Academic habitats? An essay on research ethics

1Berlant, L. (2011). Cruel optimism: Duke University Press.Search in Google Scholar

2Davies, B. (2014). Listening to children. Being and becoming. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

3Douglas-Jones, R., & Wright, S. (Eds.). (2021). Practicing integrity. Copenhagen: ETHOSLab.It University/Center for Higher Education Futures, CHEF, DPU.Search in Google Scholar

4Edwards, M. A., & Roy, S. (2017). Academic research in the 21st century: Maintaining scientific integrity in a climate of perverse incentives and hypercompetition. Environmental Engineering Science, 34(1). doi:DOI: 10.1089/ees.2016.0223Search in Google Scholar

5Edwards, S. J. (2017). Are we educating our research ethics committees? Research Ethics, 13(3-4), 99-101. doi:10.1177/1747016117743828Search in Google Scholar

6Fink, H. (2017). Om dannelse på et forskningsuniversitet. In S. N. Larsen & J. Raahauge (Eds.), Dannelse på universitetet - fordringer og udfordringer (pp. 10-21). København: Sophia.Search in Google Scholar

7Fink, H. (2021). Professionsetik for forskere - forsøg på et overblik. In. Tidsskrift for professionsstudier 17/33 Hjellbrekke, J., Drivdal, L., Ingierd, H., Rekdal, O. B., Skramstad, H., Torp, I. S., & Kaiser, M. (2018). Etikk og integritet i forskning - resultater fra en landsomfattende undersøkelse. Retrieved from; Etikk og integritet i forskning -resultater fra en landsomfattende undersøkelse | ForskningsetikkSearch in Google Scholar

8Holberg Prize - University of Bergen (Producer). (2021, 27. januar). The 2020 Holberg Conversation with Griselda Pollock [YouTube]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iyn4mJKWEYoSearch in Google Scholar

9Jensen, K. K., Andersen, M. M., Whiteley, L., & Sandøe, P. (Eds.). (2017). RCR – A Danish textbook for courses in responsible conduct of research. Frederiksberg: University of Copenhagen.Search in Google Scholar

10Juelskjær, M., & Rogowska-Stangret, M. (2017). A pace of our own? Becoming through speeds and slows – Investigating living through temporal ontologies of the university. Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics, 1(1), 1-11. doi:https://doi.org/10.20897/femenc.201706Search in Google Scholar

11Madsen, P. B. (2020). Videnskabelig uredelighed og tvivlsom forskningspraksis. In T. Riis & J. Trzaskowski (Eds.), Skriftlig jura. Den juridiske fremstilling. København: Ex Tuto Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

12Mejlgaard, N., Bouter, L. M., Gaskell, G., Kavouras, P., Allum, N., Bendtsen, A.-K., . . . Veltri, G. A. (2020). Research integrity: Nine ways to move from talk to walk. Nature (London), 586(7829), 358-360. doi:10.1038/d41586-020-02847-8Search in Google Scholar

13Ministry of Higher Education and Science. (2014). Danish code of conduct for research integrity. Retrieved from https://ufm.dk/en/publications/2014/files-2014-1/the-danish-code-of-conduct-for-research-integrity.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

14Moore, N., Dunne, N., Karels, M., & Hanlon, M. (2021). Towards an inventive ethics of carefull risk: Unsettling research through DIY academic archiving. Australian Feminist Studies, 36(108), 180-199. doi:10.1080/08164649.2021.2018991Search in Google Scholar

15Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2017). Matters of care: Speculative ethics in more than human worlds. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Search in Google Scholar

16Sarauw, L. L. (2021). The reversed causalities of doctoral training on research integrity: A case study from a medical faculty in Denmark. Journal of Academic Ethics, 19(1), 71-93. doi:10.1007/s10805-020-09388-9Search in Google Scholar

17Sarauw, L. L., Degn, L., & Ørberg, J. W. (2019). Researcher development through doctoral training in research integrity. International Journal for Academic Development, 24(2), 178-191. doi:10.1080/1360144X.2019.1595626Search in Google Scholar

18Schrader, A. (2015). Abyssal intimacies and temporalities of care: How (not) to care about deformed leaf bugs in the aftermath of Chernobyl. Social Studies of Science, 45(5), 665-690. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org.ez.statsbiblioteket.dk:2048/stable/43829051Search in Google Scholar

19Seigworth, G. J. (2012). Reading Lauren Berlant writing. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 9(4), 346-352.Search in Google Scholar

20Stanley, L., & Wise, S. (2010). The ESRC’s 2010 Framework for Research Ethics: Fit for research purpose? Sociological Research Online, 15(4), 1-10. doi:10.5153/sro.2265Search in Google Scholar

21Staunæs, D., Bjerg, H., Juelskjær, M., & Olesen, K. G. (2021). Datasans. Etisk skole- og uddannelsesledelse med data. København: Nyt fra Samfundsvidenskaberne.Search in Google Scholar

22Styrelsen for Forskning og Innovation. (2015). Rapport om det danske uredelighedssystem. Anbefalinger til håndtering af videnskabelig uredelighed i Danmark. Retrieved from https://ufm.dk/publikationer/2015/filer/rapport-om-det-danske-uredelighedssystem-anbefalinger-til-handtering-af-videnskabelig-uredelighed-idanmark.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

23UChicago Podcast Network (Producer). (2019, 4 November). Why chasing the good life is holding us back, With Lauren Berlant [Podcast]. Retrieved from https://news.uchicago.edu/podcasts/big-brains/why-chasing-good-life-holding-us-back-lauren-berlantSearch in Google Scholar

24Uddannelses- og forskningsministeriet. (2014). Den danske kodeks for integritet i forskning. Retrieved from https://ufm.dk/publikationer/2015/filer/fileSearch in Google Scholar

25Wiles, R., & Boddy, J. (2013). Introduction to the Special Issue: Research ethics in challenging contexts. Methodological innovations, 8(2), 1-5. doi:10.4256/mio.2013.009Search in Google Scholar