[
Ahmed, A. and Masroor, F. 2018. Exploring argumentation in print media: A comparative metadiscourse analysis of British and Pakistani English newspapers’ letters to the editor. Kashmir Journal of Language Research, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 153-172.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Alghazo, S. M., Al Salem, M. N., Alrashdan, I. and Rabab’ah, G. 2021. Grammatical devices of stance in written academic English. Heliyon, vol. 7, no. 11, Article e08463.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Alghazo, S. M., Al Salem, M. N. and Alrashdan, I. 2021. Stance and engagement in English and Arabic research article abstracts. System, vol. 103, Article 102681.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bhatia, V. K. 2008. Genre analysis, ESP and professional practice. English for specific purposes, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 161-174.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Boshrabadi, A. M., Biria, R. and Zavari, Z. 2014. A cross cultural analysis of textual and interpersonal metadiscourse markers: The case of economic articles in English and Persian newspapers. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 59-66.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Crismore, A. 1983. Metadiscourse: What it is and how it is used in school and non-school social science texts. Center for the Study of Reading Technical Report; no. 273.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dafouz-Milne, E. 2008. The pragmatic role of textual and interpersonal metadiscourse markers in the construction and attainment of persuasion: A cross-linguistic study of newspaper discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 95-113.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dehghan, M. and Chalak, A. 2016. Code glosses in academic writing: The comparison of Iranian and native authors. Research in English Language Pedagogy, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 21-29.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Farnia, M. and Mohammadi, N. 2018. Cross-cultural analysis of interpersonal metadiscourse markers in persuasive local newspaper articles. Discourse and Interaction, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 27-44.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gonzalez, M., Roseano, P., Borras-Comes, J. and Prieto, P. 2017. Epistemic and evidential marking in discourse: Effects of register and debatability. Lingua, vol. 186, pp. 68-87.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hyland, K. 1998. Persuasion and context: The pragmatics of academic metadiscourse. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 437-455.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hyland, K. 1999. Talking to students: Metadiscourse in introductory coursebooks. English for Specific Purposes, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 3-26.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hyland, K. 2005. Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hyland, K. 2007. Applying a gloss: Exemplifying and reformulating in academic discourse. Applied Linguistics, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 266-285.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hyland, K. 2015. Teaching and researching writing. London: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hyland, K. 2017. Metadiscourse: What is it and where is it going? Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 113, pp. 16-29.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hyland, K. 2019. Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. (2nd ed.). London: Bloomsbury Academic.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hyland, K. and Jiang, F. K. 2017. Is academic writing becoming more informal? English for Specific Purposes, vol. 45, pp. 40-51.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hyland, K. and Jiang, F. K. 2018. “In this paper we suggest”: Changing patterns of disciplinary metadiscourse. English for Specific Purposes, vol. 51, pp. 18-30.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kuhi, D. and Mojood, M. 2014. Metadiscourse in newspaper genre: A cross-linguistic study of English and Persian editorials. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 98, pp.1046-1055.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Le, E. 2004. Active participation within written argumentation: Metadiscourse and editorialist’s authority. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 687-714.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Memon, M. A., Pathan, H. and Memon, S. 2021. An intercultural investigation of interactive metadiscourse markers in research articles by Pakistani and British engineers. Journal of Corpus Linguistics, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 51-72.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Moghadam, F. D. 2017. Persuasion in journalism: A study of metadiscourse in texts by native speakers of English and Iranian EFL writers. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 483-495.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Noorian, M., & Biria, R. 2017. Interpersonal metadiscourse in persuasive journalism: A study of texts by American and Iranian EFL columnists. Journal of Modern Languages, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 64-79.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Paltridge, B. 2012. Discourse analysis: An introduction. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing. Rahman, M. M. 2011. Genre-based writing instruction: Implications in ESP classroom. English for Specific Purposes World, vol 33, no. 11, pp. 1-9.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shokouhi, H., Norwood, C., and Soltani, S. 2015. Evidential in Persian editorials. Discourse Studies, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 449-466.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Siddique, A. R., Mahmood, M. A. and Iqbal, J. 2018. Metadiscourse analysis of Pakistani English newspaper editorials: A corpus-based study. International Journal of English Linguistics, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 146-163.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sukma, B. P. and Sujatna, E. T. S. 2014. Interpersonal metadiscourse markers in opinion articles. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 16-21.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Supasiraprapa, S., and De Costa, P. I. 2017. Metadiscourse and identity construction in teaching philosophy statements: A critical case study of two MA TESOL students. TESOL Quarterly, vol 5, no. 4, pp. 868-896.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vande Kopple, W. J. 1985. Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse. College Composition and Communication, vol 36, no. 1, pp. 82-93.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zhang, M., Sun, W., Peng, H., Gan, Q. and Yu, B. 2017. A multidimensional analysis of metadiscourse markers across spoken registers. Journal of Pragmatics, vol 117, pp. 106-118.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zhao, J. 2017. Native speaker advantage in academic writing? Conjunctive realizations in EAP writing by four groups of writers. Ampersand, vol. 4, pp. 47-57.
]Search in Google Scholar
