[
Arnold, M. (1869). Culture and anarchy: An essay in political and social criticism. Smith, Elder, & Co.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Arts Council England. (2020). Let’s Create. Available at: https://www.artscouncil.org.uk/our-strategy-2020–2030 [accessed 23/04/2024].
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Belfiore, E. (2012). “Defensive instrumentalism” and the legacy of New Labour’s cultural policies. Cultural Trends, 21(2), 103–111.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bevir, M. & Rhodes, R. 2010. The state as cultural practice. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Borchi, A. (2018). Culture as commons: Theoretical challenges and empirical evidence from occupied cultural spaces in Italy. Cultural Trends, 27(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/09548963.2018.1415410
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Borchi, A. (2020). Towards a Policy for the Cultural Commons. In: Macrì, E., Morea, V., Trimarchi, M. (eds) Cultural Commons and Urban Dynamics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54418-8_2.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bourdieu, P. (2010). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bianchi, I. (2018) The post-political meaning of the concept of commons: The regulation of the urban commons in Bologna. Space and Polity, 22(3), pp. 287–306. https://doi.org/1010.1080/13562576.2018.1505492
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bradby, L., & Stewart, J. (2020). Drumming up an audience: When spectacle becomes failure. Conjunctions Transdiciplinary Journal of Cultural Participation, 7(2).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Burns, D. (2007) Systemic action research: A strategy for whole system change. Bristol: Policy Press
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Community Pride Initiative (2003) Slicing up the pie: Community involvement in participatory budgeting, Porto Alegre, Brazil. www.participatorybudgeting.org.uk
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DCMS. (2023). Taking Part Survey
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Durrer, V. Gilmore, A. Jancovich, L. Stevenson, D. (eds.) (2023). Cultural policy is local. Palgrave
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hatzihrysidis, M., & Bunting, C. (2009). Public value programme: A wider range of voices. Unpublished report, Arts Council England.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hughes, R. (1991). The shock of the new: art and the century of change (Updated and enlarged edition.). Thames and Hudson.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jancovich, L. (2015). The participation myth. International Journal of Cultural Policy, Volume 23, Issue 1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jancovich, L. (2016) Building local capacity in the arts. Journal of Policy Research in Tourism, Leisure and Events, 8:3, 289–306.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jancovich, L. (2019). Creative people and places: An experiment in place based funding. Journal of Arts and Communities, 9(2),129-147.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jancovich, L. and Stevenson, D. (2022). Failures in cultural participation. Palgrave
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kelly, O. (1984). Community, art and the state: Storming the citadels. London, Comedia
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Matarasso, F. (2019). A restless art: How participation won, and why it matters. Digital edition. London: Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation Viitattu, 15, 2020.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rigney, D. (2010). The Matthew effect: How advantage begets further advantage. Columbia University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sternfeld, N. (2013). Playing by the rules of the game: Participation in the post-representative museum. Cummas Studies Finland downloadable at https://cummastudies.files.wordpress.com/2013/08/cummapapers1_sternfeld.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stevenson, D. (2019). The cultural non-participant: Critical logics and discursive subject identities. Arts and the Market, 9 (1), pp. 50–64.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Suiter, J., M Farrell, D., Harris, C., & Murphy, P. (2022). Measuring epistemic deliberation on polarized issues: The case of abortion provision in Ireland. Political Studies Review, 20(4), 630–647.
]Search in Google Scholar
