[
Achard, Michel. 2004. Grammatical instruction in the natural approach: A cognitive grammar view. In Michel Achard & Susanne Niemeier, Cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition, and foreign language teaching. Mouton de Gruyter. 165–194. DOI: 10.1515/9783110199857.16510.1515/9783110199857.165
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Alonso Alonso, Rosa, Teresa Cadierno & Scott Jarvis. 2016. Crosslinguistic influence in the acquisition of spatial prepositions in English as a foreign language. In Rosa Alonso Alonso (ed.), Crosslinguistic influence in second language acquisition. Multilingual Matters. 93–120. DOI: 10.21832/9781783094837-00810.21832/9781783094837-008
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Andreou, Maria & Ianthi Tsimpli. 2017. Aspectual distinctions in the narratives of bilingual children. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 55(3). 305–324. DOI: 10.1515/iral-2017-011110.1515/iral-2017-0111
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Athanasopoulos, Panos. 2006. Effects of the grammatical representation of number on cognition in bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 9(1). 89–96. DOI: 10.1017/S136672890500239710.1017/S1366728905002397
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Athanasopoulos, Panos, Emanuel Bylund, Guillermo Montero-Melis, Ljubica Damjanovic, Alina Schartner, Alexandra Kibbe, Nick Riches & Guillaume Thierry. 2015. Two languages, two minds: Flexible cognitive processing driven by language of operation. Psychologcal Science 26(4). 518–526. DOI: 10.1177/095679761456750910.1177/0956797614567509
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Athanasopoulos, Panos, Ljubica Damjanovic, Andrea Krajciova & Miho Sasaki. 2011. Representation of colour concepts in bilingual cognition: The case of Japanese blues. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 14(1). 9–17. DOI: 10.1017/S136672890999004610.1017/S1366728909990046
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Austen, Samantha. 2016. Learner error in second language acquisition: The transfer of form or concept? Unpublished PhD thesis, Cardiff University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Austen, Samantha. 2017. Native language (L1) transfer in second language learning: From form to concept, the implications. Xjenza Online - Journal of the Malta Chamber of Scientists 5(1). 77–80. DOI: 10.7423/XJENZA.2017.1.10
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barsalou, Lawrence W. 2017. Cognitively plausible theories of concept composition. In James A. Hampton & Yoad Winter (eds.), Compositionality and concepts in linguistics and psychology Springer. 9–30. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-45977-6_210.1007/978-3-319-45977-6_2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bergen, Benjamin K. 2012. Louder than words: The new science of how the mind makes meaning. Basic Books.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bergen, Benjamin K. & Nancy Chang. 2013. Embodied Construction Grammar. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford University Press. 168–190 DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.001010.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0010
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Boogaart Ronny & Theo Janssen. 2007. Tense and aspect. In Dirk Geeraerts (ed.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics. Oxford University Press. 803–828.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brisard, Frank. 2013. An account of English tense and aspect in Cognitive Grammar. In Kasia M. Jaszczolt & Louis de Saussure (eds.), Time: Language, cognition, and reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 210–235. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199589876.003.001110.1093/acprof:oso/9780199589876.003.0011
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brown, Amanda & Marianne Gullberg. 2011. Bidirectional cross-linguistic influence in event conceptualization? Expressions of Path among Japanese learners of English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 14(1). 79–94. DOI: 10.1017/S136672891000006410.1017/S1366728910000064
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bybee, Joan 2010. Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO978051175052610.1017/CBO9780511750526
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bylund, Emanuel & Scott Jarvis. 2011. L2 effects on L1 event conceptualization. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 14(1). 47–59. DOI: 10.1017/S136672891000018010.1017/S1366728910000180
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bylund, Emanuel & Panos Athanasopoulos. 2014. Linguistic relativity in SLA: Toward a new research program. Language Learning 64(4). 952–985. DOI: 10.1111/lang.1208010.1111/lang.12080
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cadierno, Teresa. 2008. Learning to talk about motion in a foreign language. In Peter Robinson & Nick C. Ellis (eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition. Routledge. 239–275.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cadierno, Teresa & Karen Lund. 2004. Cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition: Motion events in a typological framework. In Bill VanPatten, Jessica Williams, Susanne Rott & Mark Overstreet (eds.), Form-meaning connections in second language acquisition. Erlbaum. 139–154.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Casad, Eugene H. 1996. Seeing it in more than one way. In John R. Taylor & Robert E. MacLaury (eds.) Language and the cognitive construal of the world. Mouton de Gruyter. 23–50. DOI: 10.1515/9783110809305.2310.1515/9783110809305.23
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cheung, Anna S. C., Stephen Matthews & Wai Lan Tsang. 2011. Transfer from L3 German to L2 English in the domain of tense/aspect. In Gessica De Angelis & Jean-Marc Dewaele (eds.), New trends in crosslinguistic influence and multilingualism research. Multilingual Matters. 53–73. DOI: 10.21832/9781847694430-00510.21832/9781847694430-005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chin, Diana Hsien-jen. 2008. A cross-linguistic investigation on the acquisition of Spanish aspect. In Joyce Bruhn de Garavito & Elena Valenzuela (eds.), Selected proceedings of the 10th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium. Cascadilla Proceedings Project. 36-50.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Croft, William & D. Alan Cruse. 2004. Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511803864
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Daller, Michael H., Jeanine Treffers-Daller & Reyhan Furman. 2011. Transfer of conceptualisation patterns in bilinguals: The construal of motion events in Turkish and German. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 14(1), 95–119. DOI: 10.1017/S136672891000010610.1017/S1366728910000106
]Search in Google Scholar
[
De Angelis, Gessica & Jean-Marc Dewaele (eds.). 2011. New trends in crosslinguistic influence and multilingualism research. Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781847694430
]Search in Google Scholar
[
De Wit Astrid & Frank Brisard. 2014. A cognitive grammar account of the semantics of the English present progressive. Journal of Linguistics 50(1) 49–90. DOI: 10.1017/S002222671300016910.1017/S0022226713000169
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Droźdź, Grzegorz. 2018. The Cognitive Grammar-based pedagogical grammar – tenses. Paper presented at the PCLA Conference, Poznań, Poland.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ellis, Nick C. & Teresa Cadierno. 2009. Constructing a second language: Introduction to the special section. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 7. 111–139. DOI: 10.1075/arcl.7.05ell10.1075/arcl.7.05ell
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ekiert, Monika & ZhaoHong Han. 2016. L1-fraught difficulty: The case of L2 acquisition of English articles by Slavic speakers. In Rosa Alonso Alonso (ed.), Crosslinguistic influence in second language acquisition. Multilingual Matters. 147–172. DOI: 10.21832/9781783094837-01010.21832/9781783094837-010
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Evans, Vyvyan. 2011. Language and cognition: The view from cognitive linguistics. In Vivian Cook & Benedetta Bassetti (eds.), Language and bilingual cognition. Psychology Press. 69–107.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Evans, Vyvyan. 2019. Cognitive linguistics: A complete guide. Edinburgh University Press.10.1515/9781474405232
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Evans, Vyvyan & Melanie Green. 2006. Cognitive linguistics: An introduction. Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ewert, Anna. 2016. Space, motion and thinking for language. In Vivian Cook & Li Wei (eds), The Cambridge handbook of linguistic multi-competence. Cambridge University Press. 376–402. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781107425965.01810.1017/CBO9781107425965.018
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fischer, Hanna. 2016. Präteritumschwund im Deutschen. Dokumentation und Erklärung eines Veränderungsprozesses. De Gruyter Mouton.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Flecken, Monique. 2011. Event conceptualization by early Dutch-German bilinguals: Insights from linguistic and eye-tracking data. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 14(1). 61–77. DOI: 10.1017/S136672891000002710.1017/S1366728910000027
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Flecken, Monique, Mary Carroll, Katja Weimar & Christiane von Stutterheim. 2015. Driving along the road or heading for the village? Conceptual differences underlying motion event encoding in French, German, and French-German L2 users. Modern Language Journal 99(S1). 100–122. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2015.12181.x10.1111/j.1540-4781.2015.12181.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Givón, Talmy. 1989. Mind, code, and context: Essays in pragmatics. Erlbaum.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Han, ZhaoHong & Teresa Cadierno (eds). 2010. Linguistic relativity in SLA: Thinking for speaking. Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781847692788
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hohenstein, Jill, Letitia R. Naigles & Ann R. Eisenberg. 2006. Keeping verb acquisition in motion: A comparison of English and Spanish. In D. Geoffrey Hall & Sandra R. Waxman (eds.), Weaving a lexicon. MIT Press. 569–602.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jarvis, Scott. 2007. Theoretical and methodological issues in the investigation of conceptual transfer. VIAL 4. 43–71.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jarvis, Scott. 2011. Conceptual transfer: Crosslinguistic effects in categorization and construal. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 14(1). 1–8. DOI: 10.1017/S136672891000015510.1017/S1366728910000155
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jarvis, Scott. 2016. Clarifying the scope of conceptual transfer. Language Learning 66(3). 608–635. DOI: 10.1111/lang.1215410.1111/lang.12154
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jarvis Scott. 2017. Transfer: An overview with an expanded scope. In Anne Golden, Scott Jarvis & Kari Tenfjord, Crosslinguistic influence and distinctive patterns of language learning: Findings and insights from a learner corpus. Multilingual Matters. 12–28. DOI: 10.21832/9781783098774-00410.21832/9781783098774-004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jarvis, Scott & Terence Odlin. 2000. Morphological type, spatial reference, and language transfer. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 22(4). 535–556. DOI: 10.1017/S027226310000403410.1017/S0272263100004034
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jarvis, Scott & Aneta Pavlenko. 2008. Crosslinguistic influence in language and cognition. Routledge.10.4324/9780203935927
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Johnson, Mark. 1987. The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reasoning. University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226177847.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Krajnović, Marta Medved & Irena Kocijan Pevec. 2015. Present Tense Devlopment in 11- to 13-Year-Old EFL Learners. In Jelena Mihaljević Djigunović & Marta Medved Krajnović (eds), Early learning and teaching of English: New dynamics of primary English. Multilingual Matters. 80–109.10.21832/9781783093397-007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kroll, Judith F. & Mary C. Potter. 1984. Recognizing words, pictures, and concepts: A comparison of lexical, object, and reality decisions. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 23(1). 39–66. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5371(84)90499-710.1016/S0022-5371(84)90499-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lakoff, George. 1990. The invariance hypothesis: Is abstract reason based on image schemas? Cognitive Linguistics 1(1). 39–74. DOI: 10.1515/cogl.1990.1.1.3910.1515/cogl.1990.1.1.39
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar. Stanford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Langacker, Ronald W. 1990. Subjectification. Cognitive Linguistics 1(1). 5–38. DOI: 10.1515/cogl.1990.1.1.510.1515/cogl.1990.1.1.5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Langacker, Ronald W. 1991. Foundations of cognitive grammar: Vol. 2: Descriptive applications. Stanford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Langacker, Ronald W. 1996. Viewing in cognition and grammar. In Philip W. Davis (ed.), Alternative linguistics: Descriptive and theoretical modes. John Benjamins. 153–212. DOI: 10.1075/cilt.102.06lan10.1075/cilt.102.06lan
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Langacker, Ronald W. 1999. Grammar and conceptualization. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/978311080052410.1515/9783110800524
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Langacker, Ronald W. 2000. A dynamic usage-based model. In Michael Barlow & Suzanne Kemmer (eds.), Usage-based models of language. University of Chicago Press. 1–63.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Langacker, Ronald W. 2007. Cognitive Grammar. In Dirk Geeraerts & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics. Oxford University Press. 421–462.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Langacker, Ronald W. 2008. Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Langacker, Ronald W. 2017. Entrenchment in cognitive grammar. In Hans-Jörg Schmid (ed.), Entrenchment and the psychology of language learning: How we reorganize and adapt linguistic knowledge. De Gruyter Mouton. 39–56. DOI: 10.1515/9783110341423-00310.1037/15969-003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Leclercq, Pascale & Amanda Edmonds. 2017. How L2 learners of French and English express modality using verbal means: A crosslinguistic and developmental study. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 55(3). 265–282. DOI: 10.1515/iral-2017-010810.1515/iral-2017-0108
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lucy, John A. 2016. Recent advances in the study of linguistic relativity in historical context: A critical assessment. Language Learning 66(3). 487–515. DOI: 10.1111/lang.1219510.1111/lang.12195
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Majid, Asifa, James S. Boster & Melissa Bowerman. 2008. The cross-linguistic categorization of everyday events: A study of cutting and breaking. Cognition 109(2). 235–250. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.08.00910.1016/j.cognition.2008.08.009
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MacWhinney, Brian. 1992. Transfer and competition in second language learning. In Richard Jackson Harris (ed.), Cognitive processing in bilinguals. North Holland. 371–390. DOI: 10.1016/S0166-4115(08)61506-X10.1016/S0166-4115(08)61506-X
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MacWhinney, Brian. 2017. Entrenchment in second-language learning. In Hans-Jörg Schmid (ed.), Entrenchment and the psychology of language learning: How we reorganize and adapt linguistic knowledge. De Gruyter Mouton. 343–366. DOI: 10.1515/9783110341423-01610.1037/15969-016
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Malt, Barbara C. & Steven A. Sloman. 2003. Linguistic diversity and object naming by non-native speakers of English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 6(1). 47–67. DOI: 10.1017/S136672890300102010.1017/S1366728903001020
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McManus, Kevin. 2015. L1-L2 differences in the acquisition of form-meaning pairings: A comparison of English and German learners of French. Canadian Modern Language Review 71(2). 155–181. DOI: 10.3138/cmlr.2070.5110.3138/cmlr.2070.51
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Michaelis, Laura A. 2004. Type shifting in construction grammar: An integrated approach to aspectual coercion. Cognitive Linguistics 15(1). 1–67. DOI: 10.1515/cogl.2004.00110.1515/cogl.2004.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Negueruela, Eduardo, James P. Lantolf, Stefanie Rehn Jordan & Jaime Gelabert. 2004. The “private function” of gesture in second language speaking activity: A study of motion verbs and gesturing in English and Spanish. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 14(1). 113–147. DOI: 10.1111/j.1473-4192.2004.00056.x10.1111/j.1473-4192.2004.00056.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Niemeier, Susanne. 2013. A Cognitive Grammar perspective on tense and aspect. In M. Rafael Salaberry & Llorenç Comajoan (eds.), Research design and methodology in studies on L2 tense and aspect. Mouton de Gruyter. 11–56. DOI: 10.1515/9781934078167.1110.1515/9781934078167.11
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Odlin, Terence. 2005. Crosslinguistic influence and conceptual transfer: What are the concepts? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 25. 3–25. DOI: 10.1017/S026719050500001210.1017/S0267190505000012
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Odlin, Terence. 2008. Conceptual transfer and meaning extensions. In Peter Robinson & Nick C. Ellis (eds), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition. Routledge. 360–340.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Odlin, Terence. 2010. Conclusion: On the interdependence of conceptual transfer and relativity studies. In ZhaoHong Han & Teresa Cadierno (eds.), Linguistic relativity in SLA: Thinking for speaking. Multilingual Matters. 183–194. DOI: 10.21832/9781847692788-01010.21832/9781847692788-010
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Otwinowska, Agnieszka. 2015. Cognate vocabulary in language acquisition and use: Attitudes, awareness, activation. Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781783094394
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Papafragou, Anna, Christine Massey & Lila Gleitman. 2002. Shake, rattle, ʽn’ roll: The representation of motion in language and cognition. Cognition 84. 189–219.10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00046-X
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Papafragou, Anna & Stathis Selimis. 2010. Event categorisation and language: A cross-linguistic study of motion. Language and Cognitive Processes 25(2). 224–260. DOI: 10.1080/0169096090301700010.1080/01690960903017000
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Park, Hae In. 2020. How do Korean-English bilinguals speak and think about motion events? Evidence from verbal and non-verbal tasks. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 23(3). 483–499. DOI: 10.1017/S136672891800107410.1017/S1366728918001074
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Park, Hae In & Nicole Ziegler. 2014. Cognitive shift in the bilingual mind: Spatial concepts in Korean-English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 17(2). 410–430. DOI: 10.1017/S136672891300040010.1017/S1366728913000400
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pavlenko, Aneta. 1999. New approaches to concepts in bilingual memory. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 2(3). 209–230. DOI: 10.1017/S136672899900032210.1017/S1366728999000322
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pavlenko, Aneta. 2000. Access to linguistic resources: Key variable in second language learning. Estudios de Sociolingüística. 1(2). 85–105. DOI: 10.1558/sols.v1i2.8510.1558/sols.v1i2.85
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pavlenko, Aneta (ed.). 2011. Thinking and speaking in two languages. Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781847693389
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pavlenko, Aneta & Viktoria Driagina. 2008. Narrative and conceptual proficiency in Russian. Center for Advanced Language Proficiency Education and Research, The Pennsylvania State University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pavlenko, Aneta & Barbara C. Malt. 2011. Kitchen Russian: Cross-linguistic differences and first-language object naming by Russian-English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition. 14(1). 19–45. DOI: 10.1017/S136672891000026X10.1017/S136672891000026X
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Radden, Günter & René Dirven. 2007. Cognitive English grammar. John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/clip.210.1075/clip.2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rogatcheva, Svetla. 2012. Perfect problems: A corpus-based comparison of the perfect in Bulgarian and German EFL writing. In Sebastian Hoffmann, Paul Rayson & Geoffrey Leech (eds.), English corpus linguistics: Looking back, moving forward. Brill. 149–163. DOI: 10.1163/9789401207478_01110.1163/9789401207478_011
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Saddour, Inès. 2012. Expressing simultaneity using aspect. A comparison of oral productions in French L1, Tunisian Arabic L1, and French L2 by Tunisian learners. In Luna Filipović & Katarzyna M. Jaszczolt (eds), Space and time in languages and cultures: Linguistic diversity. John Benjamins. 325–346. DOI: 10.1075/hcp.36.17sad10.1075/hcp.36.17sad
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Saddour, Inès. 2017. A multimodal approach to investigating temporality expression in L2: What does gesture analysis reveal? International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 55(3). 283–304. DOI: 10.1515/iral-2017-011210.1515/iral-2017-0112
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schmiedtová, Barbara. 2011. Do L2 speakers think in the L1 when speaking in the L2? VIAL 8. 97–122.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schmiedtová, Barbara. 2013. Traces of L1 patterns in the event construal of Czech advanced speakers of L2 English and L2 German. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 51(2). 87–116. DOI: 10.1515/iral-2013-000510.1515/iral-2013-0005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stam, Gale. 2010. Can a L2 speaker’s patterns of thinking for speaking change? In ZhaoHong Han & Teresa Cadierno (eds.), Linguistic relativity in SLA: Thinking for speaking. Multilingual Matters. 59–83.10.21832/9781847692788-005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Talmy, Leonard. 1985. Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. Vol. 3: Grammatical categories and the lexicon. Cambridge University Press. 225–282.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Talmy, Leonard. 1991. Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. In Laurel A. Sutton & Christopher Johnson (eds.), Proceedings of the 17th annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General session and parasession on the grammar of event structure. Berkeley Linguistic Society. 480–519. DOI: 10.3765/bls.v17i0.162010.3765/bls.v17i0.1620
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Talmy, Leonard. 1996. The windowing of attention in language. In Masayoshi Shibatani & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Grammatical construction: Their form and meaning. Oxford University Press. 235–287.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Talmy, Leonard. 2000. Toward a cognitive semantics. Vol. 1: Concept structuring systems. MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/6847.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tomasello, Michael. 2003. Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Harvard University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vanek, Norbert. 2017. ʽIt starts to explode’. Phasal segmentation of contextualised events in L2 English. In Martin Howard & Pascale Leclercq (eds.), Tense-aspect-modality in a second language: Contemporary perspectives. John Benjamins. 145–182. DOI: 10.1075/sibil.50.06van10.1075/sibil.50.06van
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vanek, Norbert. 2020. Changing event categorization in second language users through perceptual learning. Language Learning 70(2). 309–348. DOI: 10.1111/lang.1237710.1111/lang.12377
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vanek, Norbert & Henriëtte Hendriks. 2015. Convergence of temporal reference frames in sequential bilinguals: Event structuring unique to second language users. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 18(4). 753–768. DOI: 10.1017/S136672891400076510.1017/S1366728914000765
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vanek, Norbert & Larry Selinker. 2017. Covariation between temporal interlanguage features and nonverbal event categorisation. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 55(3). 223–234. DOI: 10.1515/iral-2017-010610.1515/iral-2017-0106
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Verhagen, Arie. 2007. Construal and perspectivization. In Dirk Geeraerts (ed.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics. Oxford University Press. 48–81.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
von Stutterheim, Christiane. 2003. Linguistic structures and information organisation: The case of very advanced learners. EUROSLA Yearbook 3. 183–206. DOI: 10.1075/eurosla.3.11stu10.1075/eurosla.3.11stu
]Search in Google Scholar
[
von Stutterheim, Christiane, Martin Andermann, Mary Carroll, Monique Flecken & Barbara Schmiedtová. 2012. How grammaticized concepts shape event conceptualization in language production: Insights from linguistic analysis, eye tracking data, and memory performance. Linguistics 50(4). 833–867. DOI: 10.1515/ling-2012-002610.1515/ling-2012-0026
]Search in Google Scholar
[
von Stutterheim, Christiane & Monique Lambert. 2005. Cross-linguistic analysis of temporal perspectives in text production. In Henriëtte Hendriks (ed.), The structure of learner varieties. Mouton de Gruyter. 203–230. DOI: 10.1515/9783110909593.20310.1515/9783110909593.203
]Search in Google Scholar
[
von Stutterheim, Christiane & Ralf Nüse. 2003. Processes of conceptualization in language production: Language-specific perspectives and event construal. Linguistics 41(5). 851–881. DOI: 10.1515/ling.2003.02810.1515/ling.2003.028
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zagona, Karen. 2007. Some effects of aspect on tense construal. Lingua 117(2). 464–502. DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2005.08.00410.1016/j.lingua.2005.08.004
]Search in Google Scholar
