[Bekalu, M. A., 2006. Presupposition in news discourse. Discourse and Society, vol.17, no. 2, pp. 147–172.10.1177/0957926506060248]Search in Google Scholar
[Bednarek, M. and Caple, H., 2012. News discourse. London: Continuum.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bell, A., 1991. The language of news media. Oxford: Blackwell.]Search in Google Scholar
[Benkler, Y. Faris, R. and Roberts, H., 2018. Network propaganda: Manipulation, disinformation, and radicalization in American politics. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190923624.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Blom, J. and Hansen, K., 2015. Click bait: Forward-reference as lure in online news headlines. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 76, pp. 87-100.10.1016/j.pragma.2014.11.010]Search in Google Scholar
[Carlson, M., 2018. Automating judgment? Algorithmic judgment, news knowledge, and journalistic professionalism. New Media & Society, vol.20, no.5, pp.1755-1772.10.1177/1461444817706684]Search in Google Scholar
[Chovanec, J., 2003. The mixing of modes as a means of resolving the tension between involvement and detachment in news headlines. Brno Studies in English, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 51-66.]Search in Google Scholar
[Costera Meijer, I. and Groot Kormelik, T., 2015. Checking, sharing, clicking and linking. Digital Journalism, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 664-679.10.1080/21670811.2014.937149]Search in Google Scholar
[Cotter, C. 2015. Discourse and media. In: D. Tannen, H. Hamilton, and D. Schiffrin, eds. The handbook of discourse analysis. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 795-821.10.1002/9781118584194.ch37]Search in Google Scholar
[DeMers, J., 2016. 59 percent of you will share this article without even reading it. Forbes [Accessed 18 August 2016]. Available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/jaysondemers/2016/08/08/59-percent-of-you-will-share-this-article-without-even-reading-it/#6b9ef1e72a64.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dor, D., 2003. On newspaper headlines as relevance optimizers. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 695-721.10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00134-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Ekström, M. and Westlund, O., 2019a. Epistemology and journalism. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication [Accessed 4 May 2019]. Available at: https://oxfordre.com/communication/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228613-e-806.10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.806]Search in Google Scholar
[Ekström, M. and Westlund, O., 2019b. The dislocation of news journalism: A conceptual framework for the study of epistemologies of digital journalism. Media and Communication, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 259-270.10.17645/mac.v7i1.1763]Search in Google Scholar
[Fedeli, S. and Matsa, K.E., 2018. Use of mobile devices for news continues to grow, outpacing desktops and laptops. Pew Research [Accessed on 2 June 2019] Available at: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/07/17/use-of-mobile-devices-for-news-continues-to-grow-outpacing-desktops-and-laptops/]Search in Google Scholar
[Firmstone, J., 2019. Editorial journalism and newspapers’ editorial opinions. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication [Accessed 2 May 2019]. Available at: https://oxfordre.com/communication/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228613-e-803.10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.803]Search in Google Scholar
[Fowler, R., 1991. Language in the news: Discourse and ideology in the press. London: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gabielko, M. et al. 2016. Social clicks: What and who gets read on twitter? ACM SIGMETRICS [Accessed 18 June 2017]. Available at: https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01281190/document.10.1145/2896377.2901462]Search in Google Scholar
[Gregoriou, C., 2014. The linguistic levels of foregrounding in stylistics. In: M. Burke, ed. Routledge handbook of stylistics. London: Routlegde, pp. 408-420.]Search in Google Scholar
[Groot Kormelik, T. and Costera Meijer, I., 2017. What clicks actually mean: Exploring digital news user practices. Journalism, vol. 19, no 5, pp. 668-683.10.1177/1464884916688290]Search in Google Scholar
[Hermida, A. et al. 2012. Share, like, recommend. Journalism Studies, vol.13, no. 5-6, pp. 815-824.10.1080/1461670X.2012.664430]Search in Google Scholar
[Hermida, A., 2016. Social media and the news. In: T. Witschge, et al. eds. The SAGE Handbook of Digital Journalism. London: SAGE, pp. 81-94.10.4135/9781473957909.n6]Search in Google Scholar
[Hermida, A., 2018. Social media and journalism. In: J. Burgess, A. Marwick, and T. Poell, eds. The SAGE Handbook of Social Media. London: SAGE, pp. 497-511.10.4135/9781473984066.n28]Search in Google Scholar
[Ifantidou, E., 2009. Newspaper headlines and relevance: Ad hoc concepts in ad hoc contexts. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 41, pp. 699-720.10.1016/j.pragma.2008.10.016]Search in Google Scholar
[Isani, S., 2011. Of headlines & headlinese: Towards distinctive linguistic and pragmatic genericity. ASp, vol.60 [Accessed 20 May 2016]. Available at: http://asp.revues.org/2523.10.4000/asp.2523]Search in Google Scholar
[Iarovici, E. and Amel, A., 1989. The strategy of the headline. Semiotica, vol.77, no.4, pp. 441-459.10.1515/semi.1989.77.4.441]Search in Google Scholar
[Jeffries, L., 2010. Critical stylistics: The power of English. Basingstoke: Palgrave.10.1007/978-1-137-04516-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Jeffries, L., 2014. Critical stylistics. In: M. Burke, ed. Routledge handbook of stylistics. London: Routlegde, pp. 408-420.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jeffries, L., 2015. Textual meaning and its place in a theory of language. Topics in Linguistics, vol.15 [Accessed 2 July 2016]. Available at: https://www.degruyter.com/downloadpdf/j/topling.2015.15.issue-1/topling-2015-0006/topling-2015-0006.pdf10.2478/topling-2015-0006]Search in Google Scholar
[Jeffries, L., 2016. Critical stylistics. In: V. Sotirova, ed. The Bloomberg Companion to Stylistics London: Bloomsbury Academic, pp. 157-176.]Search in Google Scholar
[Johansson, M., 2014. Reading digital news: Participation roles, activities, and positionings. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 72, pp. 31-45.10.1016/j.pragma.2014.05.011]Search in Google Scholar
[Jones, J. and Salter, L., 2012. Digital journalism. London: SAGE.10.4135/9781446288634]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Kronrod, A. and Engel, O., 2001. Accessibility theory and referring expressions in newspaper headlines. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 33, pp. 683-699.10.1016/S0378-2166(00)00013-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Kuiken, J. et al. 2017. Effective headlines of newspaper articles in a digital environment. Digital Journalism, vol. 5, no. 10, pp. 1300-1314.10.1080/21670811.2017.1279978]Search in Google Scholar
[Lindemann, B., 1989. What knowledge does it take to read a newspaper? Journal of Literary Semantics, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 50-65.10.1515/jlse.1989.18.1.50]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Miššíková, G., 2003. Linguistic stylistics. Nitra: FF UKF.]Search in Google Scholar
[Miššíková, G., 2007. Pragmatic dimensions in stylistic analysis. Brno Studies in English, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 91-100.]Search in Google Scholar
[Miššíková, G., 2012. Politeness strategies in academic digital discourse. Discourse and Interaction, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 49-62.10.5817/DI2012-1-49]Search in Google Scholar
[Molek-Kozakowska, K., 2014. Coercive metaphors in news headlines: A cognitive-pragmatic approach. Brno Studies in English, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 149-173.10.5817/BSE2014-1-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Molek-Kozakowska, K., 2015. Presupposition and nominalization in headlinese: A critical analysis of framing devices in journalistic discourse. In: M. Zabielska, E. Wasikiewicz-Firlej, and A. Szczepaniak-Kozak, eds. Discourses in co(n)text: The many faces of specialized discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 134-161.]Search in Google Scholar
[Molek-Kozakowska, K., 2016. The advantages of applying the concept of rhetorical style in language-oriented journalism studies. Stylistyka, vol. 25, (Gajda i stylistyka), pp. 277-290.10.25167/Stylistyka.25.2016.17]Search in Google Scholar
[Shearer, E. and Matsa, K.E., 2018. News use across social media. Pew Research [Accessed 20 April 2019]. Available at: https://www.journalism.org/2018/09/10/news-use-across-social-media-platforms-2018/]Search in Google Scholar
[van Dijk, T.A., 1988. News as discourse. New York: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[van Dijk, T.A., 2003. The discourse-knowledge interface. In: G. Wiess and R. Wodak, eds. Critical discourse analysis: Theory and interdisciplinarity. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.85-109.10.1057/9780230514560_5]Search in Google Scholar
[van Dijk, T.A., 2011. Discourse, knowledge, power and politics: Towards critical epistemic discourse analysis. In C. Hart, ed. Critical discourse studies in context and cognition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 27-64.10.1075/dapsac.43.03van]Search in Google Scholar
[van Dijk, T.A., 2015. Critical discourse analysis. In: D. Tannen, H. Hamilton, and D. Schiffrin, eds. The handbook of discourse analysis. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 466-485.10.1002/9781118584194.ch22]Search in Google Scholar
[Westlund, O., 2013. Mobile news: A review and model of journalism in an age of mobile media. Digital Journalism, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 6–26.10.1080/21670811.2012.740273]Search in Google Scholar