[
CEEC Project Team. 2006. Parsed Corpus of Early English Correspondence, parsed version. Annotated by Ann Taylor, Arja Nurmi, Anthony Warner, Susan Pintzuk & Terttu Nevalainen. University of York & University of Helsinki.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kroch, Anthony, Beatrice Santorini & Lauren Delfs. 2004. Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Early Modern English. Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kroch, Anthony, Beatrice Santorini & Ariel Diertani. 2010. Penn Parsed Corpus of Modern British English. Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Allen, Cynthia. 2000. Obsolescence and sudden death in syntax: The decline of the verb-final order in early Middle English. In Ricardo Bermúdez-Otero, David Denison, Richard M. Hogg & C. B. McCully (ed.), Generative theory and corpus studies: A dialogue from 10 ICEHL, Mouton de Gruyter. 3–26. DOI: 10.1515/9783110814699.310.1515/9783110814699.3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Biberauer, Theresa & Ian Roberts. 2005. Changing EPP parameters in the history of English: Accounting for variation and change. English Language and Linguistics 9(1). 5–46. DOI: 10.1017/S136067430500152810.1017/S1360674305001528
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bybee, Joan. 2015. Language change. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO978113909676810.1017/CBO9781139096768
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chongsuvivatwong, Virasakdi. 2018. epiDisplay: Epidemiological Data Display Package. http://medipe.psu.ac.th/epicalc
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Culpeper, Jonathan & Merja Kytö. 2010. Early Modern English dialogues. Spoken interaction as writing. Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Elenbaas, Marion. 2007. The synchronic and diachronic syntax of the English verb-particle combination. PhD thesis. Utrecht: LOT.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Elenbaas, Marion. 2013. Motivations for particle verb word order in Middle and Early Modern English. English Language and Linguistics 17(3). 489–511. DOI: 10.1017/S136067431300013010.1017/S1360674313000130
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Elenbaas Marion & Ans van Kemenade. 2014. Verb particles and OV/VO in the history of English. Studia Linguistica 68(1). 140–167.10.1111/stul.12018
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fischer, Olga. 1992. Syntax. In Norman Blake (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language. Vol. 2: 1066–1476, Cambridge University Press. 207–408. DOI: 10.1017/CHOL9780521264754.00510.1017/CHOL9780521264754.005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fischer, Olga & Wim van der Wurff. 2006. Syntax. In Richard Hogg & David Denison (eds.), A history of the English language, Cambridge University Press. 109–198. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511791154.00410.1017/CBO9780511791154.004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fischer, Olga, Ans van Kemenade, Willem Koopman & Wim van der Wurff. 2000. The syntax of early English. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO978051161231210.1017/CBO9780511612312
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Foster, Tony & Wim van der Wurff. 1995. The survival of object-verb order in Middle English: Some data. Neophilologus 79. 309–327. DOI: 10.1007/BF0099978710.1007/BF00999787
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fox, John & Sanford Weisberg. 2011. An R companion to applied regression. SAGE.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gelderen, Elly van. 2018. Analyzing syntax through texts. Old, Middle, and Early Modern English. Edinburgh University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gries, Stefan Thomas. 2003. Multifactorial analysis in corpus linguistics: A study of particle placement. Continuum.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Harrell, Frank E., Jr. 2019. rms: Regression Modeling Strategies. http://biostat.mc.vanderbilt.edu/rms
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hoorick, Bart Van. 1994. Pragmatic positions and the history of English word order. University of Amsterdam.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey K. Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/978131642353010.1017/9781316423530
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ingham, Richard. 2000. Negation and OV order in Late Middle English. Journal of Linguistics 36(1). 13–38. DOI: 10.1017/S002222679900796310.1017/S0022226799007963
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ingham, Richard. 2002. Negated subjects and objects in 15th-century nonliterary English. Language Variation and Change 14(3). 291–322. DOI: 10.1017/S095439450214302X10.1017/S095439450214302X
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kayne, Richard S. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. The MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kempen, Gerard & Karin Harbusch. 2017. Frequential test of (S)OV as unmarked word order in Dutch and German clauses. A serendipitous corpus-linguistic experiment. In Hilke Reckman, Lisa Lai-Shen Cheng, Maarten Hijzelendoorn & Rint Sybesma (eds.), Crossroads semantics. Computation, experiment and grammar, John Benjamins. 107–123. DOI: 10.1075/z.210.07kem10.1075/z.210.07kem
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Koopman, Willem. 2005. Transitional syntax: Postverbal pronouns and particles in Old English. English Language and Linguistics 9(1). 47–62. DOI: 10.1017/S136067430500153X10.1017/S136067430500153X
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kroch, Anthony S. & Ann Taylor. 2000. Verb-object order in early Middle English. In Susan Pintzuk, George Tsoulas & Anthony Warner (eds.), Diachronic syntax. Models and mechanisms, Oxford University Press. 132–163.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lightfoot, David W. 1979. Principles of diachronic syntax. Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lightfoot, David W. 1991. How to set parameters: Arguments from language change. The MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Moerenhout, Mike & Wim van der Wurff. 2005. Object-verb order in early sixteenth-century English prose: An exploratory study. English Language and Linguistics 9(1). 83–114. DOI: 10.1017/S136067430500155310.1017/S1360674305001553
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Moerenhout, Mike & Wim van der Wurff. 2010. Remnants of the old order: OV in the Paston Letters. English Studies 81(6). 513–530. DOI: 10.1076/enst.81.6.513.918410.1076/enst.81.6.513.9184
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pintzuk, Susan. 1999. Phrase structures in competition: Variation and change in Old English word order. Garland.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pintzuk, Susan. 2002. Verb-Object order in Old English: Variation as grammatical competition. In David W. Lightfoot (ed.), Syntactic effects of morphological change, Oxford University Press. 276–300.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pintzuk, Susan. 2005. Arguments against a universal base: Evidence from Old English. English Language and Linguistics 9(1). 115–138. DOI: 10.1017/S136067430500156510.1017/S1360674305001565
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pintzuk, Susan & Ann Taylor. 2006. The loss of OV order in the history of English. In Ans van Kemenade & Bettelou Los (eds.), The handbook of the history of English, Blackwell. 249–278.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Prince, Ellen F. 1981. Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In Peter Cole (ed.), Radical pragmatics, Academic Press. 223–256.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. Longman.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
R Core Team. 2017. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Randall, Beth. 2008. CorpusSearch 2 users guide. http://corpussearch.sourceforge.net/CS-manual/Contents.html
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rissanen, Matti. 1999. Syntax. In Roger Lass (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, Vol. 3: Early Modern English 1476–1776, Cambridge University Press. 187–331. DOI: 10.1017/CHOL9780521264761.00510.1017/CHOL9780521264761.005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Roberts, Ian. 1997. Directionality and word order change in the history of English. In Ans van Kemenade & Nigel Vincent (eds.), Parameters of morphosyntactic change, Cambridge University Press. 397–427.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Seoane, Elena. 2017. Chapter 5: Syntax. In Laurel Brinton & Alexander Bergs (eds.), The history of English. Vol, 4: Early Modern English, Mouton de Gruyter. 68–88. DOI: 10.1515/9783110525069-00510.1515/9783110525069-005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shih, Stephanie & Jason Grafmiller. 2011. Weighing in on end weight. Paper delivered at the 85th Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America. Pittsburg, PA, 9–11 January.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Szmrecsányi, Benedikt M. 2004. On operationalizing syntactic complexity. In Gérard Purnelle, Cédrick Fairon & Anne Dister (eds.), Le poids des mots: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Textual Data Statistical Analysis, March 10–12, 2004, Vol. 2, Presses universitaires de Louvain. 1032–1039.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Takizawa, Naohiro. 2012. A corpus-driven functional analysis of the SOV construction in Present-Day English. Paper delivered at the 4th International Conference on Corpus Linguistics.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Trips, Carola. 2002. From OV to VO in Early Middle English. John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/la.6010.1075/la.60
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vallduví, Enric & Elisabet Engdahl. 1996. The linguistic realization of information packaging. Linguistics 34. 459–519. DOI: 10.1515/ling.1996.34.3.45910.1515/ling.1996.34.3.459
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wurff, Wim van der. 1997. Deriving object-verb order in late Middle English. Journal of Linguistics 33(2). 485–509. DOI: 10.1017/S002222679700653110.1017/S0022226797006531
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wurff, Wim van der & Tony Foster. 1997a. Object-verb order in 16th century English: A study of its frequency and status. In Raymond Hickey & Stanisław Puppel (eds.), Language history and linguistic modelling: A festschrift for Jacek Fisiak on his 60th birthday, Vol. 1, Mouton de Gruyter. 439–453. DOI: 10.1515/9783110820751.43910.1515/9783110820751.439
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wurff, Wim van der & Tony Foster. 1997b. From syntax to discourse: The function of object-verb order in Late Middle English. In Jacek Fisiak (ed.), Studies in Middle English linguistics, Mouton de Gruyter. 135–156. DOI: 10.1515/9783110814194.13510.1515/9783110814194.135
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Venables, W. N. & B. D. Ripley. 2002. Modern applied statistics with S. Springer. DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-21706-210.1007/978-0-387-21706-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yaruss, J. Scott. 1999. Utterance length, syntactic complexity, and childhood stuttering. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 42(2). 329–344. DOI: 10.1044/jslhr.4202.32910.1044/jslhr.4202.329
]Search in Google Scholar