hujer, R. and Radić, D. 2003. Evaluating the Impacts of Subsidies on Innovation Activities in Germany. Frankfurt, Discussion Paper, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University. http://much-magic.wiwi.unifrankfurt.de/Professoren/hujer/papers/rd_eva.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Jaklič, A., Rojec M. and Damijan, J. 2006. Innovation Cooperation and Innovation Activity of Slovenian Enterprises. Paper presented at 32th Annual Conference of European International Business Association (EIBA): Regional and National Drivers of Business Location and Competitiveness, Fribourg, November.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kickul, J. and Gundry, L. 2002. Prospecting for strategic advantage: the proactive entrepreneurial personality and small firm innovation. Journal of Small Business Management, 40 (2): 85-97.10.1111/1540-627X.00042]Search in Google Scholar
[Kuhlmann, S. 2001. Governance of Innovation Policy in Europe - Three Scenarios. In Innovation Policy in Europe and the US: New Policies in New Institutions, Research Policy - Special Issue 30 6: 953-976.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kurik, S. et al. 2002. Innovation in Estonian Enterprises 1998-2000. Estonian Institute for Futures Studies, Talinn.]Search in Google Scholar
[Leiponen, A., 2005. Skill and innovation. International Journal of Industrial Organization 23: 303-323.10.1016/j.ijindorg.2005.03.005]Search in Google Scholar
[Lipparini, A. and Sobrero, M., 1994. The glue and the pieces: Entrepreneurship and innovation in small-firm networks. Journal of Business Venturing, 9 (2): 125-40.10.1016/0883-9026(94)90005-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Lööf, H. Heshmati, A. 2006. On the relationship between innovation and performance: A sensitivity analysis. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 15: 317-344.10.1080/10438590500512810]Search in Google Scholar
[Lundwall, B.Ä. 1992. National system of innovations: Towards theory of innovation and interactive learning. Printer Publisher, London.]Search in Google Scholar
[Maddala, G. S. 1986. Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mairesse, J. and Mohnen, P. 2001. To Be or Not To Be Innovative: An Exercise in Measurement. Cambridge, MS: National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Working Papers 8644. http://edocs.ub.unimaas.nl/loader/file.asp?id=243 (accessed September 9, 2007) http://edocs.ub.unimaas.nl/loader/file.asp?id=243]Search in Google Scholar
[Mohnen, P. and Dagenais, M. 2000. Towards an Innovation Intensity Index: The Case of CIS 1 in Denmark and Ireland. Montreal, CIRANO. http://www.cirano.qc.ca/pdf/publication/2000s-20.pdf (accessed January 22, 2007) http://www.cirano.qc.ca/pdf/publication/2000s-20.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Mowery, D. C. and Rosenberg, N. 1989. Technology and the Pursuit of Economic Growth. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511664441]Search in Google Scholar
[Narula, R. 2003. Understanding the growth of international R&D alliances. In Multinational]Search in Google Scholar
[Enterprises, Innovative Strategies and Systems of Innovation, edited by J. Cantwell and J. Molero, 129-152. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.]Search in Google Scholar
[NCC 2006. Croatia's Competitiveness Challenge: Annual Report on Croatia Competitiveness 2006. National Competitiveness Council, Zagreb.]Search in Google Scholar
[OECD 1997. The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities: Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data - Oslo Manual 2nd edition. OECD, Paris.]Search in Google Scholar
[Patel, P. and Pavitt, K. 2005. Patterns of Technological Activity: their Measurement and Interpretation. In Economics of Innovation and Technological Change Handbook, edited by P. Stoneman, 182-264. Oxford Blackwell Publishers Ltd, Oxford.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pavitt, K. 1984. Patterns of Technical Change: Towards Taxonomy and a Theory. Research Policy 13(6): 343-73.10.1016/0048-7333(84)90018-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Pavitt, K. 1986. Technology, Innovation and Strategic Management. In: Strategic Management Research: A European Perspective, edited by: J. Mc Gee and H. Tomas, 171-190. John Wiley & Sons, New York.]Search in Google Scholar
[Powell, W.W., Grodal, S. 2005. Networks of Innovators. In The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, edited by J. Fegerberg, D.C. Mowery and R.R. Nelson, 56-85. Oxford University Press, Oxford.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.003.0003]Search in Google Scholar
[Račić, D. et al. 2005. Innovation in Croatian Enterprises. The Institute of Economics, Zagreb.]Search in Google Scholar
[Račić, D. and Cvijanović, V. 2005. Privatization, Institution Building and Market Development: The Case of Croatia. In Path-depedent development in the Western Balkans: the impact of privatization, edited by S. Kusic, 43-77. Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main.]Search in Google Scholar
[Radić, D. 2005. Econometric Analysis of Innovation Activities. Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main.]Search in Google Scholar
[Radošević, S. 2004. A Two-tier or Multi-tier Europe? Assessing the Innovation Capacities of Central and Eastern European Countries in the Enlarged EU. Journal of Common Market Studies 42(3): 641-666.10.1111/j.0021-9886.2004.00522.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Radosevic, S. 1999. Patterns of Innovative Activities in Countries of Central and Eastern Europe: An Analysis Based on Comparison of Innovation Surveys. Sussex, SPRU Electronic Working Paper No 35. http://www.sussex.ac.uk/Units/spru/publications/imprint/sewps/sewp35/sewp35.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Raymond, W. P. et al. 2006. Persistence of innovation in Dutch manufacturing: Is it spurious? Munich, CESifo Working Paper Series No 1681. http://ssrn.com/abstract=89420310.2139/ssrn.894203]Search in Google Scholar
[Rosenberg, N. 1982. Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511611940]Search in Google Scholar
[Sanna-Randaccio, F., R. Veugelers 2003. Global innovation strategies of MNEs: Implications for host economies. In Multinational Enterprises, Innovative Strategies and Systems of Innovation, edited by J. Cantwell and J. Molero, 14-46. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schmookler, J. 1962. Economic Sources of Inventive Activity. Journal of Economic History XXII (1): 1-20.10.1017/S0022050700102311]Search in Google Scholar
[Szabo, A. 2002. Internationalisation of SMEs: The UNECE Approach. Geneva, UNECE. http://www.unece.org/indust/sme/internat.htm]Search in Google Scholar
[Švarc, J. 2006. Socio-political factors and the failure of innovation policy in Croatia as a country in transition. Research Policy 35 (1): 144-159.10.1016/j.respol.2005.09.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Teece, D. J. 1977. Technology Transfer by Multinational Firms: The Resource Cost of Transferring Technological Know-how. Economic Journal 87 (346): 242-261.10.2307/2232084]Search in Google Scholar
[Teece, D. J. 1986. Profiting from Technological Innovation. Research Policy 15 (6): 285-306.10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Vinding, A. L. 2002. Absorptive capacity and innovative performance: A human capital approach. In Interorganisational Diffusion and Transformation of Knowledge in the Process of Product Innovation. Ph.D. dissertation, Institut for Erhvervsstudier, Ålborg Universitet.]Search in Google Scholar
